Empowering scientific literacy through digital literacy and multiliteracies

Empowering Scientific Literacy through Digital Literacy and Multiliteracies

Volumn , Issue , 2013, Pages 1-198

  Ng, Wan ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF NEW SOUTH WALES   (Australia)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 84895299141     PISSN: None     EISSN: None     Source Type: Book    
DOI: None     Document Type: Book

References (247)

1. ACER (2007). Australian students perform well in science, but many below OECD baseline. Retrieved July 24, 2011, from http://www.acer.edu.au/documents/MR_071204-PISA2006.pdf.
2. Adwell, J., Copeland, N., Forber-Pratt, A.. Gitonga, K., Kleber, K., Koplinski, C., Lawhead, M.J., Martin, R., Mattison, R. & Wilken, K. (2007). Multiliteracies and education. Retrieved May 23, 2011 from http://wik.ed.uiuc.edu/index.php/Multiliteracies_and_Education.
3. Aikenhead, G.S. (2003). STS education: A rose by any other name. In R. Cross (Ed.), A vision for science education: Responding to the work of Peter J. Fensham (pp. 59-75). New York, USA: Routledge Press.
4. Ainsworth, S. (1999). The functions of multiple representations. Computers & Education, 33, 131-152.
5. Ainsworth, S., & Iacovides, I. (2005, August). Learning by constructing selfexplanation diagrams. Paper presented at the 11th Biennial Conference of European Association for Research on Learning and Instruction, Nicosia, Cyprus.
6. American Association for the Advancement of Science (AAAS), (1989). Science for all Americans: A Project 2061 report on literacy goals in science, mathematics, and technology. Washington, DC:.
7. AAAS American Association for the Advancement of Science (AAAS), (1993). Benchmarks for science literacy. New York: Oxford University Press.
8. Anderson, L. W. and Krathwohl, D. R. (2001). A taxonomy for learning, teaching, and assessing: A revision of Bloom's Taxonomy of Educational Objectives. New York: Longman.
9. Angelique, L. & Lim, Y.L. (2011). A comparison of students' reflective thinking across different years in a problem-based learning environment. Instr Sci, 39, 171-188.
10. Aviram, A. & Eshet-Alkalai, Y. (2006). Towards a Theory of Digital Literacy:Three Scenarios for the Next Steps. European Journal of Open, Distance and E-Learning. Retrieved May 12, 2011 from http://www.eurodl.org/materials/contrib/2006/Aharon_Aviram.htm.
11. Baddeley, A. D. (1992). Working memory. Science, 255, 556-559.
12. Bardini, C., Pierce, R. & Stacey, K. (2004). Teaching linear functions in context with graphics calculators: students' responses and the impact of the approach on their use of algebraic symbols. International Journal of Science and Mathematics Education, 2(3), 353-376.
13. Becker, H. J. (2000, January). Findings from the teaching, learning, and computing survey: Is Larry Cuban right? Revision of a paper written for the School Technology Leadership Conference of the Council of Chief State School Officers, Washington, D.C. Retrieved July 15, 2011 from http://www.crito.uci.edu/tlc/findings/ccsso.pdf.
14. BECTA (2006). Safeguarding children in a digital world: Developing a strategic approach to e-safety. Retrieved May 12, 2011 from http://www.mmiweb.org.uk/publications/ict/safeguarding.pdf.
15. Belanger, Y. (2007) The iPod revolution: Coming to a classroom near you. Proceedings of the 2007 Organisational Systems Research Association conference. Retrieved March 18, 2011 from http://www.osra.org/2007/papers/brookshire.pdf.
16. Bell, F. (2011). Connectivism: Its place in theory-informed research and innovation in technology-enabled learning. International Review of Research in Open and Distance Learning, 12(3), 98-118.
17. Bennett, S., Maton, K., Kervin, L. (2008). The digital natives'debate: a critical review of the evidence. British Journal of Educational Technology, 39(5), 775-786.
18. Berson, I. R. & Berson, M. J. (2003). Digital literacy for effective citizenship. Social Education, 67(3), 164-167.
19. Bloom B. S. (1956). Taxonomy of educational objectives, Handbook I: The cognitive domain. New York: David McKay Co Inc.
20. Bodmer, W. (1985). The Public Understanding of Science. London: Royal Society.
21. Boitshwarelo, B. (2010). Proposing an Integrated Research Framework for Connectivism: Utilising Theoretical Synergies. International Review of Research in Open and Distance Learning, 12(3), 161-178.
22. Braithwaite, A. (2006). New science curriculum 'more suited to the pub'. Retrieved May 3, 2011 from http://www.independent.co.uk/news/education/education-news/newscience- curriculum-more-suited-to-the-pub-419567.html.
23. Branscomb, A. W. (1981). Knowing how to know. Science, Technology, & Human Values, 6(36), 5-9.
24. Brown, C. & Czerniewicz, L. (2010). Debunking the 'digital native': beyond digital apartheid, towards digital democracy. Journal of Computer Assisted Learning, 26(5), 357-369.
25. Brown, J. S., Collins, A., & Duguid, P. (1989). Situated cognition and the culture of learning. Educational Researcher, 18(1), 32-42.
26. Bruce, B.C. (1997). Literacy technologies: What stance should we take? Journal of Literacy Research, 29(2), 289-309.
27. Bruner, J (1960). The process of education. Cambridge, MA.: Harvard University Press.
28. Bruner, J. (1966). Toward a theory of instruction. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
29. Bybee, R. (1997). Achieving scientific literacy: From purposes to practices. Portsmouth, NH: Heinemann.
30. Bybee, R. W., & DeBoer, G. (1994). Research on the goals for science education. In D. L. Gabel (Ed.), Handbook of research on teaching and learning of science (pp. 357-387). New York: Macmillan.
31. Bybee, R.W., Powell, J.C.., Ellis, J.D., Giese, J.R., Parisi, L. & Singleton, L. (1991). Integrating the History and Nature of Science and Technology in Science and Social Studies Curriculum. Science Education, 75(1), 143-155.
