Virtual screening using protein-ligand docking: Avoiding artificial enrichment

Journal of Chemical Information and Computer Sciences

Volumn 44, Issue 3, 2004, Pages 793-806

  Verdonk, Marcel L ^a   Berdini, Valerio ^a   Hartshorn, Michael J ^a   Mooij, Wijnand T M ^a   Murray, Christopher W ^a   Taylor, Richard D ^a   Watson, Paul ^a  

^a ASTEX PHARMACEUTICALS   (United Kingdom)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

COMPUTATIONAL METHODS; DRUG DOSAGE; FUNCTIONS; MOLECULAR WEIGHT; NETWORK PROTOCOLS; PROBABILITY;

BINDING MODES; LIGANDS; PHARMACOPHORES; VIRTUAL SCREENING;

PROTEINS;

DRUG; LIGAND; PROTEIN;

ARTICLE; CHEMICAL STRUCTURE; CHEMISTRY; METABOLISM; X RAY DIFFRACTION;

LIGANDS; MODELS, MOLECULAR; PHARMACEUTICAL PREPARATIONS; PROTEINS; X-RAY DIFFRACTION;

EID: 2942721004     PISSN: 00952338     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1021/ci034289q     Document Type: Article

References (53)

1. Makino, S.; Kuntz, I. D. Automated flexible ligand docking method and its application for database search. J. Comput. Chem. 1997, 18, 1812-1825.
2. Rarey, M.; Kramer, B.; Lengauer, T.; Klebe, G. A fast flexible docking method using an incremental construction algorithm. J. Mol. Biol. 1996, 261, 470-489.
3. Jones, G.; Willett, P.; Glen, R. C. Molecular recognition of receptor sites using a genetic algorithm with a description of desolvation. J. Mol. Biol. 1995, 245, 43-53.
4. Jones, G.; Willett, P.; Glen, R. C.; Leach, A. R.; Taylor, R. Development and validation of a genetic algorithm for flexible docking. J. Mol. Biol. 1997, 267, 727-748.
5. Taylor, R. D.; Jewsbury, P. J.; Essex, J. W. A review of protein-small molecule docking methods. J. Comput.-Aided Mol. Des. 2002, 16, 151-166.
6. Tondi, D.; Slomczynska, U.; Costi, M. P.; Watterson, D. M.; Ghelli, S.; Shoichet, B. K. Structure-based discovery and in-parallel optimization of novel competitive inhibitors of thymidylate synthase. Chem. Biol. 1999, 6, 319-331.
7. Doman, T. N.; McGovern, S. L.; Witherbee, B. J.; Kasten, T. P.; Kurumbail, R.; Stallings, W. C.; Connolly, D. T.; Shoichet, B. K. Molecular docking and high-throughput screening for novel inhibitors of protein tyrosine phosphatase-1B. J. Med. Chem. 2002, 45, 2213-2221.
8. Brenk, R.; Naerum, L.; Gradler, U.; Gerber, H.-D.; Garcia, G. A.; Reuter, K.; Stubbs, M. T.; Klebe, G. Virtual Screening for Submicromolar Leads of tRNA-guanine Transglycosylase Based on a New Unexpected Binding Mode Detected by Crystal Structure Analysis. J. Med. Chem. 2003, 46, 1133-1143.
9. Lyne, P. D. Structure-based virtual screening: an overview. Drug Discov. Today 2002, 7, 1047-1055.
10. Good, A. Structure-based virtual screening protocols. Curr. Opin. Drug Discov. Devel. 2001, 4, 301-307.
11. Bissantz, C.; Folkers, G.; Rognan, D. Protein-based virtual screening of chemical databases. 1. Evaluation of different docking/scoring combinations. J. Med. Chem. 2000, 43, 4759-4767.
12. Charifson, P. S.; Corkery, J. J.; Murcko, M. A.; Walters, W. P. Consensus scoring: A method for obtaining improved hit rates from docking databases of three-dimensional structures into proteins. J. Med. Chem. 1999, 42, 5100-5109.
13. Clark, R. D.; Strizhev, A.; Leonard, J. M.; Blake, J. F.; Matthew, J. B. Consensus scoring for ligand/protein interactions. J. Mol Graph. Model. 2002, 20, 281-295.
14. Baxter, C. A.; Murray, C. W.; Waszkowycz, B.; Li, J.; Sykes, R. A.; Bone, R. G. A.; Perkins, T. D. J.; Wylie, W. New approach to molecular docking and its application to virtual screening of chemical databases. J. Chem. Inf. Comput. Sci. 2000, 40, 254-262.
