Web-based technologies, technology literacy, and learning

Handbook of Research on Literacy in Technology at the K-12 Level

Volumn , Issue , 2005, Pages 94-117

  Ng, Wan ^a  

^a LA TROBE UNIVERSITY   (Australia)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 84895258404     PISSN: None     EISSN: None     Source Type: Book    
DOI: 10.4018/978-1-59140-494-1.ch006     Document Type: Chapter

References (73)

1. Alessi, S. M. (1988). Fidelity in the design of instructional simulations. Journal of Computer Based Instruction, 15(2), 40-47.
2. th International Conference on Computer-Based Learning in Science (vol. 1, pp. 402-413).
3. Australian Bureau of Statistics. (2000). Australia now-A statistical profile, communications and information technology. Real Time: Computers, Change and Schooling. Retrieved May 12, 2004, from http://www.abs.gov.au/Ausstats/abs@.nsf/0/d34a3b2e9ed5bc12ca2569de0028de8f? OpenDocument
4. Barab, S. A., Bowdish, B. E., & Lawless, K. A. (1997). Hypermedia navigation: Profiles of hypermedia users. Educational Technology Research and Development, 45(3), 23-42.
5. Becker, H. J. (1999). Internet use by teachers: Conditions of professional use and teacher-directed student use (Report #1). Irvine, CA: Center for Research on Information Technology and Organizations, University of California, Irvine, and the University of Minnesota. Retrieved April 13, 2004, from http://www.crito.uci.edu/tlc/findings/internet-use/text-tables.pdf
6. Bork, A. (1992). Learning in the twenty-first century: Interactive multimedia technology. In M. Giardina (Ed.), Interactive multimedia learning environments: Human factors and technical considerations on design issues (pp. 2-18). Berlin: Springer-Verlag.
7. Brown, I. (1998). The effect of WWW document structure on students' information retrieval. Journal of Interactive Media in Education, 98(12). Retrieved May 4, 2004, from http://www-jime.open.ac.uk/98/12/brown-98-12-01.html
8. Cañas, A. J., Ford, K. M., Novak, J. D, Hayes, P., Reichherzer, T. R., & Suri, N. (2001). Using concept maps with technology to enhance collaborative learning in Latin America. The Science Teacher, 68, 49-51.
9. Cummings, L. E. (1996). Educational technology-A faculty resistance view. Part II: Challenges of resources, technology and tradition. Educational Technology Review, 5, 18-20.
10. Dodge, B. (1997). Some thoughts about Webquests. Retrieved May 4, 2004, from http://edweb.sdsu.edu/courses/edtec596/about_webquests.html
11. Driver, R., Squires, A., Rushworth, P., & WoodRobinson, V. (1994). Making sense of secondary science: Research into children's ideas. London: Routledge.
12. Dwyer, D. (1994). Apple classrooms of tomorrow: What we've learned. Educational Leadership, 51(7), 4-10.
13. Fensham, P. J, Gunstone, R. F., & White, R. T (1994). Science content and constructivist views of learning and teaching. In P. J. Fensham, R. F. Gunstone, & R. T. White (Eds.), The content of science (pp. 1-8). London: The Falmer Press.
14. Forcheri, P., & Molfino, M.T. (2000). ICT as a tool for learning to learn. In D. M. Watson & T. Downes (Eds.), Communications and networking in education (pp. 175-184). Boston: Kluwer Academic.
15. Fulton, K. (1999). How teachers' beliefs about technology and learning are reflected in their use of technology: Case studies from urban middle schools. Thesis, University of Maryland. Retrieved May 12, 2004, from http://learn.umd.edu/fulton-thesis.html
16. Good, D.G. (1999). Future trends affecting education. Denver, CO: Education Commission of the States. Retrieved April 13, 2004, from http://www.ecs.org/clearinghouse/13/27/1327.htm
17. Hardin, J., & Ziebarth, J. (2000). Digital technology and its impact on education. Retrieved April 14, 2004, from http://www.ed.gov/Technology/Futures/hardin.html
18. Hargrave, C. P., & Kenton, J. M. (2000). Preinstructional simulations: Implications for science classroom teaching. Journal of Computers in Mathematics and Science Teaching, 19(1), 47-58.
19. Hoffman, J. L., Wu, H. K., Krajcik, J. S., & Soloway, E. (2003). The nature of middle schools learners' science content understandings with the use of on-line resources. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 40(3), 323-346.