32. Caron, A., Caronia, L. & Gagné, P.(2011). Beyond mobile learning: Identity construction and the development of social awareness. In W. Ng (Ed.), Mobile technologies and handheld devices for ubiquitous learning:Research and pedagogy (pp. 34-57). Hershey, PA: IGI Global Publishing.
33. Carr, W. and Kemmis, S. (1986) Becoming Critical. Education, knowledge and action research, Lewes: Falmer.
34. Chan, T.W., Roschelle, J., Hsi, S., Kinshuk, Sharples, M., Brown, T., Patton, C., Cherniavsky, J., Pea, R., Norris, C., Soloway, E., Balacheff, N., Scardamalia, M., Dillenbourg, P., Looi, C.K., Milrad, M. & Hoope, U. (2006) One-to-one technology-enhanced learning: an opportunity for global research collaboration. Research and Practice in Technology Enhanced Learning, 1(1), 3-29.
35. Chansanchai, A. (2006). Millennials lead the wired life: New generation digital natives in a land of digital immigrants. Retrieved July 24, 2011 from http://www.msnbc.msn.com/id/14560871/.
36. Chng, L.P, Abas, Z.W., Goolamally, N.T., Yussoff, Y. & Kaur, H, Implementation of mobile learning at the Open University Malaysia. In W. Ng (Ed.), Mobile technologies and handheld devices for ubiquitous learning: Research and pedagogy (pp. 170-186). Hershey, PA: IGI Global Publishing (2011).
37. Clark, J. M. & Paivio, A. (1991). Dual coding theory and education. Educational Psychology Review, 3(3), 149-210.
38. Coffey, H. (nd). Critical literacy. Retrieved May 12, 2011 from http://www.learnnc.org/lp/pages/4437?style=print.
39. Connor, R. (2007). Science and Technology Literature Review. NSW, Australia: Board of Studies.
40. Conroy, S. (2007). Labor's plan for cyber-safety (fact sheet). Retrieved March 18, 2011 from http://machinegunkeyboard.com/ausnetcensorship/labors_plan_for_cyber_safety.pdf.
41. Coombs, P. H. and Ahmed, M. (1974). Attacking Rural Poverty: How nonformal education can help. Baltimore: John Hopkins University.
42. Crispin, D. and Pymm, J. (2009). Podagogy: The iPod as a learning technology. Active Learning In Higher Education, 10(1), 84-96.
43. Crook, C., Harrison, C., Farrington-Flint, L., Tomás, C. and Underwood, J. (2010). The impact of technology: Value-added classroom practice. Final report. UK: BECTA.
44. Cuban, L. (2001). Oversold and underused: Reforming schools through technology, 1980- 2000. Cambridge MA: Harvard University Press.
45. Curriculum Corporation, (1994). Science - A curriculum profile for Australian schools. Victoria, Australia: Curriculum Corporation.
46. Daniels, J.. Takach, B. S., and Varnhagen C. (2002). Getting stuck in the world wide web: The impact of design on navigation. In P. Barker and S. Rebelsky, (eds), Proceedings of ED-MEDIA, 2001 World Conference on Educational Multimedia, Hypermedia & Telecommunications (pp. 371-372). Denver, USA. Norfolk, VA: Association for the Advancement of Computing in Education.
47. Darken, R.P., Bernatovich, D., Lawson, J., & Peterson, B. (1999). Quantitative measures of presence in virtual environments: The roles of attention and spatial comprehension. Cyberpsychology and Behavior, 2(4), 337-347.
48. DeBoer, G. (2000). Scientific literacy: Another look at its historical and contemporary meanings and its relationship to science education reform. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 37(6), 582-601.
49. Dede, C., Salzman, M.C., Bowen Loftin, R., & Sprague, D. (1999). Multisensory Immersion as a Modeling Environment for Learning Complex Scientific Concepts in N. Roberts, W. Feurzeig & B. Hunter (Eds.), Computer Modelling and Simulation in Science Education (pp. 282-319). Berlin: Springer.
50. Dekkers, J., & De Laeter, J. R. (2001). Enrolment trends in school science education in Australia. International Journal of Science Education, 23(5), 487-500.
51. del Carmen Valderrama Bahamóndez, E. & Schmidt, A. (2011). Mobile phones, developing countries and learning, In W. Ng (Ed.), Mobile technologies and handheld devices for ubiquitous learning: Research and pedagogy (pp. 120-137). Hershey, PA: IGI Global Publishing.
52. Department for Education and Skills (DfES) (1995). Science in the National Curriculum. London: DfES.
53. Dewey, J. (1938). École et société. Paris: PUF.
54. Dierking, L.D., Falk, J.H., Rennie, L., Anderson, D., & Ellenbogen, K. (2003). Policy statement of the 'Informal Science Education' ad hoc committee. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 40(2), 108-111.
55. Dodge, B. (2007). WebQuest.org. Retrieved June 5, 2011, from http://webquest.org/index.php.
56. Downes, S. (2005). E-learning 2.0. eLearn Magazine, 10. Retrieved May 12, 2011 from http://www.4shared.com/document/FcJQ9z1z/An_introduction_to_connective_.html.
57. Driver, R. (1989). Students' conceptions and the learning of science. International Journal of Science Education 11(5), 481-490.
58. Driver, R., Squires, A., Rushworth, P., & Wood-Robinson, V. (1994). Making sense of secondary science: Research into children's ideas. London, UK:Routledge.
59. Drucker, P. F. (1994). The age of social transformation. The Atlantic Monthly (November), 53-80.
60. Duit, R. (2002). Bibliography: Students' and teachers' conceptions and science education. Retrieved July 2, 2011 from http://www.ipn.uni-kiel.de/aktuell/stcse/stcse.html.
61. Dwyer, D. (1994). Apple classrooms of tomorrow: What we've learned. Educational Leadership, 51(7), 4-10.
62. Economist Intelligence Unit (2008). The future of higher education: How technology will shape learning. Retrieved July 7, 2011 from http://www.nmc.org/pdf/Future-of-Higher-Ed-(NMC).pdf.
