Empowering students to be scientifically literate through digital literacy

Multiple Literacy and Science Education: ICTs in Formal and Informal Learning Environments

Volumn , Issue , 2009, Pages 11-31

  Ng, Wan ^a  

^a LA TROBE UNIVERSITY   (Australia)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 84895409186     PISSN: None     EISSN: None     Source Type: Book    
DOI: 10.4018/978-1-61520-690-2.ch002     Document Type: Chapter

References (51)

1. Ainsworth, S. (1999). The functions of multiple representations. Computers & Education, 33, 131-152.doi:10.1016/S0360-1315(99)00029-9
2. American Association for the Advancement of Science. (1993). Science for all Americans: Project 2061. New York: Oxford.
3. Aviram, R., & Eshet-Alkalai, Y. (2006). Towards a theory of digital literacy: Three scenarios for the next steps. European Journal of Open Distance E-Learning. Retrieved December 29, 2008, from http://www.eurodl.org/materials/contrib/2006/Aharon_Aviram.htm
4. BECTA. (2006). Safeguarding children in a digital world: Developing a strategic approach to e-safety. Retrieved January 5, 2009, from http://publica-tions.becta.org.uk/display.cfm?resID=25933
5. Berson, I. R., & Berson, M. J. (2003). Digital literacy for effective citizenship. Social Education, 67(3), 164-167.
6. Conroy, S. (2007). Labor's plan for cyber-safety (fact sheet). Retrieved January 5, 2009, from http://www.alp.org.au/download/now/labors_plan_for_cyber_safety.pdf
7. Dodge, B. (1997). Some thoughts about Web-Quests. Retrieved January 5, 2009, from http://webque.sdsu.edu/about_webquests.html
8. Dwyer, D. (1994). Apple classrooms of tomorrow: What we've learned. Educational Leadership, 51(7), 4-10.
9. Enger, S., & Yager, R. (2001). Assessing student understanding in science: a standards-based K-12 handbook. Thousand Oaks, CA: Corw in Press.
10. Eshet-Alkalai, Y. (2004). Digital literacy: A conceptual framework for survival skills in the digital era. Journal of Educational Multimedia and Hypermedia, 13(1), 93-106.
11. Finkelhor, D., Mitchell, K., & Wolak, J. (2000). Online Victimization: A report on the Nation's Youth. National Center for Missing and Exploited Children Bulletin, Alexandria, VA, US Department of Justice, Washington, DC.
12. Goodrum, D., Hackling, M., & Rennie, L. (2001). The Status and Quality of Teaching and Learning of Science in Australian Schools. Canberra, Australia: Department of Education, Training and Youth Affairs.
13. Hanewald, R. (2008). Confronting the Pedagogical Challenge of Cyber Safety. Australian Journal of Teacher Education, 33(3), 1-16.
14. Hazen, R. (2002). Why Should You Be Scientifically Literate? Retrieved December 29, 2008, from http://www.actionbioscience.org/newfrontiers/hazen.html
15. Hoffman, J. L., Wu, H. K., Krajcik, J. S., & Soloway, E. (2003). The nature of middle schools learners' science content understandings with the use of on-line resources. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 40(3), 323-346. doi:10.1002/tea.10079
16. Lave, J., & Wenger, E. (1991). Situated Learning. Legitimate peripheral participation. Cambridge, UK: University of Cambridge Press.
17. Li, Q. (2004). Cyber-bullying in school: Nature and extent of adolescents' experience. Retrieved January 5, 2009, from http://www.ucalgary.ca/~qinli/publication/cyberbully_aera05%20.html
18. Markauskaite, L. (2006). Towards an integrated analytical framework of information and communications technology literacy: from intended to implemented and achieved dimensions. Information Research, 11(3). Retrieved December 29, 2008, from http://InformationR.net/ir/113/paper252.html
19. Martin, A. (2005). DigEuLit - a European Framework for Digital Literacy: a Progress Report. Journal of eLiteracy, 2, 130-136.
20. McKenzie, J. (1998). Grazing the Net. [from http://www.fno.org/text/grazing.html]. Phi Delta Kappan, 79(September), 26-31. Retrieved January 5, 2009.
21. Mistler-Jackson, M., & Songer, N. B. (2000). Student motivation and Internet technology: Are students empowered to learn science? Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 37(5), 459-479. doi:10.1002/(SICI)1098-2736(200005)37:5<459::AID-TEA5>3.0.CO;2-C
22. National Research Council. (1996). National Science Education Standards. Washington, DC: National Academy Press.
23. New London Group. (1996). A pedagogy of multiliteracies: Designing social futures. Harvard Educational Review, 66(1), 60-92.
24. Ng, W. (2006). Web-based Technologies, Technology Literacy and Learning. In L. W. H. Tan & R. Subramaniam (Eds.), Handbook of Research on Literacy in Technology at the K1-2 Level (pp. 94-117). Hershey, PA: Idea Group Publishing.
25. Ng, W. (2008a). Virtual teamwork: students learning about ethics in an online environment. Journal of Research in Science & Technological Education, 26(1), 13-29.doi:10.1080/02635140701847421
26. Ng, W. (2008b). Self-directed learning with webbased sites: How well do students' perceptions and thinking match with their teachers? Teaching Science, 54(2), 26-30.
