Modular peptide binding: From a comparison of natural binders to designed armadillo repeat proteins

Journal of Structural Biology

Volumn 185, Issue 2, 2014, Pages 147-162

  Reichen, Christian ^a   Hansen, Simon ^a   Plückthun, Andreas ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF ZURICH   (Switzerland)

Author keywords

Libraries; Peptide binding; Protein design; Protein engineering; Protein peptide interactions; Proteomics; Repeat proteins

Indexed keywords

LIBRARIES; PEPTIDE BINDING; PROTEIN DESIGN; PROTEIN ENGINEERING; PROTEIN-PEPTIDE INTERACTIONS; PROTEOMICS; REPEAT PROTEINS;

AMINO ACID SEQUENCE; ANIMALS; HUMANS; MOLECULAR SEQUENCE DATA; PEPTIDE FRAGMENTS; PROTEIN BINDING; PROTEIN ENGINEERING; PROTEIN INTERACTION DOMAINS AND MOTIFS; PROTEIN STABILITY; PROTEIN STRUCTURE, SECONDARY; PROTEINS; REPETITIVE SEQUENCES, AMINO ACID;

EID: 84895035916     PISSN: 10478477     EISSN: 10958657     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.jsb.2013.07.012     Document Type: Article

References (192)

1. Aasland R., Abrams C., Ampe C., Ball L.J., Bedford M.T., et al. Normalization of nomenclature for peptide motifs as ligands of modular protein domains. FEBS Lett. 2002, 513:141-144.
2. Adams J., Kelso R., Cooley L. The kelch repeat superfamily of proteins: propellers of cell function. Trends Cell Biol. 2000, 10:17-24.
3. Alfarano P., Varadamsetty G., Ewald C., Parmeggiani F., Pellarin R., et al. Optimization of designed armadillo repeat proteins by molecular dynamics simulations and NMR spectroscopy. Protein Sci. 2012, 21:1298-1314.
4. Almagro J.C. Identification of differences in the specificity-determining residues of antibodies that recognize antigens of different size: implications for the rational design of antibody repertoires. J. Mol. Recognit. 2004, 17:132-143.
5. Andrade M.A., Bork P. HEAT repeats in the Huntington's disease protein. Nat. Genet. 1995, 11:115-116.
6. Andrade M.A., Ponting C.P., Gibson T.J., Bork P. Homology-based method for identification of protein repeats using statistical significance estimates. J. Mol. Biol. 2000, 298:521-537.
7. Andrade M.A., Perez-Iratxeta C., Ponting C.P. Protein repeats: structures, functions, and evolution. J. Struct. Biol. 2001, 134:117-131.
8. Andrade M.A., Petosa C., O'Donoghue S.I., Müller C.W., Bork P. Comparison of ARM and HEAT protein repeats. J. Mol. Biol. 2001, 309:1-18.
9. Ball L.J., Jarchau T., Oschkinat H., Walter U. EVH1 domains: structure, function and interactions. FEBS Lett. 2002, 513:45-52.
10. Ben-Efraim I., Gerace L. Gradient of increasing affinity of importin beta for nucleoporins along the pathway of nuclear import. J. Cell Biol. 2001, 152:411-417.
11. Binz H.K., Amstutz P., Plückthun A. Engineering novel binding proteins from nonimmunoglobulin domains. Nat. Biotechnol. 2005, 23:1257-1268.
12. Blaikie P., Immanuel D., Wu J., Li N., Yajnik V., et al. A region in Shc distinct from the SH2 domain can bind tyrosine-phosphorylated growth factor receptors. J. Biol. Chem. 1994, 269:32031-32034.
13. Boch J., Scholze H., Schornack S., Landgraf A., Hahn S., et al. Breaking the code of DNA binding specificity of TAL-type III effectors. Science 2009, 326:1509-1512.
14. Boersma Y.L., Plückthun A. DARPins and other repeat protein scaffolds: advances in engineering and applications. Curr. Opin. Biotechnol. 2011, 22:849-857.
15. Byeon I.J., Li H., Song H., Gronenborn A.M., Tsai M.D. Sequential phosphorylation and multisite interactions characterize specific target recognition by the FHA domain of Ki67. Nat. Struct. Mol. Biol. 2005, 12:987-993.
16. Caravella J., Lugovskoy A. Design of next-generation protein therapeutics. Curr. Opin. Chem. Biol. 2010, 14:520-528.
17. Catimel B., Teh T., Fontes M.R., Jennings I.G., Jans D.A., et al. Biophysical characterization of interactions involving importin-alpha during nuclear import. J. Biol. Chem. 2001, 276:34189-34198.
18. Modular Protein Domains 2005, Wiley-VCH, Weinheim. G. Cesareni, M. Gimona, M. Sudol, M. Yaffe (Eds.).
19. Chen M.H., Ben-Efraim I., Mitrousis G., Walker-Kopp N., Sims P.J., et al. Phospholipid scramblase 1 contains a nonclassical nuclear localization signal with unique binding site in importin alpha. J. Biol. Chem. 2005, 280:10599-10606.