63. Education Services Australia (ESA) (2010). ICT professional learning:National mapping of ICT-based professional learning. Retrieved July 2, 2011 from http://www.deewr.gov.au/Schooling/DigitalEducationRevolution/DigitalStrategyforTeachers/Documents/ICTMappingFinalReport.pdf.
64. Educational Testing Services [ETS] (2007). Digital transformation: a framework for ICT literacy. Princeton: ETS.
65. Eng, T.S. (2005). The impact of ICT on learning: a review of research. International Education Journal, 6(5), 635-650.
66. Ericsson, K. A., & Kintsch, W. (1995). Long-term working memory. Psychological Review, 102(2), 211-245.
67. Eshach, H. (2007). Bridging in-school and out-of-school learning: Formal, non-formal, and informal education. Journal of Science Education and Technology, 16(2), 171-190.
68. Eshet-Alkalai, Y. (2004). Digital Literacy: a conceptual framework for survival in the digital era. Journal of Multimedia and Hypermedia, 13(1), 93-106.
69. E-Skills UK (2009).Technology counts: IT and Telecoms insights 2008. Retrieved May, 12, 2011 from http://www.nwua.ac.uk/HLSP/docs/eskillsUK_TechnologyCounts.pdf.
70. Fensham. P.J. (1985). Science for all: A reflective essay. Journal of Curriculum Studies, 17(4), 415-435.
71. Fensham, P. J. (2004). Engagement with science: An international issue that goes beyond knowledge. Paper presented at the Science and Mathematics Education Conference (SMEC) Conference, Dublin. Retrieved July 24, 2011 from www.dcu.ie/smec/plenary/Fensham,%20Peter.pdf.
72. Finkelhor, D. Mitchell, K. & Wolak, J. (2000). Online victimization: A report on the nation's youth. National Center for Missing and Exploited Children Bulletin, Alexandria, VA. :US Department of Justice, Washington, DC.
73. Finn, M. & Vandenham, N. (2004). The handheld classroom: Educational implications of mobile computing. Australian Journal of Emerging Technologies and Society, 2(1), 1-15.
74. Fischer, G. & Scharff, E. (1998). Learning technologies in support of selfdirected learning. Journal of Interactive Media in Education, 98(4). Retrieved May 3, 2011 from http://jime.open.ac.uk/article/1998-4/27.
75. Fluck, A. E. (2008). M-Learning Landscapes: e-Learning for ubiquitous school science education. Australian Educational Computing, 23(1), 24-32.
76. Fortuna, C., Henderson, S., McLuckie, J., Rodrigues, S., Syme-Smith, L., Taylor, N. & Williamson, G. (2010) in S. Rodrigues (Ed.), Multiple Literacy and Science Education: ICTs in Formal and Informal Learning Environments (pp. 1-10). Hershey, PA: IGI Global Publishing.
77. Freebody, P. & Luke, A. (1990). Literacies programs: Debates and demands in cultural context. Prospect: Australian Journal of TESOL, 5(7), 7-16.
78. Freeman, J., Lessiter, J., & Ijsselsteijn, W.(2001). An introduction to presence: A sense of being there in a mediated environment. The Psychologist, 14(4), 190-194.
79. Gardner, H. (1983). Frames of mind: The theory of multiple intelligences. New York: Basic Books.
80. Gardner, H. (1999). Intelligence reframed: Multiple intelligences for the 21st century. New York: Basic Books.
81. Garrison, D. R. (1992). Critical thinking and self directed learning in adult education: An analysis of responsibility and control issues. Adult Education Quarterly, 42(3), 136-148.
82. Goodrum, D., Hackling, M. & Rennie, L. (2001). The status and quality of teaching and learning of science in Australian schools. Canberra:Department of Education, Training and Youth Affairs.
83. Grant, L., Daanen, H. & Rudd, T. (2007). Mobile, collaborative and locationbased learning: a case study of the MobiMissions prototype. UK:FutureLab.
84. Green, R. E., Krause, J, Ptak, S. E., Briggs, A. W., Ronan, M. T., Simons, J. F., et al. (2006). Analysis of one million base pairs of Neanderthal DNA. Nature. 16, 330-336. Retrieved July 24, 2011 from http://www.nature.com/nature/journal/v444/n7117/abs/nature05336.html.
85. Hague, C. & Payton, S. (2010). Digital literacy across the curriculum. UK:Futurelab.
86. Hammond, L.D., & Brandsford, J. (2005). Preparing teachers for a changing world. San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass Wiley.
87. Hanewald, R. (2008). Confronting the Pedagogical Challenge of Cyber Safety. Australian Journal of Teacher Education, 33(3), 1-16.
88. Hartnell-Young, E. & Heym, N. (2008). How mobile phones help learning in secondary schools. University of Nottingham, UK: Learning Sciences Research Institute.
89. Hazen, R. (2002). Why Should You Be Scientifically Literate? Retrieved April 30, 2011 from http://www.actionbioscience.org/newfrontiers/hazen.html.
90. Helsper, E. & Eynon, R. (2010). Digital natives: where is the evidence? British Educational Research Journal, 36(3), 503-520.
91. Hew, K.F., & Brush, T. (2007). Integrating technology into K-12 teaching and learning: Current knowledge gaps and recommendations for future research. Educational Technology Research and Development, 55(3), 223-252.
92. Higgins, S. (2003). Does ICT improve learning and teaching in schools? A professional user review of UK research. UK: British Educational Research Association.
93. Hodson, D. (2008). Towards scientific literacy: A teachers' guide to the history, philosophy and sociology of science. Rotterdam, Netherlands:Sense Publishers.
94. Hoffman, J.L., Wu, H.K., Krajcik, J.S. & Soloway, E. (2003). The nature of middle schools learners' science content understandings with the use of on-line resources. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 40(3), 323-346.
95. Hogarth, S., Bennett, J., Lubben, F., Campbell, B. & Robinson, A. (2006) ICT in science teaching. Technical Report. In: Research Evidence in Education Library. London: EPPI-Centre, Social Science Research Unit, Institute of Education, University of London.
96. Honeyman, B. (1998). Non-formal and formal learning interactions: New directions for scientificic and technological literacy. Connect, 23(1), 1-2.
