LigMatch: A multiple structure-based ligand matching method for 3D virtual screening

Journal of Chemical Information and Modeling

Volumn 49, Issue 9, 2009, Pages 2056-2066

  Kinnings, Sarah L ^a   Jackson, Richard M ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF LEEDS   (United Kingdom)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

PROTEINS; VIRTUAL REALITY;

BIOACTIVE CONFORMATION; GEOMETRIC HASHING; MATCHING METHODS; MULTIPLE STRUCTURES; PROTEIN TARGETS; SCAFFOLD HOPPING; STRUCTURAL COMPARISON; VIRTUAL SCREENING;

LIGANDS;

LIGAND;

ARTICLE; CHEMICAL STRUCTURE; COMPUTER INTERFACE; CONFORMATION; DRUG SCREENING; FACTUAL DATABASE; METHODOLOGY; RECEIVER OPERATING CHARACTERISTIC;

DATABASES, FACTUAL; DRUG EVALUATION, PRECLINICAL; LIGANDS; MODELS, MOLECULAR; MOLECULAR CONFORMATION; ROC CURVE; USER-COMPUTER INTERFACE;

EID: 70350001745     PISSN: 15499596     EISSN: 1549960X     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1021/ci900204y     Document Type: Article

References (50)

1. Hert, J.; Willett, P.; Wilton, D. J.; Acklin, P.; Azzaoui, K.; Jacoby, E.; Schuffenhauer, A. Comparison of topological descriptors for similarity-based virtual screening using multiple bioactive reference structures. Ore. Biomol. Chem. 2004, 2 (22), 3256-3266
2. Shoichet, B. K. Virtual screening of chemical libraries. Nature 2004, 432 (7019), 862-865
3. Sperandio, O.; Andrieu, O.; Miteva, M. A.; Vo, M. Q.; Souaille, M.; Delfaud, F.; Villoutreix, B. O. MED-SuMoLig: a new ligand-based screening tool for efficient scaffold hopping. J. Chem. Inf. Model. 2007, 47 (3), 1097-1110
4. Cheeseright, T. J.; Mackey, M. D.; Melville, J. L.; Vinter, J. G. FieldScreen: virtual screening using molecular fields. Application to the DUD data set. J. Chem. Inf. Model. 2008, 48 (11), 2108-2117
5. Warren, G. L.; Andrews, C. W.; Capelli, A. M.; Clarke, B.; LaLonde, J.; Lambert, M. H.; Lindvall, M.; Nevins, N.; Semus, S. F.; Senger, S.; Tedesco, G.; Wall, I. D.; Woolven, J. M.; Peishoff, C. E.; Head, M. S. A critical assessment of docking programs and scoring functions. J. Med. Chem. 2006, 49 (20), 5912-5931
6. Tirado-Rives, J.; Jorgensen, W. L. Contribution of conformer focusing to the uncertainty in predicting free energies for protein-ligand binding. J. Med. Chem. 2006, 49 (20), 5880-5884
7. Evers, A.; Hessler, G.; Matter, H.; Klabunde, T. Virtual screening of biogenic amine-binding G-protein coupled receptors: comparative evaluation of protein- and ligand-based virtual screening protocols. J. Med. Chem. 2005, 48 (17), 5448-5465
8. Hawkins, P. C.; Skillman, A. G.; Nicholls, A. Comparison of shape- matching and docking as virtual screening tools. J. Med. Chem. 2007, 50 (1), 74-82.
9. McGaughey, G. B.; Sheridan, R. P.; Bayly, C. I.; Culberson, J. C.; Kreatsoulas, C.; Lindsley, S.; Maiorov, V.; Truchon, J. F.; Cornell, W. D. Comparison of topological, shape, and docking methods in virtual screening. J. Chem. Inf. Model. 2007, 47 (4), 1504-1519
10. Perez-Nueno, V. I.; Ritchie, D. W.; Rabal, O.; Pascual, R.; Borrell, J. I.; Teixido, J. Comparison of ligand-based and receptor-based virtual screening of HIV entry inhibitors for the CXCR4 and CCR5 receptors using 3D ligand shape matching and ligand-receptor docking. J. Chem. Inf. Model. 2008, 48 (3), 509-533
11. Rush, T. S., III; Grant, J. A.; Mosyak, L.; Nicholls, A. A shape-based 3-D scaffold hopping method and its application to a bacterial protein- protein interaction. J. Med. Chem. 2005, 48 (5), 1489-1495
12. Bender, A.; Mussa, H. Y.; Gill, G. S.; Glen, R. C. Molecular surface point environments for virtual screening and the elucidation of binding patterns (MOLPRINT 3D). J. Med. Chem. 2004, 47 (26), 6569-6583 (Pubitemid 39662752)