20. Holmevik, J. R., & Haynes, C. (1998). High wired. On the design, use and theory of educational MOOs. Ann Arbor: University of Michigan Press.
21. Jenkins, J. (1999). Teaching for tomorrow: The changing role of teachers in the connected classroom. EDEN Open Classroom Conference, Balatonfured. Retrieved May 25, 2004, from http://www.dlab.kiev.ua/edl/JENKINS.HTM
22. Johnson, D. (1996). Evaluating the impact of technology: The less simple answer. From Now On, The Educational Technology Journal, 5(5). Retrieved May 20, 2004, from http://www.fno.org/jan96/reply/html
23. Krajcik, J. S., Blumenfeld, P. C., Marx, R. W., & Soloway, E. (1994). A collaborative model for helping middle grade science teachers learn project-based instruction. The Elementary School Journal, 94(5), 483-497.
24. Kromhout, O., & Butzin, S. (1993). Integrating computers into the elementary school curriculum. Journal of Research on Computing in Education, 26(1), 55-69.
25. Lankshear, C., Snyder, I., & Green, B. (2000). Teachers and technoliteraty: Managing literacy, technology and learning in schools. New South Wales: Allen & Unwin.
26. rd ed.). New York: Harper Collins.
27. March, T. (1998). Webquests for learning. Retrieved May 20, 2004, from http://www.ozline.com/webquests/intro.html
28. Matthews, M. R. (1993). Constructivism and science education: Some epistemological problems. Journal of Science Education and Technology, 2(1), 359-370.
29. Matthews, M. R. (Ed.). (1998). Constructivism in science education: A philosophical examination. Dordrecht: Kluwer.
30. McKenzie, J. (1998). Grazing the Net. Phi Delta Kappan, 79(September), 26-31. Retrieved May 20, 2004, from http://www.fno.org/text/grazing.html
31. McKinsey & Company. (1997). The future of information technology in UK schools. London: McMinsey and Company.
32. McKenzie, J. (1999). Scoring high with new information technologies. From Now On, The Educational Technology Journal, 8(7). Retrieved May 20, 2004, from http://www.fno.org/apr99/scoring.html
33. Meredyth, D., Russell, N., Blackwood, L., Thomas, J., & Wise, P. (1999). Real time: Computers, change and schooling. Canberra: Commonwealth Department of Education, Training and Youth Affairs.
34. Mistler-Jackson, M., & Songer, N. B. (2000). Student motivation and Internet technology: Are students empowered to learn science? Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 37(5), 459-479.
35. Naiiar, L. J. (1996). Multimedia information and learning. Journal of Educational Multimedia and Hypermedia, 5(2), 129-150.
36. Nanjappa, A., & Grant, M.M. (2003). Constructing on constructivism: The role of technology. Electronic Journal for the Integration of Technology in Education, 2(1). Retrieved May 25, 2004, from http://ejite.isu.edu/Volume2No1/nanjappa.htm
37. Ng, W. (in press). Web-based resources for learning: A case study of Year 10 students' perceptions of learning concepts of Motion using Java applets. International Journal for Learning, 11.
38. Ng, W., & Gunstone, R. (2002). Students' perceptions of the effectiveness of the World Wide Web as a research and teaching tool in science learning. Research in Science Education, 32(4), 489-510.
39. Ng, W., & Gunstone, R. (2003). Science and computer-based technologies in Victorian government schools: Attitudes of secondary science teachers. Journal of Research in Sci ence and Technology Education, 21(2), 243-264.
40. Ofsted Report. (2001). ICT in schools. Retrieved April 14, 2004, from http://www.ofsted.gov.uk/publications/index.cfm?fuseaction=pubs.displayfile&id=1043&type=pdf
41. Oliver, R., & Tomei, L. (2000). Information and communications technology literacy: Getting serious about IT. Proceedings of ED-MEDIA 2000. World Conference on Educational Multimedia, Hypermedia and Telecommunications, Virginia. Retrieved May 25, 2004, from http://elrond.scam.ecu.edu.au/oliver/2000/emict.pdf
42. Oxbrow, N. (2000, October). Skills and competencies to succeed in a knowledge economy. Information Outlook. Washington, DC: Special Libraries Association. Retrieved April 14, 2004, from http://www.findarticles.com/cf_dls/m0FWE/10_4/66276583/p1/article.jhtml
43. Papert, S. (1980). Mindstorms. New York: Basic Books.
44. Papert, S. (1991). Situating constructionism. In I. Harel & S. Papert (Eds.), Constructionism. Norwood, NJ: Ablex Publishing.
