Polyp miss rate determined by tandem colonoscopy: A systematic review

American Journal of Gastroenterology

Volumn 101, Issue 2, 2006, Pages 343-350

  Van Rijn, Jeroen C ^a,b   Reitsma, Johannes B ^a   Stoker, Jaap ^a   Bossuyt, Patrick M ^a   Van Deventer, Sander J ^a   Dekker, Evelien ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF AMSTERDAM   (Netherlands)

^b ACADEMIC MEDICAL CENTER   (Netherlands)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

BINOMIAL DISTRIBUTION; CALCULATION; COCHRANE LIBRARY; COLON ADENOMA; COLON POLYP; COLONOSCOPY; CONFIDENCE INTERVAL; DATA BASE; DIAGNOSTIC ERROR; EMBASE; HUMAN; MEDLINE; POLYPECTOMY; PRIORITY JOURNAL; REVIEW; STATISTICAL MODEL; SYSTEMATIC REVIEW; TUMOR VOLUME;

COLONIC POLYPS; COLONOSCOPY; DIAGNOSIS, DIFFERENTIAL; DIAGNOSTIC ERRORS; HUMANS;

EID: 33644879743     PISSN: 00029270     EISSN: 15720241     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1111/j.1572-0241.2006.00390.x     Document Type: Review

References (26)

1. Jemal A Tiwari RC Murray T et al Cancer statistics, 2004 CA Cancer J Clin 2004 54 8 29
2. Winawer SJ Zauber AG Ho MN et al Prevention of colorectal cancer by colonoscopic polypectomy. The National Polyp Study Workgroup N Engl J Med 1993 329 27 1977 81
3. Winawer S Fletcher R Rex D et al Gastrointestinal Consortium Panel. Colorectal cancer screening and surveillance: Clinical guidelines and rationale-update based on new evidence Gastroenterology 2003 124 544 60
4. Mandel JS Bond JH Church TR et al Reducing mortality from colorectal cancer by screening for fecal occult blood. Minnesota Colon Cancer Control Study N Engl J Med 1993 328 1365 71
5. Pepe MS The Statistical Evaluation of Medical Tests for Classification and Prediction Oxford University Press New York 2004 7.3 194 8
6. Whiting P Rutjes AW Reitsma JB et al Sources of variation and bias in studies of diagnostic accuracy: A systematic review Ann Intern Med 2004 140 189 202
7. Brown LD Cai TT DasGupta A Interval estimation for a binomial proportion Stat Sci 2001 16 101 33
8. Hixson LJ Fennerty MB Sampliner RE Mc Gee D Garewal H Prospective study of the frequency and size distribution of polyps missed by colonoscopy J Natl Cancer Inst 1990 82 1769 72
9. Hixson LJ Fennerty MB Sampliner RE Garewal HS Prospective blinded trial of the colonoscopic miss-rate of large polyps Gastrointest Endosc 1991 37 125 7
10. Rex DK Cutler CS Lemmel GT et al Colonoscopic miss rates of adenomas determined by back-to-back colonoscopies Gastroenterology 1997 112 24 8
11. Matsushita M Hajiro K Okazaki K et al Efficacy of total colonoscopy with a transparent cap in comparison with colonoscopy without the cap Endoscopy 1998 30 444 7
12. Rex DK Chadalawada V Helper DJ Wide angle colonoscopy with a prototype instrument: Impact on miss rates and efficiency as determined by back-to-back colonoscopies Am J Gastroenterol 2003 98 2000 5
13. Harrison M Singh N Rex DK Impact of proximal colon retroflexion on adenoma miss rates Am J Gastroenterol 2004 99 519 22
14. Pickhardt PJ Choi JR Hwang I et al Computed tomographic virtual colonoscopy to screen for colorectal neoplasia in asymptomatic adults N Engl J Med 2003 349 2191 200
15. Schoen RE Gerber LD Margulies C The pathologic measurement of polyp size is preferable to the endoscopic estimate Gastrointest Endosc 1997 46 492 6
16. Gopalswamy N Shenoy VN Choudhry U et al Is in vivo measurement of size of polyps during colonoscopy accurate¿ Gastrointest Endosc 1997 46 497 502
17. Bossuyt PM Reitsma JB Bruns DE et al Towards complete and accurate reporting of studies of diagnostic accuracy: The STARD initiative Radiology 2003 226 24 8
18. Jass JR Hyperplastic polyps and colorectal cancer: Is there a link¿ Clin Gastroenterol Hepatol 2004 2 1 8
19. Bowles CJ Leicester R Romaya C et al Prospective study of colonoscopy practice in the UK today: Are we adequately prepared for national colorectal cancer screening tomorrow¿ Gut 2004 53 277 83
20. Postic G Lewin D Bickerstaff C Wallace MB Colonoscopic miss rates determined by direct comparison of colonoscopy with colon resection specimens Am J Gastroenterol 2002 97 3182 5
21. van Gelder RE Florie J Stoker J Colorectal cancer screening and surveillance with CT colonography: Current controversies and obstacles Abdom Imag 2005 30 5 12
22. Van Gelder RE Nio CY Florie J et al Computed tomographic colonography compared with colonoscopy in patients at increased risk for colorectal cancer Gastroenterology 2004 127 41 8
23. Brooker JC Saunders BP Shah SG et al Total colonic dye-spray increases the detection of diminutive adenomas during routine colonoscopy: A randomized controlled trial Gastrointest Endosc 2002 56 333 8
24. Kiesslich R von Bergh M Hahn M et al Chromoendoscopy with indigocarmine improves the detection of adenomatous and nonadenomatous lesions in the colon Endoscopy 2001 33 1001 6
25. Dekker E Fockens P Advances in colonic imaging: new endoscopic imaging methods Eur J Gastroenterol Hepatol 2005 17 803 8
26. Robertson DJ Greenberg ER Beach M et al Colorectal cancer in patients under close colonoscopic surveillance Gastroenterology 2005 129 34 41