13. Bergmann, R.; Linusson, A.; Zamora, I. SHOP: scaffold HOPping by GRID-based similarity searches. J. Med. Chem. 2007, 50 (11), 2708-2717
14. Cheeseright, T.; Mackey, M.; Rose, S.; Vinter, A. Molecular field extrema as descriptors of biological activity: definition and validation. J. Chem. Inf. Model. 2006, 46 (2), 665-676
15. Doddareddy, M. R.; Choo, H.; Cho, Y. S.; Rhim, H.; Koh, H. Y.; Lee, J. H.; Jeong, S. W.; Pae, A. N. 3D pharmacophore based virtual screening of T-type calcium channel blockers. Bioore. Med. Chem. 2007, 15 (2), 1091-1105 (Pubitemid 44880695)
16. Low, C. M.; Buck, I. M.; Cooke, T.; Cushnir, J. R.; Kalindjian, S. B.; Kotecha, A.; Pether, M. J.; Shankley, N. P.; Vinter, J. G.; Wright, L. Scaffold hopping with molecular field points: identification of a cholecystokinin-2 (CCK2) receptor pharmacophore and its use in the design of a prototypical series of pyrrole- and imidazole-based CCK2 antagonists. J. Med. Chem. 2005, 48 (22), 6790-6802
17. Schuster, D.; Maurer, E. M.; Laggner, C.; Nashev, L. G.; Wilckens, T.; Langer, T.; Odermatt, A. The discovery of new 11beta-hydrox- ysteroid dehydrogenase type 1 inhibitors by common feature phar- macophore modeling and virtual screening. J. Med. Chem. 2006, 49 (12), 3454-3466
18. Willett, P. Similarity-based virtual screening using 2D fingerprints. Drug Discov. Today 2006, 11 (23 -24), 1046-1053
19. Chen, X.; Reynolds, C. H. Performance of similarity measures in 2D fragment-based similarity searching: comparison of structural descriptors and similarity coefficients. J. Chem. Inf. Comput. Sci. 2002, 42 (6), 1407-1414
20. Eckert, H.; Bajorath, J. Design and evaluation of a novel class-directed 2D fingerprint to search for structurally diverse active compounds. J. Chem. Inf. Model. 2006, 46 (6), 2515-2526
21. Huang, N.; Shoichet, B. K.; Irwin, J. J. Benchmarking sets for molecular docking. J. Med. Chem. 2006, 49 (23), 6789-6801
22. Good, A. C.; Oprea, T. I. Optimization of CAMD techniques 3. Virtual screening enrichment studies: a help or hindrance in tool selection. J. Comput.-Aided Mol. Des. 2008, 22 (3 -4), 169-178
23. Kirchmair, J.; Distinto, S.; Markt, P.; Schuster, D.; Spitzer, G. M.; Liedl, K. R.; Wolber, G. How To Optimize Shape-Based Virtual Screening: Choosing the Right Query and Including Chemical Information. J. Chem. Inf. Model. 2009, 49 (3), 678-692
24. Geppert, H.; Horvath, T.; Gartner, T.; Wrobel, S.; Bajorath, J. Support- vector-machine-based ranking significantly improves the effectiveness of similarity searching using 2D fingerprints and multiple reference compounds. J. Chem. Inf. Model. 2008, 48 (4), 742-746
25. Tovar, A.; Eckert, H.; Bajorath, J. Comparison of 2D fingerprint methods for multiple template similarity searching on compound activity classes of increasing structural diversity. Chem. Med. Chem. 2007, 2 (2), 208-217
26. Shemetulskis, N. E.; Weininger, D.; Blankley, C. J.; Yang, J. J.; Humblet, C. Stigmata: an algorithm to determine structural commonalities in diverse datasets. J. Chem. Inf. Comput. 1996, 36 (4), 862-871
27. Schuffenhauer, A.; Floersheim, P.; Acklin, P.; Jacoby, E. Similarity metrics for ligands reflecting the similarity of the target proteins. J. Chem. Inf. Comput. Sci. 2003, 43 (2), 391-405.
28. Xue, L.; Godden, J. W.; Stahura, F. L.; Bajorath, J. Profile scaling increases the similarity search performance of molecular fingerprints containing numerical descriptors and structural keys. J. Chem. Inf. Comput. Sci. 2003, 43 (4), 1218-1225
29. Hert, J.; Willett, P.; Wilton, D. J.; Acklin, P.; Azzaoui, K.; Jacoby, E.; Schuffenhauer, A. Comparison of fingerprint-based methods for virtual screening using multiple bioactive reference structures. J. Chem. Inf. Comput. Sci. 2004, 44 (3), 1177-1185
