News framing theory and research

Media Effects: Advances in Theory and Research

Volumn , Issue , 2009, Pages 17-33

  Tewksbury, David ^a   Scheufele, Dietram A ^b  

^a UNIVERSITY OF ILLINOIS AT URBANA CHAMPAIGN   (United States)

^b UNIVERSITY OF WISCONSIN MADISON   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 85118287345     PISSN: None     EISSN: None     Source Type: Book    
DOI: None     Document Type: Chapter

References (71)

1. Andsager, J. L. (2000). How interest groups attempt to shape public opinion with competing news frames. Journalism & Mass Communication Quarterly, 77, 577-592.
2. Bennett, W. L. (1990). Toward a theory of press-state relations in the United States. Journal of Communication, 40(2), 103-125.
3. Boyle, M. P., Schmierbach, M., Armstrong, C. L., Cho, J., McCluskey, M., McLeod, D. M., & Shah, D. V. (2006). Expressive responses to news stories about extremist groups: A framing experiment. Journal of Communication, 56, 271-288.
4. Brewer, P. R. (2002). Framing, value words, and citizens' explanations of their issue opinions. Political Communication, 19, 303-316.
5. Brewer, P. R., Graf, J., & Willnat, L. (2003). Priming or framing: Media influences on attitudes toward foreign countries. Gazette: The International Journal for Communication Studies, 65, 493-508.
6. Brewer, P. R., & Gross, K. (2005). Values, framing, and citizens' thoughts about policy issues: Effects on content and quantity. Political Psychology, 26, 929-948.
7. Cappella, J. N., & Jamieson, K. H. (1997). Spiral of cynicism: The press and the public good. New York: Oxford University Press.
8. Chong, D., & Druckman, J. N. (2007). A theory of framing and opinion formation in competitive elite environments. Journal of Communication, 57, 99-118.
9. Clawson, R. A., & Waltenburg, E. N. (2003). Support for a Supreme Court affirmative action decision: A story in black and white. American Politics Research, 31, 251-279.
10. D'Angelo, P. (2002). News framing as a multiparadigmatic research program: A response to Entman. Journal of Communication, 52, 870-888.
11. de Vreese, C. H. (2004). The effects of frames in political television news on issue interpretation and frame salience. Journalism & Mass Communication Quarterly, 81, 36-52.
12. Domke, D., McCoy, K., & Torres, M. (1999). News media, racial perceptions, and political cognition. Communication Research, 26, 570-607.
13. Domke, D., Shah, D. V., & Wackman, D. B. (1998). "Moral referendums": News media, and the process of candidate choice. Political Communication, 15, 301-321.
14. Druckman, J. N. (2001). On the limits of framing effects: Who can frame? The Journal of Politics, 63, 1041-1066.
15. Druckman, J. N., & Nelson, K. R. (2003). Framing and deliberation: How citizens' conversations limit elite influence. American Journal of Political Science, 47, 729-745.
16. Edelman, M. (1964). The symbolic uses of politics. Urbana: University of Illinois Press.
17. Edelman, M. J. (1993). Contestable categories and public opinion. Political Communication, 10, 231-242.
18. Entman, R. M. (1993). Framing: Towards clarification of a fractured paradigm. Journal of Communication, 43, 51-58.
19. Fishbein, M., & Ajzen, I. (1975). Belief, attitude, intention and behavior: An introduction to theory and research. Reading: Addison-Wesley.
20. Gamson, W. A., & Modigliani, A. (1987). The changing culture of affirmative action. Research in Political Sociology, 3, 137-177.
21. Gamson, W. A., & Modigliani, A. (1989). Media discourse and public opinion on nuclear power-A constructionist approach. American Journal of Sociology, 95(1), 1-37.
22. Goffman, E. (1974). Frame analysis: An essay on the organization of experience. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
23. Heider, F. (1959). The psychology of interpersonal relations (2nd ed). New York: Wiley.
24. Heider, F., & Simmel, M. (1944). An experimental study of apparent behavior. American Journal of Psychology, 57, 243-259.
