Political public relations and strategic framing

Political Public Relations: Principles and Applications

Volumn , Issue , 2011, Pages 177-213

  Hallahan, Kirk ^a  

^a Veterinary Dentistry and Oral Surgery   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 84890421092     PISSN: None     EISSN: None     Source Type: Book    
DOI: 10.4324/9780203864173     Document Type: Chapter

References (309)

1. Adams, M., & Coltrane, S. (2007). Framing divorce reform: Media, morality, and the politics of family. Family Process, 46(1), 17–34.
2. Alexander, R. J. (2008). Framing discourse on the environment: A critical discourse approach. New York: Routledge.
3. Amireh, A. (2002). Framing Nawal El Saadaw: Arab feminism in a transnational world. In T. Saliba, C. Allen, & J. A. Howard (Eds.), Gender, politics and Islam (pp. 269–304). Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.
4. Andsager, J. L. (2000). How interest groups attempt to shape public opinion with competing news frames. Journalism & Mass Communication Quarterly, 77(3), 577–592.
5. Baer, K. S. (2005, January/February). Word games. Washington Monthly. Retrieved from http://www.washingtonmonthly.com/features/2005/0501.baer.html.
6. Bai, M. (2005, July 17). The framing wars. New York Times Magazine. Retrieved from http://www.nytimes.com/2005/07/17/magazine/17DEMOCRATS.html?pagewanted=all.
7. Baker, F. W. (2009). Political campaigns and political advertising: A media literacy guide. Westport, CT: Greenwood Press.
8. Bantimaroudis, P. (2007). Media framing of religious minorities in Greece: The case of the Protestants. Journal of Media and Religion, 6(3), 219–235.
9. Baptista, L. C. (2003). Framing and cognition. In J. A. Treveño (Ed.), Goffman’s legacy (pp. 197–215). Lanham, MD: Rowman & Littlefield.
10. Bateson, G. (1972). Steps to an ecology of mind: Collected essays in anthropology, psychology, evolution and epistemology. San Francisco, CA: Chandler.
11. Bauer, M. W., & Gutteling, J. M. (2006). Issue salience and media framing over 30 years. In G. Gaskell & M. W. Bauer (Eds.), Genomics and society: Legal, ethical and social dimensions (pp. 113–130). Sterling, VA: Earthscan.
12. Baumeister, R. F., Bratslavsky, E., Finkenauer, C., & Vohs, K. D. (2001). Bad is stronger than good. Review of General Psychology, 5(4), 323–370.
13. Baysha, O., & Hallahan, K. (2004). Media framing of the Ukrainian political crisis, 2000–2001. Journalism Studies, 5(2), 233–246.
14. Beach, L. R., & Connolly, T. (2005). The psychology of decision making: People in organizations. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
15. Beger, N. J. (2004). Tensions in the struggle for sexual minority rights in Europe: Que(e)rying political practices. Manchester, England: Manchester University Press.
16. Bell, J. S. C. (2006). Framing the AIDS epidemic: From “homo” geneous deviance to widespread panic. In L. Castañeda & S. B. Campbell (Eds.), News and sexuality: Media portraits of diversity (pp. 95–110). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
17. Benford, R. D. (1997). An insider’s critique of the social movement framing perspective. Sociological Inquiry, 67(4), 409–430.
18. Benford, R. D., & Snow, D. A. (2000). Framing processes and social movements: An overview and assessment. Annual Review of Sociology, 26, 11–39.
19. Bennett, C. J. (2008). The privacy advocates: Resisting the spread of surveillance. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
20. Bennett, W. L. (2008). News: The politics of illusion (8th ed.). New York: Longman.
21. Berns, N. (2004). Framing the victim: Domestic violence, media and social problems. Hawthorne, NY: Aldine de Gruyter.
22. Besley, J., & McComas, K. (2005). Framing justice: Using the concept of procedural justice to advance political communication research. Communication Theory, 15(4), 414–436.
23. Best, J. (1987). Images of issues: Typifying contemporary social problems. New York: Aldine de Gruyter.
24. Biocca, F. (1991a). Television and political advertising: Vol. 1. Psychological processes. Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
25. Biocca, F (1991b). Television and political advertising: Vol. 2. Signs, codes and images. Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
26. Bizer, G. Y., Larsen, J. T., & Pettty, R. E. (2011). Exploring the valence-framing effect: Negative framing enhances attitude strength. Political Psychology, 32, 59–80.
27. Bizer, G., & Petty, R. E. (2005). How we conceptualize our attitudes matters: The effects of valence framing on the resistance of political attitudes. Political Psychology, 26(4), 553–568.
28. Bleich, S. (2007). Is it all in a word? The effect of issue framing on public support for U.S. spending on HIV/AIDS in developing countries. Harvard Institute for Global Health, 12(2), 120–132.
29. Boardman, R. (2006). The international politics of bird conservation: Biodiversity, regionalism and global governance. Northampton, MA: Edward Elgar.
30. Bosman, J. (1987). Persuasive effects of political metaphors. Metaphor and Symbol, 2(2), 97–113.
31. Boyles Tucey, C. (2010, April). Face-to-face vs. online deliberation on global warming and stem cell issues. Paper presented to Western Political Science Association, San Francisco.
32. Brader, T. (2005). Striking a responsive chord: How political ads motivate and persuade voters by appealing to emotions. American Journal of Political Science, 49(2), 388–405.
33. Brewer, P. R. (2002). Framing, value words, and citizens’ explanations of their issue opinions. Political Communication, 19(3), 303–316.
34. Brewer, P., & Sigelman, L. (2002). Political scientists as color commentators: Framing and expert commentary in media campaign coverage. Harvard International Journal of Press/Politics, 7(1), 23–35.
35. Broder, J. M. (2009, May 2). Seeking to save the planet, with a thesaurus. New York Times. Retrieved from http://www.nytimes.com/2009/05/02/us/politics/02enviro.html?_r=1&pagewanted=print.
36. Bruno, J., & Greenfield J. (1971). The advance man. New York: Morrow.
37. Brunsma, D., Overfelt, D., & Picou, J. S. (2007). The sociology of Katrina: Perspectives on a modern catastrophe. Lanham, MD: Rowman & Littlefield.
38. Burack, C. (2008). Sin, sex and democracy: Antigay rhetoric and the Christian right. Albany, NY: SUNY Press.
39. Burnett, B. (2008, August 7). Framing the election. Huffington Post. Retrieved from http://www.huffingtonpost.com/bob-burnett/framingtheelection_b_117420.html
40. Butler, J. (2009). Frames of war: When is life grievable? London: Verso.
41. Callaghan, K. (2005). Controversies and new directions in framing research. In K. Callaghan & F. Schnell (Eds.), Framing American politics (pp. 179–214). Pittsburgh, PA: University of Pittsburgh Press.
