Polypectomy rate is a valid quality measure for colonoscopy: Results from a national endoscopy database

Gastrointestinal Endoscopy

Volumn 75, Issue 3, 2012, Pages 576-582

  Williams, Jason E ^a,b   Holub, Jennifer L ^b   Faigel, Douglas O ^c  

^a SANTA CLARA VALLEY MEDICAL CENTER   (United States)

^b OREGON HEALTH AND SCIENCE UNIVERSITY   (United States)

^c MAYO CLINIC   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ADENOMATOUS POLYP; ADULT; AGED; ARTICLE; CLINICAL PRACTICE; COLONOSCOPY; DATA BASE; DIAGNOSTIC PROCEDURE; ENDOSCOPY; FEMALE; HUMAN; MAJOR CLINICAL STUDY; MALE; POLYPECTOMY; PRIORITY JOURNAL; QUALITY CONTROL; UNITED STATES;

ADENOMA; AGED; AGED, 80 AND OVER; COLONIC POLYPS; COLONOSCOPY; COLORECTAL NEOPLASMS; DATABASES, FACTUAL; FEMALE; HUMANS; MALE; MIDDLE AGED; RETROSPECTIVE STUDIES;

EID: 84863181532     PISSN: 00165107     EISSN: 10976779     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.gie.2011.12.012     Document Type: Article

References (27)

1. B.K. Edwards, E. Ward, B.A. Kohler Annual report to the nation on the status of cancer, 1975-2006, featuring colorectal cancer trends and impact of interventions (risk factors, screening, and treatment) to reduce future rates Cancer 116 2010 544 573
2. R.L. Barclay, J.J. Vicari, A.S. Doughty Colonoscopic withdrawal times and adenoma detection during screening colonoscopy N Engl J Med 355 2006 2533 2541
3. D.K. Rex, C.S. Cutler, G.T. Lemmel Colonoscopic miss rates of adenomas determined by back-to-back colonoscopies Gastroenterology 112 1997 24 28
4. S.C. Chen, D.K. Rex Endoscopist can be more powerful than age and male gender in predicting adenoma detection at colonoscopy Am J Gastroenterol 102 2007 856 861
5. P.J. Pickhardt, P.A. Nugent, P.A. Mysliwiec Location of adenomas missed by optical colonoscopy Ann Intern Med 141 2004 352 359
6. H. Brenner, M. Hoffmeister, V. Arndt Protection from right- and left-sided colorectal neoplasms after colonoscopy: population-based study J Natl Cancer Inst 102 2010 89 95
7. N.N. Baxter, R. Sutradhar, S.S. Forbes Analysis of administrative data finds endoscopist quality measures associated with postcolonoscopy colorectal cancer Gastroenterology 140 2011 65 72
8. G.S. Cooper, F. Xu, S. Koroukian Prevalence and predictors of new or missed colorectal cancer: a population based, United States study Gastroenterology 138 2010 S-24
9. M.F. Kaminski, J. Regula, E. Kraszewska Quality indicators for colonoscopy and the risk of interval cancer N Engl J Med 362 2010 1795 1803
10. B. Bressler, L.F. Paszat, Z. Chen Rates of new or missed colorectal cancers after colonoscopy and their risk factors: a population-based analysis Gastroenterology 132 2007 96 102
11. D.K. Rex, J.L. Petrini, T.H. Baron Quality indicators for colonoscopy Gastrointest Endosc 63 2006 S16 S28
12. D.K. Rex, J.H. Bond, S. Winawer Quality in the technical performance of colonoscopy and the continuous quality improvement process for colonoscopy: recommendations of the U.S. Multi-Society Task Force on Colorectal Cancer Am J Gastroenterol 97 2002 1296 1308
13. J.E. Williams, T.D. Le, D.O. Faigel Polypectomy rate as a quality measure for colonoscopy Gastrointest Endosc 73 2011 498 506
14. E.A. McGlynn, S.M. Asch, J. Adams The quality of health care delivered to adults in the United States N Engl J Med 348 2003 2635 2645
15. D. Lieberman Quality in medicine: raising the accountability bar Gastrointest Endosc 73 2011 561 566
16. D. Lieberman A call to action: measuring the quality of colonoscopy N Engl J Med 355 2006 2588 2589
17. B.T. Petersen "Demand the data! Your patients will ask and your practice will need it." Am J Gastroenterol 102 2007 862 863
18. D.K. Rex Quality in colonoscopy: cecal intubation first, then what Am J Gastroenterol 101 2006 732 734
19. M.R. Chassin, J.M. Loeb, S.P. Schmaltz Accountability measures: using measurement to promote quality improvement N Engl J Med 363 2010 683 688
20. J.M. Inadomi In search of quality colonoscopy Gastroenterology 135 2008 1845 1847
21. D.O. Faigel, P.B. Cotton World Organization of Digestive Endoscopy The London OMED position statement for credentialing and quality assurance in digestive endoscopy Endoscopy 41 2009 1069 1074
22. D.G. Hewett, D.K. Rex Improving colonoscopy quality through health-care payment reform Am J Gastroenterol 105 2010 1925 1933
23. D.L. Francis, D.T. Rodriguez-Correa, A. Buchner Application of a conversion factor to estimate the adenoma detection rate from the polyp detection rate Gastrointest Endosc 73 2011 493 497
24. B. Denis, E.A. Sauleau, I. Gendre The polyp detection rate can replace the adenoma detection rate to assess the yield of colonoscopy in current practice [abstract] Gastrointest Endosc 71 2010 AB326
25. R.J. Hilsden, A. Rostom, C. Dube Is polyp detection rate a valid proxy for adenoma detection rate for measuring the technical quality of colonoscopy? Gastroenterology 138 2010 S-57
26. D. Lieberman, M. Moravec, J. Holub Polyp size and advanced histology in patients undergoing colonoscopy screening: implications for CT colonography Gastroenterology 135 2008 1100 1105
27. C.W. Ko, J.A. Dominitz, P. Green Accuracy of Medicare claims for identifying findings and procedures performed during colonoscopy Gastrointest Endosc 73 2011 447 453