Tapping into digital literacy: Handheld computers in the K-12 classroom

Handbook of Research on Literacy in Technology at the K-12 Level

Volumn , Issue , 2005, Pages 287-307

  van't Hooft, Mark ^a  

^a KENT STATE UNIVERSITY   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 84895295607     PISSN: None     EISSN: None     Source Type: Book    
DOI: 10.4018/978-1-59140-494-1.ch016     Document Type: Chapter

References (46)

1. Bayus, B. L., Jain, S., & Rao, A. G. (1997). Too little, too late: Introduction timing and new product performance in the personal digital assistant industry. Journal of Marketing Research, 34(1), 50-63.
2. Becker, H., Ravitz, J. L., & Wong, Y. (1999). Teacher and teacher-directed student use of computers and software. Report #3, Teaching, Learning, and Computing: 1998 National Survey. Irvine, CA: Center for Research on Information Technology and Organizations, University of California, Irvine.
3. Cajas, F. (2001). The science/technology interaction: Implications for science literacy. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 38, 715-729.
4. Cole, H., & Stanton, D. (2003). Designing mobile technologies to support co-present collaboration. Personal and Ubiquitous Computing, 7, 365-371.
5. Danesh, A., Inkpen, K., Lau, F., Shu, K., & Booth, K. (2001). GeneyTM: Designing a collaborative activity for the PalmTM handheld computer. Proceedings of CHI, Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems, Seattle, Washington.
6. Doolittle, P. E., & Hicks, D. (2003). Constructivism as a theoretical foundation for the use of technology in social studies. Theory and Research in Social Education, 31, 72-104.
7. Doyle, C. (1992). Outcome measures for information literacy within the national education goals of 1990. Final Report to the National Forum of Information Literacy. Summary of Findings. (Eric Document Reproduction Service, ED 351 033).
8. Fitzpatrick, C. (2000). Navigating a new information landscape. Social Education, 64, 33-34.
9. Fung, P., Hennessy, S., & O'Shea, T. (1998). Pocketbook computing: A paradigm shift? Computers in the Schools, 14, 109-118.
10. Gilster, P. (1992). Digital literacy. New York: Wiley Computer Publishing Co.
11. Hennessy, S. (1997). Portable technologies and graphing investigations: Review of the literature. CALRG Technical Report 175. Milton Keynes, UK: The Open University, Institute of Educational Technology.
12. Hennessy, S. (2000). Graphing investigations using portable (palmtop) technology. Journal of Computer Assisted Learning, 16, 243-258.
13. HPC Factor. (2004). A brief history of Windows CE: The beginning is always a very good place to start. Retrieved October 12, 2004, from http://www.hpcfactor.com/support/windowsce/
14. Inkpen, K. (2001). Designing handheld technologies for kids. Personal Technologies Journal, 3, 81-89. Proceedings of CHI, Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems, Seattle, Washington.
15. International Society for Technology in Education. (1999). National education technology standards. Retrieved May 18, 2004, from http://cnets.iste.org.index.htm
16. Jonassen, D. H. (2000a). Computers as mindtools for schools: Engaging critical thinking. Upper Saddle River, NJ: Merrill.
17. Jonassen, D. H. (2000b). Transforming learning with technology: Beyond modernism and post-modernism or whoever controls the technology creates the reality. Educational Technology, 40(2), 21-25.
18. Langford, L. (1999). Information literacy? Seeking clarification. School Libraries Worldwide, 4(1), 59-72.
19. Mandryk, R. L., Inkpen, K. M., Bilezkjian, M., Klemmer, S. R., & Landay, J. A. (2001). Supporting children's collaboration across handheld computers. Proceedings of CHI, Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems, Seattle, Washington.
20. Marx, R. W., Blumenfeld, P., Krajick, J., Fishman, B., Soloway, E., Geier, R., & Tal, T. (2000). Inquiry based science in the middle grades: Assessment of student learning in the context of systemic reform. Unpublished Manuscript, University of Michigan Center for Learning Technologies in Urban Schools, USA.
