Quality indicators for colorectal cancer screening for colonoscopy

Techniques in Gastrointestinal Endoscopy

Volumn 15, Issue 2, 2013, Pages 59-68

  Schoenfeld, Philip S ^a   Cohen, Jonathan ^b  

^a UNIVERSITY OF MICHIGAN MEDICAL SCHOOL   (United States)

^b NEW YORK UNIVERSITY MEDICAL CENTER   (United States)

Author keywords

Colon cancer; Colon polyps; Colonoscopy; Quality indicators; Screening; Surveillance

Indexed keywords

CANCER PREVENTION; CANCER SCREENING; CANCER SURGERY; CECAL INTUBATION; COLON PERFORATION; COLON POLYP; COLONOSCOPY; COLORECTAL ADENOMA; COLORECTAL CANCER; CONSERVATIVE TREATMENT; DEVICE REMOVAL; DIGESTIVE TRACT ENDOSCOPY; DIGESTIVE TRACT INTUBATION; DISEASE SURVEILLANCE; ENDOSCOPIC POLYPECTOMY; HEALTH CARE QUALITY; HISTOPATHOLOGY; HUMAN; INFORMED CONSENT; POSTOPERATIVE CARE; POSTOPERATIVE HEMORRHAGE; PREOPERATIVE CARE; REPEAT PROCEDURE; REVIEW; RISK FACTOR; TUMOR VOLUME;

EID: 84876864236     PISSN: 10962883     EISSN: 15585050     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.tgie.2013.02.005     Document Type: Review

References (147)

1. Peery A.F., Dellon E.S., Lund J., et al. Burden of gastrointestinal disease in the United States. Gastroenterology 2012, 143:1179-1187.
2. Rex D.K. Colonoscopic withdrawal technique is associated with adenoma miss rates. Gastrointest Endosc 2000, 51:33-36.
3. Lee R.H., Tang R.S., Muthusamy V.R., et al. Quality of colonoscopy withdrawal technique and variability in adenoma detection rates (with videos). Gastrointest Endosc 2011, 74:128-134.
4. Barclay R., Vicari J.J., Johanson J.F., Greenlaw R.I. Variation in adenoma detection rates and colonoscopic withdrawal times during screening colonoscopy. Gastrointest Endosc 2005, 61:AB107.
5. Sanchez W., Harewood G.C., Petersen B.T. Evaluation of polyp detection in relation to procedure time of screening or surveillance colonoscopy. Am J Gastroenterol 2004, 99:1941-1945.
6. Fatima H., Rex D.K., Rothstein R, et al. Cecal insertion and withdrawal times with wide-angle versus standard colonoscopes: a randomized controlled trial. Clin Gastroenterol Hepatol 2008, 6:109-114.
7. Simmons D.T., Harewood GC, Baron TH, et al. Impact of endoscopist withdrawal speed on polyp yield: implications for optimal colonoscopy withdrawal time. Aliment Pharmacol Ther 2006, 24:965-971.
8. Lim G., Viney S.K., Chapman B.A., Frizelle F.A., Gearry R.B. A prospective study of endoscopist-blinded colonoscopy withdrawal times and polyp detection rates in a tertiary hospital. N Z Med J 2012, 125:52-59.
9. Lin O.S., Kozarek R.A., Arai A., et al. The effect of periodic monitoring and feedback on screening colonoscopy withdrawal times, polyp detection rates, and patient satisfaction scores. Gastrointest Endosc 2010, 71:1253-1259.
10. Lieberman D.A., Rex D.K., Winawer S.J., et al. Guidelines for colonoscopy surveillance after screening and polypectomy: a consensus update by the US Multi-Society Task Force on Colorectal Cancer. Gastroenterology 2012, 143:844-857.
11. Kaminski M.F., Regula J., Kraszewska E., et al. Quality indicators for colonoscopy and the risk of interval cancer. N Engl J Med 2010, 362:1795-1803.
12. Baxter N.N., Goldwasser M.A., Paszat L.F., Saskin R., Urbach D.R., Rabeneck L. Association of colonoscopy and death from colorectal cancer. Ann Intern Med 2009, 150:1-8.
