Framing as a theory of media effects

Journal of Communication

Volumn 49, Issue 1, 1999, Pages 103-122

  Scheufele, Dietram A ^a  

^a NONE

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 0033422567     PISSN: 00219916     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1111/j.1460-2466.1999.tb02784.x     Document Type: Article

References (77)

1. Bassili, J. N. (1995). Response latency and the accessibility of voting intentions: What contributes to accessibility and how it affects vote choice. Personal and Social Psychology Bulletin, 21, 686-695.
2. Beniger, J. R., & Gusek, J. A. (1995). The cognitive revolution in public opinion and communication research. In T. L. Classer &C. T. Salmon (Eds.), Public opinion and the communication of consent (pp. 217-248). New York: Guilford Press.
3. Bennett, W. L. (1993.). Constructing publics and their opinions. Political Communication, 10, 101-120.
4. Brosius, H. B., & Eps, P. (1995). Prototyping through key events: News selection in the case of violence against aliens and asylum seekers in Germany. European Journal of Communication. 10, 391-412.
5. Cobb, R. W., 26amp; Elder, C. (1972). Participation in American politics: the dynamics of agenda-building. Boston: Allyn & Bacon.
6. Coleman, J. S. (1987). Microfoundations and macrosocial behavior. In J. C. Alexander, B. Giesen, R. Munch. & N. J. Smelser (Eds.). The micro-macro link (pp. 153-173). Berkeley: University of California Press.
7. Doise, W. (1986). Levels of explanation in social psychology. New York: Cambridge University Press.
8. Donshach, W. (1981). Legitimacy through competence rather than value judgments: The concept of professionalization reconsidered Gazette, 27, 47-67.
9. Edelman, M. J. (1977). Political language. New York: Academic Press.
10. Edelman, M. J. (1993) Contestable categories and public opinion. Political Communication, 10, 231-242.
11. Entman, R. M. (1991) Framing U.S. coverage of international news: Contrasts in narratives of the KAL and Iran air incidents. Journal of Communication, 41(4), 6-27.
12. Entman, R. M. (1993). Framing: Towards clarification of a fractured paradigm. Journal of Communication, 43(4), 51-58.
13. Entman. R. M., & Rojecki, A. (1993) Freezing out the public: Elite and media framing of the U.S. antinuclear movement. Political Communication, 10, 155-173.
14. Eulau, H. (1977). Multilevel methods in comparative politics. American Behavioral Scientist, 21, 39-62.
15. Eulau, H. (1986). Politics, self, and society: A theme and variation. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
16. Fishman, M. (1977). Crime waves as ideology. Social Problems, 1, 531-543.
17. Fishman, M. (1980). Manufacturing the news. Austin. University of Texas Press.
18. Friedland, L. A., & Zhong, M. (1996). International television coverage of Beijing Spring 1989: A comparative approach. Journalism & Mass Communication Monographs, 156.
19. Gamson, W. A. (1985). Goffman's legacy to political sociology. Theory and Society, 74, 605-621.
20. Gamson, W. A. (1989). News as framing: Comments on Graber. American Behavioral Scientist, 33, 157-166.
21. Gamson, W. A. (1992a). The social psychology of collective action. In A. D. Morris & C. McClurg Mueller (Eds.), Frontiers in social movement theory (pp. 53-76). New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.
22. Gamson, W. A. (1992b). Talking politics. New York: Cambridge University Press.
23. Gamson, W. A., & Modigliani, A. (1987). The changing culture of affirmative action. In R. G. Braungart & M. M. Braungart (Eds.), Research in political sociology (Vol. 3, pp. 137-177). Greenwich, CT: JAI Press.
24. Gamson, W. A., & Modigliani, A. (1989) Media discourse and public opinion on nuclear power: A constructionist approach. American Journal of Sociology, 95, 1-37.
25. Gans, H. (1979). Deciding what's news. New York: Patheon.
26. Gerhards, J., & Rucht, D. (1992). Mesomobilization: Organizing and framing in two protest campaigns in West Germany. American Journal of Sociology, 98, 555-595.
27. Gitlin, T. (1980). The whole world is watching: Mass media in the making & unmaking of the new left. Berkeley: University of California Press.
