Editorial: Detection targets for colonoscopy: From variable detection to validation

American Journal of Gastroenterology

Volumn 105, Issue 12, 2010, Pages 2665-2669

  Rex, Douglas K ^a   Hewett, David G ^a   Snover, Dale C ^b  

^a INDIANA UNIVERSITY SCHOOL OF MEDICINE   (United States)

^b UNIVERSITY OF MINNESOTA MEDICAL SCHOOL   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

CANCER PREVENTION; COLON ADENOMA; COLON CANCER; COLONOSCOPY; GASTROINTESTINAL ENDOSCOPY; HUMAN; NARROW BAND IMAGING; PRIORITY JOURNAL; REVIEW;

ADENOMA; BIOPSY; COLONIC POLYPS; COLONOSCOPY; COLORECTAL NEOPLASMS; HUMANS; MASS SCREENING; OBSERVER VARIATION; QUALITY OF HEALTH CARE;

EID: 78649867002     PISSN: 00029270     EISSN: 15720241     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1038/ajg.2010.330     Document Type: Review

References (42)

1. Kaminski MF, Regula J, Kraszewska E et al. Quality indicators for colonoscopy and the risk of interval cancer. N Engl J Med 2010;362: 1795-803.
2. Rex DK, Bond JH, Winawer S et al. Quality in the technical performance of colonoscopy and the continuous quality improvement process for colonoscopy: recommendations of the US. Multi-Society Task Force on Colorectal Cancer. Am J Gastroenterol 2002;97: 1296-308.
3. Rex D, Cutler CS, Lemmel GT et al. Colonoscopic miss rates of adenomas determined by back-to-back colonoscopies. Gastroenterology 1997;112: 24-8.
4. Rex DK. Colonoscopy versus barium enema: A reappraisal of the facts and issues-Reply. Gastroenterology 1997;113: 1049-50.
5. Bressler B, Paszat LF, Chen Z et al. Rates of new or missed colorectal cancers aft er colonoscopy and their risk factors: a population-based analysis. Gastroenterology 2007;132: 96-102.
6. Singh H, Nugent Z, Mahmud SM et al. Predictors of colorectal cancer aft er negative colonoscopy: a population-based study. Am J Gastroenterol 2010;105: 663-73.
7. Barclay RL, Vicari JJ, Doughty AS et al. Colonoscopic withdrawal times and adenoma detection during screening colonoscopy. N Engl J Med 2006;355: 2533-41.
8. Chen SC, Rex DK. Endoscopist can be more powerful than age and male gender in predicting adenoma detection at colonoscopy. Am J Gastroenterol 2007;102: 856-61.
9. Imperiale TF, Glowinski EA, Juliar BE et al. Variation in polyp detection rates at screening colonoscopy. Gastrointest Endosc 2009;69: 1288-95.
10. Atkin W, Rogers P, Cardwell C et al. Wide variation in adenoma detection rates at screening fl exible sigmoidoscopy. Gastroenterology 2004;126: 1247-56.
11. Rex DK. Update on colonoscopic imaging and projections for the future. Clin Gastroenterol Hepatol 2010;8: 318-21.
12. Hewett DG, Rex DK. Improving colonoscopy quality through health-care payment reform. Am J Gastroenterol 2010;doi:10.1038/ajg.2010.247 (in press).
13. Appelman HD. Con: High-grade dysplasia and villous features should not be part of the routine diagnosis of colorectal adenomas. Am J Gastroenterol 2008;103: 1329-31.
14. Alikhan M, Cummings O, Ulbright T et al. Accuracy of pathologic interpretation of Barrettt's metaplasia and dysplasia by community hospital general pathologists. Gastrointest Endosc 1998;47: AB64.
15. Demers RY, Neale AV, Budev H et al. Pathologist agreement in the interpretation of colorectal polyps. Am J Gastroenterol 1990;85: 417-21.
16. Cross SS, Betmouni S, Burton JL et al. What levels of agreement can be expected between histopathologists assigning cases to discrete nominal categories? A study of the diagnosis of hyperplastic and adenomatous colorectal polyps. Mod Pathol 2000;13: 941-4.
17. Terry MB, Neugut AI, Bostick RM et al. Reliability in the classifi cation of advanced colorectal adenomas. Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev 2002;11: 660-3.
18. Denis B, Sauleau EA, Gendre I et al. The polyp detection rate can replace the adenoma detection rate to assess the yield of colonoscopy in current practice. Gastrointest Endosc 2010;71: AB326.
19. Rodriguez Correa D, Buchner AM, Wallace MB et al. Estimating adenoma detection rate with polyp detection rate: proof of concept. Gastrointest Endosc 2010;71: AB127-8.