20. Chen C.K., Chan N.L., Wang A.H. The many blades of the beta-propeller proteins: conserved but versatile. Trends Biochem. Sci. 2011, 36:553-561.
21. Choi H.J., Huber A.H., Weis W.I. Thermodynamics of beta-catenin-ligand interactions: the roles of the N- and C-terminal tails in modulating binding affinity. J. Biol. Chem. 2006, 281:1027-1038.
22. Choi H.J., Gross J.C., Pokutta S., Weis W.I. Interactions of plakoglobin and beta-catenin with desmosomal cadherins: basis of selective exclusion of alpha- and beta-catenin from desmosomes. J. Biol. Chem. 2009, 284:31776-31788.
23. Chook Y.M., Blobel G. Structure of the nuclear transport complex karyopherin-beta2-Ran x GppNHp. Nature 1999, 399:230-237.
24. Christinck E.R., Luscher M.A., Barber B.H., Williams D.B. Peptide binding to class I MHC on living cells and quantitation of complexes required for CTL lysis. Nature 1991, 352:67-70.
25. Cingolani G., Petosa C., Weis K., Müller C.W. Structure of importin-beta bound to the IBB domain of importin-alpha. Nature 1999, 399:221-229.
26. Coates J.C. Armadillo repeat proteins: beyond the animal kingdom. Trends Cell Biol. 2003, 13:463-471.
27. Collins R.E., Northrop J.P., Horton J.R., Lee D.Y., Zhang X., et al. The ankyrin repeats of G9a and GLP histone methyltransferases are mono- and dimethyllysine binding modules. Nat. Struct. Mol. Biol. 2008, 15:245-250.
28. Collis A.V., Brouwer A.P., Martin A.C. Analysis of the antigen combining site: correlations between length and sequence composition of the hypervariable loops and the nature of the antigen. J. Mol. Biol. 2003, 325:337-354.
29. Conti E., Kuriyan J. Crystallographic analysis of the specific yet versatile recognition of distinct nuclear localization signals by karyopherin alpha. Structure 2000, 8:329-338.
30. Conti E., Uy M., Leighton L., Blobel G., Kuriyan J. Crystallographic analysis of the recognition of a nuclear localization signal by the nuclear import factor karyopherin alpha. Cell 1998, 94:193-204.
31. Corper A.L., Stratmann T., Apostolopoulos V., Scott C.A., Garcia K.C., et al. A structural framework for deciphering the link between I-Ag7 and autoimmune diabetes. Science 2000, 288:505-511.
32. Cortajarena A.L., Kajander T., Pan W., Cocco M.J., Regan L. Protein design to understand peptide ligand recognition by tetratricopeptide repeat proteins. Protein Eng. Des. Sel. 2004, 17:399-409.
33. Cortajarena A.L., Yi F., Regan L. Designed TPR modules as novel anticancer agents. ACS Chem. Biol. 2008, 3:161-166.
34. Cortajarena A.L., Wang J., Regan L. Crystal structure of a designed tetratricopeptide repeat module in complex with its peptide ligand. FEBS J. 2010, 277:1058-1066.
35. Cortajarena A.L., Liu T.Y., Hochstrasser M., Regan L. Designed proteins to modulate cellular networks. ACS Chem. Biol. 2010, 5:545-552.
36. Couture J.F., Collazo E., Trievel R.C. Molecular recognition of histone H3 by the WD40 protein WDR5. Nat. Struct. Mol. Biol. 2006, 13:698-703.
37. Cutress M.L., Whitaker H.C., Mills I.G., Stewart M., Neal D.E. Structural basis for the nuclear import of the human androgen receptor. J. Cell Sci. 2008, 121:957-968.
38. Dalby P.A., Hoess R.H., DeGrado W.F. Evolution of binding affinity in a WW domain probed by phage display. Protein Sci. 2000, 9:2366-2376.
39. D'Andrea L.D., Regan L. TPR proteins: the versatile helix. Trends Biochem. Sci. 2003, 28:655-662.
40. Daniels D.L., Weis W.I. ICAT inhibits beta-catenin binding to Tcf/Lef-family transcription factors and the general coactivator p300 using independent structural modules. Mol. Cell 2002, 10:573-584.
41. Deng D., Yan C., Pan X., Mahfouz M., Wang J., et al. Structural basis for sequence-specific recognition of DNA by TAL effectors. Science 2012, 335:720-723.
42. Dias S.M., Wilson K.F., Rojas K.S., Ambrosio A.L., Cerione R.A. The molecular basis for the regulation of the cap-binding complex by the importins. Nat. Struct. Mol. Biol. 2009, 16:930-937.
43. Diella F., Haslam N., Chica C., Budd A., Michael S., et al. Understanding eukaryotic linear motifs and their role in cell signaling and regulation. Front. Biosci. 2008, 13:6580-6603.
44. Doyle D.A., Lee A., Lewis J., Kim E., Sheng M., et al. Crystal structures of a complexed and peptide-free membrane protein-binding domain: molecular basis of peptide recognition by PDZ. Cell 1996, 85:1067-1076.