97. Horton, W. (2000). Designing web-based training. New York: Wiley & Sons.
98. Hurd, P. D. (1958). Science literacy: Its meaning for American schools. Educational Leadership, 16(1), 13-16.
99. Ito, M., Horst, H., Bittanti, M., Boyd, D., Herr-Stephenson, B., Lange, P. G., Pascoe, C. J., Robinson, L., Baumer, S., Cody, R., Mahendran, D., Martínez, K., Perkel, D., Sims, C. & Tripp, L. (2008). Living and Learning with New Media: Summary of Findings from the Digital Youth Project. Retrieved July 20, 2011 from http://digitalyouth.ischool.berkeley.edu/files/report/digitalyouth-WhitePaper.pdf.
100. Jones, L. (1980). Great expectations: America and the baby boom generation. New York: Coward, McCann & Geoghegan.
101. Jones, M. G., Falvo, M.R., Taylor, A.R. & Broadwell, B.P. (2007). Nanoscale Science: Activities for Grades 6-12. US: NSTA Press.
102. Kane, S. (not dated). Baby boomers. Retrieved May 12, 2011 from http://legalcareers.about.com/od/practicetips/a/Babyboomers.htm.
103. Kaplan, A. M. & Haenlein, M. (2010). Users of the world, unite! The challenges and opportunities of Social Media. Business Horizons, 53(1), 59-68.
104. Karsenti, T., Brodeur, M., Deaudelin, C., Larose, F. & Tardif, M. (2002). Integrating ICTs in teacher tr@ining: a challenging balance. Paper presented at the Pan-Canadian Education Research Agenda Symposium:Information Technology and Learning, Montreal, Quebec. Retrieved July 2, 2011 from http://www.cesc.ca/pceradocs/2002/papers/TKarsenti_TEN.pdf.
105. Kellner, D. (2004). Technological Transformation, Multiple Literacies, and the Re-visioning of Education. E-Learning, 1(1), 9-37.
106. Kennedy, G., Judd, T.S., Churchward, A., Gray, K. & Krause, K. (2008). First year students' experiences with technology: Are they really digital natives? Australian Journal of Educational Technology, 24(1), 108-122.
107. Keogh, K. (2011). Using mobile phones for teaching, learning and assessing Irish in Ireland: Processes, Benefits and Challenges. In W. Ng (Ed.), Mobile technologies and handheld devices for ubiquitous learning:Research and pedagogy (pp. 236-258). Hershey, PA: IGI Global Publishing.
108. Klopfer, E, Squire, K & Jenkins, H (2002). Environmental detectives: PDAs as a window into a virtual simulated world. Proceedings of IEEE International Workshop on Wireless and Mobile Technologies in Education (pp. 95-98). Vaxjo, Sweden: IEEE Computer Society.
109. Knain, E. (2006). Achieving science literacy through transformation of multimodal textual resources. Sci Ed, 90(4), 656-659.
110. Koballa, T., Kemp, A. & Evans. R. (1997). The spectrum of scientific literacy. Science Teacher, 64(7), 27-31.
111. Kozma, R. B. (2003). Global perspectives: innovative technology integration practices from around the world. Learning & Leading with Technology, 31(2), 6-9, 52-54.
112. Lankshear, C. & Knobel, M. (1998). Critical literacy and new technologies. Paper presented at the American Education Research Association annual conference, San Diego. Retrieved May 12, 2011 from http://everydayliteracies.net/critlitnewtechs.html.
113. Lankshear, C. & Knobel, M. (2003). New Literacies: Changing Knowledge and ClassroomPractice. Buckingham, UK: Open University Press.
114. Laugksch, R. (2000). Scientific literacy: A conceptual overview. Science Education, 84(1), 71-94.
115. Lave, J., & Wenger, E. (1990). Situated Learning: Legitimate Periperal Participation. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
116. Lee, J. J. & Hsu, Y. (2002). Web navigation: The role of metaphor, concept map and individual differences. In P. Barker and S. Rebelsky, (Eds.), Proceedings of ED-MEDIA, 2001 World Conference on Educational Multimedia, Hypermedia & Telecommunications (pp. 1000-1001). Denver, USA. Norfolk, VA: Association for the Advancement of Computing in Education.
117. Leu, Jr.,D. J. (2002). The new literacies: Research on reading instruction with the Internet and other digital technologies. In J. Samuels and A. E. Farstrup (Eds.), What research has to say about reading instruction (pp. 310- 336). Newark, DE: International Reading Association.
118. Leu, Jr., D.J., Kinzer, C.K., Coiro, J., & Cammack, D.W. (2004). Toward a Theory of New Literacies Emerging From the Internet and Other Information and Communication Technologies. In R.B. Ruddell & N.J. Unrau (Eds.), Theoretical Models and Processes of Reading (pp. 1570-1613). Newark, DE: International Reading Association.
119. Lombard, M., & Ditton, T. (1997). At the heart of it all: The concept of presence. Journal of Computer-Mediated Communication, 3(2), Retrieved May 12, 2011 from http://jcmc.indiana.edu/vol3/issue2/lombard.html.
120. Luke, A. (2000). Critical literacy in Australia: A matter of context and standpoint. Journal of adolescent and adult literacy, 43(5), 448-461.
121. Lyons, T. (2006). The puzzle of falling enrolments in physics and chemistry courses: Putting some pieces together. Research in Science Education, 36(3), 285-311.
122. McMahon, M., & Pospisil, R. (2005). Laptops for a digital lifestyle: Millennial students and wireless mobile technologies. In H. Goss (Ed.), ASCILITE 2005 Balance, Fidelity, Mobility: maintaining the momentum? Proceedings of the 22nd annual conference of the Australasian Society for Computers in Learning in Tertiary Education (Vol. 2, pp. 421-431). Brisbane: ASCILITE.
123. Markauskaite, L. (2006). Towards an integrated analytical framework of information and communications technology literacy: From intended to implemented and achieved dimensions. Information Research, 11(3), 252-280.