13. Brenner H., Chang-Claude J., Seiler C.M., Stürmer T., Hoffmeister M. Does a negative screening colonoscopy ever need to be repeated?. Gut 2006, 55:1145-1150.
14. Lakoff J., Paszat L.F., Saskin R., Rabeneck L. Risk of developing proximal versus distal colorectal cancer after a negative colonoscopy: a population-based study. Clin Gastroenterol Hepatol 2008, 6:1117-1121.
15. Singh H., Nugent Z., Mahmud S.M., Demers A.A., Bernstein C.N. Predictors of colorectal cancer after negative colonoscopy: a population-based study. Am J Gastroenterol 2010, 105:663-673.
16. Singh H., Nugent Z., Demers A.A., Kliewer E.V., Mahmud S.M., Bernstein C.N. The reduction in colorectal cancer mortality after colonoscopy varies by site of the cancer. Gastroenterology 2010, 139:1128-1137.
17. Brenner H., Chang-Claude J., Seiler C.M., Rickert A., Hoffmeister M. Protection from colorectal cancer after colonoscopy: a population-based, case-control study. Ann Intern Med 2011, 154:22-30.
18. Rex D.K., Rahmani E.Y., Haseman J.H., Lemmel G.T., Kaster S., Buckley J.S. Relative sensitivity of colonoscopy and barium enema for detection of colorectal cancer in clinical practice. Gastroenterology 1997, 112:17-23.
19. Baxter N., Sutradhar R., Forbes D.D., Paszat L.F., Saskin R., Rabeneck L. Analysis of administrative data finds endoscopist quality measures associated with post-colonoscopy colorectal cancer. Gastroenterology 2011, 140:65-72.
20. Rabeneck L., Paszat L.F., Saskin R. Endoscopist specialty is associated with incident colorectal cancer after a negative colonoscopy. Clin Gastroenterol Hepatol 2010, 8:275-279.
21. Baxter N.N., Warren J.L., Barrett M.J., Stukel T.A., Doria-Rose V.P. Association between colonoscopy and colorectal cancer mortality in a US cohort according to site of cancer and colonoscopist specialty. J Clin Oncol 2012, 30:2664-2669.
22. Ko C.W., Dominitz J.A., Green P., Kreuter W., Baldwin L.M. Specialty differences in polyp detection, removal, and biopsy during colonoscopy. Am J Med 2010, 123:528-535.
23. Pox C.P., Altenhofen L., Brenner H., Theilmeier A., Von Stillfried D., Schmiegel W. Efficacy of a nationwide screening colonoscopy program for colorectal cancer. Gastroenterology 2012, 142:1460-1467.
24. Hewett D.G., Rex D.K. Improving colonoscopy quality through health-care payment reform. Am J Gastroenterol 2010, 105:1925-1933.
25. Early D.S., T.Ben-Menachem, G.A.Decker, et al. Appropriate use of GI endoscopy. Gastrointest Endosc 2012, 75:1127-1131.
26. Balaguer F., Llach J., Castells A., et al. The European panel on the appropriateness of gastrointestinal endoscopy guidelines colonoscopy in an open-access endoscopy unit: a prospective study. Aliment Pharmacol Ther 2005, 21:609-613.
27. Vader J.P., Pache I., Froehlich F., et al. Overuse and underuse of colonoscopy in a European primary care setting. Gastrointest Endosc 2000, 52:593-599.
28. de Bosset V., Froehlich F., Rey J.P., et al. Do explicit appropriateness criteria enhance the diagnostic yield of colonoscopy?. Endoscopy 2002, 34:360-368.
29. Terraz O., Wietlisbach V., Jeannot J.G., et al. The EPAGE internet guideline as a decision support tool for determining the appropriateness of colonoscopy. Digestion 2005, 71:72-77.
30. Morini S., Hassan C., Meucci G., Toldi A., Zullo A., Minoli G. Diagnostic yield of open access colonoscopy according to appropriateness. Gastrointest Endosc 2001, 54:175-179.
31. Bersani G., Rossi A., Ricci G., et al. Do ASGE guidelines for the appropriate use of colonoscopy enhance the probability of finding relevant pathologies in an open access service?. Dig Liver Dis 2005, 37:609-614.
