The efficacy of cap-assisted colonoscopy in polyp detection and cecal intubation: A meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials

American Journal of Gastroenterology

Volumn 107, Issue 8, 2012, Pages 1165-1173

  Ng, Siew C ^a   Tsoi, Kelvin K F ^a   Hirai, Hoyee W ^a   Lee, Yuk Tong ^a   Wu, Justin C Y ^a   Sung, Joseph J Y ^a   Chan, Francis K L ^a   Lau, James Y W ^a  

^a CHINESE UNIVERSITY OF HONG KONG   (Hong Kong)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

CAP ASSISTED COLONOSCOPY; CLINICAL ASSESSMENT TOOL; COLON ADENOMA; COLON POLYP; COLONOSCOPE; COLONOSCOPY; DIGESTIVE TRACT INTUBATION; HUMAN; INTERMETHOD COMPARISON; META ANALYSIS; OUTCOME ASSESSMENT; PRIORITY JOURNAL; RANDOMIZED CONTROLLED TRIAL (TOPIC); REVIEW; RISK FACTOR; STANDARD; SYSTEMATIC REVIEW;

ADENOMA; CECUM; COLONIC NEOPLASMS; COLONIC POLYPS; COLONOSCOPES; COLONOSCOPY; HUMANS; INTUBATION; RANDOMIZED CONTROLLED TRIALS AS TOPIC;

EID: 84864576338     PISSN: 00029270     EISSN: 15720241     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1038/ajg.2012.135     Document Type: Review

References (44)