124. Martin, A. (2005). DigEuLit - a European Framework for Digital Literacy: a Progress Report. Journal of eLiteracy, 2, 130-136.
125. Martin, A., & Grudziecki, J. (2006). DigEuLit: Concepts and tools for digital literacy development. Retrieved April 30, 2011 from:http://www.ics.heacademy.ac.uk/italics/vol5iss4/martin-grudziecki.pdf.
126. Matthews, C. M. (2007). Science,engineering, and mathematics education:Status and issues. US: Congressional Research Services. Retrieved July 20, 2011 from http://www.fas.org/sgp/crs/misc/98-871.pdf.
127. Matthews, K. E., Adams, P., & Gannaway, D. (2009). The impact of social learning spaces on student engagement. Paper presented at the 12th annual Pacific Rim First Year in Higher Education conference, Townsville, Qld, June 2009. Retrieved July 20, 2011, from http://www.fyhe.qut.edu.au/past_papers/papers09/content/pdf/3A.pdf.
128. Matthews, K. E., Andrews, V. & Adams, P. (2011). Social learning spaces and student engagement. Higher Education Research and Development, 30(2), 105-120.
129. Mayer, R. E. & Sims, V. K. (1994). For whom is a picture worth a thousand words? Extensions of a dual-coding theory of multimedia learning. Journal of Educational Psychology, 86(3), 389-401.
130. Mayer, R. E. (1997). Multimedia learning: Are we asking the right questions? Educational Psychologist, 32(1), 1-19.
131. McKenzie, J. (1998). Grazing the Net: Raising a generation of free-range students. Phi Delta Kappan, 79 (September), 26-31.
132. Meiers, M. (2009). The use of ICTs in schools in the digital age: what does the research say? NSWIT Digest, 2009(1). Retrieved May 5, 2011 from http://www.nswteachers. nsw.edu.au.
133. Millar, R. (1996). Towards a science curriculum for public understanding. School Science Review, 77(280), 7-18.
134. Miller, G.A. (1956). The magical number seven plus or minus two: some limits on our capacity for processing information. Psychological Review, 63(2), 81-97.
135. Miller, J. D. (1983). Scientific literacy: A conceptual and empirical review. Daedalus, 112(2), 29-48.
136. Mishra, P. & Koehler, M.J., (2006). Technological pedagogical content knowledge: A framework for teacher knowledge. Teachers College Record, 108(6), 1017-1054.
137. Mistler-Jackson, M & Songer, N.B. (2000). Student motivation and Internet technology: Are students empowered to learn science? Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 37(5), 459-479.
138. Moreno, R., & Mayer, R. E. (2000). A learner-centered approach to multimedia explanations: Deriving instructional design principles from cognitive theory. Interactive Multimedia Electronic Journal of Computer Enhanced Learning. Retrieved March 22, 2011, from http://imej.wfu.edu/articles/2000/2/05/index.asp.
139. Mulhearn, G. & Hill, S. (2007). Children of the New Millennium: Research and Professional Learning in Practice. Journal of Australian Research in Early Childhood Education, 14(1), 57-66.
140. Murray, C. (2011). Imagine mobile learning in your pocket. In W. Ng (Ed), Mobile technologies and handheld devices for ubiquitous learning:Research and pedagogy, pp. 209-236. Hershey, PA: IGI Global Publishing.
141. National Research Council (NRC) (1996). National Science Education Standards. Washington, DC: National Academy Press.
142. National Science Board, (1983). Educating American for the 21st century. Washington, D.C.: U.S. Government Printing Office.
143. National Science Teachers Association (NSTA). (1982). Science-technologysociety:Science education for the 1980s (NSTA Position Statement). Washington, DC: National Science Teachers Association.
144. National Science Teachers Association (NSTA), (1990-91). The NSTA position statement on science-technology-society (STS). In NSTA handbook (pp. 47-48). Arlington, VA: NSTA Press.
145. Nbina, J.B. & Obomanu, B.J. (2010). The Meaning of Scientific Literacy: A Model of Relevance in Science Education. Academic Leadership: The Online Journal, 8(4). Retrieved May 3, 2011 from http://www.academicleadership.org/pdf/ALJ_ISSN1533-7812_8_4_863.pdf.
146. Nelson, S. A. (2010). Weathering and clay minerals. Retrieved June 28, 2011 from http://www.tulane.edu/950sanelson/eens211/weathering&clayminerals.htm.
147. New London Group. (1996). A pedagogy of multiliteracies: Designing social futures. Harvard Educational Review, 66(1), 60-92.
148. Ng, W. (2006). Web-based technologies, technology literacy and learning in Tan, L.W.H. and Subramaniam, R. (Eds.), Handbook of Research on Literacy in Technology at the K1-2 Level (pp. 94-117). Hershey, PA: Idea Group Publishers.
149. Ng, W. (2008). Self-directed learning with web-based sites: How well do students' perceptions and thinking match with their teachers? Teaching Science, 54(2), 26-30.
150. Ng, W. (2009). Nanoscience and nanotechnology for the middle years. Teaching Science, 55(2), 16-24.
151. Ng, W. (2010). Empowering students to be scientifically literate through digital literacy in Rodrigues, S. (Ed.), Multiple Literacy and Science Education: ICTs in Formal and Informal Learning Environments (pp. 11-31). Hershey, USA: IGI Global Publishing.
152. Ng, W. and Gunstone, R. (2002) Students' perceptions of the effectiveness of the World Wide Web as a research and teaching tool in science learning. Research in Science Education, 32(4), 489-510.
153. Ng, W. & Gunstone, R. (2003) Science and Computer-based Technologies in Victorian Government Schools: Attitudes of Secondary Science Teachers. Journal of Research in Science and Technology Education, 21(2), 243-264.
154. Ng, W. & Nicholas, H. (2007). Ubiquitous learning with handhelds in schools. In Norman, A. & Pearce, J. (Eds.), Proceedings of the 6th International Conference on Mobile Learning, Melbourne, Australia, pp. 186-193.
155. Ng, W. & Nicholas, H. (2009). Introduction of pocket PC in schools: attitudes and beliefs in the first year. Computers and Education, 52(2), 470-480.