42. Callaghan, K., & Schnell, F. (2005). Framing political issues in American policies. In K. Callaghan & F. Schnell (Eds.), Framing American politics (pp. 1–20). Pittsburgh, PA: University of Pittsburgh Press.
43. Campbell, N. D. (2007). Framing the “opium problem”: Protoscientific concepts of addiction. In Discovering addiction: The science and politics of substance abuse research (pp. 12–28). Ann Arbor: University of Michigan Press.
44. Cappella, J. N., & Jamieson, K. H. (1997). Spiral of cynicism: The press and the public good. New York: Oxford University Press.
45. Carragee, M., & Roefs, W. (2004). The neglect of power in recent framing research. Journal of Communication, 54(2), 214–233.
46. Chaiken, S., & Maheswaran, D. (1994). Heuristic processing can bias systematic processing: Effects of source credibility, argument ambiguity, and task importance on attitude judgment. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 66(3), 460–473
47. Chitty, N. (2000). A matrix model for framing news media. In A. Malken & A. P. Kavoori (Eds.), The global dynamics of news: Studies in international news coverage and news agenda (pp. 13–30). Stamford, CT: Ablex.
48. Choi, J. (2004). The framing of the “axis of evil.” In R. D. Berenger (Ed.), Global media go to war: The role of news and entertainment media during the 2003 Iraq war (pp. 29–39). Spokane, WA: Marquette Books.
49. Chong, D., & Druckman, J. N. (2007a). Framing theory. Annual Review of Political Science 10, 103–126.
50. Chong, D., & Druckman, J. N. (2007b). A theory of framing and opinion formation in competitive elite environments. Journal of Communication, 57(1), 99–118.
51. Clawson, R. (2008). Legacy and legitimacy: Black Americans and the Supreme Court. Philadelphia, PA: Temple University Press.
52. Coaffee, J. (2003). Terrorism, risk, and the city: The making of a contemporary urban landscape. Aldershot, England: Ashgate.
53. Cobb, R. A., & Elder, C. D. (1972). Participation in American politics: The dynamics of agenda building. Boston, MA: Allyn & Bacon.
54. Conrad, P. (1992). Medicalization and social control. Annual Review of Sociology 18, 209–232.
55. Constantinescu, A. R., & Tedesco, J. C. (2007). Frame convergence between online newspaper coverage and reader discussion posts about three kidnapped Romanian journalists. Journalism Studies, 8(3), 444–464.
56. Coombs, W. T. (2010) Parameters for crisis communications In W. T. Coombs & S. Holladay (Eds.), Handbook of crisis communications (pp. 17–54). Malden, MA: Wiley-Blackwell.
57. Cooper, A. H. (2002). Media framing and social movement mobilization: German peace protest against INF missiles, the Gulf War and NATO peace enforcement in Bosnia. European Journal of Political Research, 41(1), 37–80.
58. Cooper, M. (2005). Thinking of jackasses. The Atlantic, 295(3), 99–103. Retrieved from www.theatlantic.com/magazine/archive/2005/04//thinking-of-jackasses/3838/.
59. Currie, G. (2007). Framing narratives. In D. D. Hutto (Ed.), Narrative and understanding persons (pp. 17–42). New York: Cambridge University Press.
60. D’Angelo, P. (2002). News framing as a multi-paradigmatic research program: A response to Entman. Journal of Communication, 48(4), 100–117.
61. DeChaine, D. R. (2005). Global humanitarianism: NGOs and the crafting of community. Lanham, MD: Lexington Books.
62. Delli Carpini, M. X. (2005). News from somewhere: Journalistic frames and the debate over “public journalism.” In K. Callaghan & F. Schnell (Eds.), Framing American politics (pp. 21–53). Pittsburgh, PA: University of Pittsburgh Press.
63. De Martino, B., Kumaran, D., Seymour, B., & Dolan, R. J. (2006). Frames, biases, and rational decision making in the human brain. Science, 313(5787), 684–687.
64. Dershowitz, A. (1994) The abuse excuse: And other cop-outs, sob stories, and evasions of responsibility. Boston, MA: Little Brown.
65. de Vreese, C. H. (2003). Framing Europe: Television news and European integration. Amsterdam, the Netherlands: Aksant.
66. de Vreese, C. H. (2005a). News narrative and news framing: Constructing political reality. International Journal of Public Opinion Research, 17(3), 380–381.
67. de Vreese, C. H. (2005b). News framing: Theory and typology. Information Design Journal + Document Design, 13(1), 51–62
68. de Vreese, C. H., Peter, J., & Semetko, H. (2001). Framing politics at the launch of the Euro: A cross-national comparative study of frames in the news. Political Communication, 18(2), 107–122.
69. de Vreese, C. H., & Semetko, H. A. (2004). Political campaigning in referendums: Framing the referendum issue. London: Routledge.
70. Dickerson, D. L. (2001). Framing “political correctness” in the New York Times. In S. D. Reese, O. H. Gandy, Jr., & A. E. Grant (Eds.), Framing public life: Perspectives on media and our understanding of the social world (pp. 163–174). Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.
71. Dillard, J. P., & Anderson, J. W. (2004). The role of fear in persuasion. Psychology & Marketing, 21(11), 909–926.
72. Dimitrova, D. V., & Strömbäck, J. (2005). Mission accomplished? Framing of the Iraq War in the elite newspapers in Sweden and the United States. Gazette, 67(5), 399–417.
73. Dixon, D. (2005). Aid workers or evangelists, charity or conspiracy: Framing of missionary activity as a function of international political alliances. Journal of Media & Religion, 4(1), 13–25.
74. Downs, D. (2002). Representing gun owners: Frame identification as social responsibility in news media discourse. Written Communication, 19(1), 44–75.
75. Drake, P., & Higgins, M. (2006). “I’m a celebrity, get me into politics”: The political celebrity and the celebrity politician. In S. Holmes & S. Redmond (Eds.), Framing celebrity: New directions in celebrity culture (pp. 87–100). New York: Routledge.
76. Druckman, J. (2001a). On the limits of framing effects: Who can frame? Journal of Politics, 63(4), 1041–1066.
77. Druckman, J. (2001b). The implications of framing effects for citizen competence. Political Behavior, 23(3), 225–256.
78. Durham, F. (2001). Breaching powerful boundaries: A postmodern critique of framing. In S. D. Reese, O. H. Gandy, Jr., & A. E. Grant (Eds.), Framing public life: Perspectives on media and our understanding of the social world (pp. 123–136). Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.
79. Edelman, M. (1967). The symbolic uses of politics. Urbana: University of Illinois Press.
80. Edelman, M. (1993). Contestable categories and public opinion. Political Communication, 10, 231–242.
81. Edy, J. A., & Meirick, P. C. (2007). Wanted, dead or alive: Media frames, frame adoption and support for the war in Afghanistan. Journal of Communication, 57(1), 119–141.