32. Baron T.H., Kimery B.D., Sorbi D., Gorkis L.C., Leighton J.A., Fleischer D.E. Strategies to address increased demand for colonoscopy: guidelines in an open endoscopy practice. Clin Gastroenterol Hepatol 2004, 2:178-182.
33. Rex D.K., Johnson D.A., Anderson J.C., Lengerich E.J. American College of Gastroenterology guidelines for colorectal cancer screening 2008. Am J Gastroenterol 2009, 104:739-750.
34. Levin B., Lieberman D.A., McFarland B., et al. Screening and surveillance for the early detection of colorectal cancer and adenomatous polyps, 2008: a joint guideline from the American Cancer Society, the US Multi-Society Task Force on Colorectal Cancer, and the American College of Radiology. Gastroenterology 2008, 134:1570-1595.
35. Brenner H., Chang-Claude J., Seiler C.M., Hoffmeister M. Long-term risk of colorectal cancer after negative colonoscopy. J Clin Oncol 2011, 29:3761-3767.
36. Imperiale T.F., Glowinski E.A., Lin-Cooper C., et al. Five-year risk of colorectal neoplasia after negative screening colonoscopy. N Engl J Med 2008, 359:1218-1224.
37. Rex D.K., Cummings O.W., Helper D.J., et al. 5-Year incidence of adenomas after negative colonoscopy in asymptomatic average-risk persons [see comment]. Gastroenterology 1996, 111:1178-1181.
38. Selby J.V., Friedman G.D., Quesenberry C.P., Weiss N.S. A case-control study of screening sigmoidoscopy and mortality from colorectal cancer. N Engl J Med 1992, 326:653-657.
39. Newcomb P.A., Storer B.E., Morimoto L.M., Templeton A., Potter J.D. Long-term efficacy of sigmoidoscopy in the reduction of colorectal cancer incidence. J Natl Cancer Inst 2003, 95:622-625.
40. Goodwin J.S., Singh A., Reddy N., Riall T.S., Kuo Y.F. Overuse of screening colonoscopy in the Medicare population. Arch Intern Med 2011, 171:1335-1343.
41. Mysliwiec P.A., Brown M.L., Klabunde C.N., Ransohoff D.F. Are physicians doing too much colonoscopy? A national survey of colorectal surveillance after polypectomy. Ann Intern Med 2004, 141:264-271.
42. Saini S.D., Nayak R.S., Kuhn L., Schoenfeld P. Why don't gastroenterologists follow colon polyp surveillance guidelines? Results of a national survey. J Clin Gastroenterol 2009, 43:554-558.
43. Burke C., Issa M., Church J. A nationwide survey of post-polypectomy surveillance colonoscopy: too many too soon!. Gastroenterology 2005, 128:A566.
44. Boolchand V., Singh J., Olds G., et al. Colonoscopy surveillance after polypectomy: a national survey study of primary care physicians. Am J Gastroenterol 2005, 100:S384-S385.
45. Kim E.R., Sinn D.H., Kim J.Y., et al. Factors associated with adherence to the recommended postpolypectomy surveillance interval. Surg Endosc 2012, 26:1690-1695.
46. Shah T.U., Voils C.I., McNeil R., Wu R., Fisher D.A. Understanding gastroenterologist adherence to polyp surveillance guidelines. Am J Gastroenterol 2012, 107:1283-1287.
47. Schoen R.E., Pinsky P.F., Weissfeld J.L., et al. Utilization of surveillance colonoscopy in community practice. Gastroenterology 2010, 138:73-81.
48. Rex D.K., Ahnen D.J., Baron J.A., et al. Serrated lesions of the colorectum: review and recommendations from an expert panel. Am J Gastroenterol 2012, 107:1315-1329.
49. Farrar W.D., Sawhney M.S., Nelson D.B., Lederle F.A., Bond J.H. Colorectal cancers found after a complete colonoscopy. Clin Gastroenterol Hepatol 2006, 4:1259-1264.
50. Arain M.A., Sawhney M., Sheikh S., et al. CIMP status of interval colon cancers: another piece to the puzzle. Am J Gastroenterol 2010, 105:1189-1195.
