Consensus virtual screening approaches to predict protein ligands

European Journal of Medicinal Chemistry

Volumn 46, Issue 9, 2011, Pages 4661-4664

  Kukol, Andreas ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF HERTFORDSHIRE   (United Kingdom)

Author keywords

Benchmark; Comparison; Consensus ranking; In silico screening; Molecular docking

Indexed keywords

LIGAND;

ALGORITHM; ARTICLE; CONSENSUS; DRUG SCREENING; DRUG TARGETING; MOLECULAR DOCKING; PREDICTIVE VALUE; PROTEIN TARGETING;

LIGANDS; PROTEINS; ROC CURVE;

EID: 80052948931     PISSN: 02235234     EISSN: 17683254     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.ejmech.2011.05.026     Document Type: Article

References (15)

1. K. Lee, K.W. Jeong, Y. Lee, J.Y. Song, M.S. Kim, G.S. Lee, and Y. Kim Pharmacophore modeling and virtual screening studies for new VEGFR-2 kinase inhibitors European Journal of Medicinal Chemistry 45 2010 5420 5427
2. H. Park, B.R. Bhattarai, S.W. Ham, and H. Cho Structure-based virtual screening approach to identify novel classes of PTP1B inhibitors European Journal of Medicinal Chemistry 44 2009 3280 3284
3. J.B. Bruning, A.A. Parent, G. Gil, M. Zhao, J. Nowak, M.C. Pace, C.L. Smith, P.V. Afonine, P.D. Adams, J.A. Katzenellenbogen, and K.W. Nettles Coupling of receptor conformation and ligand orientation determine graded activity Nature Chemical Biology 6 2010 837 843
4. Y. Chen, and B.K. Shoichet Molecular docking and ligand specificity in fragment-based inhibitor discovery Nature Chemical Biology 5 2009 358 364
5. V. Darapaneni, V.K. Prabhaker, and A. Kukol Large-scale analysis of influenza A virus sequences reveals potential drug target sites of non-structural proteins Journal of General Virology 90 2009 2124 2133
6. D. Plewczynski, M. Lazniewski, M. von Grotthuss, L. Rychlewski, and K. Ginalski VoteDock: consensus docking method for prediction of protein-ligand interactions Journal of Computational Chemistry 32 2011 568 581
7. A.T. Garcia-Sosa, C. Hetenyi, and U. Maran Drug efficiency indices for improvement of molecular docking scoring functions Journal of Computational Chemistry 31 2010 174 184
8. R.X. Wang, X.L. Fang, Y.P. Lu, C.Y. Yang, and S.M. Wang The PDBbind database: methodologies and updates Journal of Medicinal Chemistry 48 2005 4111 4119
9. O. Trott, and A.J. Olson AutoDock Vina: improving the speed and accuracy of docking with a new scoring function, efficient optimization and multithreading Journal of Computational Chemistry 31 2010 455 461
10. R. Huey, G.M. Morris, A.J. Olson, and D.S. Goodsell A semiempirical free energy force field with charge-based desolvation Journal of Computational Chemistry 28 2007 1145 1152
11. J.M. Yang, and C.C. Chen GEMDOCK: a generic evolutionary method for molecular docking Proteins-Structure Function and Bioinformatics 55 2004 288 304
12. N. Huang, B.K. Shoichet, and J.J. Irwin Benchmarking sets for molecular docking Journal of Medicinal Chemistry 49 2006 6789 6801
13. G.M. Morris, D.S. Goodsell, R.S. Halliday, R. Huey, W.E. Hart, R.K. Belew, and A.J. Olson Automated docking using a Lamarckian genetic algorithm and an empirical binding free energy function Journal of Computational Chemistry 19 1998 1639 1662
14. T.J. Cheng, Y. Zhao, X. Li, F. Lin, Y. Xu, X.L. Zhang, Y. Li, R.X. Wang, and L.H. Lai Computation of octanol-water partition coefficients by guiding an additive model with knowledge Journal of Chemical Information and Modeling 47 2007 2140 2148
15. A. Nicholls What do we know and when do we know it? Journal of Computer-Aided Molecular Design 22 2008 239 255