82. Elliott, C. S., & Hayward, D. M. (1998). The expanding definition of framing and its particular impact on economic experimentation. Journal of Socio-Economics, 27(2), 229–243.
83. Ensink, T., & Sauer, J. (Eds.) (2003). Framing and perspectivising in discourse. Philadelphia, PA: John Benjamins.
84. Entman, R. M. (1993). Framing: Toward a clarification of a fractured paradigm. Journal of Communication, 43(4), 51–58.
85. Entman, R. M. (2003). Cascading activation: Contesting the White House’s frame after 9/11. Political Communication, 20(4), 415–432.
86. Entman, R. M. (2004). Projections of power: Framing news, public opinion, and U.S. foreign policy. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.
87. Entman, R. M., Matthes, J., & Pellicano, L. (2009). Nature, sources and effects of news framing In. K. Wahl-Jorgensen & T. Hanitzsch (Eds.), Handbook of journalism studies (pp. 175–190). New York: Routledge.
88. Esacove, A. W. (2004). Dialogic framing: The framing/counterframing of “partial birth” abortion. Sociological Inquiry, 74(1), 70–101.
89. Fairhurst, G., & Sarr, R. (1996). The art of framing. San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass.
90. Feldman, J. (Ed.). (2007). Framing the debate: Famous presidential speeches and how progressives can use them to change the conversation (and win elections). Brooklyn, NY: Ig.
91. Fernandes, L. (2006). India’s new middle class: Democratic policies in an era of economic reform. Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press.
92. Fiske, S. T., & Taylor, S. E. (1991). Social cognition (2nd ed.). New York: McGraw-Hill.
93. Fredin, E. S. (2001). Frame breaking and creativity: A frame data base for hypermedia news. In S. D. Reese, O. H. Gandy, Jr., & A. E. Grant (Eds.), Framing public life: Perspectives on media and our understanding of the social world (pp. 269–294). Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.
94. Fridkin, K. L., & Kenney, P. J. (2005a). The dimensions of negative messages. American Politics Research, 36(5), 694–723.
95. Fridkin, K., & Kenney, P. J. (2005b). Campaign frames: Can candidates influence media coverage? In K. Callaghan & F. Schnell (Eds.), Framing American politics (pp. 54–75). Pittsburgh, PA: University of Pittsburgh Press.
96. Froehlich, R., & Rüdiger, B. (2006). Framing political public relations: Measuring success of political communication strategies in Germany. Public Relations Review, 32(1), 18–25.
97. Futrell, R. (2003). Framing processes, cognitive liberation and the NIMBY protest in the U.S. chemical-weapons disposal conflict. Sociological Inquiry, 73(3), 359–386.
98. Gabrielson, T. (2005). Obstacles and opportunities: Factors that constrain elective officials’ ability to frame political issues. In K. Callaghan & F. Schnell (Eds.), Framing American politics (pp. 76–102) Pittsburgh, PA: University of Pittsburgh Press.
99. Gamson, W. A. (1996). Media discourse as a framing resource. In A. N. Crigler (Ed.), The psychology of political communication (pp. 111–132). Ann Arbor: University of Michigan Press.
100. Gamson, W. A., Croteau, D., Hoyner, W., & Sasson, T. (1992). Media images and social construction of reality. Annual Review of Sociology, 18, 373–393.
101. Gamson, W. A., & Modigliani, A. (1989). Media discourse and public opinion on nuclear power: A constructionist approach. American Journal of Sociology, 95(3), 1–37.
102. Gevorgyan, G. (2010). Does culture matter? Using accommodation, framing and Hofstede theories to predict Chinese voters’ perceptions and attitudes toward culturally oriented online political advertising. China Media Research, 6(1). Retrieved from http://www.chinamediaresearch.net.
103. Gilliam, F. D., & Iyengar, S. (2005). Super-predators or victims of societal neglect? Framing effects in juvenile crime coverage. In K. Callaghan & F. Schnell (Eds.), Framing American politics (pp. 148–166) Pittsburgh, PA: University of Pittsburgh Press.
104. Gitlin, T. (1980). The whole world is watching. Berkeley: University of California Press.
105. Glenn, J. K., III. (2001). Framing democracy: Civil society and civic movements in Eastern Europe. Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press.
106. Goffman, E. (1974). Frame analysis: An essay on the organization of experience. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
107. Golden, J. L. (2005). Message in a bottle: The making of fetal alcohol syndrome. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
108. Graber, D. A. (1988). Processing the news (2nd ed.). New York: Longman.
109. Grant, J. T., & Rudolph, T. J. (2004). Expression v. equality: The politics of campaign finance reform. Columbus: Ohio State University Press.
110. Green, J. (2005). It isn’t the message, stupid. The Atlantic, 295(4), 45–46. Retrieved from http://www.theatlantic.com/magazine/print/2005/05/it-isn-apos-t-the-message-stupid/3903/
111. Grossman, A. D. (2001). Neither dead or nor red: Civilian defense and American political development during the early Cold War. New York: Routledge.
112. Guiora, A. N. (2008). Fundamentals of counterterrorism. Austin, TX: Wolters Kluwer Law & Business.
113. Gunsch, M. A., Brownlow, S., Haynes, S. E., & Mabe, Z. (2000). Differential forms: Linguistic content of various political advertising. Journal of Broadcasting & Electronic Media, 44(1), 27–42.
114. Hagendoorn, L., & Kantorova, A. (2000). The effects of issues framing on public opinion formation. The trickery of political communication. In N. Schleicher (Ed.), Communication culture in transition (pp. 9–27). Budapest, Hungary: Akadémiai Kiadó.
115. Hale, H. E. (2008). The foundations of ethnic policies: Separatism of states and nations in Eurasia and the world. New York: Cambridge University Press.
116. Hallahan, K. (1999a). Seven models of framing: Implications for public relations. Public Relations Review, 11(3), 205–242.
117. Hallahan, K. (1999b). Content class as a heuristic cue in the processing of news versus advertising. Public Relations Review, 11(4), 293–320.
118. Hallahan, K. (2008). Strategic framing. In W. Donsbach (Ed.), International encyclopedia of communication (Vol. 10, pp. 4855–4860). Malden, MA: Blackwell.
119. Hallahan, K. (2010a). Being public: Publicity as public relations. In R. L. Heath (Ed.), Handbook of public relations (2nd ed., pp. 523–545). Los Angeles, CA: Sage.
120. Hallahan, K. (2010b). Public relations media. In R. L. Heath (Ed.), Handbook of public relations. (2nd ed., pp. 623–641). Los Angeles, CA: Sage.
121. Hammond, P. (2007). Framing post-Cold War conflicts: The media and international intervention. Manchester, England: Manchester University Press.
122. Hänggli, R., & Kriesi. H. (2010). Political framing strategies and their impact on media framing in a Swiss direct-democratic campaign. Political Communication, 27(2), 141–157.
