The impact of videorecording on the quality of colonoscopy performance: A pilot study

American Journal of Gastroenterology

Volumn 105, Issue 11, 2010, Pages 2312-2317

  Rex, Douglas K ^a   Hewett, David G ^a   Raghavendra, Meghana ^a   Chalasani, Naga ^a  

^a INDIANA UNIVERSITY SCHOOL OF MEDICINE   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ARTICLE; AWARENESS; CLINICAL PRACTICE; COLON ADENOMA; COLONOSCOPY; HUMAN; JOB PERFORMANCE; NORMAL HUMAN; PERFORMANCE; PILOT STUDY; PRIORITY JOURNAL; QUALITY CONTROL; VIDEORECORDING;

ADENOMA; CLINICAL COMPETENCE; COLONIC NEOPLASMS; COLONOSCOPY; HUMANS; PILOT PROJECTS; QUALITY IMPROVEMENT; VIDEO RECORDING;

EID: 78149247627     PISSN: 00029270     EISSN: 15720241     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1038/ajg.2010.245     Document Type: Article

References (37)

1. Barclay RL, Vicari JJ, Doughty AS et al. Colonoscopic withdrawal timesand adenoma detection during screening colonoscopy. N Engl J Med2006;355:2533-41.
2. Chen SC, Rex DK. Endoscopist can be more powerful than age and malegender in predicting adenoma detection at colonoscopy. Am J Gastroenterol2007;102:856- 61.
3. Imperiale TF, Glowinski EA, Juliar BE et al. Variation in polyp detectionrates at screening colonoscopy. Gastrointest Endosc 2009;69:1288-95.
4. Simmons DT, Harewood GC, Baron Thet al. Impact ofendoscopistwithdrawal speed on polyp yield: implications for optimal colonoscopywithdrawal time. Aliment Pharmacol Ther 2006;24:965-71.
5. Rex DK. Colonoscopic withdrawal technique is associated with adenomamiss rates. Gastrointest Endosc 2000;51:33-6.
6. Fatima H, Rex DK, Rothstein R et al. Cecal insertion and withdrawal timeswith wide-angle versus standard colonoscopes: a randomized controlledtrial. Clin Gastroenterol Hepatol 2008;6:109-14.
7. Sanchez W, Harewood GC, Petersen BT. Evaluation of polyp detection inrelation to procedure time of screening or surveillance colonoscopy. Am JGastroenterol 2004;99:1941-5.
8. Sawhney MS, Cury MS, Neeman N et al. Effect of institution-wide policy ofcolonoscopy withdrawal time > or = 7 minutes on polyp detection. Gastroenterology2008;135:1892-8.
9. Barclay RL, Vicari JJ, Greenlaw RL. Effect of a time-dependent colonoscopicwithdrawal protocol on adenoma detection during screening colonoscopy.Clin Gastroenterol Hepatol 2008;6:1091-8.
10. Shaukat A, Oancea C, Bond JH et al. Variation in detection of adenomasand polyps by colonoscopy and change over time with a performanceimprovement program. Clin Gastroenterol Hepatol 2009;7:1335-40.
11. Thomas-Gibson S, Rogers PA, Suzuki N et al. Development of a videoassessment scoring method to determine the accuracy ofendoscopist performanceat screening flexible sigmoidoscopy. Endoscopy 2006;38:218-25.
12. Rex DK, Bond JH, Winawer S et al. Quality in the technical performance ofcolonoscopy and the continuous quality improvement process for colonoscopy:recommendations of the U.S. Multi-Society Task Force on ColorectalCancer. Am J Gastroenterol 2002;97:1296-308.
13. Rex DK, Petrini JL, Baron Thet al. Quality indicators for colonoscopy. AmJ Gastroenterol 2006;101:873-85.
14. Hewett DG, Kahi CJ, Rex DK. Does colonoscopy work? J Natl Compr CancNetw 2010;8:67-77.
15. Martinez ME, Baron JA, Lieberman DA et al. A pooled analysis of advancedcolorectal neoplasia diagnoses after colonoscopic polypectomy. Gastroenterology2009;136:832-41.
16. Farrar WD, Sawhney MS, Nelson DB et al. Colorectal cancers found after acomplete colonoscopy. Clin Gastroenterol Hepatol 2006;4:1259-64.
17. Singh H, Turner D, Xue L et al. Risk of developing colorectal cancer followinga negative colonoscopy examination: evidence for a 10-year intervalbetween colonoscopies. JAMA 2006;295:2366-73.