156. Ng, W. & Anastopoulou, S. (2011). Formal and informal use of handhelds by Australian and British students: A comparative case studies in W. Ng (Ed.), Mobile Technologies and Handheld Devices for Ubiquitous Learning: Research and Pedagogy (pp. 279-298). Hershey, PA: IGI Global Publishing.
157. Ng, W. & Nicholas, H. (2011). Insights into students' thinking with handheld computers in W. Ng (Ed.), Mobile technologies and handheld devices for ubiquitous learning: Research and pedagogy (pp. 79-98). Hershey, PA:IGI Global Publishing.
158. Ng, W., Nicholas, H., Loke, S. & Torabi, T. (2010). Designing effective pedagogical systems for teaching and learning with mobile and ubiquitous devices in Goh, T. T. (Ed.), Multiplatform E-Learning Systems and Technologies: Mobile Devices for Ubiquitous ICT-Based Education (pp. 42-56). Hershey, PA: IGI Global Publishing.
159. Nicholas, H. (2011). Ubiquitous computing does not guarantee ubiquitous learning in schools: The case of handheld computers in W. Ng (Ed.), Mobile technologies and handheld devices for ubiquitous learning:Research and pedagogy (pp. 30-44). Hershey, PA: IGI Global Publishing.
160. Nicholas, H. & Ng, W. (2009). Ubiquitous learning and handhelds: An overview of theory and pedagogy. In Rogers, P., Berg, G., Boettcher, J., Howard, C, Justice, L. & Schenk, K. (Eds.), Encyclopedia for online and distance learning, Volume IV (pp. 2171-2176). Hershey, PA: IGI Global Publishers.
161. Nixon, H., Atkinson, S. & Beavis, C. (2006). New media pathways:Navigating the links between home, school and the workplace in Tan, L.W.H. and Subramaniam, R. (Eds.), Handbook of Research on Literacy in Technology at the K1-2 Level (pp. 118-136). Hershey, PA: Idea Group Publishing.
162. Norris, S. & Phillips, L. (2003). How literacy in its fundamental sense is central to scientific literacy. Science Education, 87(2), 224-240.
163. Novak, J. D. & Cañas, A. J. (2008). The Theory Underlying Concept Maps and How to Construct and Use Them, Technical Report IHMC CmapTools 2006-01 Rev 01-2008, Florida: Florida Institute for Human and Machine Cognition. Retrieved July, 22, 2011 from http://cmap.ihmc.us/Publications/ResearchPapers/TheoryUnderlyingConceptMaps.pdf.
164. Nuthall, G. (1999). The way students learn: Acquiring knowledge from an integrated science and social studies unit. Elementary School Journal, 99(4), 303-341.
165. Oblinger, D. G. (2003). Boomers & gen-Xers, millennials: Understanding the "new students". EDUCAUSE Review, 38(4), 37-47.
166. OECD. (2003). The PISA 2003 Assessment Framework - Mathematics, Reading, Science and Problem Solving Knowledge and Skills. Paris:OECD.
167. Oliver, R. & Tomei, L. (2000). Information and communications technology literacy: getting serious about IT. Proceedings of ED-MEDIA 2000. World Conference on Educational Multimedia, Hypermedia and Telecommunications, Virginia. Retrieved May 12, 2011, from http://elrond.scam.ecu.edu.au/oliver/2000/emict.pdf.
168. Paivio, A (1986). Mental representations: a dual coding approach. Oxford. England: Oxford University Press.
169. Palm Inc. (2002). Palm Education Pioneers Program Final Evaluation Report. Retrieved March 21, 2011 from http://www.palmgrants.sri.com/PEP_Final_Report.pdf.
170. Papert, S. (1980). Mindstorms. New York: Basic Books.
171. Papert, S. (1993). The children's machine: Rethinking school in the age of the computer. New York: Basic Books.
172. Parliament of Victoria, Education and Training Committee. (2006). Inquiry into the Promotion of Mathematics and Science Education: Final report. Victoria: Victorian Government Printer.
173. Paul, P.V. (2006). New Literacies, Multiple Literacies, Unlimited Literacies:What Now, What Next, Where to? A Response to Blue Listerine, Parochialism and ASL Literacy. Journal of Deaf Studies and Deaf Education, 11(3), 382-7.
174. Pedretti, E., Mayer-Smith, J. & Woodrow, J. (1998). Technology, text and talk: Students' learning in a technology enhanced secondary science classroom. Science Education, 82(5), 569-589.
175. Pella, M. O., O'Hearn, G. T., & Gale, C. G. (1966). Referents to scientific literacy. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 4, 199-208.
176. Perry, D. (2003). Handheld computers (PDAs) in schools. Coventry: BETCA.
177. Piacciano, A. (2001). Distance learning. New Jersey: Merrill, Prentice Hall.
178. Piaget, J. (1955). The construction of reality in the child. London: Routledge & Keegan Paul.
179. Piaget, J. (1972). Psychology and epistemology: Towards a theory of knowledge. London: Penguin University Books.
180. Pittard, V., Bannister, P. & Dunn, J. (2003). The Big pICTure: The Impact of ICT onAttainment, Motivation and Learning. UK: DfES Publications.
181. Prain, V., & Waldrip, B. (2006). An exploratory study of teachers' and students' use of multimodal representation of concepts in primary science. International Journal of Science Education, 28(15), 1843-1866.
182. Prain, V., & Waldrip, B. (2010). Representing science literacies: An introduction. Research in Science Education, 40(1), 1-3.
183. Prensky, M. (2001). Digital Natives, Digital Immigrants. On the Horizon, 9(5). Retrieved May 12, 2011 from http://www.marcprensky.com/writing/prensky%20%20digital%20natives,%20digital%20immigrants%20-%20part1.pdf.
184. Punie, Y., Zinnbauer, D. & Cabrera, M. (2006). A review of the impact of ICT on Learning. Luxembourg: Office for Official Publications of the European Communities.
185. Raizen, S., Sellwood, P., Todd, R., & Vickers, M. (1995). Technology education in the classroom. San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass Publishers.
