Framing controversies: Television and the 2002 presidential election in Brazil

Political Communication

Volumn 24, Issue 1, 2007, Pages 19-36

  Porto, Mauro P ^a  

^a TULANE UNIVERSITY   (United States)

Author keywords

Brazil; Framing; Political communication; Television journalism

Indexed keywords

EID: 33847225941     PISSN: 10584609     EISSN: 10917675     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1080/10584600601128705     Document Type: Article

References (57)

1. Almeida, J. (2004). Serra e a mudança: Um discurso fora de lugar. In A. A. Rubim (Ed.), Eleições presidenciais em 2002 no Brasil (pp. 129-141). São Paulo: Hacker.
2. Amaral, R., & Guimarães, C. (1994). Media monopoly in Brazil. Journal of Communication, 44(4), 26-38.
3. Baker, A., Ames, B., & Rennó, L. (2006). Social context and campaign volatility in new democracies: Networks and neighborhoods in Brazil's 2002 elections. American Journal of Political Science, 50, 382-399.
4. Bartels, L. (1993). Messages received: The political impact of media exposure. American Political Science Review, 87, 267-285.
5. Bennett, W. L. (1990). Toward a theory of press-state relations in the United States. Journal of Communication, 40, 103-125.
6. Berelson, B., Lazarsfeld, P., & McPhee, W. (1986). Voting. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
7. Boas, T. (2005). Television and neopopulism in Latin America: Media effects in Brazil and Peru. Latin American Research Review, 40(2), 27-49.
8. Callaghan, K., & Schnell, F. (2001). Assessing the democratic debate: How the news media frame elite policy discourse. Political Communication, 18, 183-212.
9. Callaghan, K., & Schnell, F. (Eds.). (2005). Framing American politics. Pittsburgh, PA: University of Pittsburgh Press.
10. Cappella, J., & Jamieson, K. (1997). Spiral of cynicism. New York: Oxford University Press.
11. Carreirão, Y. (2004). A eleição presidencial de 2002: Uma análise preliminar do processo e dos resultados eleitorais. Revista de Sociologia e Política, 22, 179-194.
12. Chaffee, S. (1977). Mass media effects: New research perspectives. In D. Lerner & L. Nelson (Eds.), Communication research: A half-century appraisal (pp. 211-241). Honolulu: University Press of Hawaii.
13. Entman, R. (1993). Framing: Toward a clarification of a fractured paradigm. Journal of Communication, 43(4), 51-58.
14. Entman, R. (2004). Projections of power: Framing news, public opinion and U.S. foreign policy. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
15. Figueiredo, R., & Coutinho, C. (2003). A eleição de 2002. Opinião Pública, 9, 93-117.
16. Fox, E. (Ed.). (1988). Media and politics in Latin America. London: Sage.
17. Gitlin, T. (1980). The whole world is watching. Berkeley: University of California Press.
18. Hackett, R. (1984). Decline of a paradigm? Bias and objectivity in news media studies. Critical Studies in Mass Communication, 1, 229-259.
19. Hallin, D. (1994). We keep America on top of the world: Television journalism and the public sphere. London: Routledge.
20. Hallin, D. (2000). Media, political power, and democratization in Mexico. In J. Curran & M.-J. Park (Eds.), De-Westernizing media studies (pp. 97-110). London: Routledge.
21. Hughes, S., & Lawson, C. (2004). Propaganda and crony capitalism: Partisan bias in Mexican television news. Latin American Research Review, 39(3), 81-105.
22. Hughes, S., & Lawson, C. (2005). The barriers to media opening in Latin America. Political Communication, 22, 9-25.
23. Iyengar, S., & Kinder, D. (1987). News that matters: Television and American opinion. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
24. Iyengar, S., & Lenart, S. (1989). Beyond 'minimal consequences': A survey of media political effects. In S. Long (Ed.), Political behavior annual (pp. 21-38). Boulder, CO: Westview Press.
25. Joslyn, R. (1990). Election campaigns as occasions for civic culture. In D. Swanson & D. Nimmo (Eds.), New directions in political communication (pp. 86-119). Newbury Park, CA: Sage.
26. Kaid, L., & Holtz-Bacha, C. (Eds.). (1995). Political advertising in Western democracies. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
27. Katz, E. (1980). On conceptualizing media effects. Studies in Communication, 1, 119-141.
28. Lawson, C. (2002). Building the fourth state: Democratization and the rise of a free press in Mexico. Berkeley: University of California Press.