45. Durocher D., Jackson S.P. The FHA domain. FEBS Lett. 2002, 513:58-66.
46. Durocher D., Taylor I.A., Sarbassova D., Haire L.F., Westcott S.L., et al. The molecular basis of FHA domain:phosphopeptide binding specificity and implications for phospho-dependent signaling mechanisms. Mol. Cell 2000, 6:1169-1182.
47. Eklof Spink K., Fridman S.G., Weis W.I. Molecular mechanisms of beta-catenin recognition by adenomatous polyposis coli revealed by the structure of an APC-beta-catenin complex. EMBO J. 2001, 20:6203-6212.
48. Ernst A., Gfeller D., Kan Z., Seshagiri S., Kim P.M., et al. Coevolution of PDZ domain-ligand interactions analyzed by high-throughput phage display and deep sequencing. Mol. Biosys. 2010, 6:1782-1790.
49. Fahnestock M.L., Johnson J.L., Feldman R.M., Tsomides T.J., Mayer J., et al. Effects of peptide length and composition on binding to an empty class I MHC heterodimer. Biochemistry 1994, 33:8149-8158.
50. Ferrières G., Villard S., Pugniere M., Mani J.C., Navarro-Teulon I., et al. Affinity for the cognate monoclonal antibody of synthetic peptides derived from selection by phage display. Role of sequences flanking thebinding motif. Eur. J. Biochem. 2000, 267:1819-1829.
51. Fontes M.R., Teh T., Kobe B. Structural basis of recognition of monopartite and bipartite nuclear localization sequences by mammalian importin-alpha. J. Mol. Biol. 2000, 297:1183-1194.
52. Fontes M.R., Teh T., Jans D., Brinkworth R.I., Kobe B. Structural basis for the specificity of bipartite nuclear localization sequence binding by importin-alpha. J. Biol. Chem. 2003, 278:27981-27987.
53. Fontes M.R., Teh T., Toth G., John A., Pavo I., et al. Role of flanking sequences and phosphorylation in the recognition of the simian-virus-40 large T-antigen nuclear localization sequences by importin-alpha. Biochem. J. 2003, 375:339-349.
54. Forrer P., Binz H.K., Stumpp M.T., Plückthun A. Consensus design of repeat proteins. ChemBioChem 2004, 5:183-189.
55. Freund C., Kühne R., Yang H., Park S., Reinherz E.L., et al. Dynamic interaction of CD2 with the GYF and the SH3 domain of compartmentalized effector molecules. EMBO J. 2002, 21:5985-5995.
56. Froloff N., Windemuth A., Honig B. On the calculation of binding free energies using continuum methods: application to MHC class I protein-peptide interactions. Protein Sci. 1997, 6:1293-1301.
57. Giesecke A., Stewart M. Novel binding of the mitotic regulator TPX2 (target protein for Xenopus kinesin-like protein 2) to importin-alpha. J. Biol. Chem. 2010, 285:17628-17635.
58. Graham T.A., Weaver C., Mao F., Kimelman D., Xu W. Crystal structure of a beta-catenin/Tcf complex. Cell 2000, 103:885-896.
59. Graham T.A., Ferkey D.M., Mao F., Kimelman D., Xu W. Tcf4 can specifically recognize beta-catenin using alternative conformations. Nat. Struct. Biol. 2001, 8:1048-1052.
60. Graham T.A., Clements W.K., Kimelman D., Xu W. The crystal structure of the beta-catenin/ICAT complex reveals the inhibitory mechanism of ICAT. Mol. Cell 2002, 10:563-571.
61. Grove T.Z., Cortajarena A.L., Regan L. Ligand binding by repeat proteins: natural and designed. Curr. Opin. Struct. Biol. 2008, 18:507-515.
62. Grove T.Z., Hands M., Regan L. Creating novel proteins by combining design and selection. Protein Eng. Des. Sel. 2010, 23:449-455.
63. Ha N.C., Tonozuka T., Stamos J.L., Choi H.J., Weis W.I. Mechanism of phosphorylation-dependent binding of APC to beta-catenin and its role in beta-catenin degradation. Mol. Cell 2004, 15:511-521.
64. Hansen T.H., Connolly J.M., Gould K.G., Fremont D.H. Basic and translational applications of engineered MHC class I proteins. Trends Immunol. 2010, 31:363-369.
65. Harrison S.C. Peptide-surface association: the case of PDZ and PTB domains. Cell 1996, 86:341-343.
66. Hatzfeld M. The armadillo family of structural proteins. Int. Rev. Cytol. 1999, 186:179-224.
67. Hiipakka M., Saksela K. Versatile retargeting of SH3 domain binding by modification of non-conserved loop residues. FEBS Lett. 2007, 581:1735-1741.
68. Hiipakka M., Poikonen K., Saksela K. SH3 domains with high affinity and engineered ligand specificities targeted to HIV-1 Nef. J. Mol. Biol. 1999, 293:1097-1106.
69. Hiipakka M., Huotari P., Manninen A., Renkema G.H., Saksela K. Inhibition of cellular functions of HIV-1 Nef by artificial SH3 domains. Virology 2001, 286:152-159.