21. National Council for the Social Studies. (1994). Expectations of excellence: Curriculum standards for Social Studies. Washington, DC: National Council for the Social Studies.
22. Norris, C., & Soloway, E. (2001, June). Towards realizing the potential of palm-sized computers in K-12. iMP Magazine. Retrieved May 18, 2004, from http://www.cisp.org/imp/june_2001/06_01soloway.htm
23. Norris, C., & Soloway, E. (2004). Envisioning the handheld-centric classroom. Journal of Educational Computing Research, 30(4), 281-294.
24. Ohio Department of Education. (2002). Social studies academic content standards. Columbus, OH: State Board of Education.
25. Rice, M. L., & Wilson, E. K. (1999). How technology aids constructivism in the social studies classroom. The Social Studies, 90, 28-33.
26. Risinger, F. C. (1998). Separating wheat from chaff: Why dirty pictures are not the real dilemma in using the Internet to teach social studies. Social Education, 62, 148-150.
27. Robertson, S. I., Calder, J., Fung, P., Jones, A., O'Shea, T., & Lambrechts, G. (1996). Pupils, teachers, and palmtop computers. Journal of Computer Assisted Learning, 12, 194-204.
28. Roschelle, J. (2003). Unlocking the value of wireless mobile devices. Journal of Computer Assisted Learning, 19, 260-272.
29. Roschelle, J., & Pea, R. (2002). A walk on the WILD side: How wireless handhelds may change computer-supported collaborative learning. International Journal of Cognition and Technology, 1(1), 145-168.
30. Roschelle, J., Penuel, W. R., & Abrahamson, L. (2004). The networked classroom. Educational Leadership, 61(5), 50-53.
31. Ross, E. W. (2000). The promise and perils of e-learning. Theory and Research in Social Education, 28, 482-492.
32. Roth, J. (2002). Patterns of mobile interaction. Personal and Ubiquitous Computing, 6, 282-289.
33. Salomon, G., Perkins, D. N., & Globerson, T. (1991). Partners in cognition: Extending human intelligence with intelligent technologies. Educational Researcher, 20(3), 2-9.
34. Saye, J. W. (1998). Creating time to develop student thinking: Team-teaching with technology. Social Education, 62, 356-362.
35. Sharples, M. (2000a). Disruptive devices: Personal technologies and education. Educational Technology Research Paper Series 11. Birmingham, UK: University of Birmingham.
36. Sharples, M. (2000b). The design of personal mobile technologies for lifelong learning. Computers and Education, 34, 177-193.
37. Soloway, E. (2004, May). Why handhelds? Proceedings of the America's Future Classroom: Advancing Learning with Handhelds Conference. Oklahoma City, Oklahoma.
38. Soloway, E., Norris, C., Blumenfeld, P., Fishman, B., Krajcik, J., & Marx, R. (2001). Log on to education: Handheld devices are ready-at-hand. Communications of the ACM, 44(6), 15-20.
39. Tatar, D., Roschelle, J., Vahey, P., & Penuel, W. R. (2003). Handhelds go to school: Lessons learned. IEEE Computer, 36(9), 30-37.
40. Vahey, P., & Crawford, V. (2002). Palm education pioneers: Final evaluation report. Menlo Park, CA: SRI International.
41. van 't Hooft, M. A. H., & Diáz, S. (2002). Palm education pioneers: Final report. Unpublished report, Kent State University, USA.
42. van 't Hooft, M. A. H., Diáz, S., & Andrews, S. (2003). Byte-sized learning: Handhelds in K-12 classrooms. Learning Technology, 5(2), 37-38.
43. van 't Hooft, M. A. H., Diáz, S., & Swan, K. (2004). Examining the potential of handheld computers: Findings from the Ohio PEP project. Journal of Educational Computing Research, 30(4), 295-311.
44. van 't Hooft, M. A. H., & Kelly, J. (2004). Macro or micro: Teaching fifth-grade economics using handheld computers. Social Education, 68(2), 165-168.
45. st century. Scientific American, 265(3), 94-95, 98-102.
46. Williams, B. (2004). We're getting wired, we're going mobile, what's next? Eugene, OR: ISTE Publications.