28. Hamill, R., & Lodge, M. (1986). Cognitive consequences of political sophistication. In R. R. Lau & D. O. Sears (Eds.), Political cognition (pp. 69-95). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
29. Hastie, R., & Park, B. (1986). The relationship between memory and judgment depends on whether the task is memory-based or on-line. Psychological Review, 93, 258-268.
30. Hodges, S. D., & Wilson, T. D. (1993). Effects of analyzing reasons on attitude change: The moderating role of attitude accessibility. Social Cognition, 11, 353-366.
31. Houston, D. A., & Fazio, R. H. (1989). Biased processing as a function of attitude accessibility: Making objective judgments subjectively. Social Cognition, 7, 51-66.
32. Huang, K. S. (1996, May). A comparison between media frames and audience frames: The case of the Hill-Thomas controversy. Paper presented at the annual conference of the International Communication Association, Chicago, IL.
33. Iyengar, S. (1987). Television news and citizens' explanations of national affairs. American Political Science Review, 81, 815-831.
34. Iyengar, S. (1989). How citizens think about national issues: A matter of responsibility. American Journal of Political Science, 33, 878-900.
35. Iyengar, S. (1990). The accessibility bias in politics: Television news and public opinion. International Journal of Public Opinion Research, 2, 1-15.
36. Iyengar, S. (1991). Is anyone responsible? How television frames political issues. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
37. Iyengar, S., & Kinder, D. R. (1987). News that matters: Television and American opinion. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
38. Kinder, D. R. (1983). Diversity and complexity in American public opinion. In A. W. Finifter (Ed.), Political science: The state of the discipline (pp. 389-425). Washington, DC: American Political Science Association.
39. Kinder, D. R., & Sanders, L. M. (1990). Mimicking political debate with survey questions: The case of white opinion on affirmative action for blacks. Social Cognition, 8, 73-103.
40. Kinder, D. R., & Sears, D. O. (1985). Public opinion and political action. In G. Lindzey & E. Aronson (Eds.), Handbook of social psychology (2nd ed., Vol. 2, pp. 173-196). Reading, MA: Addison-Wesley.
41. Klandermans, B. (1988). The formation and mobilization of consensus. In B. Klandermans, H. Kriesi, & S. Tarrow (Eds.), International social movement research. (Vol. 1, pp. 173-196). Greenwich, CT: JAI Press.
42. Klandermans, B. (1992). The social construction of protest and multiorganizational fields. In A. D. Morris & C. McClurg Mueller (Eds.), Frontiers in social movement theory (pp. 77-103). New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.
43. Klandermans, B., & Oegema, D. (1987). Potentials, networks, motivations, and barriers: Steps towards participation in social movements. American Sociological Review, 52, 519-531.
44. Klapper, J. (1960). The effects of mass communication. New York: Free Press.
45. Kosicki, G. M., & McLeod, J. M. (1990). Learning from political news: Effects of media images and information-processing strategies. In S. Kraus (Ed.), Mass communication and political information processing (pp. 69-83). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
46. Lodge, M., & Hamill, R. (1986). A partisan schema for political information processing. American Political Science Review, 80, 505-519.
47. Luhmann, N. (1995). Social systems. Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press.
48. McCombs, M., Llamas, J. P., Lopez-Escobar, E., & Rey, F. (1997). Candidate images in Spanish elections: Second-level agenda-setting effects. Journalism & Mass Communication Quarterly, 74, 703-717.
49. McCombs, M. E., & Shaw, D. L. (1972). The agenda-setting function of mass media. Public Opinion Quarterly, 36, 176-187.
50. McCombs, M., Shaw, D. L., & Weaver, D. (1997). Communication and democracy: Exploring the intellectual frontiers in agenda-setting theory. Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.
51. McLeod, J. M., Kosicki, G. M., Pan, Z., & Allen, S. G. (1987, August). Audience perspectives on the news: Assessing their complexity and conceptual frames. Paper presented at the annual conference of the Association for Education in Journalism and Mass Communication, San Antonio, TX.