70. Hirano H., Matsuura Y. Sensing actin dynamics: structural basis for G-actin-sensitive nuclear import of MAL. Biochem. Biophys. Res. Commun. 2011, 414:373-378.
71. Hodel M.R., Corbett A.H., Hodel A.E. Dissection of a nuclear localization signal. J. Biol. Chem. 2001, 276:1317-1325.
72. Hosse R.J., Rothe A., Power B.E. A new generation of protein display scaffolds for molecular recognition. Protein Sci. 2006, 15:14-27.
73. Huang X., Poy F., Zhang R., Joachimiak A., Sudol M., et al. Structure of a WW domain containing fragment of dystrophin in complex with beta-dystroglycan. Nat. Struct. Biol. 2000, 7:634-638.
74. Huang J., Koide A., Makabe K., Koide S. Design of protein function leaps by directed domain interface evolution. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 2008, 105:6578-6583.
75. Huber A.H., Weis W.I. The structure of the beta-catenin/E-cadherin complex and the molecular basis of diverse ligand recognition by beta-catenin. Cell 2001, 105:391-402.
76. Huber A.H., Nelson W.J., Weis W.I. Three-dimensional structure of the armadillo repeat region of beta-catenin. Cell 1997, 90:871-882.
77. Hübner S., Xiao C.Y., Jans D.A. The protein kinase CK2 site (Ser111/112) enhances recognition of the simian virus 40 large T-antigen nuclear localization sequence by importin. J. Biol. Chem. 1997, 272:17191-17195.
78. Jackrel M.E., Valverde R., Regan L. Redesign of a protein-peptide interaction: characterization and applications. Protein Sci. 2009, 18:762-774.
79. Jackrel M.E., Cortajarena A.L., Liu T.Y., Regan L. Screening libraries to identify proteins with desired binding activities using a split-GFP reassembly assay. ACS Chem. Biol. 2010, 5:553-562.
80. Jaulin-Bastard F., Arsanto J.P., Le Bivic A., Navarro C., Vely F., et al. Interaction between Erbin and a Catenin-related protein in epithelial cells. J. Biol. Chem. 2002, 277:2869-2875.
81. Jennings B.H., Pickles L.M., Wainwright S.M., Roe S.M., Pearl L.H., et al. Molecular recognition of transcriptional repressor motifs by the WD domain of the Groucho/TLE corepressor. Mol. Cell 2006, 22:645-655.
82. Jiang W., Boder E.T. High-throughput engineering and analysis of peptide binding to class II MHC. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 2010, 107:13258-13263.
83. Junqueira D., Cilenti L., Musumeci L., Sedivy J.M., Zervos A.S. Random mutagenesis of PDZ(Omi) domain and selection of mutants that specifically bind the Myc proto-oncogene and induce apoptosis. Oncogene 2003, 22:2772-2781.
84. Kajander T., Cortajarena A.L., Main E.R., Mochrie S.G., Regan L. A new folding paradigm for repeat proteins. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2005, 127:10188-10190.
85. Kajander T., Sachs J.N., Goldman A., Regan L. Electrostatic interactions of Hsp-organizing protein tetratricopeptide domains with Hsp70 and Hsp90: computational analysis and protein engineering. J. Biol. Chem. 2009, 284:25364-25374.
86. Kaneko T., Sidhu S.S., Li S.S. Evolving specificity from variability for protein interaction domains. Trends Biochem. Sci. 2011, 36:183-190.
87. Kay B.K., Williamson M.P., Sudol M. The importance of being proline: the interaction of proline-rich motifs in signaling proteins with their cognate domains. FASEB J. 2000, 14:231-241.
88. Killian B.J., Kravitz J.Y., Somani S., Dasgupta P., Pang Y.P., et al. Configurational entropy in protein-peptide binding: computational study of Tsg101 ubiquitin E2 variant domain with an HIV-derived PTAP nonapeptide. J. Mol. Biol. 2009, 389:315-335.
89. Kippert F., Gerloff D.L. Highly sensitive detection of individual HEAT and ARM repeats with HHpred and COACH. PLoS One 2009, 4:e7148.
90. Klug A. The discovery of zinc fingers and their applications in gene regulation and genome manipulation. Annu. Rev. Biochem. 2010, 79:213-231.
91. Knappik A., Ge L., Honegger A., Pack P., Fischer M., et al. Fully synthetic human combinatorial antibody libraries (HuCAL) based on modular consensus frameworks and CDRs randomized with trinucleotides. J. Mol. Biol. 2000, 296:57-86.
92. Kobe B. Autoinhibition by an internal nuclear localization signal revealed by the crystal structure of mammalian importin alpha. Nat. Struct. Biol. 1999, 6:388-397.
93. Kofler M.M., Freund C. The GYF domain. FEBS J. 2006, 273:245-256.
94. Kosugi S., Hasebe M., Matsumura N., Takashima H., Miyamoto-Sato E., et al. Six classes of nuclear localization signals specific to different binding grooves of importin alpha. J. Biol. Chem. 2009, 284:478-485.