123. Hansen, A. (2000). Claims-making and framing in British newspaper coverage of the “Brent Spar” controversy. In S. Allan, B. Adam, & C. Carter (Eds.), Environmental risk and the media (pp. 55–72). London: Routledge.
124. Hartmann, T. (2007). Cracking the code: How to win hearts, change minds and restore America’s original vision. San Francisco, CA: Berrett-Koehler.
125. Haydarov, R. (2010). Effects of attribute framing and goal framing on vaccinations (Unpublished master’s thesis). Kansas State University, Manhattan.
126. Heidensohn, F. (2000). Sexual politics and social control. Philadelphia, PA: Open University Press.
127. Henderson, J., Coveney, J., Ward, P., & Taylor, A. (2009). Governing child obesity: Framing regulation of fast food advertising in the Australian print media. Social Science & Medicine, 69(9), 1402–1408.
128. Hertog, J. K., & McLeod, D. M. (2001). Multiperspective approach to framing analysis: A field guide. In S. D. Reese, O. H. Gandy, Jr., & A. E. Grant (Eds.), Framing public life: Perspectives on media and our understanding of the social world (pp. 139–162). Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.
129. Hilgartner, S., & Bosk, C. L. (1988). The rise and fall of social problems: A public arenas model. American Journal of Sociology, 94(1), 53.
130. Holbert, R., Tschida, D., Dixon, M., Cherry, K., Steuber, K., & Airne, D. (2005). The West Wing and depictions of the American presidency: Expanding the domains of framing in political communication. Communication Quarterly, 53(4), 505–522.
131. Holmes, S., & Redmond, S. (2006). Framing celebrity: New directions in celebrity culture. New York: Routledge, 2006.
132. Hughes, A. (2003). Defining negative political advertising: Definition, features and tactics. Australian National University (Working paper). Retrieved from http://smib.vuw.ac.nz:8081/WWW/ANZMAC2003/…/ADV21_hughesa.pdf
133. Iyengar, S. (1991). Is anyone responsible? Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.
134. Iyengar, S., & Kinder, D. R. (1987). News that matters: Television and American opinion. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.
135. Jamal, A. (2005). Media politics and democracy in Palestine: Political culture, pluralism and the Palestinian Authority. Portland, OR: Sussex Academic Press.
136. Jasperson, A. E., & Fan, D. P. (2004). The news as molder of campaign ad effects. International Journal of Public Opinion Research, 16(4), 417–436.
137. Jasperson, A. E, Shah, D. V., Watts, M., Faber, R. J., & Fan, D.P. (1998). Framing the public agenda. Media effects on the importance of the federal budget deficit. Political Communication, 15(2), 205–224.
138. Jenness, V. (2006). Social movement growth, domain expansion and framing processes: The gay/lesbian movement and violence against gays and lesbians as a social problem. In D. Schneer & C. Aviv (Eds.), American queer, now and then (pp. 198–209). Boulder, CO: Paradigm.
139. Johnson-Cartee, K. S. (2005). News narratives and news framing: Constructing political reality. Lanham, MD: Rowman & Littlefield.
140. Jones, S. A. (2007). Framing the violence in southern Thailand: Three ways of Malay–Muslim separatism (Unpublished master’s thesis). Ohio University, Athens. Retrieved from http://etd.ohiolink.edu/send-pdf.cgi/Jones%20Sara%20A.pdf?ohiou1179351296
141. Jones, S. L. (2010). Coalition building in the anti-death penalty movement: Privileged morality, race realities. Lanham, MD: Lexington Books.
142. Kahneman, D., & Tversky, A. (1979). Prospect theory: An analysis of decision under risk. Econometrica, 47(2), 263–291.
143. Kelley, H. H. (1967). Attribution social psychology. In D. Lewis (Ed.), Nebraska symposium on motivation (Vol. 14, pp. 192–240). Lincoln: University of Nebraska Press.
144. Kellstedt, P. M. (2003). The mass media and the dynamics of American racial attitudes. New York: Cambridge University Press.
145. Kellstedt, P. M. (2005). Media frames, core values, and the dynamics of racial policy preferences. In K. Callaghan & F. Schnell (Eds.), Framing American politics (pp. 167–178). Pittsburgh, PA: University of Pittsburgh Press.
146. Kendall, D. E. (2005). Framing class: Media representations of wealth and poverty in America. Lanham, MD: Rowman & Littlefield.
147. Kensicki, L. (2001, April). Deaf President Now! Positive media framing of a social movement within a hegemonic political environment. Journal of Communication Inquiry, 25(2), 147–166.
148. Kenski, K. M. (2003). The framing of network news coverage during the first three months of the Clinton–Lewinsky scandal. In R. E. Denton Jr. & R. L. Holloway (Eds.), Images, scandal and communication strategies of the Clinton presidency (pp. 247–270). Westport, CT: Praeger.
149. Kinder, D. R., & Nelson, T. E. (2005). Democratic debate and real opinions. In K. Callaghan & F. Schnell (Eds.), Framing American politics (pp. 103–122). Pittsburgh, PA: University of Pittsburgh Press.
150. King, E. G., & Wells, R. A. (2009). Framing the Iraq War endgame: War’s denouement in an age of terror. New York: Palgrave Macmillan.
151. King, P., & McCombs, M. (1994). The party agendas in the 1992 Taiwan legislative election: A content analysis of the television political party advertisings (TPPA). Asian Journal of Communication, 4(1), 77–98.
152. Kiousis, S. (2008). Priming. In Encyclopedia of political communication. Retrieved from http://0-www.sage-rereference.com/catalog.library.colostate.edu/politicalcommunication/Article_n539.html.
153. Kiousis, S., Kim, S., McDevitt, M., & Ostrowski, A. (2009). Competing for attention: Information subsidy influence in agenda building during election campaigns. Journalism & Mass Communication Quarterly, 86(3), 545–562.
154. Kitzinger, J. (2004). Framing abuse: Media influence and public understanding of sexual violence against children. Ann Arbor, MI: Pluto.
155. Kitzinger, J. (2006). Ultimate neighbour from hell? Stranger danger and the media framing of pedophilia. In C. Critcher (Ed.), Critical readings: Moral panics and the media (pp. 135–147). New York: Open University Press. (Original work published in 1999)
156. Klandermans, B. (1997). The social psychology of protest. Oxford, England: Blackwell.
157. König, T. (2005). Frame analysis: Theoretical preliminaries. Retrieved from http://www.ccsr.ac.uk/methods/publications/frameanalysis/
158. Kosicki, G. (2002). The media priming effect: News media and considerations affecting political judgment. In J. P. Dillard & M. Pfau (Eds.), The persuasion handbook: Developments in theory and practice (pp. 63–81). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
159. Kuypers, J. A. (1997). Presidential crisis rhetoric and the press in the post-Cold War world. Westport, CT: Praeger.
