Quality of colonoscopy withdrawal technique and variability in adenoma detection rates (with videos)

Gastrointestinal Endoscopy

Volumn 74, Issue 1, 2011, Pages 128-134

  Lee, Robert H ^a,b,e   Tang, Raymond S ^c   Muthusamy, V Raman ^a   Ho, Samuel B ^d   Shah, Nimeesh K ^a   Wetzel, Laura ^b   Bain, Andrew S ^c   MacKintosh, Erin E ^c   Paek, Aeri M ^a,b   Crissien, Ana Maria ^a   Saraf, Lida Jafari ^a,b   Kalmaz, Denise M ^c   Savides, Thomas J ^c  

^a UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA   (United States)

^b VA LONG BEACH HEALTHCARE SYSTEM   (United States)

^c UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA   (United States)

^d VA SAN DIEGO HEALTHCARE SYSTEM   (United States)

^e NONE   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ADENOMA; ARTICLE; CANCER SCREENING; COLONOSCOPY; COLONOSCOPY WITHDRAWAL TECHNIQUE; CONTROLLED CLINICAL TRIAL; CONTROLLED STUDY; DIAGNOSTIC PROCEDURE; DIAGNOSTIC VALUE; FEMALE; HUMAN; MAJOR CLINICAL STUDY; MALE; MULTICENTER STUDY; PRIORITY JOURNAL; RETROSPECTIVE STUDY; SCREENING; SINGLE BLIND PROCEDURE; VIDEORECORDING;

EID: 79959739061     PISSN: 00165107     EISSN: 10976779     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.gie.2011.03.003     Document Type: Article

References (15)

1. S.J. Winawer, A.G. Zauber, and M.N. Ho Prevention of colorectal cancer by colonoscopic polypectomy The National Polyp Study Workgroup N Engl J Med 329 1993 1977 1981 (Pubitemid 24015040)
2. D.J. Bjorkman, and J.W. Popp Jr Measuring the quality of endoscopy Am J Gastroenterol 101 2006 864 865
3. D.K. Rex, J.L. Petrini, and T.H. Baron Quality indicators for colonoscopy Am J Gastroenterol 101 2006 873 885
4. S.C. Chen, and D.K. Rex Endoscopist can be more powerful than age and male gender in predicting adenoma detection at colonoscopy Am J Gastroenterol 102 2007 856 861 (Pubitemid 46496608)
5. R.L. Barclay, J.J. Vicari, and A.S. Doughty Colonoscopic withdrawal times and adenoma detection during screening colonoscopy N Engl J Med 355 2006 2533 2541 (Pubitemid 44917501)
6. B.F. Overholt, L. Brooks-Belli, and M. Grace Withdrawal times and associated factors in colonoscopy: a quality assurance multicenter assessment J Clin Gastroenterol 44 2010 e80 e86
7. D.T. Simmons, G.C. Harewood, and T.H. Baron Impact of endoscopist withdrawal speed on polyp yield: implications for optimal colonoscopy withdrawal time Aliment Pharmacol Ther 24 2006 965 971 (Pubitemid 44326377)
8. W. Sanchez, G.C. Harewood, and B.T. Petersen Evaluation of polyp detection in relation to procedure time of screening or surveillance colonoscopy Am J Gastroenterol 99 2004 1941 1945 (Pubitemid 39421236)
9. H. Fatima, D.K. Rex, and R. Rothstein Cecal insertion and withdrawal times with wide-angle versus standard colonoscopes: a randomized controlled trial Clin Gastroenterol Hepatol 6 2008 109 114 (Pubitemid 50008421)
10. D.K. Rex Colonoscopic withdrawal technique is associated with adenoma miss rates Gastrointest Endosc 51 2000 33 36 (Pubitemid 30051607)
11. D.K. Rex, D.G. Hewett, and M. Raghavendra The impact of videorecording on the quality of colonoscopy performance: a pilot study Am J Gastroenterol 105 2010 2312 2317
12. A. Rostom, and E. Jolicoeur Validation of a new scale for the assessment of bowel preparation quality Gastrointest Endosc 59 2004 482 486 (Pubitemid 38437086)
13. R. McCarney, J. Warner, and S. Iliffe The Hawthorne Effect: a randomised, controlled trial BMC Med Res Methodol 7 2007 30
14. M.S. Sawhney, M.S. Cury, and N. Neeman Effect of institution-wide policy of colonoscopy withdrawal time > or = 7 minutes on polyp detection Gastroenterology 135 2008 1892 1898
15. R.L. Barclay, J.J. Vicari, and R.L. Greenlaw Effect of a time-dependent colonoscopic withdrawal protocol on adenoma detection during screening colonoscopy Clin Gastroenterol Hepatol 6 2008 1091 1098