95. Kuriyan J., Cowburn D. Modular peptide recognition domains in eukaryotic signaling. Annu. Rev. Biophys. Biomol. Struct. 1997, 26:259-288.
96. Lam M.H., Briggs L.J., Hu W., Martin T.J., Gillespie M.T., et al. Importin beta recognizes parathyroid hormone-related protein with high affinity and mediates its nuclear import in the absence of importin alpha. J. Biol. Chem. 1999, 274:7391-7398.
97. Lee C.H., Leung B., Lemmon M.A., Zheng J., Cowburn D., et al. A single amino acid in the SH3 domain of Hck determines its high affinity and specificity in binding to HIV-1 Nef protein. EMBO J. 1995, 14:5006-5015.
98. Lee B.J., Cansizoglu A.E., Suel K.E., Louis T.H., Zhang Z., et al. Rules for nuclear localization sequence recognition by karyopherin beta 2. Cell 2006, 126:543-558.
99. Lim W.A., Richards F.M., Fox R.O. Structural determinants of peptide-binding orientation and of sequence specificity in SH3 domains. Nature 1994, 372:375-379.
100. Löfblom J., Frejd F.Y., Ståhl S. Non-immunoglobulin based protein scaffolds. Curr. Opin. Biotechnol. 2011, 22:843-848.
101. London N., Movshovitz-Attias D., Schueler-Furman O. The structural basis of peptide-protein binding strategies. Structure 2010, 18:188-199.
102. Lott K., Bhardwaj A., Mitrousis G., Pante N., Cingolani G. The importin beta binding domain modulates the avidity of importin beta for the nuclear pore complex. J. Biol. Chem. 2010, 285:13769-13780.
103. Lu P.J., Zhou X.Z., Shen M., Lu K.P. Function of WW domains as phosphoserine- or phosphothreonine-binding modules. Science 1999, 283:1325-1328.
104. Luginbühl B., Kanyo Z., Jones R.M., Fletterick R.J., Prusiner S.B., et al. Directed evolution of an anti-prion protein scFv fragment to an affinity of 1 pM and its structural interpretation. J. Mol. Biol. 2006, 363:75-97.
105. MacCallum R.M., Martin A.C., Thornton J.M. Antibody-antigen interactions: contact analysis and binding site topography. J. Mol. Biol. 1996, 262:732-745.
106. Macias M.J., Wiesner S., Sudol M. WW and SH3 domains, two different scaffolds to recognize proline-rich ligands. FEBS Lett. 2002, 513:30-37.
107. Madhurantakam C., Varadamsetty G., Grütter M.G., Plückthun A., Mittl P.R. Structure-based optimization of designed Armadillo-repeat proteins. Protein Sci. 2012, 21:1015-1028.
108. Mahajan A., Yuan C., Lee H., Chen E.S., Wu P.Y., et al. Structure and function of the phosphothreonine- specific FHA domain. Sci. Signal. 2008, 1:re12.
109. Main E.R., Lowe A.R., Mochrie S.G., Jackson S.E., Regan L. A recurring theme in protein engineering: the design, stability and folding of repeat proteins. Curr. Opin. Struct. Biol. 2005, 15:464-471.
110. Mak A.N., Bradley P., Cernadas R.A., Bogdanove A.J., Stoddard B.L. The crystal structure of TAL effector PthXo1 bound to its DNA target. Science 2012, 335:716-719.
111. Malabarba M.G., Milia E., Faretta M., Zamponi R., Pelicci P.G., et al. A repertoire library that allows the selection of synthetic SH2s with altered binding specificities. Oncogene 2001, 20:5186-5194.
112. Marfori M., Mynott A., Ellis J.J., Mehdi A.M., Saunders N.F., et al. Molecular basis for specificity of nuclear import and prediction of nuclear localization. Biochim. Biophys. Acta 2011, 1813:1562-1577.
113. Marfori M., Lonhienne T.G., Forwood J.K., Kobe B. Structural basis of high affinity nuclear localization signal interactions with Importin alpha. Traffic 2012, 13:532-548.
114. Matsuura Y., Stewart M. Nup50/Npap60 function in nuclear protein import complex disassembly and importin recycling. EMBO J. 2005, 24:3681-3689.
115. Mayer B.J. SH3 domains: complexity in moderation. J. Cell Sci. 2001, 114:1253-1263.
116. Mintz C.S., Crea R. Protein Scaffolds. BioProcess International 2013, 11:40-48.
117. Mondon P., Dubreuil O., Bouayadi K., Kharrat H. Human antibody libraries: a race to engineer and explore a larger diversity. Front. Biosci. 2008, 13:1117-1129.
118. Morgan C.S., Holton J.M., Olafson B.D., Bjorkman P.J., Mayo S.L. Circular dichroism determination of class I MHC-peptide equilibrium dissociation constants. Protein Sci. 1997, 6:1771-1773.
119. Munson M., Balasubramanian S., Fleming K.G., Nagi A.D., O'Brien R., et al. What makes a protein a protein? Hydrophobic core designs that specify stability and structural properties. Protein Sci. 1996, 5:1584-1593.