52. McLeod, J. M., & Pan, Z. (1989). Getting levels across and crossing levels. American Behavioral Scientist, 33, 199-202.
53. McLeod, J. M., Pan, Z., & Rucinski, D. (1995). Levels of analysis in public opinion research. In T. L. Classer & C. T. Salmon (Eds.), Public opinion and the communication of consent (pp. 55-85). New York: Guilforcl Press.
54. McQuail, D. (1987). Mass communication theory: An introduction (2nd ed.). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
55. McQuail, D. (1994). Mass communication theory: An introduction (3rd ed.). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
56. Nelson, T. E., Clawson, R. A., & Oxley, Z. M. (1997). Media framing of a civil liberties conflict and its effect on tolerance. American Political Science Review, 91, 567-583.
57. Nelson, T. E., & Kinder, D. R. (1996). Issue framing and group-centrism in American public opinion. Journal of Politics, 58, 1055-1078.
58. Neuman, R. W., Just, M. R., Crigler, A. N. (1992). Common knowledge. News and the construction of political meaning. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
59. Noelle-Neumann, E. (1973). Return to the concept of powerful mass media. Studies of Broadcasting, 9, 67-112.
60. Pan, Z., & Kosicki, G. M. (1993). Framing analysis: An approach to news discourse. Political Communication, 10, 55-75.
61. Pan, Z., & McLeod, J. M. (1991). Multilevel analysis in mass communication research. Communication Research, 18, 140-173.
62. Patterson, T. E. (1993). Out of order. New York: Random House.
63. Popkin, S. L. (1994). The reasoning voter, communication and persuasion in presidential campaigns. (2nd ed.). Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
64. Price, V., Tewksbury, D., & Powers, E. (1995, November). Switching trains of thought: The impact of news frames on readers' cognitive responses. Paper presented at the annual conference of the Midwest Association for Public Opinion Research, Chicago, IL.
65. Price, V., Tewksbury, D., & Powers, E. (1996, May). Switching trains of thought. The impact of news frames on readers'cognitive responses. Paper presented at the annual conference of the International Communication Association, Chicago, IL.
66. Price, V., Tewksbury, D., & Powers, E. (1997). Switching trains of thought: The impact of news frames on readers' cognitive responses. Communication Research, 24, 481-506.
67. Rhodebeck, L. A. (1998, April). Framing policy debates on old age. Paper presented at the annual conference of the Midwest Political Science Association, Chicago, IL.
68. Shoemaker, P. J., & Reese, S. D. (1996). Mediating the message (2nd ed.). White Plains, NY: Longman.
69. Snow, D. A., & Benford, R. D. (1988). Ideology, frame resonance, and participant mobilization. In B. Klandermans, H. Kriesi, & S. Tarrow (Eds.), International socialmovement research (Vol. 1. pp. 197-217). Greenwich, CT: JAI Press.
70. Snow, D. A., & Benford, R. D. (1992). Master frames and cycles of protest. In A. D. Morris & C. M. Mueller (Eds.), Frontiers in social movement theory (pp. 133-155). New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.
71. Snow, D. A., Burke Rochford, E., Jr., Worden, S. K., & Benford, R. D. (1986). Frame alignment processes, micromobilization, and movement participation. American Sociological Review, 51, 464-481.
72. Tversky, A., & Kahneman, D. (1973). Availability: A heuristic for judging frequency and probability. Cognitive Psychology, 5, 207-222.
73. Tuchman, G. (1978). Making news: A study in the construction of reality. New York: Free Press.
74. van Dijk, T A. (1985). Structures of news in the press. In T. A. Van Dijk (Ed.), Discourse and communication: New approaches to the analysis of mass media discourse and communication (pp. 69-93). New York: W. de Gruyter.
75. White, D. M. (1950). The "gate keeper": A case study in the selection of news. Journalism Quarterly, 27, 383-390.
76. Whitney, D. C., & Becker, L. B. (1982). "Keeping the gates" for gatekeepers: The effects of wire news. Journalism Quarterly, 59, 60-65.
77. Wicks, R. H. (1992). Schema theory and measurement in mass communication research: Theoretical and methodological issues in news information processing. Communication Yearbook, 15, 115-145.