15. Stahl, M.; Rarey, M. Detailed analysis of scoring functions for virtual screening. J. Med. Chem. 2001, 44, 1035-1042.
16. Jenkins, J. L.; Kao, R. Y.; Shapiro, R. Virtual screening to enrich hit lists from high-throughput screening: A case study on small-molecule inhibitors of angiogenin. Proteins 2003, 50, 81-93.
17. Good, A. C.; Cheney, D. L.; Sitkoff, D. F.; Tokarski, J. S.; Stouch, T. R.; Bassolino, D. A.; Krystek, S. R.; Li, Y.; Mason, J. S.; Perkins, T. D. Analysis and optimization of structure-based virtual screening protocols. 2. Examination of docked ligand orientation sampling methodology: mapping a pharmacophore for success. J. Mol. Graph. Model. 2003, 22, 31-40.
18. Nissink, J. W.; Murray, C.; Hartshorn, M.; Verdonk, M. L.; Cole, J. C.; Taylor, R. A new test set for validating predictions of protein-ligand interaction. Proteins 2002, 49, 457-471.
19. Berman, H. M.; Battistuz, T.; Bhat, T. N.; Bluhm, W. F.; Bourne, P. E.; Burkhardt, K.; Feng, Z.; Gilliland, G. L.; Iype, L.; Jain, S.; Fagan, P.; Marvin, J.; Padilla, D.; Ravichandran, V.; Schneider, B.; Thanki, N.; Weissig, H.; Westbrook, J. D.; Zardecki, C. The protein data bank. Acta Crystallogr. D Biol. Crystallogr. 2002, 58, 899-907.
20. Verdonk, M. L.; Cole, J. C.; Hartshorn, M.; Murray, C.; Taylor, R. D. Improved protein-ligand docking using GOLD. Proteins 2003, 52, 609-623.
21. Eldridge, M. D.; Murray, C. W.; Auton, T. R.; Paolini, G. V.; Mee, R. P. Empirical scoring functions. 1. The development of a fast empirical scoring function to estimate the binding affinity of ligands in receptor complexes. J. Comput.-Aided Mol. Des. 1997, 11, 425-445.
22. Pierce, A. C.; Sandretto, K. L.; Bemis, G. W. Kinase inhibitors and the case for CH⋯O hydrogen bonds in protein-ligand binding. Proteins 2002, 49, 567-576.
23. Gohlke, H.; Hendlich, M.; Klebe, G. Knowledge-based scoring function to predict protein-ligand interactions. J. Mol. Biol. 2000, 295, 337-356.
24. Gohlke, H.; Hendlich, M.; Klebe, G. Predicting binding modes, binding affinities and 'hot spots' for protein-ligand complexes using a knowledge-based scoring function. Perspect. Drug Discov. Des. 2000, 20, 115-144.
25. Pan, Y.; Huang, N.; Cho, S.; MacKerell, A. D., Jr. Consideration of molecular weight during compound selection in virtual target-based database screening. J. Chem. Inf. Comput. Sci. 2003, 43, 267-272.
26. Wang, R.; Lai, L.; Wang, S. Further development and validation of empirical scoring functions for structure-based binding affinity prediction. J. Comput.-Aided Mol. Des. 2002, 16, 11-26.
27. Fradera, X.; Knegtel, R. M. A.; Mestres, J. Similarity-driven flexible ligand docking. Proteins 2000, 40, 623-636.
28. Hindle, S. A.; Rarey, M.; Buning, C.; Lengaue, T. Flexible docking under pharmacophore type constraints. J. Comput.-Aided Mol. Des. 2002, 16, 129-149.
29. Blundell, T. L.; Jhoti, H.; Abell, C. High-throughput crystallography for lead discovery in drug design. Nat. Rev. Drug Discov. 2002, 1, 45-54.
30. Boehm, H. J.; Boehringer, M.; Bur, D.; Gmuender, H.; Huber, W.; Klaus, W.; Kostrewa, D.; Kuehne, H.; Luebbers, T.; Meunier-Keller, N.; Mueller, F. Novel inhibitors of DNA gyrase: 3D structure based biased needle screening, hit validation by biophysical methods, and 3D guided optimization. A promising alternative to random screening. J. Med. Chem. 2000, 43, 2664-2674.
31. Carr, R.; Jhoti, H. Structure-based screening of low-affinity compounds. Drug Discov. Today 2002, 7, 522-527.
32. Fejzo, J.; Lepre, C. A.; Peng, J. W.; Bemis, G. W.; Ajay; Murcko, M. A.; Moore, J. M. The SHAPES strategy: an NMR-based approach for lead generation in drug discovery. Chem. Biol. 1999, 6, 755-769.