120. Muslin A.J., Tanner J.W., Allen P.M., Shaw A.S. Interaction of 14-3-3 with signaling proteins is mediated by the recognition of phosphoserine. Cell 1996, 84:889-897.
121. Mynott A.V., Harrop S.J., Brown L.J., Breit S.N., Kobe B., et al. Crystal structure of importin-alpha bound to a peptide bearing the nuclear localisation signal from chloride intracellular channel protein 4. FEBS J. 2011, 278:1662-1675.
122. Nash P., Tang X., Orlicky S., Chen Q., Gertler F.B., et al. Multisite phosphorylation of a CDK inhibitor sets a threshold for the onset of DNA replication. Nature 2001, 414:514-521.
123. Neefjes J., Jongsma M.L., Paul P., Bakke O. Towards a systems understanding of MHC class I and MHC class II antigen presentation. Nat. Rev. Immunol. 2011, 11:823-836.
124. Nieto J.L., Rico M., Santoro J., Herranz J., Bermejo F.J. Assignment and conformation of neurotensin in aqueous solution by 1H NMR. Int. J. Pept. Protein Res. 1986, 28:315-323.
125. Nikkhah M., Jawad-Alami Z., Demydchuk M., Ribbons D., Paoli M. Engineering of beta-propeller protein scaffolds by multiple gene duplication and fusion of an idealized WD repeat. Biomol. Eng. 2006, 23:185-194.
126. Nourry C., Grant S.G., Borg J.P. PDZ domain proteins plug and play!. Sci. STKE 2003, re7.
127. Nüsslein-Volhard C., Wieschaus E. Mutations affecting segment number and polarity in Drosophila. Nature 1980, 287:795-801.
128. Obsil T., Obsilova V. Structural basis of 14-3-3 protein functions. Semin. Cell Dev. Biol. 2011, 22:663-672.
129. Oliver A.W., Swift S., Lord C.J., Ashworth A., Pearl L.H. Structural basis for recruitment of BRCA2 by PALB2. EMBO Rep. 2009, 10:990-996.
130. Orlicky S., Tang X., Willems A., Tyers M., Sicheri F. Structural basis for phosphodependent substrate selection and orientation by the SCFCdc4 ubiquitin ligase. Cell 2003, 112:243-256.
131. Panni S., Dente L., Cesareni G. In vitro evolution of recognition specificity mediated by SH3 domains reveals target recognition rules. J. Biol. Chem. 2002, 277:21666-21674.
132. Parmeggiani F., Pellarin R., Larsen A.P., Varadamsetty G., Stumpp M.T., et al. Designed armadillo repeat proteins as general peptide-binding scaffolds: consensus design and computational optimization of the hydrophobic core. J. Mol. Biol. 2008, 376:1282-1304.
133. Pawson T., Nash P. Assembly of cell regulatory systems through protein interaction domains. Science 2003, 300:445-452.
134. Pawson T., Scott J.D. Signaling through scaffold, anchoring, and adaptor proteins. Science 1997, 278:2075-2080.
135. Pennell S., Westcott S., Ortiz-Lombardia M., Patel D., Li J., et al. Structural and functional analysis of phosphothreonine-dependent FHA domain interactions. Structure 2010, 18:1587-1595.
136. Pershad K., Wypisniak K., Kay B.K. Directed evolution of the forkhead-associated domain to generate anti-phosphospecific reagents by phage display. J. Mol. Biol. 2012, 424:88-103.
137. Peterson F.C., Volkman B.F. Diversity of polyproline recognition by EVH1 domains. Front Biosci. 2009, 14:833-846.
138. Petsalaki E., Stark A., Garcia-Urdiales E., Russell R.B. Accurate prediction of peptide binding sites on protein surfaces. PLoS Comput. Biol. 2009, 5:e1000335.
139. Plückthun A., Schaffitzel C., Hanes J., Jermutus L. In vitro selection and evolution of proteins. Adv. Protein Chem. 2000, 55:367-403.
140. Pope M.E., Soste M.V., Eyford B.A., Anderson N.L., Pearson T.W. Anti-peptide antibody screening: selection of high affinity monoclonal reagents by a refined surface plasmon resonance technique. J. Immunol. Meth. 2009, 341:86-96.
141. Posern G., Zheng J., Knudsen B.S., Kardinal C., Müller K.B., et al. Development of highly selective SH3 binding peptides for Crk and CRKL which disrupt Crk-complexes with DOCK180, SoS and C3G. Oncogene 1998, 16:1903-1912.
142. Poy F., Lepourcelet M., Shivdasani R.A., Eck M.J. Structure of a human Tcf4-beta-catenin complex. Nat. Struct. Biol. 2001, 8:1053-1057.
143. Prehoda K.E., Lee D.J., Lim W.A. Structure of the enabled/VASP homology 1 domain-peptide complex: a key component in the spatial control of actin assembly. Cell 1999, 97:471-480.
144. Pumroy R.A., Nardozzi J.D., Hart D.J., Root M.J., Cingolani G. Nucleoporin Nup50 stabilizes closed conformation of armadillo repeat 10 in importin alpha5. J. Biol. Chem. 2012, 287:2022-2031.