160. Kuypers, J. A. (2002). Press bias and politics: How the media frame controversial issues. Westport, CT: Praeger.
161. Kuypers, J. A. (2006). Bush’s war: Press bias and framing of the war on terror. Lanham, MD: Rowman & Littlefield.
162. Kuypers, J. A. (Ed.). (2009). Rhetorical criticism: Perspectives in action. Lanham, MD: Lexington Press.
163. Lakoff, G. (2002). Moral politics: How liberals and conservatives think. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.
164. Lakoff, G. (2004). Don’t think of an elephant: Know your values and frame the debate: The essential guide for progressives. White River Junction, VT: Chelsea Green.
165. Lakoff, G. (2008). The political mind. New York: Viking Press.
166. Levin, I. P., Schneider, S. L., & Gaeth, G. J. (1998). All frames are not created equal: A typology and critical analysis of framing effects. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 76(2), 149–188.
167. Levy, J. S. (2003). Applications of prospect theory to political science. Synthese, 35(2), 215–241.
168. Lewicki, R. J., Gray, B., & Elliott, M. (Eds.). (2003). Making sense of intractable environmental conflicts: Frames and cases. Washington, DC: Island Press.
169. Lippmann, W. (1961). Public opinion. New York: Macmillan. (Original work published 1922)
170. Loue, S., Lloyd, L. S., & O’Shea, D. (2003). Community health advocacy. New York: Kluwer Academic.
171. Lowney, K. S. (2008). Claims-making, culture and the media in the social construction process. In J. A. Holstein & J. F. Gubrium (Eds.), Handbook of constructionist research (pp. 331–354). New York: Guilford Press.
172. Lowry, D. (2008). Network TV news framing of good vs. bad economic news under democratic and republican presidents: A lexical analysis of political bias. Journalism & Mass Communication Quarterly, 85(3), 483–498.
173. Luntz, F. (2006). New American lexicon [memorandum]. Retrieved from http://www.political-cortex.com/special/Luntz_NAL_Introduction.
174. Luntz, F. (2007). Words that work: It’s not what you say, it’s what people hear. New York: Hyperion.
175. Luther, C., & Zhou, X. (2005). Within the boundaries of politics: News framing of SARS in China and the United States. Journalism & Mass Communication Quarterly, 82(4), 857–872.
176. Luthra, R. (2007). Framing gender in Afghanistan and Iraq: Unveiling the gaze of empire. In A. Sreberny & P. Sonwalkar (Eds.), Media and political violence (pp. 325–340). Cresskill, NJ: Hampton Press.
177. Lytton, T. D. (2008). Holding bishops accountable: How lawsuits helped the Catholic Church confront clergy sexual abuse. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
178. Maher, T. M. (2001). Framing: An emerging paradigm or a phase of agenda setting? In S. D. Reese, O. H. Gandy, Jr., & A. E. Grant (Eds.), Framing public life: Perspectives on media and our understanding of the social world (pp. 83–94). Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.
179. Manheim, J. (1987). A model of agenda dynamics. Communication yearbook 10, 449–516.
180. Mann, C. R., Zatz, M. S., & Rodriguez (Eds.). (2006) Images of color, images of crime (3rd ed.). Los Angeles, CA: Roxbury.
181. Mann, J. (2000). Framing China. In D. A. Graber (Ed.), Media power in politics (4th ed., pp. 44–47). Washington, DC: CQ Press.
182. Martz-Mayfield, M., & Hallahan, K. (2009). Filmmakers as social advocates: A new challenge for issues managers. Public Relations Journal, 3(4), Article 2. Retrieved from http://www.prsa.org/SearchResults/download/6D-030404/0/Filmmakers_as_Social_Advocates_A_New_Challenge_for
183. Matthes, J. (2009a). Framing responsibility for political issues: The preference for dispositional attributions and the effects of news frames. Communication Research Reports, 26(1), 82–86.
184. Matthes, J. (2009b). What’s in a frame? A content analysis of media framing studies in the world’s leading communication journals, 1990–2005. Journalism and Mass Communication Quarterly, 86(2), 349–367.
185. McClure, J., White, J., & Sibley, C. G. (2009). Framing effects on preparation intentions: Distinguishing actions and outcomes. Disaster Prevention and Management, 18(2), 187–199.
186. McCombs, M. (2004). Setting the agenda: The news media and public opinion. Malden, MA: Blackwell.
187. McCombs, M., & Ghanem, S. I. (2001). Convergence of agenda-setting and framing. In S. D. Reese, O. H. Gandy, Jr., & A. E. Grant (Eds.), Framing public life: Perspectives on media and our understanding of the social world (pp. 67–82). Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.
188. McCright, A. M., & Dunlap, R. E. (2000). Challenging global warming as a social problem: An analysis of the conservative movement’s counter-claims. Social Problems, 47(4), 499–522.
189. McDermott, R., Fowler, J. H., & Smirnov, O. (2008). On the evolutionary origin of prospect theory preferences. Journal of Politics, 70(2), 335–350.
190. Mercer, J. (2005). Prospect theory and political science. Annual Review of Political Science 8, 1–21.
191. Miller, C.A. (2006). Framing shared values: Reason and trust in environmental governance. In J. Bauer (Ed.), Forging environmentalism: Justice, livelihood and contested environments (pp. 377–396). Armonk, NY: M. E. Sharpe.
192. Miller, M. M., & Riechert, B. P. (2001). Spiral of opportunity and frame resonance: Mapping the issue cycle in news and public discourse. In S. D. Reese, O. H. Gandy, Jr., & A. E. Grant (Eds.), Framing public life: Perspectives on media and our understanding of the social world (pp. 107–122). Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.
193. Montiel, C., & Shah, A. (2008). Effects of political framing and perceiver’s social position on trait attributions of a terrorist/freedom fighter. Journal of Language & Social Psychology, 27(3), 266–275.
194. Morgan, A. (2008). The price of right: How the conservatives’ agenda has failed America (and always will). New York: Sterling & Ross.
195. Nash, K., & Bell, V. (2007). The politics of framing. Theory, Culture & Society, 24(4), 73–86.
196. Nelson, T. E., Oxley, Z. M., & Clawson, R. A. (1997). Toward a psychology of framing effects. Political Behavior, 19(3), 221–246.
197. Nelson, T. E., & Willey, E. A. (2001). Issues frames that strike a value balance: A political psychology perspective. In S. D. Reese, O. H. Gandy, Jr., & A. E. Grant (Eds.), Framing public life: Perspectives on media and our understanding of the social world (pp. 245–266). Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.
198. Nesbitt-Larking, P. (2007). Politics, society and media. Orchard Park, NY: Broadview Press.
199. Neuman, W. R., Just, M., & Crigler, A. N. (1992). Common knowledge: News and the construction of political meaning. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.