186. Raja, D., Bowman, D., Lucas, J., & North, C. (2004). Exploring the Benefits of Immersion in Abstract Information Visualization. Proceedings of the 8th International Immersive Projection Technology Workshop, Iowa State, IA.
187. Ramey-Gassert, Linda, Walberg III, H.J., & Walberg, H.J. (1994). Reexamining connections: Museums as science learning environments. Science Education, 78(4), 345-363.
188. Read, T. (2000). Kormilda Science Project - Part 2. Labtalk, 44(3), 22-27.
189. Reader, J. (1988). Missing Links. London: Penguin Books.
190. Reimann, P. and Goodyear, P. (2004). ICT and Pedagogy Stimulus Paper, version 3.3. Retrieved April 15, 2011 from http://lrnlab.edfac.usyd.edu.au:8200/Research/mceetya2004/report/Archive/ExFile.2004-06-15.8659319410/attach/rep33.doc.
191. Reinking, D. (1998). Synthesizing technological transformations of literacy in a post-typographicworld. In D. Reinking, M.C. McKenna, L.D. Labbo, & R.D. Kieffer (Eds.), Handbook of literacy and technology:Transformations in a post-typographic world (pp. xi-xxx). Mahwah, NJ:Erlbaum.
192. Rennie, L. J. & Williams, G.F. (2002). Science Centers and Scientific Literacy: Promoting a Relationship with science. Science Education, 86(5), 706-26.
193. Roblyer, M.D., & Doering, A.H. (2010). Integrating educational technology into teaching. (5th ed.). Boston: Allen and Bacon/Pearson.
194. Rogers, A. (1997). Learning: Can we change the discourse? Adults learning, 8(5), 116-117.
195. Rogers, A. (2005). Non-formal education: flexible schooling or participatory education? Hong Kong Comparative Education Research Centre: Kluwer Academic Pub.
196. Romeo, G.I. (2006). Engage, empower, enable: Developing a shared vision for technology in education in D. Hung & M.S. Khine (Eds.), Engaged learning with emerging technologies (pp 149-176). Dordrecht: Springer.
197. Russell, T. & McGuigan, L. (2001). Promoting understanding through representational redescription: an illustration referring to young pupils' ideas about gravity. In D. Psillos, P. Kariotoglou, V. Tselfes, G. Bisdikian, G. Fassoulopoulos, E. Hatzikraniotis, & E. Kallery (Eds.), Science education research in the knowledge-based society. Proceedings of the Third International Conference of the ESERA (pp. 600-602). Thessaloniki, Greece: Aristotle University of Thessaloniki.
198. Sagan, C. (1997).The demon-haunted world: science as a candle in the dark. New York: Ballantine Books.
199. Sargant, N. (1991). Learning and 'Leisure': A study of adult participation in learning and its policy implica tions. Leicester: National Institute of Adult Continuing Education.
200. Schreiner, C. & Sjøberg, S. (2004). Sowing the seeds of ROSE: Background, Rationale, Questionnaire Development and Data Collection for ROSE (The Relevance of Science Education) - a comparative study of students' views of science and science education. Dept. of Teacher Education and School Development, University of Oslo, Oslo. Retrieved July 20, 2011 from http://www.ils.uio.no/english/rose/publications/english-pub.html.
201. Shamos, M. H. (1995). The myth of scientific literacy. New Brunswick, NJ:Rutgers University Press.
202. Shepard, S. (2004). Managing the millennials. Retrieved July 24, 2010, from http://www.shepardcomm.com/managing-millennials-wp.pdf.
203. Shen, S.P. (1975). Science literacy and the public understanding of science. In S.B. Day (Ed.), Communication of Scientific Information (pp 44-52). Karger: Basel.
204. Shih, J.L., Chuang, C. W. & Hwang, G. J. (2011). Historic monument education: The impact of a collaborative inquiry-based mobile learning strategy on social relationship development. In W. Ng (Ed.), Mobile technologies and handheld devices for ubiquitous learning: Research and pedagogy (pp. 128-169). Hershey, PA: IGI Global Publishing.
205. Shulman, L.S. (1987). Knowledge and teaching: foundations of the new reform. Harvard Educational Review, 57(1), 1-22.
206. Siemens, G. (2005). Connectivism: a learning theory for the digital age. International journal of instructional technology & distance learning, 2(1), 3-9.
207. Sinitsa, K. (2000). Learning individually: a life-long perspective. Educational Technology & Society, 3(1), 17-23.
208. Smith, E. (2010). Is there a crisis in school science education in the UK? Educational Review, 62(2), 189-202.
209. Smith, M. (1996). Self-direction. The encyclopaedia of informal education. Retrieved June 28, 2011 from http://www.infed.org/biblio/b-selfdr.htm.
210. Smith, P., Mahdavi, J. Carvalho, M. & Tippet, N. (2006). An investigation into cyber bullying, its forms, awareness and impact, and the relationship between age and gender in cyber bullying: A report to the anti-bullying alliance. London. UK: DfE. Retrieved May 12, 2011, from https://www.education.gov.uk/publications/eOrderingDownload/RBX03-06.pdf.
211. Sprague, D., Kopfman, K., & Dorsey, S. (1998). Faculty development in the integration of technology in teacher education courses. Journal of Computing in Teacher Education, 2(14), 24-28.
212. Stewart, K.M. & Hedberg, J.G. (2011). The pedagogy of mobility. In W. Ng (Ed.), Mobile technologies and handheld devices for ubiquitous learning:Research and pedagogy, (pp.258-278). Hershey, PA: IGI Global Publishing.
213. Stocklmayer, S. M., Rennie, L. J. & Gilbert, J. K.(2010). The roles of the formal and informal sectors in the provision of effective science education. Studies in Science Education, 46(1), 1-44.
214. Strategic ICT Advisory Service (2009). Hot topic: ICT in preservice teacher training. Retrieved July 2, 2011 from http://dspace.edna.edu.au/dspace/bitstream/2150/54714/1/SICTAS_HT_pr e-service.pdf.