25. Higgins, E.T. (1996). Knowledge activation: Accessibility, applicability, and salience. In E. T. Higgins & A.W. Kruglanski (Eds.), Social psychology: Handbook of basic principles (pp. 133-168). New York: Guilford Press.
26. Higgins, E. T., Rholes, W. S., & Jones, C. R. (1977). Category accessibility and impression formation. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 13, 141-154.
27. Hovland, C. I., Janis, I. L., & Kelly, H. H. (1953). Communication and persuasion: Psychological studies of opinion change. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.
28. Iyengar, S. (1991). Is anyone responsible? How television frames political issues. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
29. Iyengar, S., & Kinder, D. R. (1987). News that matters: Television and American opinion. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
30. Kahneman, D. (2003). Maps of bounded rationality: A perspective on intuitive judgment and choice. In T. Frängsmyr (Ed.), Les Prix Nobel: The Nobel Prizes 2002 (pp. 449-489). Stockholm, Sweden: Nobel Foundation.
31. Kahneman, D., & Tversky, A. (1979). Prospect theory-Analysis of decision under risk. Econometrica, 47(2), 263-291.
32. Kahneman, D., & Tversky, A. (1984). Choices, values, and frames. American Psychologist, 39(4), 341-350.
33. Kim, S. H., Scheufele, D. A., & Shanahan, J. (2002). Think about it this way: Attribute agendasetting function of the press and the public's evaluation of a local issue. Journalism & Mass Communication Quarterly, 79, 7-25.
34. Kinder, D. R., & Sanders, L. M. (1990). Mimicking political debate with survey questions: The case of white opinion on affirmative action for blacks. Social Cognition, 8, 73-103.
35. Lakoff, G. (1996). Moral politics: How liberals and conservatives think. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
36. Luntz, F. (2007). Words that work:It's not what you say, it's what people hear. New York: Hyperion.
37. McCombs, M. E. (2004). Setting the agenda: The mass media and public opinion. Malden, MA: Blackwell.
38. McCombs, M. E., & Shaw, D. (1972). The agenda setting function of the mass media. Public Opinion Quarterly, 36, 176-187.
39. Miller, M. M., Andsager, J. L., & Riechert, B. P. (1998). Framing the candidates in presidential primaries: Issues and images in press releases and news coverage. Journalism and Mass Communication Quarterly, 75, 312-324.
40. Nelson, T. E., Clawson, R. A., & Oxley, Z. M. (1997). Media framing of civil liberties conflict and its effects on tolerance. American Political Science Review, 91, 567-583.
41. Nelson, T. E., & Oxley, Z. M. (1999). Issue framing effects on belief importance and opinion. The Journal of Politics, 61, 1040-1067.
42. Nelson, T. E., Oxley, Z. M., & Clawson, R. A. (1997). Toward a psychology of framing effects. Political Behavior, 19, 221-246.
43. Nisbet, M. C., Brossard, D., & Kroepsch, A. (2003). Framing science-The stem cell controversy in an age of press/politics. The Harvard International Journal of Press-Politics, 8(2), 36-70.
44. Nisbet, M. C., & Huge, M. (2006). Attention cycles and frames in the plant biotechnology debate: Managing power and participation through the press/policy connection. The Harvard International Journal of Press/Politics, 11(2), 3-40.
45. Pan, Z., & Kosicki, G. M. (1993). Framing analysis: An approach to news discourse. Political Communication, 10, 59-79.
46. Price, V., & Tewksbury, D. (1997). News values and public opinion: A theoretical account of media priming and framing. In G. A. Barett & F. J. Boster (Eds.), Progress in communication sciences: Advances in persuasion (Vol. 13, pp. 173-212). Greenwich, CT: Ablex.
47. Price, V., Tewksbury, D., & Powers, E. (1997). Switching trains of thought: The impact of news frames on readers' cognitive responses. Communication Research, 24, 481-506.
48. Reese, S. D. (2007). The framing project: A bridging model for media research revisited. Journal of Communication, 57, 148-154.