200. Nisbet, M., Brossard, D., & Kroepsch, A. (2003). Framing science: The stem cell controversy in an age of press/politics. Harvard International Journal of Press/Politics, 8(2), 36.
201. Nisbet, M. C., & Huge, M. (2007). Where do science debates come from? Understanding attention cycles and framing. In D. Brossard, J. Shanahan, & T. C. Nesbitt (Eds.), The media, the public and agricultural biotechnology (pp. 193–230). Cambridge, MA: CABI.
202. Norris, P., Kern, M., & Just, M. (Eds.). (2003). Framing terrorism: The news media, the government and the public. New York: Routledge.
203. Opp, K. (2009). Theories of political protest and social movements: A multidisciplinary introduction, critique and synthesis. New York: Routledge.
204. Ott, B., & Aoki, E. (2002). The politics of negotiating public tragedy: Media framing of the Matthew Shepard murder. Rhetoric & Public Affairs, 5(3), 483–505.
205. Pan, Z., & Kosicki, G. (1993). Framing analysis: An approach to news discourse. Political Communication, 10(1), 59–79.
206. Pan, Z., & Kosicki, G. (2001). Framing as a strategic action in public deliberation. In S. D. Reese, O. H. Gandy, Jr., & A. E. Grant (Eds.), Framing public life: Perspectives on media and our understanding of the social world (pp. 35–66). Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.
207. Parmalee, J. H., Perkins, S. C., & Sayre, J. J. (2007). What about people our age? Applying qualitative and quantitative methods to uncover how political ads alienate college students. Journal of Mixed Research Methods, 1(2), 183–199.
208. Parrott, J. B. (2009, August 2). Obama, Gates and Lakoff: The perils of “framing.” American Thinker. Retrieved from http://www.americanthinker.com/2009/08/obama_and_gates_lakoff_theper.html
209. Patton, T. O. (2006). Through whose lens? (Re)framing the race and gender divide in journalism. In B. A. Muse & C. J. Price (Eds.), Emerging issues in contemporary journalism (pp. 243–264). Lewiston, NY: Edwin Mellen Press.
210. Perkins, S. C. (2005). Un-presidented: A qualitative framing analysis of the NAACP’s public relations response to the 2000 presidential election. Public Relations Review, 31(1), 63–71.
211. Petty, R. E., & Cacioppo, J. T. (1986). Communication and persuasion: Central and peripheral routes to attitude change. New York: Springer-Verlag.
212. Piñon, A., & Gambara, H. (2005). A meta-analytic review of framming effect: Risky, attribute and goal framing. Psicothema, 17(2), 325–337.
213. Pintak, L. (2006). Framing the other: Worldview, rhetoric and media dissonance since 9/11. In E. Poole & J. E. Richardson (Eds.), Muslims and the news media (pp. 188–198). New York: I.B. Tauris.
214. Poole, E. (2002). Reporting Islam: Media representations of British Muslims. London: I. B. Tauris.
215. Porto, M. P. (2007). Framing controversies: Television and the 2002 presidential election in Brasil. Political Communication, 24(1), 19–36.
216. Pratto, F., & John, O. P. (1991). Automatic vigilance: The attention-grabbing power of negative social information. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 61(3), 380–391.
217. Price, V., & Tewksbury, D. (1997). News values and public opinion: A theoretical account of media primary and framing. In G. Barnett & F. J. Boster (Eds.), Progress in communication science (pp. 173–212). Greenwich, CT: Ablex.
218. Price, V., Tewksbury, D., & Powers (1997). Switching trains of thought: The impact of news frames on readers’ cognitive responses. Communication Research, 24(5), 481–506.
219. Priest, S. H., & Eyck, T. T. (2004). Peril or promise: News media framing of the biotechnology debate in Europe and the U.S. In N. Sterh (Ed.), Biotechnology: Between commerce and civil society (pp. 175–178). New Brunswick, NJ: Transaction.
220. Rajiva, L. (2005). The language of empire: Abu Ghraib and the American media. New York: Monthly Review Press.
221. Reese, S. D. (2001). Framing public life: A bridging model for media research. In S. D. Reese, O. H. Gandy, Jr., & A. E. Grant (Eds.), Framing public life: Perspectives on media and our understanding of the social world (pp. 7–32). Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.
222. Reese, S. D. (2004). Militarized journalism: Framing dissent in the Gulf Wars. In S. Allan & B. Zellzer (Eds.), Reporting war: Journalism in wartime (pp. 247–265). New York: Routledge.
223. Reese, S. D. (2007). The framing project: A bridging model for media research revisited. Journal of Communication, 57(1), 148–154.
224. Reese, S. D., Gandy, O. H., Jr., & Grant, A. E. (Eds.) (2001). Framing public life: Perspectives on media and our understanding of the social world. Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.
225. Reynolds, A., & Barnett, B. (2003). “America under attack”: CNN’s visual and verbal framing of September 11. In S. Chermak, F. Y. Bailey, & M. Brown (Eds.), Media representations of September 11 (pp. 85–102). Westport, CT: Praeger.
226. Rhodes, J. (2007). Framing the Black Panthers: The spectacular rise of a Black power icon. New York: New Press.
227. Richardson, G. W. (2008). Pulp politics: How political advertising tells the stories of American politics (2nd ed.). Lanham, MD: Rowman & Littlefield.
228. Ries, A., & Trout, J. (1981). Positioning: The battle for your mind. New York: McGraw-Hill.
229. Ritter, S. (2003). Frontier justice: Weapons of mass destruction and the Bushwhacking of America. New York: Context Books.
230. Rohlinger, D. A. (2002). Framing the abortion debate: Organization resources, media strategies and movement-countermovement dynamics. Sociological Quarterly, 43(4), 479–507.
231. Roizen, R. (2004). How does the nation’s “alcohol problem” change from era to era? Stalking the social logic of problem-definition transformation since repeal. In S. W. Tracy & C. J. Acker (Eds.), Altering American consciousness: The history of alcohol and drug use in the United States, 1800–2000 (pp. 61–90). Amherst: University of Massachusetts Press.
232. Roskos-Ewoldsen, D. R., Roskos-Ewoldsen, B., & Dillman Carpentier, R. F. (2002). Media priming: An updated synthesis. In J. Bryant & M. B. Oliver (Eds.), Media effects: Advances in theory and research (3rd ed., pp. 74–93). New York: Routledge.
233. Ross, R. J. S. (2004). Slaves to fashion: Poverty and abuse in the new sweatshops. Ann Arbor, University of Michigan Press.
