Cecal Insertion and Withdrawal Times With Wide-Angle Versus Standard Colonoscopes: A Randomized Controlled Trial

Clinical Gastroenterology and Hepatology

Volumn 6, Issue 1, 2008, Pages 109-114

  Fatima, Hala ^a   Rex, Douglas K ^a   Rothstein, Richard ^b   Rahmani, Emad ^a   Nehme, Omar ^a   Dewitt, John ^a   Helper, Debra ^a   Toor, Arifa ^b   Bensen, Steven ^b  

^a INDIANA UNIVERSITY MEDICAL CENTER   (United States)

^b DARTMOUTH HITCHCOCK MEDICAL CENTER   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ADENOMA; CECUM; COLONIC NEOPLASMS; COLONIC POLYPS; COLONOSCOPES; COLONOSCOPY; EQUIPMENT DESIGN; FEMALE; HUMANS; MALE; MIDDLE AGED; TIME FACTORS;

EID: 37449021269     PISSN: 15423565     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.cgh.2007.10.009     Document Type: Article

References (28)

1. Rex D.K., Bond J.H., and Feld A.D. Medical-legal risks of incident cancers after clearing colonoscopy. Am J Gastroenterol 96 (2001) 952-957
2. Rex D.K., Cutler C.S., Lemmel G.T., et al. Colonoscopic miss rates of adenomas determined by back-to-back colonoscopies. Gastroenterology 112 (1997) 24-28
3. Hixson L.J., Fennerty M.B., Sampliner R.E., et al. Prospective study of the frequency and size distribution of polyps missed by colonoscopy. J Natl Cancer Inst 82 (1990) 1769-1772
4. Schoenfeld P., Lipscomb S., Crook J., et al. Accuracy of polyp detection by gastroenterologists and nurse endoscopists during flexible sigmoidoscopy: a randomized trial. Gastroenterology 117 (1999) 312-318
5. Bensen S., Mott L.A., Dain B., et al. The colonoscopic miss rate and true one-year recurrence of colorectal neoplastic polyps. Polyp Prevention Study Group. Am J Gastroenterol 94 (1999) 194-199
6. Rex D.K. Colonoscopic withdrawal technique is associated with adenoma miss rates. Gastrointest Endosc 51 (2000) 33-36
7. Matsushita M., Hajiro K., Okazaki K., et al. Efficacy of total colonoscopy with a transparent cap in comparison with colonoscopy without the cap. Endoscopy 30 (1998) 444-447
8. Fujii T., Rembacken B.J., Dixon M.F., et al. Flat adenomas in the United Kingdom: are treatable cancers being missed?. Endoscopy 30 (1998) 437-443
9. Kudo S., Kashida H., Tamura S., et al. The problem of "flat" colonic adenoma. Gastrointest Endosc Clin N Am 7 (1997) 87-98
10. Rex D.K., Chadalawada V., and Helper D.J. Wide angle colonoscopy with a prototype instrument: impact on miss rates and efficiency as determined by back-to-back colonoscopies. Am J Gastroenterol 98 (2003) 2000-2005
11. Pishvaian A.C., and Al-Kawas F.H. Retroflexion in the colon: a useful and safe technique in the evaluation and resection of sessile polyps during colonoscopy. Am J Gastroenterol 101 (2006) 1479-1483
12. Harrison M., Singh N., and Rex D.K. Impact of proximal colon retroflexion on adenoma miss rates. Am J Gastroenterol 99 (2004) 519-522
13. Triadafilopoulos G., Watts D., Higgins J., et al. A novel retrograde-viewing axillary imaging device ("Third Eye Retroscope (TM)") improves the detection of simulated polyps in anatomical models of the colon. Gastrointest Endosc 63 (2006) AB103
14. Deenadayalu V.P., Chadalawada V., and Rex D.K. 170 degrees wide-angle colonoscope: effect on efficiency and miss rates. Am J Gastroenterol 99 (2004) 2138-2142
15. Cram P., Fendrick A.M., Inadomi J., et al. The impact of a celebrity promotional campaign on the use of colon cancer screening: the Katie Couric effect. Arch Intern Med 163 (2003) 1601-1605
16. Vijan S., Inadomi J., Hayward R.A., et al. Projections of demand and capacity for colonoscopy related to increasing rates of colorectal cancer screening in the United States. Aliment Pharmacol Ther 20 (2004) 507-515
17. Le Rhun M., Coron E., Parlier D., et al. High resolution colonoscopy with chromoscopy versus standard colonoscopy for the detection of colonic neoplasia: a randomized study. Clin Gastroenterol Hepatol 4 (2006) 349-354
18. Barclay R.L., Vicari J.J., Doughty A.S., et al. Colonoscopic withdrawal times and adenoma detection during screening colonoscopy. N Engl J Med 355 (2006) 2533-2541
19. Brooker J.C., Saunders B.P., Shah S.G., et al. Total colonic dye-spray increases the detection of diminutive adenomas during routine colonoscopy: a randomized controlled trial. Gastrointest Endosc 56 (2002) 333-338
20. Rex D.K., and Rex D.K. Maximizing detection of adenomas and cancers during colonoscopy. Am J Gastroenterol 101 (2006) 2866-2877
21. Rex D.K., and Rex D.K. Colonoscopic withdrawal technique is associated with adenoma miss rates. Gastrointest Endosc 51 (2000) 33-36
22. Chen S.C., Rex D.K., Chen S.C., et al. Endoscopist can be more powerful than age and male gender in predicting adenoma detection at colonoscopy. Am J Gastroenterol 102 (2007) 856-861
23. Bernstein C., Thorn M., Monsees K., et al. A prospective study of factors that determine cecal intubation time at colonoscopy. Gastrointest Endosc 61 (2005) 72-75
24. Zuber-Jerger I., Kullmann F., Zuber-Jerger I., et al. A prospective study of factors that determine cecal intubation time at colonoscopy. Gastrointest Endosc 63 (2006) 358-359
25. Saunders B.P., Fukumoto M., Halligan S., et al. Why is colonoscopy more difficult in women?. Gastrointest Endosc 43 (1996) 124-126
26. Kim W.H., Cho Y.J., Park J.Y., et al. Factors affecting insertion time and patient discomfort during colonoscopy. Gastrointest Endosc 52 (2000) 600-605
27. Rex D.K., Petrini J.L., Baron T.H., et al. Endoscopy AAToQi. Quality indicators for colonoscopy. Am J Gastroenterol 101 (2006) 873-885
28. Rex D.K., Petrini J.L., Baron T.H., et al. Quality indicators for colonoscopy. Gastrointest Endosc 63 (2006) S16-S28