51. Pabby A., Schoen R.E., Weissfeld J.L., et al. Analysis of colorectal cancer occurrence during surveillance colonoscopy in the Dietary Polyp Prevention Trial. Gastrointest Endosc 2005, 61:385-391.
52. Finkelstein S., Bini E.J. Annual fecal occult blood testing can be safely suspended for up to 5 years after a negative colonoscopy in asymptomatic average-risk patients. Gastrointest Endosc 2005, 61:AB250.
53. Bampton P.A., Sandford J.J., Cole S.R., et al. Interval faecal occult blood testing in a colonoscopy based screening programme detects additional pathology. Gut 2005, 54:803-806.
54. Winawer S., Fletcher R., Rex D., et al. Colorectal cancer screening and surveillance: clinical guidelines and rationale-update based on new evidence. Gastroenterology 2003, 124:544-560.
55. Lieberman D., Nadel M., Smith R.A., et al. Standardized colonoscopy reporting and data system: report of the Quality Assurance Task Group of the National Colorectal Cancer Roundtable. Gastrointest Endosc 2007, 65:757-766.
56. Wexner S.D., Beck D.E., Baron T.H., et al. A consensus document on bowel preparation before colonoscopy: prepared by a Task Force from the American Society of Colon and Rectal Surgeons (ASCRS), the American Society for Gastrointestinal Endoscopy (ASGE), and the Society of American Gastrointestinal and Endoscopic Surgeons (SAGES). Surg Endosc 2006, 20:1161.
57. Larsen M., Hills N., Terdiman J. The impact of the quality of colon preparation on follow-up colonoscopy recommendations. Am J Gastroenterol 2011, 106:2058-2062.
58. Manno M., Pigo F., Manta R., et al. Bowel preparation with polyethylene glycol electrolyte solution: optimizing the splitting regimen. Dig Liver Dis 2012, 44:576-579.
59. Rex D.K., Bond J.H., Winawer S., et al. Quality in the technical performance of colonoscopy and the continuous quality improvement process for colonoscopy: recommendations of the U.S. Multi-Society Task Force on Colorectal Cancer. Am J Gastroenterol 2002, 97:1296-1308.
60. Calderwood A.H., Jacobson B.C. Comprehensive validation of the Boston Bowel Preparation Scale. Gastrointest Endosc 2010, 72:686-692.
61. Rostom A., Jolicoeur E. Validation of a new scale for the assessment of bowel preparation quality. Gastrointest Endosc 2004, 59:482-486.
62. Harewood G.C., Sharma V.K., de Garmo P. Impact of colonoscopy preparation quality on detection of suspected colonic neoplasia. Gastrointest Endosc 2003, 58:76-79.
63. Froehlich F., Wietlisbach V., Gonvers J.J., Burnand B., Vader J.P. Impact of colonic cleansing on quality and diagnostic yield of colonoscopy: the European Panel of Appropriateness of Gastrointestinal Endoscopy European multicenter study. Gastrointest Endosc 2005, 61:378-384.
64. Lebwohl B., Kastrinos F., Glick M., Rosenbaum A.J., Wang T., Neugut A.I. The impact of suboptimal bowel preparation on adenoma miss rates and the factors associated with early repeat colonoscopy. Gastrointest Endosc 2011, 73:1207-1214.
65. Rex D.K., Imperiale T.F., Latinovich D.R., Bratcher L.L. Impact of bowel preparation on efficiency and cost of colonoscopy. Am J Gastroenterol 2002, 97:1696-1700.
66. Kilgore T.W., Abdinoor A.A., Szary N.M., et al. Bowel preparation with split-dose polyethylene glycol before colonoscopy: a meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials. Gastrointest Endosc 2011, 73:1240-1245.
67. Varughese S., Kumar A.R., George A., Castro F.J. Morning-only one-gallon polyethylene glycol improves bowel cleansing for afternoon colonoscopies: a randomized endoscopist-blinded prospective study. Am J Gastroenterol 2010, 105:2368-2374.
68. Practice guidelines for preoperative fasting and the use of pharmacologic agents to reduce the risk of pulmonary aspiration: application to healthy patients undergoing elective procedures: an updated report by the American Society of Anesthesiologists Committee on Standards and Practice Parameters. Anesthesiology 2011, 114:495-511.