27. Ng, W., & Gunstone, R. (2002). Students' perceptions of the effectiveness of the World Wide Web as a research and teaching tool in science learning. Research in Science Education, 32(4), 489-510.m
28. Ng, W., & Gunstone, R. (2003). Science and computer-based technologies in Victorian government schools: Attitudes of secondary science teachers. Journal of Research in Science and Technology Education, 21(2), 243-264.doi:10.1080/0263514032000127266
29. OECD. (2003). The PISA 2003 Assessment Framework - Mathematics, Reading, Science and Problem Solving Knowledge and Skills. Paris: OECD.
30. Oliver, R., & Tomei, L. (2000). Information and communications technology literacy: getting serious about IT. In Proceedings of ED-MEDIA 2000. World Conference on Educational Multimedia, Hypermedia and Telecommunications, VA. Retrieved January 5, 2004, from http://elrond.scam.ecu.edu.au/oliver/2000/emict.pdf
31. Papert, S. (1980). Mindstorms. New York: Basic Books.
32. Papert, S. (1993). The children's machine: Rethinking school in the age of the computer. New York: Basic Books.
33. Pedretti, E., Mayer-Smith, J., & Woodrow, J. (1998). Technology, text and talk: Students' learning in a technology enhanced secondary science classroom. Science Education, 82, 569-589. doi:10.1002/ (SICI)1098-237X(199809)82:5<569::AID-SCE3>3.0.CO;2-7
34. Piaget, J. (1955). The construction of reality in the child. Routledge & Keegan Paul: London.
35. Piaget, J. (1972). Psychology and epistemology: Towards a theory of knowledge. London: Penguin University Books.
36. Pittard, V., Bannister, P., & Dunn, J. (2003). The big pICTure: The impact of ICT on attainment, motivation and learning. Nottinghamshire,UK: DfES publishing Department for Education and Skills. Retrieved January 5, 2009, from http://www.dcsf.gov.uk/research/data/uploadfiles/ThebigpICTure.pdf
37. Prain, V., & Waldrip, B. (2006). An exploratory study of teachers' and students' use of multi-modal representation of concepts in primary science. International Journal of Science Education, 28(15), 1843-1866.doi:10.1080/09500690600718294
38. Raizen, S., Sellwood, P., Todd, R., & Vickers, M. (1995). Technology education in the classroom. San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass Publishers.
39. Russell, T., & McGuigan, L. (2001). Promoting understanding through representational redescription: an illustration referring to young pupils' ideas about gravity. In D. Psillos, P. Kariotoglou, V. Tselfes, G. Bisdikian, G. Fassoulopoulos, E. Hatzikraniotis, & E. Kallery (Eds.), Science education research in the knowledge-based society. Proceedings of the Third International Conference of the ESERA (pp. 600-602). Thessaloniki, Greece: Aristotle University of Thessaloniki.
40. Shen, S. P. (1975). Science Literacy and the Public Understanding of Science. In S. B. Day (Ed.), Communication of Scientific Information (pp. 44-52). Basel, Switzerland: Karger.
41. Smith, P., Mahdavi, J., Carvalho, M., & Tippet, N. (2006). An investigation into cyber bullying, its forms, awareness and impact, and the relationship between age and gender in cyber bullying (A Report to the anti-Bullying Alliance). London. UK. Retrieved January 5, 2009, from http://www.anti-bullyingalliance.org/
42. Treder, M. (2004). Jolt to the system: the transformative impact of nanotechnology. Retrieved December 29, 2008, from http://www.crnano.org/Speech%20%20Troy%20%20Mike%20Treder,%20CRN.ppt
43. Vygotsky, L. (1978). Mind in society: The development of higher psychological processes. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
44. Vygotsky, L. S. (1962). Thought and language. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
45. Waldrip, B., Prain, V., & Carolan, J. (2006). Learning junior secondary science through multi-modal representations. Electronic Journal of Science Education, 11(1), 87-107.
46. Wallace, R., Kupperman, J., Krajcik, J., & Soloway, E. (2000). Science on the Web: Students on-line in a sixth grade classroom. Journal of the Learning Sciences, 9(1), 75-104. doi:10.1207/ s15327809jls0901_5
47. Wallace, R. M. (2002). The Internet as a site for changing practice: the case of Ms Owens. Research in Science Education, 32(4), 465-487. doi:10.1023/A:1022477832695
48. Whittle, P., & Maharjan, D. (2000). Scientific and technological literacy for sustainable development in the 21st Century. In Proceedings to the International symposium BioEd 2000: The challenge of the next century. Paris. Retrieved January 5, 2009, from http://www.iubs.org/cbe/pdf/whittle.pdf
49. Wolak, J., Mitchell, K., & Finkelhor, D. (2006). Online victimization of youth: five years later (National Center for Missing & Exploited Children bulletin - #07-06-025). Alexandria, VA.
50. Wynne, M. E., & Cooper, W. L. (2007). Power up: The campaign for digital inclusion. Retrieved December 28, 2008, from http://www.digitalac-cess.org/pdf/White_Paper.pdf
51. Yoder, M. B. (1999). A productive and thought-provoking use of the Internet. Learning and Leading with Technology, 26(7), 6-11.