45. Papert, S. (1993). The children's machine: Rethinking school in the age of the computer. New York: Basic Books.
46. Pedretti, E., Mayer-Smith, J., & Woodrow, J. (1998). Technology, text and talk: Students' learning in a technology enhanced secondary science classroom. Science Education, 82, 569-589.
47. Phillips, D. C. (1995). The good, the bad, and the ugly: The many faces of constructivism. Educational Researcher, 24(7), 5-12.
48. Phillips, D. (Ed.). (2000). Constructivism in education: Opinions and second opinions on controversial issues. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
49. Piaget, J. (1955). The construction of reality in the child. London: Routledge & Keegan Paul.
50. Piaget, J. (1972). Psychology and epistemology: Towards a theory of knowledge. London: Penguin University Books.
51. Raizen, S., Sellwood, P., Todd, R., & Vickers, M. (1995). Technology education in the classroom. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.
52. Salomon, G., Perkins, D. N., & Gloerson, T. (1991). Partners in cognition: Extending human intelligence with intellectual technologies. Educational Researcher, 20, 2-9.
53. Semple, A. (2000). Learning theories and their influence on the development and use of educational technologies. Australian Science Teachers' Journal, 46(3), 21-28.
54. Settlage, J. (1995). Children's conceptions of light in the context of a technology-based curriculum. Science Education, 79(5), 535-553.
55. Solomon, J. (1994). The rise and fall of constructivism. Studies in Science Education, 23, 1-19.
56. Stevenson, D. (1997). Information and communications technology in UK schools. An independent inquiry. London: The Independent ICT in Schools Commission. Retrieved May 20, 2004, from http://rubble.ultralab.anglia.ac.uk/stevenson
57. Thomas, M. (1998). Higher-order thinking strategies for the classroom. Retrieved May 20, 2004, from http://members.aol.com/MattT10574/HigherOrderLiteracy.htm
58. Thomas, R., & Hooper, E. (1991). Simulations: An opportunity we are missing. Journal of Research on Computing in Education, 23(4), 497-513.
59. Tebbutt, M. (2000). ICT in science: Problems, possibilities...and principles? School Science Review, 81(297), 57-64.
60. UNESCO Report. (2003). Retrieved May 20, 2004, from http://www.unescobkk.org/education/ict/v2/info.asp?id=11002
61. Van Dusen, L. M., & Worthen, B. R. (1993). Factors that facilitate or impede implementation of integrated learning systems. In G. D. Bailey (Ed.), Computer-based integrated learning systems. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Educational Technology Publications.
62. VCAA (Victorian Curriculum and Assessment Authority). (2002). E-merging: Perspectives on information and communications technology-Teaching and learning in the VCE. Victoria: VCAA.
63. Vidoni, K. L., & Maddux, C. D. (2002). Webquests: Can they be used to improve critical thinking skills in students? Computers in Schools, 19(1-2), 101-117.
64. von Glasersfeld, E. (1995). Radical constructivism: A way of knowing and learning. London: Falmer Press.
65. Vygotsky, L.S. (1962). Thought and language. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
66. Vygotsky, L. (1978). Mind in society: The development of higher psychological processes. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
67. Wallace, R., Kupperman, J., Krajcik, J., & Soloway, E. (2000). Science on the Web: Students on-line in a sixth grade classroom. Journal of Learning Sciences, 9(1), 75-104.
68. Wallace, R. M. (2002). The Internet as a site for changing practice: The case of Ms. Owens. Research in Science Education, 32(4), 465-487.
69. Warschauer, M., & Kern, R. (Eds.). (2000). Network-based language teaching: Concepts and practice. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
70. Weil, L. (2002). Successful strategies: Technology in education. New York: Business Coalition for Education Reform. Retrieved April 14, 2004, fromhttp://www.bcer.org/projres/Technologyineducation3.pdf
71. Weinstein, M. (2000). A framework for critical thinking. High School Magazine, 7(8), 40-43.
72. Wellington, J. (2003). Has ICT in science teaching come of age? School Science Review, 84(309), 39.
73. Yoder, M. B. (1999). A productive and thoughtprovoking use of the Internet. Learning and Leading with Technology, 26(7), 6-11.