Polypectomy rate as a quality measure for colonoscopy

Gastrointestinal Endoscopy

Volumn 73, Issue 3, 2011, Pages 498-506

  Williams, Jason E ^a   Le, Thienluong Domi ^b   Faigel, Douglas O ^a  

^a OREGON HEALTH AND SCIENCE UNIVERSITY   (United States)

^b OREGON HEALTH AND SCIENCE UNIVERSITY   (United States)

Author keywords

adenoma detection rate; ADR; OHSU; Oregon Health and Science University; polypectomy rate; Portland Veterans Affairs Medical Center; PR; PVAMC

Indexed keywords

ADENOMA DETECTION RATE; ADULT; ARTICLE; CANCER RISK; CANCER SCREENING; COLON POLYP; COLONOSCOPY; COLORECTAL ADENOMA; CONTROLLED STUDY; CORRELATION ANALYSIS; ENDOSCOPY; FEMALE; HUMAN; MAJOR CLINICAL STUDY; MALE; OUTCOME ASSESSMENT; PHYSICIAN; POLECTOMY RATE; POLYPECTOMY; PRIORITY JOURNAL; QUALITY CONTROL; RATING SCALE; RETROSPECTIVE STUDY; SEX DIFFERENCE; UNITED STATES;

ADENOMA; AGED; AGED, 80 AND OVER; BENCHMARKING; CLINICAL COMPETENCE; COLONIC POLYPS; COLONOSCOPY; COLORECTAL NEOPLASMS; FEMALE; HUMANS; MALE; MIDDLE AGED; QUALITY INDICATORS, HEALTH CARE; RETROSPECTIVE STUDIES;

EID: 79952068400     PISSN: 00165107     EISSN: 10976779     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.gie.2010.08.008     Document Type: Article

References (24)

1. Jemal A, Siegel R, Ward E, et al. Cancer statistics, 2009. CA Cancer J Clin 2009;59:225-49.
2. Winawer SJ, Zauber AG, Ho MN, et al. Prevention of colorectal cancer by colonoscopic polypectomy. the National Polyp Study Workgroup. N Engl J Med 1993;329:1977-81. (Pubitemid 24015040)
3. Lieberman DA, Weiss DG, Bond JH, et al. Use of colonoscopy to screen asymptomatic adults for colorectal cancer. Veterans Affairs Cooperative Study Group 380. N Engl J Med 2000;343:162-8. (Pubitemid 30489212)
4. Edwards BK, Ward E, Kohler BA, et al. Annual report to the nation on the status of cancer, 1975-2006, featuring colorectal cancer trends and impact of interventions (risk factors, screening, and treatment) to reduce future rates. Cancer 2010;116:544-73.
5. Sanchez W, Harewood GC, Petersen BT. Evaluation of polyp detection in relation to procedure time of screening or surveillance colonoscopy. Am J Gastroenterol 2004;99:1941-5. (Pubitemid 39421236)
6. Simmons DT, Harewood GC, Baron TH, et al. Impact of endoscopist withdrawal speed on polyp yield: implications for optimal colonoscopy withdrawal time. Aliment Pharmacol Ther 2006;24:965-71. (Pubitemid 44326377)
7. van Rijn JC, Reitsma JB, Stoker J, et al. Polyp miss rate determined by tandem colonoscopy: a systematic review. Am J Gastroenterol 2006;101:343-50. (Pubitemid 43381678)
8. Rex DK, Cutler CS, Lemmel GT, et al. Colonoscopic miss rates of adenomas determined by back-to-back colonoscopies. Gastroenterology 1997;112:24-8. (Pubitemid 27008981)
9. Chen SC, Rex DK. Endoscopist can be more powerful than age and male gender in predicting adenoma detection at colonoscopy. Am J Gastroenterol 2007;102:856-61. (Pubitemid 46496608)
10. Barclay RL, Vicari JJ, Doughty AS, et al. Colonoscopic withdrawal times and adenoma detection during screening colonoscopy. N Engl J Med 2006;355:2533-41. (Pubitemid 44917501)
11. Imperiale TF, Glowinski EA, Juliar BE, et al. Variation in polyp detection rates at screening colonoscopy. Gastrointest Endosc 2009;69:1288-95.
12. Pickhardt PJ, Nugent PA, Mysliwiec PA, et al. Location of adenomas missed by optical colonoscopy. Ann Intern Med 2004;141:352-9.
13. Kaminski MF, Regula J, Kraszewska E, et al. Quality indicators for colonoscopy and the risk of interval cancer. N Engl J Med 2010;362:1795-803.
14. Rex DK, Petrini JL, Baron TH, et al. Quality indicators for colonoscopy. Gastrointest Endosc 2006;63(Suppl):S16-28.
15. Rex DK, Bond JH, Winawer S, et al. Quality in the technical performance of colonoscopy and the continuous quality improvement process for colonoscopy: recommendations of the U.S. multi-society task force on colorectal cancer. Am J Gastroenterol 2002;97:1296-308. (Pubitemid 34664769)
16. Lin OS. Less stick, more carrot: measuring and improving patient satisfaction with endoscopic procedures. Gastrointest Endosc 2009;69:892-5.
17. Are you ahead of the GI QI curve? Available at. http://www.beckersasc. com. Accessed November 15, 2009.
18. Chen SC, Rex DK. Variable detection of nonadenomatous polyps by individual endoscopists at colonoscopy and correlation with adenoma detection. J Clin Gastroenterol 2008;42:704-7.
19. Barclay RL, Vicari JJ, Greenlaw RL. Effect of a time-dependent colonoscopic withdrawal protocol on adenoma detection during screening colonoscopy. Clin Gastroenterol Hepatol 2008;6:1091-8.
20. Sawhney MS, Cury MS, Neeman N, et al. Effect of institution-wide policy of colonoscopy withdrawal time > or = 7 minutes on polyp detection. Gastroenterology 2008;135:1892-8.
21. Hyman NH, Anderson P, Blasyk H. Hyperplastic polyposis and the risk of colorectal cancer. Dis Colon Rectum 2004;47:2101-4. (Pubitemid 40179073)
22. Renaut AJ, Douglas PR, Newstead GL. Hyperplastic polyposis of the colon and rectum. Colorectal Dis 2002;4:213-5. (Pubitemid 34567883)
23. Goldstein NS, Bhanot P, Odish E, et al. Hyperplastic-like colon polyps that preceded microsatellite-unstable adenocarcinomas. Am J Clin Pathol 2003;119:778-96. (Pubitemid 37047838)
24. Pike IM, Vicari J. Incorporating quality measurement and improvement into a gastroenterology practice. Am J Gastroenterol 2010;105:252-4.