69. Huffman M., Unger R.Z., Thatikonda C., Amstutz S., Rex D.K. Split-dose bowel preparation for colonoscopy and residual gastric fluid volume: an observational study. Gastrointest Endosc 2010, 72:516-522.
70. Williams C. Insertion technique. Colonoscopy Principles and Practice 2009, Wiley-Blackwell publishing, London, UK, p. 537-559 [Chapter 40]. 2nd ed. J.D. Waye, D.K. Rex, C.B. Williams (Eds.).
71. Rex D.K. Still photography versus videotaping for documentation of cecal intubation: a prospective study. Gastrointest Endosc 2000, 51:451-459.
72. Marshall J.B., Barthel J.S. The frequency of total colonoscopy and terminal ileal intubation in the 1990s. Gastrointest Endosc 1993, 39:518-520.
73. Johnson D.A., Gurney M.S., Volpe R.J., et al. A prospective study of the prevalence of colonic neoplasms in asymptomatic patients with an age-related risk. Am J Gastroenterol 1990, 85:969-974.
74. Foutch P.G., Mai H., Pardy K., DiSario J.A., Manne R.K., Kerr D. Flexible sigmoidoscopy may be ineffective for secondary prevention of colorectal cancer in asymptomatic, average-risk men. Dig Dis Sci 1991, 36:924-928.
75. Lieberman D.A., Smith F.W. Screening for colon malignancy with colonoscopy. Am J Gastroenterol 1991, 86:946-951.
76. Rogge J.D., Elmore M.F., Mahoney S.J., et al. Low-cost, office-based, screening colonoscopy. Am J Gastroenterol 1994, 89:1775-1780.
77. Rex D., Sledge G., Harper P., et al. Colonic neoplasia in asymptomatic persons with negative fecal occult blood tests: influence of age, gender, and family history. Am J Gastroenterol 1993, 88:825-831.
78. Kadakia S., Wrobleski C., Kadakia A., Meier N. Prevalence of proximal colonic polyps in average-risk asymptomatic patients with negative fecal occult blood tests and flexible sigmoidoscopy. Gastrointest Endosc 1996, 44:112-117.
79. Lieberman D.A., Weiss D.G., Bond J.H., Ahnen D.J., Garewal H., Chejfec G. Use of colonoscopy to screen asymptomatic adults for colorectal cancer. Veterans Affairs Cooperative Study Group 380. N Engl J Med 2000, 343:162-168.
80. Imperiale T., Wagner D., Lin C., Larkin G.N., Rogge J.D., Ransohoff D.F. Risk of advanced proximal neoplasms in asymptomatic adults according to the distal colorectal findings. N Engl J Med 2000, 343:169-174.
81. Imperiale TF, Ransohoff DF, Itzkowitz SH, Turnbull BA, Ross ME, Colorectal Cancer Study Group. Fecal DNA versus fecal occult blood for colorectal-cancer screening in an average-risk population. N Engl J Med 2004;351:2704-14.
82. Schoenfeld P., Cash B., Flood A., et al. Colonoscopic screening of average-risk women for colorectal neoplasia. N Engl J Med 2005, 352:2061-2068.
83. Rathgaber S.W., Wick T.M. Colonoscopy completion and complication rates in a community gastroenterology practice. Gastrointest Endosc 2006, 64:556-562.
84. Kim D.H., Lee S.Y., Choi K.S., et al. The usefulness of colonoscopy as a screening test for detecting colorectal polyps. Hepatogastroenterology 2007, 54:2240-2242.
85. Niv Y., Hazazi R., Levi Z., Fraser G. Screening colonoscopy for colorectal cancer in asymptomatic people: a meta-analysis. Dig Dis Sci 2008, 53:3049-3054.
86. van Rijn J.C., Reitsma J.B., Stoker J., Bossuyt P.M., van Deventer S.J., Dekker E. Polyp miss rate determined by tandem colonoscopy: a systematic review. Am J Gastroenterol 2006, 101:343-350.
87. Pickhardt P.J., Nugent P.A., Mysliwiec P.A., Choi J.R., Schindler W.R. Location of adenomas missed by optical colonoscopy. Ann Intern Med 2004, 141:352-359.