234. Rove, K. (2010). Courage and consequence: My life as a conservative in the fight. New York: Threshold.
235. Ruiter, R. A. C., Abraham, C., & Kok, G. (2001). Scary warnings and rational precautions: A review of the psychology of fear appeals. Psychology and Health, 16(6), 613–630
236. Ryan, C. (1991). Prime time activism. Boston, MA: South End Press.
237. Ryan, C., & Gamson, W. A. (2006). The art of reframing political debates. Contexts, 5(1), 13–18.
238. Salmon, C. T. (1990, Spring). God understands when the cause is noble. Gannett Center Journal, 4(2), 23–34.
239. Salovey, P., Schneider, T. A., & Apanovitch, A. M. (2002). Message framing and the early prevention and detection of illness. In J. P. Dillard & M. Pfau (Eds.), The persuasion handbook: Developments in theory and practice (pp. 391–406). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
240. Salvatore, A. (2007). The exit from a Westphalian framing of political space and the emergence of a transnational Islamic public. Theory, Culture & Society, 24(4), 45–52.
241. Sarabia-Panol, M. Z. (2007). The 9/11 terrorist attacks on America: Media frames from the Far East. In T. Pludowski (Ed.), How the world’s news media reacted to 9/11: Essays from around the globe (pp. 169–185). Spokane, WA: Marquette Books.
242. Scheneck-Hamlin, W. J., Procter, D. E., & Rumsey, D. J. (2006). The influence of negative advertising frames on political cynicism and politician accountability. Human Communication Research, 26(1), 53–74.
243. Scheufele, B. (2004). Framing-effects approach: A theoretical and methodological critique. Communications. The European Journal of Communication Research, 29(4), 401–428.
244. Scheufele, D. (1999). Framing as a theory of media effects. Journal of Communication, 49(4), 103–122.
245. Scheufele, D. (2000). Agenda-setting, priming, and framing revisited: Another look at cognitive effects of political communication. Mass Communication & Society, 3(2/3), 297–316.
246. Scheufele, D. (2008). Framing effects. In W. Donsbach (Ed.), The international encyclopedia of communication. Malden, MA: Blackwell. doi 10.1111/b.9781405131995.2008.x
247. Schneider, J. W. (1985). Social problems theory: The constructionist view. Annual Review of Sociology 11, 209–229.
248. Schnell, F. D., & Callaghan, K. (2005). Terrorism, media frames and framing effects: A macro-and micro-level analysis. In K. Callaghan & F. Schnell (Eds.), Framing American politics (pp. 123–147). Pittsburgh, PA: University of Pittsburgh Press.
249. Schroedel, J. R. (2000). Is the fetus a person? A comparison of policies across the fifty states. Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press.
250. Segvic, I. (2005). The framing of politics: A content analysis of three Croatian newspapers. Gazette: International Journal for Communication Studies, 67(5), 469–488.
251. Semetko, H., & Valkenburg, P. (2000). Framing European politics: A content analysis of press and television news. Journal of Communication, 50(2), 93–109.
252. Seymour, F. (2008). Framing the millennium ecosystem assessment messages for political resonance. In J. Ranganathan, M. Munasinghe, & F. Irvin (Eds.), Policies for sustainable governance of global ecosystem services (pp. 296–314). Northhampton, MA: Edward Elgar.
253. Shah, D., Domke, D., & Wackman, D. B. (2001). Effects of value-framing on political judgment and reasoning. In S. D. Reese, O. H. Gandy, Jr., & A. E. Grant (Eds.), Framing public life. Perspectives on media and our understanding of the social world (pp. 227–246). Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.
254. Shah, D., Watts, M., Domke, D., & Fan, D. (2002). News frames and cueing of issue regimes: Explaining Clinton’s public approval in spite of scandal. Public Opinion Quarterly, 66(3), 339–370.
255. Shen, E. (2004). Effects of news frames and schemes on individual’s issue interpretation and attitudes. Journalism and Mass Communication Quarterly, 81(2), 400–416.
256. Shen, E., & Edwards, H. H. (2005). Economic individualism, humanitarianism and welfare reform: A value-based account of framing effects. Journal of Communication, 55(4), 795–809.
257. Sherif, M. (1967). Social interaction: Processes and products. Chicago, IL: Aldine.
258. Shoemaker, P. J., & Reese, S. D. (1996). Mediating the message: Theories of influences on mass media content (3rd ed.). New York: Longman.
259. Simon, A. F. (2001). A unified method for analyzing media framing. In R. P. Hart & D. R. Shaw (Eds.), Communication in U.S. elections: New agendas (pp. 75–90). Lanham, MD: Rowman & Littlefield.
260. Simon, A. F., & Xenos, M. (2000). Media framing and effective public deliberation. Political Communication, 17(4), 363–376.
261. Simon, A. F., & Jerit, J. (2007). Toward a theory relating political discourse, media and public opinion. Journal of Communication, 57(1), 254–271.
262. Simpson, D. (2006). The culture of commemoration. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.
263. Sky, T. (2003). To provide for the general welfare: A history of the federal spending power. Newark, DE: University of Delaware Press.
264. Sloan, J. (2006). Learning to think strategically. Boston, MA: Elsevier/Butterworth-Heinemann.
265. Sniderman, P. M., & Theriault, S. M. (2004). The structure of political argument and the logic of issue framing. In W. E. Saris & P. M. Sniderman (Eds.), Studies in public opinion (pp. 133–165). Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
266. Snow, D. A. (2004). Framing processes, ideology and discursive fields. In D. A. Snow, S. A. Soule, & H. Kriesi (Eds.), The Blackwell companion to social movements (pp. 380–412). Malden, MA: Blackwell.
267. Snow, D. A., & Benford, R. D. (1992). Master frames and cycles of protest. In A. D. Morris & C. M. Mueller (Eds.), Frontiers in social movement theory (pp. 133–155). New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.
268. Snow, D. A., Rochford, E. B., Worden, W. K., & Benford, R. D. (1986). Frame alignment processes, micromobilization and movement participation. American Sociological Review, 51(4), 464–481.
269. Soderlund, W. C. (2001). Press framing of the 1965 U.S. intervention in the Dominican Republic: A test of the propaganda model. In W. C. Soderlund (Ed.), Media definitions of Cold War reality: The Caribbean basin, 1953–1992 (pp. 43–58). Toronto: Canadian Scholars’ Press.
270. Spector, M., & Kitsuse, J. I. (1987). Constructing social problems. New York: Aldine de Gruyter.
271. Squires, J. (2000). Gender in political theory. Malden, MA: Blackwell
272. Stanton, R. (2007). Media relations. South Melbourne, Australia: Oxford University Press.
273. Strömbäck, J., & Dimitrova, D. V. (2006). Political and media systems matter. A comparison of election news coverage in Sweden and the United States. Harvard International Journal of Press/Politics, 11(4), 131–147.
274. Strömbäck, J., & Kaid, L. L. (Eds.). (2008). Handbook of election news coverage around the world. New York: Routledge.
275. Strömbäck, J., Mitrook, M. A., & Kiousis, S. (2010). Bridging two schools of thought: Applications of public relations theory to political communication. Journal of Political Marketing, 9(1–2), 73–92.