33. Hajduk, P. J.; Meadows, R. P.; Fesik, S. W. NMR-based screening in drug discovery. Q. Rev. Biophys. 1999, 32, 211-240.
34. Nienaber, V. L.; Richardson, P. L.; Klighofer, V.; Bouska, J. J.; Giranda, V. L.; Greer, J. Discovering novel ligands for macromolecules using X-ray crystallographic screening. Nat. Biotechnol. 2000, 18, 1105-1108.
35. O'Reilly, M.; Woolford, A. J.-A. 2003, Unpublished work.
36. Birch, L.; Murray, C. W.; Hartshorn, M. J.; Tickle, I.; Verdonk, M. L. Sensitivity of molecular docking to induced fit effects in influenza virus neuraminidase. J. Comput.-Aided Mol. Des. 2002, 16, 855-869.
37. Iversen, L. F.; Andersen, H. S.; Branner, S.; Mortensen, S. B.; Peters, G. H.; Norris, K.; Olsen, O. H.; Jeppesen, C. B.; Lundt, B. F.; Ripka, W.; Moller, K. B.; Moller, N. P. Structure-based design of a low molecular weight, nonphosphorus, nonpeptide, and highly selective inhibitor of protein-tyrosine phosphatase 1B. J. Biol. Chem. 2000, 275, 10300-10307.
38. Lipinski, C. A. Drug-like properties and the causes of poor solubility and poor permeability. J. Pharmacol. Toxicol. Methods 2000, 44, 235-249.
39. Lipinski, C. A.; Lombardo, F.; Dominy, B. W.; Feeney, P. J. Experimental and computational approaches to estimate solubility and permeability in drug discovery and development settings. Adv. Drug Deliv. Rev. 2001, 46, 3-26.
40. Baxter, C. A.; Murray, C. W.; Clark, D. E.; Westhead, D. R.; Eldridge, M. D. Flexible docking using Tabu search and an empirical estimate of binding affinity. Proteins 1998, 33, 367-382.
41. Hartshorn, M. J.; Watson, P. 2002, Unpublished work.
42. Hendlich, M.; Rippmann, F.; Barnickel, G. BALI: Automatic assignment of bond and atom types for protein ligands in the Brookhaven Protein Databank. J. Chem. Inf. Comput. Sci. 1997, 37, 774-778.
43. Sayle, R. PDB: Cruft to content (perception of molecular connectivity from 3D coordinates) (http://www.daylight.com/meetings/mug01/ Sayle/m4xbondage.html) 2001.
44. Veber, D. F.; Johnson, S. R.; Cheng, H. Y.; Smith, B. R.; Ward, K. W.; Kopple, K. D. Molecular properties that influence the oral bioavailability of drug candidates. J. Med. Chem. 2002, 45, 2615-2623.
45. Sotriffer, C. A.; Gohlke, H.; Klebe, G. Docking into knowledge-based potential fields: a comparative evaluation of DrugScore. J. Med. Chem. 2002, 45, 1967-1970.
46. Daylight Chemical Information Systems, Mission Vieho, CA. (http:// www/daylight.com). 2003.
47. Wang, R.; Wang, S. How does consensus scoring work for virtual library screening? An idealized computer experiment. J. Chem. Inf. Comput. Sci. 2001, 41, 1422-1426.
48. Watson, P.; Verdonk, M. L.; Hartshorn, M. A web-based platform for virtual screening. J. Mol. Graph. Model. 2003, 22, 71-82.
49. Weininger, D. SMILES, a chemical language and information system. 1. Introduction to methodology and encoding rules. J. Chem. Inf. Comput. Sci. 1998, 28, 31-36.
50. Gasteiger, J.; Rudolph, C.; Sadowski, J. Automatic generation of 3D-atomic coordinates for organic molecules. Tetrahedron Comput. Method. 1990, 3, 537-547.
51. Waszkowycz, B.; Perkins, T. D. J.; Sykes, R. A.; Li, J. Large-scale virtual screening for discovering leads in the postgenomic era. IBM. Syst. J. 2001, 40, 360-376.
52. Ewing, T. J. A.; Makino, S.; Skillman, A. G.; Kuntz, I. D. DOCK 4.0: Search strategies for automated molecular docking of flexible molecule databases. J. Comput.-Aided Mol Des. 2001, 15, 411-428.
53. Smith, R.; Hubbard, R. E.; Gschwend, D. A.; Leach, A. R.; Good, A. C. Analysis and optimization of structure-based virtual screening protocols. (3). New methods and old problems in scoring function design. J. Mol Graph. Model. 2003, 22, 41-53.