1. Winawer SJ, Zauber AG, Fletcher RH et al. Guidelines for colonoscopy surveillance aft er polypectomy: a consensus update by the US Multi-Society Task Force on Colorectal Cancer and the American Cancer Society. Gastroenterology 2006; 130: 1872-85. (Pubitemid 43668826)
2. Pignone M, Rich M, Teutsch SM et al. Screening for colorectal cancer in adults at average risk: a summary of the evidence for the US Preventive Services Task Force. Ann Intern Med 2002; 137: 132-41. (Pubitemid 34779159)
3. Shah HA, Paszat LF, Saskin R et al. Factors associated with incomplete colo noscopy: a population-based study. Gastroenterology 2007; 132: 2297-303. (Pubitemid 46890860)
4. Rex DK, Cutler CS, Lemmel GT et al. Colonoscopic miss rates of adenomas determined by back-to-back colonoscopies. Gastroenterology 1997; 112: 24-8. (Pubitemid 27008981)
5. Kaminski MF, Regula J, Kraszewska E et al. Quality indicators for colonoscopy and the risk of interval cancer. N Engl J Med 2010; 362: 1795-803.
6. Lieberman DA, Weiss DG, Bond JH et al. Use of colonoscopy to screen asymptomatic adults for colorectal cancer. Veterans Aff airs Cooperative Study Group 380. N Engl J Med 2000; 343: 162-8. (Pubitemid 30489212)
7. Rainis T, Keren D, Goldstein O et al. Diagnostic yield and safety of colonoscopy in Israeli patients in an open access referral system. J Clin Gastroenterol 2007; 41: 394-9. (Pubitemid 46573069)
8. Barclay RL, Vicari JJ, Doughty AS et al. Colonoscopic withdrawal times and adenoma detection during screening colonoscopy. N Engl J Med 2006; 355: 2533-41. (Pubitemid 44917501)
9. Barclay RL, Vicari JJ, Greenlaw RL. Eff ect of a time-dependent colonoscopic withdrawal protocol on adenoma detection during screening colonoscopy. Clin Gastroenterol Hepatol 2008; 6: 1091-8.
10. Corley DA, Jensen CD, Marks AR. Can we improve adenoma detection rates? A systematic review of intervention studies. Gastrointest Endosc 2011; 74: 656-65.
11. Le RM, Coron E, Parlier D et al. High resolution colonoscopy with chromoscopy versus standard colonoscopy for the detection of colonic neoplasia: a randomized study. Clin Gastroenterol Hepatol 2006; 4: 349-54. (Pubitemid 43343892)
12. Hurlstone DP, Cross SS, Drew K et al. An evaluation of colorectal endoscopic mucosal resection using high-magnifi cation chromoscopic colonoscopy: a prospective study of 1000 colonoscopies. Endoscopy 2004; 36: 491-8. (Pubitemid 38811616)
13. Lapalus MG, Helbert T, Napoleon B et al. Does chromoendoscopy with structure enhancement improve the colonoscopic adenoma detection rate? Endoscopy 2006; 38: 444-8. (Pubitemid 43744700)
14. Deenadayalu VP, Chadalawada V, Rex DK. 170 degrees wide-angle colonoscope: eff ect on effi ciency and miss rates. Am J Gastroenterol 2004; 99: 2138-42.
15. Fatima H, Rex DK, Rothstein R et al. Cecal insertion and withdrawal times with wide-angle versus standard colonoscopes: a randomized controlled trial. Clin Gastroenterol Hepatol 2008; 6: 109-14. (Pubitemid 50008421)
16. Chiu HM, Chang CY, Chen CC et al. A prospective comparative study of narrow-band imaging, chromoendoscopy, and conventional colonoscopy in the diagnosis of colorectal neoplasia. Gut 2007; 56: 373-9.
17. Leufk ens AM, DeMarco DC, Rastogi A et al. Eff ect of a retrogradeviewing device on adenoma detection rate during colonoscopy: the TERRACE study. Gastrointest Endosc 2011; 73: 480-9.
18. Tada M, Inoue H, Yabata E et al. Feasibility of the transparent cap-fi tted colonoscope for screening and mucosal resection. Dis Colon Rectum 1997; 40: 618-21. (Pubitemid 27200708)
19. Dafnis GM. Technical considerations and patient comfort in total colonoscopy with and without a transparent cap: initial experiences from a pilot study. Endoscopy 2000; 32: 381-4. (Pubitemid 30219154)
20. Matsushita M, Hajiro K, Okazaki K et al. Effi cacy of total colonoscopy with a transparent cap in comparison with colonoscopy without the cap. Endoscopy 1998; 30: 444-7. (Pubitemid 28353551)
21. Kondo S, Yamaji Y, Watabe H et al. A randomized controlled trial evaluating the usefulness of a transparent hood attached to the tip of the colonoscope . Am J Gastroenterol 2007; 102: 75-81. (Pubitemid 46072045)
22. Horiuchi A, Nakayama Y. Improved colorectal adenoma detection with a transparent retractable extension device. Am J Gastroenterol 2008; 103: 341-5. (Pubitemid 351248707)
23. Shida T, Takano S, Kaiho M et al. Transparent hood attached to a gastroscope: a simple rescue technique for patients with diffi cult or incomplete colonoscopy. Endoscopy 2008; 40 (Suppl 2): E139.
24. DerSimonian R, Laird N. Meta-analysis in clinical trials. Control Clin Trials 1986; 7: 177-88. (Pubitemid 17189972)
25. Egger M, Davey SG, Schneider M et al. Bias in meta-analysis detected by a simple, graphical test. BMJ 1997; 315: 629-34. (Pubitemid 27387172)
26. Duval S, Tweedie R. Trim and fi ll: a simple funnel-plot-based method of testing and adjusting for publication bias in meta-analysis. Biometrics 2000; 56: 455-63. (Pubitemid 30422636)
27. Rosenthal R. The " fi le drawer problem " and tolerance for null results. British Medical Journal. 1979; 315(7109): 629-34.
28. The Cochrane Collaboration Review Manager (Revman) computer programme, Version 5.0. The Nordic Cochrane Centre, 2008.
29. Bax L, Yu LM, Ikeda N et al. A systematic comparison of soft ware dedicated to meta-analysis of causal studies. BMC Med Res Methodol 2007; 7: 40.
30. Tee HP, Corte C, Al-Ghamdi H et al. Prospective randomized controlled trial evaluating cap-assisted colonoscopy vs standard colonoscopy. World J Gastroenterol 2010; 16: 3905-10.
31. Lee YT, Lai LH, Hui AJ et al. Effi cacy of cap-assisted colonoscopy in comparison with regular colonoscopy: a randomized controlled trial. Am J Gastroenterol 2009; 104: 41-6.
32. Harada Y, Hirasawa D, Fujita N et al. Impact of a transparent hood on the performance of total colonoscopy: a randomized controlled trial. Gastrointest Endosc 2009; 69: 637-44.
33. Hewett DG, Rex DK. Cap-fi tted colonoscopy: a randomized, tandem colonoscopy study of adenoma miss rates. Gastrointest Endosc 2010; 72: 775-81.
34. Dai J, Feng N, Lu H et al. Transparent cap improves patients ′?tolerance of colonoscopy and shortens examination time by inexperienced endoscopists . J Dig Dis 2010; 11: 364-8.
35. Takeuchi Y, Inoue T, Hanaoka N et al. Autofl uorescence imaging with a transparent hood for detection of colorectal neoplasms: a prospective, randomized trial. Gastrointest Endosc 2010; 72: 1006-13.
36. Lee JS, Choi SH, Choi SW. Effi cacy of hood-cap associated colonoscopy: comparison with regular colonoscopy, prospective study. Gastroenterology; 2011; 140: 1440.
37. Takano N, Yamaji Y, Kajiwara H. A randomized controlled trial of the usefulness of cap-fi tted colonoscopy on the polyp detection. Gastrointestinal Endoscopy 2008; 167: AB303.
38. de Wijkerslooth TR, Stoop EM, Bossuyt PM et al. Adenoma detection with cap-assisted colonoscopy versus regular colonoscopy: a randomised controlled trial. Gut; advance online publication, 20 December 2011; e-pub ahead of print.
39. Rastogi A, Bansal A, Rao DS et al. Higher adenoma detection rates with cap-assisted colonoscopy: a randomised controlled trial. Gut 2012; 61: 402-8.
40. Shida T, Katsuura Y, Teramoto O et al. Transparent hood attached to the colonoscope: does it really work for all types of colonoscopes? Surg Endosc 2008; 22: 2654-8.
41. Sato K, Hirahata K, Furuhata T. Effi cacy of oblique transparent cap with colonoscope for trainees analyzed with magnetic endoscope imaging (MEI): a preliminary report. Gastrointestinal Endoscopy 2009; 69: AB120.
42. Aslinia F, Uradomo L, Steele A et al. Quality assessment of colonoscopic cecal intubation: an analysis of 6 years of continuous practice at a university hospital. Am J Gastroenterol 2006; 101: 721-31.
43. Morgan J, Th omas K, Lee-Robichaud H et al. Transparent cap colonoscopy versus standard colonoscopy for investigation of gastrointestinal tract conditions. Cochrane Database Syst Rev 2011, CD008211.
44. Lee YT, Hui AJ, Wong VW et al. Improved colonoscopy success rate with a distally attached mucosectomy cap. Endoscopy 2006; 38: 739-42. (Pubitemid 44044405)