276. Strömbäck, J., & van Aelst, Peter (2010). Exploring some antecedents of the media’s framing of election news: A comparison of Swedish and Belgian election news. International Journal of Press/Politics, 15(1), 41–59.
277. Swain, C. M. (2002). The new white nationalism in America. New York: Cambridge University Press.
278. Tadlock, B. L., Gordon, C. A., & Popp, E. (2007). Framing the issue of same-sex marriage: Traditional values versus equal rights. In C. A. Riggerman & C. Wilcox (Eds.), The politics of same-sex marriage (pp. 193–214). Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.
279. Tankard, J. W. (2001). The empirical approach to the study of media framing. In S. D. Reese, O. H. Gandy, & A. E. Grant (Eds.), Framing public life: Perspectives on media and our understanding of the social world (pp. 95–106). Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.
280. Tewksbury, D., Jones, J., Peske, M. W., Raymond, A., & Vig W. (2000). The interaction of news and advocate frames: Manipulating audience perceptions of a local public policy issue. Journalism and Mass Communication Quarterly, 77(4), 804–829.
281. Tewksbury, D., & Scheufele, D. A. (2009). News framing theory and research. In J. Bryant & M. B. Oliver (Eds.), Media effects: Advances in theory and research (3rd ed., pp. 17–33). New York: Routledge.
282. Thornburgh, D., & Lin, H. S. (Eds.). (2002). Youth, pornography and the Internet: Report of Committee to Study Tools and Strategies for Protecting Kids from Pornography and Their Applicability to Other Inappropriate Internet Content, Computer Science and Telecommunications Board, National Research Council. Washington, DC: National Academy Press.
283. Thrall, A. T. (2006). The myth of the outside strategy: Mass media news coverage of interest groups. Political Communication, 23(4), 407–420.
284. Tiung, L., & Hasim, M. S. (2009). Media framing of political personality: A case study of a Malaysian politician. European Journal of Social Science, 9(3), 408–424.
285. Trent, J. S., & Friedenberg, R. (2007). Political campaign communication: Principles and practice. Lanham, MD: Rowman & Littlefield.
286. Tuchman, G. (1978). Making news: A study in the construction of social reality. New York: Free Press.
287. Tversky, A., & Kahneman, D. (1981). The framing of decisions and the psychology of choice. Science, 211(4481), 453–458.
288. Valentino, N. A. Beckmann, M. N., & Buhr, T. A. (2001). A spiral of cynicism for some: The contingent effects of campaign news frames on participation and confidence in government. Political Communication, 18(4), 347–367.
289. Van Gorp, B. (2007). The constructionist approach to framing: Bringing culture back in. Journal of Communication, 57(1), 6–78.
290. Vraga E. K., Carr, D. J., Nytes, J. P., & Shah, D. V. (2010). Precision v. realism on the framing continuum: Understanding the underpinnings of message effects. Political Communication, 27(1), 1–19.
291. Wang, S. (2003). Framing piracy: Globalization and film distribution in greater China. Lanham, MD: Rowan & Littlefield.
292. Watkins, M., Edwards, M., & Thakar, U. (2001). Winning the influence game: What every business leader should know about government. New York: Wiley.
293. Weaver, D. H. (2007). Thoughts on agenda setting, framing and priming. Journal of Communication, 57(1), 142–147.
294. Wells, W. D. (1989). Lectures and dramas. In P. Cafferata & A. M. Tybout (Eds.), Cognitive and affective responses to advertising (pp. 13–20). Lexington, MA: Lexington Books.
295. Werder, O., & Golan, G. (2002). Sharon wins: News coverage and framing of the 2001 Israeli prime minister election in ten western print media. Global Media Journal, 1(1). Retrieved from http://lass.calumet.purdue.edu/cca/gmj/fa02/graduatefa02/gmj-fa02-werder-golan.htm
296. Weyland, K. (2002). The politics of market reform in fragile democracies: Argentina, Brazil, Peru and Venezuela. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
297. White, W. L. (2004). Lessons of language: Historical perspectives on the rhetoric of addiction. In S. W. Tracy & C. J. Acker (Eds.), Altering American consciousness: The history of alcohol and drug use in the United States, 1800–2000 (pp. 33–60). Amherst: University of Massachusetts Press.
298. Wicks, R. H. (2001). Understanding audiences: Learning to use the media constructively. Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.
299. Wiggins, E. L. (2001). Frames of conviction: The intersection of social frameworks and standards of appraisal in letters to the editor regarding a lesbian commitment ceremony. In S. D. Reese, O. H. Gandy, Jr., & A. E. Grant (Eds.), Framing public life: Perspectives on media and our understanding of the social world (pp. 207–214). Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.
300. Williams, A. P. (2006). Self-referential and opponent-based framing: Candidate e-mail strategies in campaign 2004. In A. P. Williams & J. C. Tedesco (Eds.), The Internet election: Perspectives on the Web in campaign 2004 (pp. 83–98). Lanham, MD: Rowman & Littlefield.
301. Williams, G. I., & Williams, R. H. (2003). Framing the fathers’ rights movement. In D. R. Loeske & J. Best (Eds.), Social problems: Constructivist readings (pp. 93–100). New York: Aldine de Gruyter.
302. Wong, C. O., & McMurray, N. E. (2002). Framing communication: Communicating the anti-smoking message effectively to all smokers. Journal of Community Psychology, 30(4), 433–447.
303. Yeo, E., Park, K., & Arabi, A. (2007). News framing West Nile virus—An outbreak of a new health hazard. Journal of Humanities & Social Sciences, 1(2). Retrieved from http://www.scientificjournals.org/journals2007/articles/1152.pdf
304. Yoos, G. E. (2007). Reframing rhetoric: A liberal politics without dogma. New York: Palgrave Macmillan.
305. Zelinsky, E. A. (2005, April 1). Do tax expenditures create framing effects? Volunteer firefighters, property tax exemptions and the paradox of tax expenditure analysis. Virginia Tax Review, 24, 797. Retrieved from http://www.allbusiness.com/accounting/3584666-1.html
306. Žeželj, I., Škoić, B., Hristić, D., & Stokić, D. (2007). Valence framing of political preferences and resistance to persuasion. Psihologija, 40(3), 356–385.
307. Zhou, C., & Moy, P. (2007). Parsing framing processes: The interplay between online public opinion and media coverage. Journal of Communication, 57(1), 79–98.
308. Zoch, L. M. (2001). What’s really important here? Media self-coverage in the Susan Smith murder trial. In S. D. Reese, O. H. Gandy, Jr., & A. E. Grant (Eds.), Framing public life: Perspectives on media and our understanding of the social world (pp. 195–206). Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.
309. Zoch, L. M., Collins, E. L. Sisco, H. F., & Supa, D. H. (2008). Empowering the activist: Using framing devices on activist organizations’ web sites. Public Relations Review, 34(4), 351–358.