30. Hert, J.; Willett, P.; Wilton, D. J.; Acklin, P.; Azzaoui, K.; Jacoby, E.; Schuffenhauer, A. New methods for ligand-based virtual screening: use of data fusion and machine learning to enhance the effectiveness of similarity searching. J. Chem. Inf. Model. 2006, 46 (2), 462-470
31. Whittle, M.; Gillet, V. J.; Willett, P.; Alex, A.; Loesel, J. Enhancing the effectiveness of virtual screening by fusing nearest neighbor lists: a comparison of similarity coefficients. J. Chem. Inf. Comput. Sci. 2004, 44 (5), 1840-1848
32. Brakoulias, A.; Jackson, R. M. Towards a structural classification of phosphate binding sites in protein-nucleotide complexes: an automated all-against-all structural comparison using geometric matching. Proteins 2004, 56 (2), 250-260
33. ROCS, Version 2.3.1; Openeye Scientific Software, Inc.: Santa Fe, NM, 2007.
34. The Open Babel Package, Version 2.1.1; http://openbabel.sourcefour-ge. net/. Accessed May, 2008.
35. Guha, R.; Howard, M. T.; Hutchison, G. R.; Murray-Rust, P.; Rzepa, H.; Steinbeck, C.; Wegner, J.; Willighagen, E. L. The Blue Obelisk- interoperability in chemical informatics. J. Chem. Inf. Model. 2006, 46 (3), 991-998
36. Irwin, J. J. Community benchmarks for virtual screening. J. Comput.- Aided Mol. Des. 2008, 22 (3-4), 193-199
37. OMEGA, Version 2.2.1; Openeye Scientific Software, Inc.: Santa Fe, NM, 2007.
38. Bostrom, J.; Greenwood, J. R.; Gottfries, J. Assessing the performance of OMEGA with respect to retrieving bioactive conformations. J. Mol. Graphics Modell. 2003, 21 (5), 449-462
39. Kirchmair, J.; Wolber, G.; Laggner, C.; Langer, T. Comparative performance assessment of the conformational model generators omega and catalyst: a large-scale survey on the retrieval of protein-bound ligand conformations. J. Chem. Inf. Model. 2006, 46 (4), 184-861.
40. Berman, H. M.; Westbrook, J.; Feng, Z.; Gilliland, G.; Bhat, T. N.; Weissig, H.; Shindyalov, I. N.; Bourne, P. E. The Protein Data Bank. Nucleic Acids Res. 2000, 28 (1), 235-242
41. James, C. A., Weininger, D. Daylight Theory Manual. Daylight Chemical Information Systems Inc.: Irvine, CA., 2006.
42. Clark, R. D.; Webster-Clark, D. J. Managing bias in ROC curves. J. Comput.-Aided Mol. Des. 2008, 22 (3-4), 141-146
43. Altschul, S. F.; Gish, W.; Miller, W.; Myers, E. W.; Lipman, D. J. Basic local alignment search tool. J. Mol. Biol. 1990, 215 (3), 403-410
44. Matter, H. Selecting optimally diverse compounds from structure databases: a validation study of two-dimensional and three-dimensional molecular descriptors. J. Med. Chem. 1997, 40 (8), 1219-1229
45. Thimm, M.; Goede, A.; Hougardy, S.; Preissner, R. Comparison of 2D similarity and 3D superposition. Application to searching a conformational drug database. J. Chem. Inf. Comput. Sci. 2004, 44 (5), 1816-22.
46. Wallach, I.; Lilien, R. The protein-small-molecule database, a non- redundant structural resource for the analysis of protein-ligand binding. Bioinformatics 2009, 25 (5), 615-620.
47. Nicholls, A. What do we know and when do we know it. J. Comput.-Aided Mol. Des. 2008, 22 (3-4), 239-255
48. Kinnings, S. L.; Jackson, R. M. Binding site similarity analysis for the functional classification of the protein kinase family. J. Chem. Inf. Model. 2009, 49 (2), 318-329
49. Pargellis, C.; Tong, L.; Churchill, L.; Cirillo, P. F.; Gilmore, T.; Graham, A. G.; Grob, P. M.; Hickey, E. R.; Moss, N.; Pav, S.; Regan, J. Inhibition of p38 MAP kinase by utilizing a novel allosteric binding site. Nat. Struct. Biol. 2002, 9 (4), 268-272
50. Sheridan, R. P.; McGaughey, G. B.; Cornell, W. D. Multiple protein structures and multiple ligands: effects on the apparent goodness of virtual screening results. J. Comput.-Aided Mol. Des. 2008, 22 (3-4), 257-265