145. Reimand J., Hui S., Jain S., Law B., Bader G.D. Domain-mediated protein interaction prediction: From genome to network. FEBS Lett. 2012, 586:2751-2763.
146. Reina J., Lacroix E., Hobson S.D., Fernandez-Ballester G., Rybin V., et al. Computer-aided design of a PDZ domain to recognize new target sequences. Nat. Struct. Biol. 2002, 9:621-627.
147. Riggleman B., Wieschaus E., Schedl P. Molecular analysis of the armadillo locus: uniformly distributed transcripts and a protein with novel internal repeats are associated with a Drosophila segment polarity gene. Genes Dev. 1989, 3:96-113.
148. Rini J.M., Schulze-Gahmen U., Wilson I.A. Structural evidence for induced fit as a mechanism for antibody-antigen recognition. Science 1992, 255:959-965.
149. Rittinger K., Budman J., Xu J., Volinia S., Cantley L.C., et al. Structural analysis of 14-3-3 phosphopeptide complexes identifies a dual role for the nuclear export signal of 14-3-3 in ligand binding. Mol. Cell 1999, 4:153-166.
150. Rudolph M.G., Speir J.A., Brunmark A., Mattsson N., Jackson M.R., et al. The crystal structures of K(bm1) and K(bm8) reveal that subtle changes in the peptide environment impact thermostability and alloreactivity. Immunity 2001, 14:231-242.
151. Rudolph M.G., Heissmann R., Wittmann J.G., Klostermeier D. Crystal structure and nucleotide binding of the Thermus thermophilus RNA helicase Hera N-terminal domain. J. Mol. Biol. 2006, 361:731-743.
152. Sadegh-Nasseri S., Stern L.J., Wiley D.C., Germain R.N. MHC class II function preserved by low-affinity peptide interactions preceding stable binding. Nature 1994, 370:647-650.
153. Sampietro J., Dahlberg C.L., Cho U.S., Hinds T.R., Kimelman D., et al. Crystal structure of a beta-catenin/BCL9/Tcf4 complex. Mol. Cell 2006, 24:293-300.
154. Scheufler C., Brinker A., Bourenkov G., Pegoraro S., Moroder L., et al. Structure of TPR domain-peptide complexes: critical elements in the assembly of the Hsp70-Hsp90 multichaperone machine. Cell 2000, 101:199-210.
155. Schlessinger J., Lemmon M.A. SH2 and PTB domains in tyrosine kinase signaling. Sci. STKE 2003, 2:re12.
156. Schneider S., Buchert M., Georgiev O., Catimel B., Halford M., et al. Mutagenesis and selection of PDZ domains that bind new protein targets. Nat. Biotechnol. 1999, 17:170-175.
157. Shapiro L., Weis W.I. Structure and biochemistry of cadherins and catenins. Cold Spring Harb. Perspect. Biol. 2009, 1:a003053.
158. Smith T.F., Gaitatzes C., Saxena K., Neer E.J. The WD repeat: a common architecture for diverse functions. Trends Biochem. Sci. 1999, 24:181-185.
159. Song J.J., Garlick J.D., Kingston R.E. Structural basis of histone H4 recognition by p55. Genes Dev. 2008, 22:1313-1318.
160. Songyang Z., Fanning A.S., Fu C., Xu J., Marfatia S.M., et al. Recognition of unique carboxyl-terminal motifs by distinct PDZ domains. Science 1997, 275:73-77.
161. Stanfield R.L., Wilson I.A. Protein-peptide interactions. Curr. Opin. Struct. Biol. 1995, 5:103-113.
162. Stiffler M.A., Chen J.R., Grantcharova V.P., Lei Y., Fuchs D., et al. PDZ domain binding selectivity is optimized across the mouse proteome. Science 2007, 317:364-369.
163. Stirnimann C.U., Petsalaki E., Russell R.B., Müller C.W. WD40 proteins propel cellular networks. Trends Biochem. Sci. 2010, 35:565-574.
164. Stoevesandt O., Taussig M.J. Affinity proteomics: the role of specific binding reagents in human proteome analysis. Exp. Rev. Proteomics 2012, 9:401-414.
165. Sun J., Weis W.I. Biochemical and structural characterization of beta-catenin interactions with nonphosphorylated and CK2-phosphorylated Lef-1. J. Mol. Biol. 2011, 405:519-530.
166. Sundberg E.J. Structural basis of antibody-antigen interactions. Meth. Mol. Biol. 2009, 524:23-36.
167. Takeda A.A., de Barros A.C., Chang C.W., Kobe B., Fontes M.R. Structural basis of importin-alpha-mediated nuclear transport for Ku70 and Ku80. J. Mol. Biol. 2011, 412:226-234.
168. Tarendeau F., Boudet J., Guilligay D., Mas P.J., Bougault C.M., et al. Structure and nuclear import function of the C-terminal domain of influenza virus polymerase PB2 subunit. Nat. Struct. Mol. Biol. 2007, 14:229-233.