49. Rhee, J. W. (1997). Strategy and issue frames in election campaign coverage: A social cognitive account of framing effects. Journal of Communication, 47, 26-48.
50. Roskos-Ewoldsen, D. R., Roskos-Ewoldsen, B., & Carpentier, F. R. (2002). Media priming: A synthesis. In J. Bryant and D. Zillmann (Eds.), Media effects: Advances in theory and research (pp. 97-120). Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.
51. Scheufele, B. T. (2004). Framing-effects approach: A theoretical and methodological critique. Communications, 29, 401-428.
52. Scheufele, D. A. (1999). Framing as a theory of media effects. Journal of Communication, 49(1), 103-122.
53. Scheufele, D. A. (2008). Framing theory. In W. Donsbach (Ed.), The international encyclopedia of communication (pp. 1862-1868). Malden, MA: Blackwell Publishing.
54. Scheufele, D. A., & Nisbet, M. C. (2007). Framing. In L. L. Kaid & C. Holz-Bacha (Eds.), Encyclopedia of political communication (pp. 254-257). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
55. Scheufele, D. A., & Tewksbury, D. (2007). Framing, agenda-setting, and priming: The evolution of three media effects models. Journal of Communication, 57, 9-20.
56. Shah, D. V., Domke, D., & Wackman, D. B. (1996). "To thine own self be true": Values, framing, and voter decision-making strategies. Communication Research, 23, 509-560.
57. Shah, D. V., Kwak, N., Schmierbach, M., & Zubric, J. (2004). The interplay of news frames on cognitive complexity. Human Communication Research, 30, 102-120.
58. Shen, F. (2004). Effects of news frames and schemas on individuals' issue interpretations and attitudes. Journalism & Mass Communication Quarterly, 81, 400-416.
59. Shen, F., & Edwards, H. H. (2005). Economic individualism, humanitarianism, and welfare reform: A value-based account of framing effects. Journal of Communication, 55, 795-809.
60. Sherif, M. (1967). Social interaction: Processes and products. Chicago: Aldine.
61. Shoemaker, P. J., & Reese S. D. (1996). Mediating the message (2nd ed.). White Plains, NY: Longman.
62. Simon, A., & Jerit, J. (2007). Toward a theory relating political discourse, media, and public opinion. Journal of Communication, 57, 254-271.
63. Snow, D. A., & Benford, R. D. (1988). Ideology, frame resonance, and participant mobilization. In B. Klandermans, H. Kriesi, & S. Tarrow (Eds.), International social movement research. Volume 1. From structure to action: Comparing social movement research across cultures (pp. 197-217). Greenwich, CT: JAI Press.
64. Snow, D. A., & Benford, R. D. (1992). Master frames and cycles of protest. In A. D. Morris & C. McClurg Mueller (Eds.), Frontiers in social movement theory (pp. 133-155). New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.
65. Sotirovic, M. (2000). Effects of media use on audience framing and support for welfare. Mass Communication & Society, 3, 269-296.
66. Terkildsen, N., & Schnell, F. (1997). How media frames move public opinion: An analysis of the women's movement. Political Research Quarterly, 50, 879-900.
67. Tewksbury, D., Jones, J., Peske, M., Raymond, A., & Vig, W. (2000). The interaction of news and advocate frames: Manipulating audience perceptions of a local public policy issue. Journalism & Mass Communication Quarterly, 77, 804-829.
68. Tuchman, G. (1978). Making news: A study in the construction of reality. New York: The Free Press.
69. Valentino, N. A., Beckmann, M. N., & Buhr, T. A. (2001). A spiral of cynicism for some: The contingent effects of campaign news frames on participation and confidence in government. Political Communication, 18, 347-367.
70. van Dijk, T. A. (1985). Structures of news in the press. In T. A. van Dijk (Ed.), Discourse and communication: New approaches to the analysis of mass media discourse and communication (pp. 69-93). New York: de Gruyter.
71. van Gorp, B. (2007). The constructionist approach to framing: Bringing culture back in. Journal of Communication, 57, 60-78.