88. Van Gelder R.E., Nio C.Y., Florie J., et al. Computed tomographic colonography compared with colonoscopy in patients at increased risk for colorectal cancer. Gastroenterology 2004, 127:41-48.
89. Pohl H., Robertson D.J. Colorectal cancers detected after colonoscopy frequently result from missed lesions. Clin Gastroenterol Hepatol 2010, 8:858-864.
90. Barclay R.L., Vicari J.J., Doughty A.S., Johanson J.F., Greenlaw R.L. Colonoscopic withdrawal times and adenoma detection during screening colonoscopy. N Engl J Med 2006, 355:2533-2541.
91. Chen S.C., Rex D.K. Endoscopist can be more powerful than age and male gender in predicting adenoma detection at colonoscopy. Am J Gastroenterol 2007, 102:856-861.
92. Shaukat A., Oancea C., Bond J.H., Church T.R., Allen J.I. Variation in detection of adenomas and polyps by colonoscopy and change over time with a performance improvement program. Clin Gastroenterol Hepatol 2009, 7:1335-1340.
93. Imperiale T.F., Glowinski E.A., Juliar B.E., Azzouz F., Ransohoff D.F. Variation in polyp detection rates at screening colonoscopy. Gastrointest Endosc 2009, 69:1288-1295.
94. Rex D.K., Petrini J.L., Baron T.H., et al. Quality indicators for colonoscopy. Am J Gastroenterol 2006, 101:873-885.
95. Rex D.K., Petrini J.L., Baron T.H., et al. Quality indicators for colonoscopy. Gastrointest Endosc 2006, 63:S16-S28.
96. Rex D.K., Helbig C.C. High yields of small and flat adenomas with high-definition colonoscopes using either white light or narrow band imaging. Gastroenterology 2007, 133:42-47.
97. Kahi C.J., Anderson J.C., Waxman I., et al. High-definition chromocolonoscopy vs. high-definition white light colonoscopy for average-risk colorectal cancer screening. Am J Gastroenterol 2010, 105:1301-1307.
98. Williams J.E., Le T.D., Faigel D.O. Polypectomy rate as a quality measure for colonoscopy. Gastrointest Endosc 2011, 73:498-506.
99. Francis D.L., Rodriguez-Correa D.T., Buchner A., Harewood G.C., Wallace M. Application of a conversion factor to estimate the adenoma detection rate from the polyp detection rate. Gastrointest Endosc 2011, 73:493-497.
100. Williams J.E., Holub J.L., Faigel D.O. Polypectomy rate is a valid quality measure for colonoscopy: results from a national endoscopy database. Gastrointest Endosc 2012, 75:576-582.
101. Hetzel J., Huang C.S., Coukos J.A., et al. Variation in the detection of serrated polyps in an average risk colorectal cancer screening cohort. Am J Gastroenterol 2010, 105:2656-2664.
102. Kahi C.J., Hewett D.G., Norton D.L., Eckert G.J., Rex D.K. Prevalence and variable detection of proximal colon serrated polyps during screening colonoscopy. Clin Gastroenterol Hepatol 2011, 9:42-46.
103. Kahi C.J., Li X., Eckert G.J., Rex D.K. High colonoscopic prevalence of proximal colon serrated polyps in average-risk men and women. Gastrointest Endosc 2012, 75:515-520.
104. Khalid O., Radaideh S., Cummings O.W., O'Brien M.J., Goldblum J.R., Rex D.K. Reinterpretation of histology of proximal colon polyps called hyperplastic in 2001. World J Gastroenterol 2009, 15:3767-3770.
105. Wong N.A., Hunt L.P., Novelli M.R., Shepherd N.A., Warren B.F. Observer agreement in the diagnosis of serrated polyps of the large bowel. Histopathology 2009, 55:63-66.
106. Corley D.A., Jensen C.D., Marks A.R. Can we improve adenoma detection rates? A systematic review of intervention studies. Gastrointest Endosc 2011, 74:656-665.
107. Sawhney M.S., Cury M.S., Neeman N., et al. Effect of institution-wide policy of colonoscopy withdrawal time > or = 7 minutes on polyp detection. Gastroenterology 2008, 135:1892-1898.