169. Tewari R., Bailes E., Bunting K.A., Coates J.C. Armadillo-repeat protein functions: questions for little creatures. Trends Cell Biol. 2010, 20:470-481.
170. Teyra J., Sidhu S.S., Kim P.M. Elucidation of the binding preferences of peptide recognition modules: SH3 and PDZ domains. FEBS Lett. 2012, 586:2631-2637.
171. Tonikian R., Zhang Y., Sazinsky S.L., Currell B., Yeh J.H., et al. A specificity map for the PDZ domain family. PLoS Biol. 2008, 6:e239.
172. Tripp K.W., Barrick D. Enhancing the stability and folding rate of a repeat protein through the addition of consensus repeats. J. Mol. Biol. 2007, 365:1187-1200.
173. Uhlik M.T., Temple B., Bencharit S., Kimple A.J., Siderovski D.P., et al. Structural and evolutionary division of phosphotyrosine binding (PTB) domains. J. Mol. Biol. 2005, 345:1-20.
174. Urvoas A., Guellouz A., Valerio-Lepiniec M., Graille M., Durand D., et al. Design, production and molecular structure of a new family of artificial alpha-helicoidal repeat proteins (alphaRep) based on thermostable HEAT-like repeats. J. Mol. Biol. 2010, 404:307-327.
175. Varadamsetty G., Tremmel D., Hansen S., Parmeggiani F., Plückthun A. Designed Armadillo repeat proteins: library generation, characterization and selection of peptide binders with high specificity. J. Mol. Biol. 2012, 424:68-87.
176. Vyas J.M., Van der Veen A.G., Ploegh H.L. The known unknowns of antigen processing and presentation. Nat. Rev. Immunol. 2008, 8:607-618.
177. Waksman G., Shoelson S.E., Pant N., Cowburn D., Kuriyan J. Binding of a high affinity phosphotyrosyl peptide to the Src SH2 domain: crystal structures of the complexed and peptide-free forms. Cell 1993, 72:779-790.
178. Wetzel S.K., Settanni G., Kenig M., Binz H.K., Plückthun A. Folding and unfolding mechanism of highly stable full-consensus ankyrin repeat proteins. J. Mol. Biol. 2008, 376:241-257.
179. Wilson I.A., Ghiara J.B., Stanfield R.L. Structure of anti-peptide antibody complexes. Res. Immunol. 1994, 145:73-78.
180. Wolf G., Trub T., Ottinger E., Groninga L., Lynch A., et al. PTB domains of IRS-1 and Shc have distinct but overlapping binding specificities. J. Biol. Chem. 1995, 270:27407-27410.
181. Xing Y., Clements W.K., Le Trong I., Hinds T.R., Stenkamp R., et al. Crystal structure of a beta-catenin/APC complex reveals a critical role for APC phosphorylation in APC function. Mol. Cell 2004, 15:523-533.
182. Xu W., Kimelman D. Mechanistic insights from structural studies of beta-catenin and its binding partners. J. Cell Sci. 2007, 120:3337-3344.
183. Xu C., Jin J., Bian C., Lam R., Tian R., et al. Sequence- specific recognition of a PxLPxI/L motif by an ankyrin repeat tumbler lock. Sci. Signal. 2012, 5:ra39.
184. Yaffe M.B. Phosphotyrosine-binding domains in signal transduction. Nat. Rev. Mol. Cell Biol. 2002, 3:177-186.
185. Yaffe M.B., Smerdon S.J. The use of in vitro peptide-library screens in the analysis of phosphoserine/threonine-binding domain structure and function. Annu. Rev. Biophys. Biomol. Struct. 2004, 33:225-244.
186. Yaffe M.B., Rittinger K., Volinia S., Caron P.R., Aitken A., et al. The structural basis for 14-3-3:phosphopeptide binding specificity. Cell 1997, 91:961-971.
187. Yaneva R., Schneeweiss C., Zacharias M., Springer S. Peptide binding to MHC class I and II proteins: new avenues from new methods. Mol. Immunol. 2010, 47:649-657.
188. Yang S.N., Takeda A.A., Fontes M.R., Harris J.M., Jans D.A., et al. Probing the specificity of binding to the major nuclear localization sequence-binding site of importin-alpha using oriented peptide library screening. J. Biol. Chem. 2010, 285:19935-19946.
189. Zahnd C., Spinelli S., Luginbühl B., Amstutz P., Cambillau C., et al. Directed in vitro evolution and crystallographic analysis of a peptide-binding single chain antibody fragment (scFv) with low picomolar affinity. J. Biol. Chem. 2004, 279:18870-18877.
190. Zarrinpar A., Bhattacharyya R.P., Lim W.A. The structure and function of proline recognition domains. Sci. STKE 2003, 2:re8.
191. Zeytuni N., Zarivach R. Structural and functional discussion of the tetra-trico-peptide repeat, a protein interaction module. Structure 2012, 20:397-405.
192. Zhou M.M., Huang B., Olejniczak E.T., Meadows R.P., Shuker S.B., et al. Structural basis for IL-4 receptor phosphopeptide recognition by the IRS-1 PTB domain. Nat. Struct. Biol. 1996, 3:388-393.