18. Robertson DJ, Greenberg ER, Beach M et al. Colorectal cancer in patientsunder close colonoscopic surveillance. Gastroenterology 2005;129:34-41.
19. Haseman JH, Lemmel GT, Rahmani EY et al. Failure of colonoscopy todetect colorectal cancer: evaluation of 47 cases in 20 hospitals. GastrointestEndosc 1997;45:451-5.
20. Sawhney MS, Farrar WD, Gudiseva S et al. Microsatellite instability ininterval colon cancers. Gastroenterology 2006;131:1700-5.
21. Pabby A, Schoen RE, Weissfeld JL et al. Analysis of colorectal cancer occurrenceduring surveillance colonoscopy in the Dietary Polyp PreventionTrial. Gastrointest Endosc 2005;61:385-91.
22. Harewood GC, Sharma VK, de Garmo P. Impact of colonoscopy preparationquality on detection of suspected colonic neoplasia. GastrointestEndosc 2003;58:76-9.
23. Froehlich F, Wietlisbach V, Gonvers JJ et al. Impact of colonic cleansingon quality and diagnostic yield of colonoscopy: the European Panel of Appropriateness of Gastrointestinal Endoscopy European multicenter study.Gastrointest Endosc 2005;61:378-84.
24. Parra-Blanco A, Nicolas-Perez D, Gimeno-Garcia A et al. The timing ofbowel preparation before colonoscopy determines the quality of cleansing,and is a significant factor contributing to the detection of flat lesions: arandomized study. World J Gastroenterol 2006;12:6161-6.
25. Soetikno RM, Kaltenbach T, Rouse RV et al. Prevalence of nonpolypoid (flatand depressed) colorectal neoplasms in asymptomatic and symptomaticadults. JAMA 2008;299:1027-35.
26. Rex DK. Considering double contrast barium enema and its demise: acase for systematic videorecording of colonoscopy. Am J Gastroenterol2008;103:3149- 51.
27. Eccles M, Grimshaw J, Walker A et al. Changing the behavior of healthcareprofessionals: the use of theory in promoting the uptake of research findings.J Clin Epidemiol 2005;58:107-12.
28. Michie S, Johnston M, Abraham C et al. Making psychological theory usefulfor implementing evidence based practice: a consensus approach. Qual SafHealth Care 2005;14:26-33.
29. Grol RP, Bosch MC, Hulscher ME et al. Planning and studying improvementin patient care: the use of theoretical perspectives. Milbank Q2007;85:93-138.
30. Petrini J. Continuous quality improvement in colonoscopy. In: Waye JD,Rex DK, Williams CB (eds). Colonoscopy: Principles and Practice, 2ndedn. Wiley-Blackwell: Chichester, UK, 2009, pp 41-56.
31. Ferlie EB, Shortell SM. Improving the quality of health care in the UnitedKingdom and the United States: a framework for change. Milbank Q2001;79:281-315.
32. French JRP Jr, Raven BH. The bases of social power. In: Cartwright D (ed).Studies in Social Power. Institute for Social Research: Ann Arbor, MI, 1959,pp 150-67.
33. Rex DK, Cutler CS, Lemmel GT et al. Colonoscopic miss rates of adenomasdetermined by back-to-back colonoscopies. Gastroenterology1997;112:24-8.
34. Rex DK, Helbig CC. High yields of small and flat adenomas with highdefinitioncolonoscopes using either white light or narrow band imaging.Gastroenterology 2007;133:42-7.
35. Rex DK, Overhiser A, Chen S et al. Estimation of the impact of AmericanCollege of Radiology recommendations for CT colonography reporting forresection of high-risk findings. Gastrointest Endosc 2008;67:AB105-6.
36. Chen SC, Rex DK. Variable detection of nonadenomatous polyps byindividual endoscopists at colonoscopy and correlation with adenomadetection. J Clin Gastroenterol 2008;42:704-7.
37. McCarney R, Warner J, Iliffe S et al. The Hawthorne Effect: a randomised,controlled trial. BMC Med Res Methodol [online] 2007;7:30.