29. Lawson, C., & McCann, J. (2005). Television news, Mexico's 2000 elections and media effects in emerging democracies. British Journal of Political Science, 35, 1-30.
30. Lazarsfeld, P., Berelson, B., & Gaudet, H. (1952). The people's choice. New York: Columbia University Press.
31. Lima, V. A. (1988). The state, television and political power in Brazil. Critical Studies in Mass Communication, 5, 108-128.
32. Lima, V. A. (1993). Brazilian television in the 1989 presidential election: Constructing a president. In T. Skidmore (Ed.), Television, politics and the transition to democracy in Latin America (pp. 97-117). Baltimore: Johns Hopkins University Press.
33. Marchi, R. (2005). Reframing the runway: A case study of the impact of community organizing on news and politics. Journalism, 6, 465-485.
34. Martínez, J., & Santiso, J. (2003). Financial markets and politics: The confidence game in Latin American emerging economies. International Political Science Review, 24, 363-395.
35. McAdam, D., McCarthy, J., & Zald, M. (Eds.). (1996). Comparative perspectives on social movements. New York: Cambridge University Press.
36. McCombs, M. (2004). Setting the agenda. Cambridge, England: Polity Press.
37. McCombs, M., & Shaw, D. (1971). The agenda-setting function of mass media. Public Opinion Quarterly, 36, 176-185.
38. McLeod, J., Kosicki, G., & Pan, Z. (1992). On understanding and misunderstanding media effects. In J. Curran & M. Gurevitch (Eds.), Mass media and society (pp. 235-266). London: Edward Arnold.
39. Miguel, L. F. (2000). The Globo Television Network and the election of 1998. Latin American Perspectives, 27(6), 65-84.
40. Nelson, T., Oxley, Z., & Clawson, R. (1997). Toward a psychology of framing effects. Political Behavior, 19, 221-247.
41. Noelle-Neumann, E. (1973). Return to the concept of powerful mass media. Studies of Broadcasting, 9, 67-112.
42. Porto, M. (2001). Media framing and citizen competence: Television and audiences' interpretation of politics in Brazil. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, University of California, San Diego.
43. Porto, M. (2002). Novos apresentadores ou novo jornalismo? O Jornal Nacional antes e depois da saída de Cid Moreira. Comunicação e Espaço Público, 4, 9-31.
44. Porto, M. (2003). Mass media and politics in democratic Brazil. In M. D. A. Kinzo & J. Dunkerley (Eds.), Brazil since 1985 (pp. 288-313). London: Institute of Latin American Studies.
45. Porto, M. (2006). Political advertising and democracy in Brazil. In L. Kaid & C. Holtz-Bacha (Eds.), The Sage handbook of political advertising (pp. 129-143). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
46. Porto, M., Vasconcelos, R., & Bastos, B. (2004). A televisão e o primeiro turno das eleições presidenciais de 2002: Análise do Jornal Nacional e do horário eleitoral. In A. A. Rubim (Ed.), Eleições presidenciais em 2002 no Brasil (pp. 68-90). São Paulo: Hacker.
47. Reese, S., Gandy O., Jr., & Grant, A. (Eds.). (2001). Framing public life. Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.
48. Rhee, J. W. (1997). Strategy and issue frames in election campaign coverage: A social cognitive account of framing effects. Journal of Communication, 47(3), 26-48.
49. Scheufele, D. (1999). Framing as a theory of media effects. Journal of Communication, 49(1), 103-122.
50. Schon, D., & Rein, M. (1994). Frame reflection. New York: Basic Books.
51. Skidmore, T. (Ed.). (1993). Television, politics, and the transition to democracy in Latin America. Baltimore: Johns Hopkins University Press.
52. Spanakos, A., & Rennó, L. (in press). Elections and economic turbulence in Brazil: Candidates, voters and investors. Latin American Politics and Society.
53. Straubhaar, J. (1989). Television and video in the transition from military to civilian rule in Brazil. Latin American Research Review, 24, 140-154.
54. Wolfsfeld, G. (1997). Media and political conflict: News from the Middle East. Cambridge, England: Cambridge University Press.
55. Woo, J. (1996). Television news discourse in political transition: Framing the 1987 and 1992 Korean presidential elections. Political Communication, 13, 63-80.
56. Zaller, J. (1996). The myth of massive media impact revisited: New support for a discredited idea. In D. Mutz, P. Sniderman, & R. Brody (Eds.), Political persuasion and attitude change (pp. 17-78). Ann Arbor: University of Michigan Press.
57. Zaller, J., & Chiu, D. (1996). Government's little helper: U.S. press coverage of foreign policy crises, 1945-1991. Political Communication, 13, 385-405.