108. Barclay R.L., Vicari J.J., Greenlaw R.L. Effect of a time-dependent colonoscopic withdrawal protocol on adenoma detection during screening colonoscopy. Clin Gastroenterol Hepatol 2008, 6:1091-1098.
109. The Paris endoscopic classification of superficial neoplastic lesions: esophagus, stomach, and colon: November 30 to December 1, 2002. Gastrointest Endosc 2003, 58:S3-S43.
110. Soetikno R.M., Kaltenbach T., Rouse R.V., et al. Prevalence of nonpolypoid (flat and depressed) colorectal neoplasms in asymptomatic and symptomatic adults. J Am Med Assoc 2008, 299:1027-1035.
111. Rex D., Hewett D.G., Snover D.C. Supplementary appendix 2: proximal colon serrated lesion image library. Detection targets for colonoscopy: from variable detection to validation. Am J Gastroenterol 2010, 105:2665-2669.
112. Rex D.K., Hewett D.G., Raghavendra M., Chalasani N. The impact of videorecording on the quality of colonoscopy performance: a pilot study. Am J Gastroenterol 2010, 105:2312-2317.
113. Rex D.K. Update on colonoscopic imaging and projections for the future. Clin Gastroenterol Hepatol 2010, 8:318-321.
114. Adler A., Pohl H., Papanikolaou I.S., et al. A prospective randomised study on narrow-band imaging versus conventional colonoscopy for adenoma detection: does narrow-band imaging induce a learning effect?. Gut 2008, 57:59-64.
115. Pohl J., Schneider A., Vogell H., Mayer G., Kaiser G., Ell C. Pancolonic chromoendoscopy with indigo carmine versus standard colonoscopy for detection of neoplastic lesions: a randomised two-centre trial. Gut 2011, 60:485-490.
116. Ng S.C., Tsoi K.K., Hirai H.W., et al. The efficacy of cap-assisted colonoscopy in polyp detection and cecal intubation: a meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials. Am J Gastroenterol 2012, 107:1165-1173.
117. Moss A., Bourke M.J., Williams S.J., et al. Endoscopic mucosal resection outcomes and prediction of submucosal cancer from advanced colonic mucosal neoplasia. Gastroenterology 2011, 140:1909-1918.
118. Holt B.A., Bourke M.J. Wide field endoscopic resection for advanced colonic mucosal neoplasia: current status and future directions. Clin Gastroenterol Hepatol 2012, 10:969-979.
119. Onken J.E., Friedman J.Y., Subramanian S., et al. Treatment patterns and costs associated with sessile colorectal polyps. Am J Gastroenterol 2002, 97:2896-2901.
120. Fruhmorgen P., Demling L. Complications of diagnostic and therapeutic colonoscopy in the Federal-Republic-of-Germany-results of an inquiry. Endoscopy 1979, 11:146-150.
121. Nivatvongs S. Complications in colonoscopic polypectomy-an experience with 1555 polypectomies. Dis Colon Rectum 1986, 29:825-830.
122. Silvis S.E., Nebel O., Rogers G., et al. Endoscopic complications. Results of the 1974 American Society for Gastrointestinal Endoscopy Survey. J Am Med Assoc 1976, 235:928-930.
123. Anderson M.L., Pasha T.M., Leighton J.A. Endoscopic perforation of the colon: lessons from a 10-year study. Am J Gastroenterol 2000, 95:3418-3422.
124. Gatto N.M., Frucht H., Sundararajan V., Jacobson J.S., Grann V.R., Neugut A.I. Risk of perforation after colonoscopy and sigmoidoscopy: a population-based study. J Natl Cancer Inst 2003, 95:230-236.
125. Luchette F.A., Doerr R.J., Kelly K., Kulaylat M., Stephan R.M., Hassett J.M. Colonoscopic impaction in left colon strictures resulting in right colon pneumatic perforation. Surg Endosc 1992, 6:273-276.
126. Woltjen J.A. A retrospective analysis of cecal barotrauma caused by colonoscope air flow and pressure. Gastrointest Endosc 2005, 61:37-45.
127. Sieg A., Hachmoeller-Eisenbach U., Eisenbach T. Prospective evaluation of complications in outpatient GI endoscopy: a survey among German gastroenterologists. Gastrointest Endosc 2001, 53:620-627.
