ID-score: A new empirical scoring function based on a comprehensive set of descriptors related to protein-ligand interactions

Journal of Chemical Information and Modeling

Volumn 53, Issue 3, 2013, Pages 592-600

  Li, Guo Bo ^a   Yang, Ling Ling ^a,b   Wang, Wen Jing ^a   Li, Lin Li ^a   Yang, Sheng Yong ^a  

^a SICHUAN UNIVERSITY   (China)

^b SICHUAN UNIVERSITY   (China)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

BENCHMARKING; BINDING ENERGY; HYDROGEN BONDS; PROTEINS; SUPPORT VECTOR REGRESSION; VAN DER WAALS FORCES;

BINDING AFFINITIES; BIOLOGICAL TARGETS; EVALUATION RESULTS; HYDROGEN BONDING INTERACTIONS; METAL-LIGAND BONDING; PROTEIN-LIGAND BINDING AFFINITIES; PROTEIN-LIGAND INTERACTIONS; VAN DER WAALS INTERACTIONS;

LIGANDS;

LIGAND; PROTEIN;

ALGORITHM; ARTICLE; CHEMISTRY; ENTROPY; HYDROGEN BOND; NONLINEAR SYSTEM; PROTEIN BINDING; PROTEIN DATABASE; QUANTITATIVE STRUCTURE ACTIVITY RELATION; SUPPORT VECTOR MACHINE; X RAY CRYSTALLOGRAPHY;

ALGORITHMS; CRYSTALLOGRAPHY, X-RAY; DATABASES, PROTEIN; ENTROPY; HYDROGEN BONDING; LIGANDS; NONLINEAR DYNAMICS; PROTEIN BINDING; PROTEINS; QUANTITATIVE STRUCTURE-ACTIVITY RELATIONSHIP; SUPPORT VECTOR MACHINES;

EID: 84875428269     PISSN: 15499596     EISSN: 1549960X     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1021/ci300493w     Document Type: Article

References (45)