20. Hilsden R, Rostom A, Dube C et al. Is polyp detection rate a valid proxy for adenoma detection rate for measuring the technical quality of colonoscopy? Gastroenterol 2010;138: S57.
21. Williams J, Le TD, Faigel DO. Polypectomy rate as a surrogate marker for adenoma detection in quality measurement for colonoscopy. Gastrointest Endosc 2010;71: AB146.
22. Martinez ME, Baron JA, Lieberman DA et al. A pooled analysis of advanced colorectal neoplasia diagnoses aft er colonoscopic polypectomy. Gastroenterology 2009;136: 832-41.
23. Rex DK, Petrini JL, Baron TH et al. Quality indicators for colonoscopy. Am J Gastroenterol 2006;101: 873-85.
24. Rex DK, Helbig CC. High yields of small and fl at adenomas with highdefi nition colonoscopes using either white light or narrow band imaging. Gastroenterology 2007;133: 42-7.
25. Kahi CJ, Anderson JC, Waxman I et al. High-defi nition chromocolonoscopy vs. high-defi nition white light colonoscopy for average-risk colorectal cancer screening. Am J Gastroenterol 2010;105: 1301-7.
26. Baxter NN, Goldwasser MA, Paszat LF et al. Association of colonoscopy and death from colorectal cancer. Ann Intern Med 2009;150: 1-8.
27. Singh G, Gerson LB, Wang H et al. Screening colonoscopy, colorectal cancer and gender: an unfair deal for the fair sex? Gastrointest Endosc 2007;65: AB100.
28. Brenner H, Hoffemeister M, Arndt V et al. Protection from right- and left - sided colorectal neoplasms aft er colonoscopy: population-based study. J Natl Cancer Inst 2010;102: 89-95.
29. Rex DK, Johnson DA, Anderson JC et al. American College of Gastroenterology guidelines for colorectal cancer screening 2008. Am J Gastroenterol 2009;104: 739-50.
30. Leggett B, Whitehall V. Role of the serrated pathway in colorectal cancer pathogenesis. Gastroenterology 2010;138: 2088-100.
31. Goldstein NS. Small colonic microsatellite unstable adenocarcinomas and high-grade epithelial dysplasias in sessile serrated adenoma polypectomy specimens: a study of eight cases. Am J Clin Pathol 2006;125: 132-45.
32. Sheridan TB, Fenton H, Lewin MR et al. Sessile serrated adenomas with low- and high-grade dysplasia and early carcinomas: an immunohistochemical study of serrated lesions "caught in the act ". Am J Clin Pathol 2006;126: 564-71.
33. Soetikno RM, Kaltenbach T, Rouse RV et al. Prevalence of nonpolypoid (fl at and depressed) colorectal neoplasms in asymptomatic and symptomatic adults. JAMA 2008;299: 1027-35.
34. Hetzel J, Huang CS, Coukos JA et al. Variation in the detection of serrated polyps in an average risk colorectal cancer screening cohort. Am J Gastroenterol 2010;105:2656-64 (this issue).
35. Variable detection of nonadenomatous polyps by individual endoscopists at colonoscopy and correlation with adenoma detection. J Clin Gastroenterol 2008;42: 704-7.
36. Khalid O, Radaideh S, Cummings OW et al. Reinterpretation of histology of proximal colon polyps called hyperplastic in 2001. World J Gastroenterol 2009;15: 3767-70.
37. Farris AB, Misdraji J, Srivastava A et al. Sessile serrated adenoma: challenging discrimination from other serrated colonic polyps. Am J Surg Pathol 2008;32: 30-5.
38. Sandmeier D, Seelentag W, Bouzourene H. Serrated polyps of the colorectum: is sessile serrated adenoma distinguishable from hyperplastic polyp in a daily practice? Virchows Arch 2007;450: 613-8.
39. Shaukat A, Oancea C, Bond JH et al. Variation in detection of adenomas and polyps by colonoscopy and change over time with a performance improvement program. Clin Gastroenterol Hepatol 2009;7: 1335-40.
40. Rex DK. Colonoscopic withdrawal technique is associated with adenoma miss rates. Gastrointest Endosc 2000;51: 33-6.
41. Rex DK. Narrow-band imaging without optical magnifi cation for histologic analysis of colorectal polyps. Gastroenterology 2009;136: 1174-81.
42. Raghavendra M, Hewett DG, Rex DK. Diffeerentiating adenomas from hyperplastic colorectal polyps: Narrow-band imaging can be learned in 20 min. Gastrointest Endosc;doi:10.1016/j gie 2010.03.1124 (in press).