128. Heldwein W., Dollhopf M., Rosch T., et al. The Munich Polypectomy Study (MUPS): prospective analysis of complications and risk factors in 4000 colonic snare polypectomies. Endoscopy 2005, 37:1116-1122.
129. Kim D.H., Pickhardt P.J., Taylor A.J., et al. CT colonography versus colonoscopy for the detection of advanced neoplasia. N Engl J Med 2007, 357:1403-1412.
130. Nelson D.B., McQuaid K.R., Bond J.H., Lieberman D.A., Weiss D.G., Johnston T.K. Procedural success and complications of large-scale screening colonoscopy. Gastrointest Endosc 2002, 55:307-314.
131. Eckardt V.F., Kanzler G., Schmitt T., Bernhard G. Complications and adverse effects of colonoscopy with selective sedation. Gastrointest Endosc 1999, 49:560-565.
132. Karajeh M.A., Sanders D.S., Hurlstone D.P. Colonoscopy in elderly people is a safe procedure with a high diagnostic yield: a prospective comparative study of 2000 patients. Endoscopy 2006, 38:226-230.
133. Basson M.D., Etter L., Panzini L.A. Rates of colonoscopic perforation in current practice. Gastroenterology 1998, 114:1115.
134. Zubarik R., Fleischer D.E., Mastropietro C., et al. Prospective analysis of complications 30 days after outpatient colonoscopy. Gastrointest Endosc 1999, 50:322-328.
135. Sorbi D., Norton I., Conio M., Balm R., Zinsmeister A., Gostout C.J. Postpolypectomy lower GI bleeding: descriptive analysis. Gastrointest Endosc 2000, 51:690-696.
136. Von Gossum A., Cozzoli A., Adler M., Taton G., Cremer M. Colonoscopic snare polypectomy: analysis of 1485 resections comparing two types of current. Gastrointest Endosc 1992, 38:472-475.
137. Parra-Blanco A., Kaminaga N., Kojima T., Endo Y., Tajiri A., Fujita R. Colonoscopic polypectomy with cutting current: is it safe?. Gastrointest Endosc 2000, 51:676-681.
138. Singh M., Mehta N., Murthy U.K., Kaul V., Arif A., Newman N. Postpolypectomy bleeding in patients undergoing colonoscopy on uninterrupted clopidogrel therapy. Gastrointest Endosc 2010, 71:998-1005.
139. Waye J., Ramaiah C., Hipona J. Saline assisted polypectomy. Risks and balances. Gastrointest Endosc 1994, 40:38.
140. Khashab M., Eid E., Rusche M., Rex D.K. Incidence and predictors of "late" recurrences after endoscopic piecemeal resection of large sessile adenomas. Gastrointest Endosc 2009, 70:344-349.
141. Buchner A.M., Guarner-Argente C., Ginsberg G.G. Outcomes of EMR of defiant colorectal lesions directed to an endoscopy referral center. Gastrointest Endosc 2012, 76:255-263.
142. Hsieh Y.H., Lin H.J., Tseng G.Y., et al. Is submucosal epinephrine injection necessary before polypectomy? A prospective, comparative study. Hepatogastroenterology 2001, 48:1379-1382.
143. Di Giorgio P., De Luca L., Calcagno G., Rivellini G., Mandato M., De Luca B. Detachable snare versus epinephrine injection in the prevention of postpolypectomy bleeding: a randomized and controlled study. Endoscopy 2004, 36:860-863.
144. Iishi H., Tatsuta M., Narahara H., Iseki K., Sakai N. Endoscopic resection of large pedunculated colorectal polyps using a detachable snare. Gastrointest Endosc 1996, 44:594-597.
145. Binmoeller K.F., Thonke F., Soehendra N. Endoscopic hemoclip treatment for gastrointestinal bleeding. Endoscopy 1993, 25:167-170.
146. Rex D.K., Lewis B.S., Waye J.D. Colonoscopy and endoscopic therapy for delayed post-polypectomy hemorrhage. Gastrointest Endosc 1992, 38:127-129.
147. Screening for colorectal cancer: U.S. Preventive Services Task Force recommendation statement. Ann Intern Med 2008, 149:627-637.