1. Kuntz, I. D. Structure-based strategies for drug design and discovery Science 1992, 257, 1078-1082
2. Blundell, T. L. Structure-based drug design Nature 1996, 384, 23-26
3. Kitchen, D. B.; Decornez, H.; Furr, J. R.; Bajorath, J. Docking and scoring in virtual screening for drug discovery: Methods and applications Nat. Rev. Drug Discovery 2004, 3, 935-949
4. Leach, A. R.; Shoichet, B. K.; Peishoff, C. E. Prediction of protein-ligand interactions. Docking and scoring: successes and gaps J. Med. Chem. 2006, 49, 5851-5855
5. Wang, R.; Liu, L.; Lai, L.; Tang, Y. SCORE: A new empirical method for estimating the binding affinity of a protein-ligand complex J. Mol. Model. 1998, 4, 379-394
6. Eldridge, M. D.; Murray, C. W.; Auton, T. R.; Paolini, G. V.; Mee, R. P. Empirical scoring functions: I. The development of a fast empirical scoring function to estimate the binding affinity of ligands in receptor complexes J. Comput.-Aided Mol. Des. 1997, 11, 425-445
7. Krammer, A.; Kirchhoff, P. D.; Jiang, X.; Venkatachalam, C. M.; Waldman, M. LigScore: A novel scoring function for predicting binding affinities J. Mol. Graphics Modell. 2005, 23, 395-407
8. Sotriffer, C. A.; Sanschagrin, P.; Matter, H.; Klebe, G. SFCscore: Scoring functions for affinity prediction of protein-ligand complexes Proteins 2008, 73, 395-419
9. Raub, S.; Steffen, A.; Kamper, A.; Marian, C. M. AIScore chemically diverse empirical scoring function employing quantum chemical binding energies of hydrogen-bonded complexes J. Chem. Inf. Model. 2008, 48, 1492-1510
10. Warren, G. L.; Andrews, C. W.; Capelli, A. M.; Clarke, B.; LaLonde, J.; Lambert, M. H.; Lindvall, M.; Nevins, N.; Semus, S. F.; Senger, S.; Tedesco, G.; Wall, I. D.; Woolven, J. M.; Peishoff, C. E.; Head, M. S. A critical assessment of docking programs and scoring functions J. Med. Chem. 2006, 49, 5912-5931
11. Ballester, P. J.; Mitchell, J. B. A machine learning approach to predicting protein-ligand binding affinity with applications to molecular docking Bioinformatics 2010, 26, 1169-1175
12. Muley, L.; Baum, B.; Smolinski, M.; Freindorf, M.; Heine, A.; Klebe, G.; Hangauer, D. G. Enhancement of hydrophobic interactions and hydrogen bond strength by cooperativity: Synthesis, modeling, and molecular dynamics simulations of a congeneric series of thrombin inhibitors J. Med. Chem. 2010, 53, 2126-2135
13. Baum, B.; Muley, L.; Smolinski, M.; Heine, A.; Hangauer, D.; Klebe, G. Non-additivity of functional group contributions in protein-ligand binding: A comprehensive study by crystallography and isothermal titration calorimetry J. Mol. Biol. 2010, 397, 1042-1054
14. Williams, D. H.; Stephens, E.; O'Brien, D. P.; Zhou, M. Understanding noncovalent interactions: Ligand binding energy and catalytic efficiency from ligand-induced reductions in motion within receptors and enzymes Angew. Chem., Int. Ed. 2004, 43, 6596-6616
15. Kinnings, S. L.; Liu, N.; Tonge, P. J.; Jackson, R. M.; Xie, L.; Bourne, P. E. A machine learning-based method to improve docking scoring functions and its application to drug repurposing J. Chem. Inf. Model. 2011, 51, 408-419
16. Tang, Y. T.; Marshall, G. R. PHOENIX: A scoring function for affinity prediction derived using high-resolution crystal structures and calorimetry measurements J. Chem. Inf. Model. 2011, 51, 214-228
17. Rahaman, O.; Estrada, T. P.; Doren, D. J.; Taufer, M.; Brooks, C. L., 3rd; Armen, R. S. Evaluation of several two-step scoring functions based on linear interaction energy, effective ligand size, and empirical pair potentials for prediction of protein-ligand binding geometry and free energy J. Chem. Inf. Model. 2011, 51, 2047-2065
18. Kramer, C.; Gedeck, P. Global free energy scoring functions based on distance-dependent atom-type pair descriptors J. Chem. Inf. Model. 2011, 51, 707-720
19. Li, L.; Wang, B.; Meroueh, S. O. Support vector regression scoring of receptor-ligand complexes for rank-ordering and virtual screening of chemical libraries J. Chem. Inf. Model. 2011, 51, 2132-2138
20. Zheng, Z.; Merz, K. M., Jr. Ligand identification scoring algorithm (LISA) J. Chem. Inf. Model. 2011, 51, 1296-1306
21. Wang, R.; Fang, X.; Lu, Y.; Wang, S. The PDBbind database: Collection of binding affinities for protein-ligand complexes with known three-dimensional structures J. Med. Chem. 2004, 47, 2977-2980
22. Wang, R.; Fang, X.; Lu, Y.; Yang, C. Y.; Wang, S. The PDBbind database: Methodologies and updates J. Med. Chem. 2005, 48, 4111-4119
