Wanted, dead or alive: Media frames, frame adoption, and support for the war in Afghanistan

Journal of Communication

Volumn 57, Issue 1, 2007, Pages 119-141

  Edy, Jill A ^a   Meirick, Patrick C ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF OKLAHOMA   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

MASS MEDIA; SOCIAL POLICY; WAR;

AFGHANISTAN; ASIA; EURASIA; SOUTH ASIA;

EID: 33847335509     PISSN: 00219916     EISSN: 14602466     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1111/j.1460-2466.2006.00332.x     Document Type: Article

References (39)

1. Althaus, S. (2002). American news consumption during times of national crisis. PS: Political Science & Politics, 35, 517-521.
2. American Association for Public Opinion Research. (2006). Standard definitions: Final dispositions of case codes and outcome rates for surveys (4th ed.). Lenexa, KS: Author.
3. Baumgartner, F. R., & Jones, B. (1993). Agendas and instabilities in American politics. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
4. Bennett, W. L. (1990). Toward a theory of press-state relations. Journal of Communication, 40, 103-125.
5. Bush, G. W. (2001, September 20). Address to a joint session of Congress and the American people. Retrieved August 25, 2005, from http://www.whitehouse.gov/news/releases/2001/09/20010920-8.html
6. Center for Media and Public Affairs. (n.d.). Network news studies. Retrieved May 24, 2006, from http://www.cmpa.com/networkNewsStudies/ index.htm
7. Chong, D. (1996). Creating common frames of reference on political issues. In D. C. Mutz, P. M. Sniderman, & R. A. Brody (Eds.), Political persuasion and attitude change (pp. 195-224). Ann Arbor, MI: University of Michigan Press.
8. Domke, D., Shah, D. V., & Wackman, D. B. (1998). Media priming effects: Accessibility, association, and activation. International Journal of Public Opinion Research, 10, 51-74.
9. Druckman, J. N. (2004). Political preference formation: Competition, deliberation, and the (ir)relevance of framing effects. American Political Science Review, 98, 671-686.
10. Entman, R. M. (1991). Framing coverage of international news: Contrasts in narratives of the KAL and Iran Air incidents. Journal of Communication, 41 (4), 6-27.
11. Entman, R. M. (1993). Framing: Toward clarification of a fractured paradigm. Journal of Communication, 43, 51-58.
12. Entman, R. M. (2003). Cascading activation: Contesting the White House's frame after 9/11. Political Communication, 20, 415-432.
13. Gamson, W. A. (1992). Talking politics. Cambridge, U.K.: Cambridge University Press.
14. Gamson, W. A., & Modigliani, A. (1989). Media discourse and public opinion on nuclear power: A constructionist approach. American Journal of Sociology, 95, 1-37.
15. Goffman, E. (1974). Frame analysis. Philadelphia: University of Pennsylvania Press.
16. Graber, D. A. (1990). Seeing is remembering: How visuals contribute to learning from television news. Journal of Communication, 40 (3), 134-155.
17. Hall, S. (1982). The rediscovery of ideology: The return of the repressed in media studies. In M. Gurevitch, T. Bennett, J. Curran, & J. Woollacott (Eds.), Culture society and media (pp. 56-90). London: Methuen.
18. Iyengar, S. (1987). Television news and citizens' explanations of national affairs. American Political Science Review, 81, 815-831.
19. Iyengar, S. (1991). Is anyone responsible?: How television frames political issues. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
20. Iyengar, S., & Kinder, D. (1987). News that matters: Television and American opinion. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
21. Kahneman, D., & Tversky, A. (1984). Choice, values and frames. American Psychologist, 39, 341-350.
22. Keeter, S., Miller, C., Kohut, A., Groves, R.M., & Presser, S. (2000). Consequences of reducing nonresponse in a national telephone survey. Public Opinion Quarterly, 64, 125-148.
23. Li, X., Lindsay, L. F., & Mogensen, K. (2002, August). Media in a crisis situation involving national interest: A content analysis of the TV networks coverage of the 9/11 incident during the first eight hours. Paper presented at the 2002 convention of the Association for Education in Journalism and Mass Communication, Miami, FL.
24. McCombs, M. (1997). New frontiers in agenda-setting: Agendas of attributes and frames. Mass Comm Review, 24 (1,2), 32-52.
25. McCombs, M., Llamas, J. P., Lopez-Escobar, E., & Rey, F. (1997). Candidate images in Spanish elections: Second-level agenda-setting effects. Journalism & Mass Communication Quarterly, 74, 703-717.
26. Morley, D. (1980). The "Nationwide" audience: Structure and decoding. London: British Film Institute.
27. NBC Nightly News. (2001, October 31). [Television broadcast]. New York: National Broadcasting Company.
28. Nelson, T. E. (2004). Policy goals, public rhetoric, and political attitudes. Journal of Politics, 66, 581-605.
29. Nelson, T. E., & Oxley, Z. M. (1999). Issue framing effects on belief importance and opinion. Journal of Politics, 61, 1040-1068.
30. Price, V., & Tewksbury, D. (1997). News values and public opinion: A theoretical account of media priming and framing. In G. Barnett & F. J. Boster (Eds.), Progress in the communication sciences (pp. 173-212). Greenwich, CT: Ablex.
31. Price, V., Tewksbury, D., & Powers, E. (1997). Switching trains of thought: The impact of news frames on readers' cognitive responses. Communication Research, 24, 481-506.
32. Scheufele, D. A. (2000). Agenda-setting, priming, and framing revisited: Another look at cognitive effects of political communication. Mass Communication and Society, 3, 297-316.
33. Shah, D. V., Watts, M. D., Domke, D., & Fan, D. P. (2002). News framing and cueing of issue regimes: Explaining Clinton's public approval in spite of scandal. Public Opinion Quarterly, 66, 339-370.
34. Sniderman, P. M., & Theriault, S. M. (2004). The structure of political argument and the logic of issue framing. In W. E. Saris & P. M. Sniderman (Eds.), Studies in public opinion: Attitudes, nonattitudes, measurement error, and change (pp. 133-165). Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
35. Stone, D. A. (1989). Causal stories and the formation of policy agendas. Political Science Quarterly, 104, 281-300.
36. Tversky, A., & Kahneman, D. (1981). The framing of decisions and the psychology of choice. Science, 211, 453-458.
37. White, H. (1987). The content of the form: Narrative discourse and historical representation. Baltimore, MD: The Johns Hopkins University Press.
38. Valentino, N. A. (1999). Crime news and the priming of racial attitudes during evaluations of the president. Public Opinion Quarterly, 63, 293-320.
39. Zaller, J. (1992). The nature and origins of mass opinion. New York: Cambridge University Press.