215. Stylianou D. & Pitta-Pantazi D. (2002). Visualization and high achievement in mathematics: A critical look at successful visualization strategies. In F. Hitt (Ed.), Representations and mathematics visualization (pp. 31- 46).Mexico: Cinvestav-IPN.
216. Sweller, J.(1988). Cognitive load during problem solving: Effects on learning. Cognitive Science, 12(2), 257-285.
217. Sweller, J.(2005). Implications of cognitive load theory for multimedia learning. In R.E. Mayer (Ed.), The Cambridge Handbook of Multimedia Learning (pp. 19-30). New York: Cambridge University Press.
218. Sweller, J. (2009). Cognitive bases of human creativity. Educational Psychology Review, 21(1), 11-19.
219. Sweller, J., van Merrienboer, J.J.G. and Paas, F.G.W.C. (1998). Cognitive architecture and instructional design. Educational Psychology Review, 10(3), 251-295.
220. Tasmanian Department of Education (2009). Critical Literacy. Retrieved May 12, 2011 from http://www.education.tas.gov.au/curriculum/standards/english/english/teachers/critlit.
221. Tebbutt, M. (2000). ICT in science: problems, possibilities... and principles?School Science Review, 81(297), 57-64.
222. The European White Paper on Education and Training, (1995). Retrieved April 12, 2011 from http://europa.eu/documents/comm/white_papers/pdf/com95_590_en.pdf.
223. The Royal Society, (1985). The public understanding of science. London: The Royal Society.
224. Tough, A. M. (1967). Learning without a teacher. A study of tasks and assistance during adult self-teaching projects. Toronto: Ontario Institute for Studies in Education.
225. Town, S. (2000). Wisdom or welfare? The seven pillars model. In S. Corrall & H. Hathaway (Eds.), Seven pillars of wisdom? Good practice in information skills development (pp. 11-21). London: SCONUL.
226. Treder, M. (2004). Jolt to the system: the transformative impact of nanotechnology. Retrieved July 12, 2011 from http://www.cmano.org/Speech%20%20Troy%20%20Mike%20Treder,%20CRN.ppt.
227. Tuman, S. M. (2008). Guiding the design of E-learning programs: managing presentation content to match the cognitive factors of users. In T. B. Scott & J. I. Livingston (Eds.), Leading edge educational technology (pp. 49-75). New York: Nova Science Publishers.
228. Tyner, K. (1998). Literacy in a digital world: Teaching and learning in the age of information. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
229. Tytler, R. (2007). Re-imagining science education: Engaging students in science for Australia's future. Camberwell, Victoria: ACER Press. University of Cambridge (2010). Mobile communications for medicine. Retrieved July 12, 2011 from http://www.cam.ac.uk/research/news/mobilecommunications-for-medicine/Upper Yarra Community House (not dated). Integrating new literacies into classroom practise final report. Retrieved May 12, 2011 from http://www.newliteracies.com.au/file/file/Integrating%20New%20Lits%20Into%20Classroom%20Practice%20Final%20Report.pdf.
230. van't Hooft, M. (2006). Tapping into digital literacy: Handheld computers in the K-12 classroom. In L.W.H. Tan & R. Subramaniam (Eds.), Handbook of Research on Literacy in Technology at the K-12 Level (pp. 287- 307). Hershey, USA: Idea Group Publishing.
231. Vygotsky, L. (1978). Mind in society: The development of higher psychological processes. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
232. Vygotsky, L. S. (1962). Thought and language. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
233. Waldrop, M. M. (2008). Science 2.0 -- Is Open Access Science the Future? Scientific American. Retrieved July 20, 2011 from http://www.scientificamerican.com/article.cfm?id=science-2-point-0.
234. Waldrip, B., Prain, V. & Carolan, J. (2006). Learning junior secondary science through multi-modal representations. Electronic Journal of Science Education, 11(1), 87-107.
235. Wallace, R. (2002). The internet as a site for changing practice: the case of Ms Owens. Research in Science Education, 32(4), 465-487.
236. Wallace, R., Kupperman, J., Krajcik, J. & Soloway, E. (2000). Science on the Web: Students on-line in a sixth grade classroom. Journal of Learning Sciences, 9(1), 75-104.
237. Waycott, J., Jones, A., & Scanlon, E. (2005). PDAs as lifelong learning tools:An activity theory based analysis. Learning, Media and Technology, 30(2), 107-130.
238. Wayne, M. & Cooper, L. (2007). A white paper on Digital inclusion imperatives offer municipalities new social and economic opportunities. Retrieved June 9, 2011 from http://www.digitalaccess.org/pdf/White_Paper.pdf.
239. Webb, M. (2005). Affordances of ICT in science learning: implications for an integrated pedagogy. International Journal of Science Education, 27(6), 705-735.
240. Weiser, M. (1991). The Computer for the Twenty-First Century, Scientific American, September issue, 94-10.
241. Weiser, M., & Brown, J. S. (1996). The coming of age of calm technology. Retrieved August 2, 2011 from http://www.ubiq.com/hypertext/weiser/acmfuture2endnote.htm.
242. Willis, J. & Cifuentes, L (2005). Training teachers to integrate technology into the classroom curriculum: Online versus face-to-face course delivery. Journal of Technology and Teacher Education, 13(1), 43-64.
243. Wolak, J., Mitchell, K., & Finkelhor, D. (2006). Online victimization of youth:five years later. National Center for Missing & Exploited Children bulletin - #07-06-025. Alexandria, VA.
244. Wynne, M. E. & Cooper, W. L. (2007). Power up: The campaign for digital inclusion. Retrieved May 12, 2011 from http://www.digitalaccess.org/pdf/White_Paper.pdf.
245. Yoder, M.B. (1999). A productive and thought-provoking use of the Internet. Learning and Leading with Technology, 26(7), 6-11.
246. Yu, K.C. (2005). Digital Full-Domes: The Future of Virtual Astronomy Education. Planetarian, Journal of the International Planetarium Society, 34(3), 6-11.
247. Zurita, G. and Nussbaum, M. (2004). Computer supported collaborative learning using wirelessly interconnected handheld computers. Computers & Education, 42(3), 289-314.