23. Cheng, T.; Li, X.; Li, Y.; Liu, Z.; Wang, R. Comparative assessment of scoring functions on a diverse test set J. Chem. Inf. Model. 2009, 49, 1079-1093
24. Cornell, W. D.; Cieplak, P.; Bayly, C. I.; Gould, I. R.; Merz, K. M.; Ferguson, D. M.; Spellmeyer, D. C.; Fox, T.; Caldwell, J. W.; Kollman, P. A. A second generation force field for the simulation of proteins, nucleic acids, and organic molecules J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1995, 117, 5179-5197
25. Vedani, A.; Dunitz, J. D. Lone-pair directionality in hydrogen-bond potential functions for molecular mechanics calculations: The inhibition of human carbonic anhydrase II by sulfonamides J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1985, 107, 7653-7658
26. Vedani, A. YETI: An interactive molecular mechanics program for small-molecule protein complexes J. Comput. Chem. 1988, 9, 269-280
27. Sarkhel, S.; Desiraju, G. R. N-H...O, O-H...O, and C-H...O hydrogen bonds in protein-ligand complexes: strong and weak interactions in molecular recognition Proteins 2004, 54, 247-259
28. Panigrahi, S. K. Strong and weak hydrogen bonds in protein-ligand complexes of kinases: A comparative study Amino Acids 2008, 34, 617-633
29. Muller, K.; Faeh, C.; Diederich, F. Fluorine in pharmaceuticals: Looking beyond intuition Science 2007, 317, 1881-1886
30. Matter, H.; Nazare, M.; Gussregen, S.; Will, D. W.; Schreuder, H.; Bauer, A.; Urmann, M.; Ritter, K.; Wagner, M.; Wehner, V. Evidence for C-Cl/C-Br...pi interactions as an important contribution to protein-ligand binding affinity Angew. Chem., Int. Ed. 2009, 48, 2911-2916
31. Grimme, S. Do special noncovalent pi-pi stacking interactions really exist? Angew. Chem., Int. Ed. 2008, 47, 3430-3434
32. Quiñonero, D.; Frontera, A.; Escudero, D.; Ballester, P.; Costa, A.; Deya, P. M. MP2 study of synergistic effects between X-H/π (X = C,N,O) and π-π interactions Theor. Chem. Acc. 2008, 120, 385-393
33. Huang, S. Y.; Zou, X. Inclusion of solvation and entropy in the knowledge-based scoring function for protein-ligand interactions J. Chem. Inf. Model. 2010, 50, 262-273
34. Ghose, A. K.; Viswanadhan, V. N.; Wendoloski, J. J. Prediction of hydrophobic (lipophilic) properties of small organic molecules using fragmental methods: An analysis of ALOGP and CLOGP methods J. Phys. Chem. A. 1998, 102, 3762-3772
35. Ertl, P.; Rohde, B.; Selzer, P. Fast calculation of molecular polar surface area as a sum of fragment-based contributions and its application to the prediction of drug transport properties J. Med. Chem. 2000, 43, 3714-3717
36. Head, R. D.; Smythe, M. L.; Oprea, T. I.; Waller, C. L.; Green, S. M.; Marshall, G. R. VALIDATE: A new method for the receptor-based prediction of binding affinities of novel ligands J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1996, 118, 3959-3969
37. Vapnik, V. N. Statistical Learning theory; Wiley Press: New York, 1998; pp 1-55.
38. Burges, C. J. C. A Tutorial on support vector machines for pattern recognition Data Min. Knowl. Discov. 1998, 2, 121-167
39. Wu, C.-H.; Tzeng, G.-H.; Lin, R.-H. A novel hybrid genetic algorithm for kernel function and parameter optimization in support vector regression Expert Syst. Appl. 2009, 36, 4725-4735
40. Chapelle, O.; Vapnik, V.; Bousquet, O.; Mukherjee, S. Choosing multiple parameters for support vector machines Mach. Learn. 2002, 46, 131-159
41. Yang, S. Y.; Huang, Q.; Li, L. L.; Ma, C. Y.; Zhang, H.; Bai, R.; Teng, Q. Z.; Xiang, M. L.; Wei, Y. Q. An integrated scheme for feature selection and parameter setting in the support vector machine modeling and its application to the prediction of pharmacokinetic properties of drugs Artif. Intell. Med. 2009, 46, 155-163
42. Schumacher, M.; Binder, H.; Gerds, T. Assessment of survival prediction models based on microarray data Bioinformatics 2007, 23, 1768-1774
43. Hou, Z.; Nakanishi, I.; Kinoshita, T.; Takei, Y.; Yasue, M.; Misu, R.; Suzuki, Y.; Nakamura, S.; Kure, T.; Ohno, H.; Murata, K.; Kitaura, K.; Hirasawa, A.; Tsujimoto, G.; Oishi, S.; Fujii, N. Structure-based design of novel potent protein kinase CK2 (CK2) inhibitors with phenyl-azole scaffolds J. Med. Chem. 2012, 55, 2899-2903
44. GOLD, version 5.0; Cambridge Crystallographic Data Centre: Cambridge, U.K.
45. LigandFit, Discovery Studio version 3.1; Accelrys: San Diego, CA.