The impact of the quality of colon preparation on follow-up colonoscopy recommendations

American Journal of Gastroenterology

Volumn 106, Issue 12, 2011, Pages 2058-2062

  Larsen, Michael ^a   Hills, Nancy ^a   Terdiman, Jonathan ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ADULT; ARTICLE; CANCER SCREENING; CLINICAL EXAMINATION; COLON CANCER; COLONOSCOPY; DEMOGRAPHY; FEMALE; FOLLOW UP; HEALTH CARE QUALITY; HUMAN; INTESTINE POLYP; INTESTINE PREPARATION; MALE; MEDICAL SPECIALIST; PRIORITY JOURNAL; SCREENING;

COLONOSCOPY; DATA COLLECTION; EARLY DETECTION OF CANCER; FEMALE; FOLLOW-UP STUDIES; GASTRIC MUCOSA; GASTROENTEROLOGY; GUIDELINE ADHERENCE; HUMANS; MALE; MIDDLE AGED; PHYSICIAN'S PRACTICE PATTERNS; PRACTICE GUIDELINES AS TOPIC; QUESTIONNAIRES; TIME FACTORS;

EID: 82955188161     PISSN: 00029270     EISSN: 15720241     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1038/ajg.2011.238     Document Type: Article

References (15)

1. Rex DK, Johnson DA, Anderson JC et al. American College of Gastroenterology guidelines for colorectal cancer screening 2009. Am J Gastroenterol 2009;104:739-50.
2. Levin B, Lieberman DA, McFarland B et al. Screening and surveillance for the early detection of colorectal cancer and adenomatous polyps, 2008: a joint guideline from the American Cancer Society, the US Multi-Society Task Force on Colorectal Cancer, and the American College of Radiology. CA Cancer J Clin 2008;58:130-60. (Pubitemid 351830299)
3. Davila RE, Rajan E, Baron TH et al. ASGE guideline: colorectal cancer screening and surveillance. Gastrointest Endosc 2006;63:546-57.
4. Burt RW, Barthel JS, Dunn KB et al. NCCN clinical practice guidelines in oncology. Colorectal cancer screening. J Natl Compr Canc Netw 2010;8:8-61.
5. US Preventive Services Task Force. Screening for colorectal cancer: U.S. Preventive Services Task Force recommendation statement. Ann Intern Med 2008;149:627-37.
6. Wexner SD, Beck DE, Baron TH et al. A consensus document on bowel preparation before colonoscopy: prepared by a task force from the American Society of Colon and Rectal Surgeons (ASCRS), the American Society for Gastrointestinal Endoscopy (ASGE), and the Society of American Gastrointestinal and Endoscopic Surgeons (SAGES). Gastrointest Endosc 2006;63:894-909. (Pubitemid 43792431)
7. Chung YW, Han DS, Park KH et al. Patient factors predictive of inadequate bowel preparation using polyethylene glycol: a prospective study in Korea. J Clin Gastroenterol 2009;43:448-52.
8. Ness RM, Manam R, Hoen H et al. Predictors of inadequate bowel preparation for colonoscopy. Am J Gastroenterol 2001;96:1797-1802.
9. Lai EJ, Calderwood AH, Doros G et al. The Boston bowel preparation scale: a valid and reliable instrument for colonoscopy-oriented research. Gastrointest Endosc 2009;69:620-5.
10. Rostom A, Jolicoeur E. Validation of a new scale for the assessment of bowel preparation quality. Gastrointest Endosc 2004;59:482-6. (Pubitemid 38437086)
11. Ben-Horin S, Bar-Meir S, Avidan B. The impact of colon cleanliness assessment on endoscopists' recommendations for follow-up colonoscopy. Am J Gastroenterol 2007;102:2680-5. (Pubitemid 350179325)
12. Soetikno RM, Kaltenbach T, Rouse RV et al. Prevalence of nonpolypoid (flat and depressed) colorectal neoplasms in asymptomatic and symptomatic adults. JAMA 2008;299:1027-35. (Pubitemid 351347059)
13. Froehlich F, Wietlisbach V, Gonvers JJ et al. Impact of colonic cleansing on quality and diagnostic yield of colonoscopy: the European Panel of Appropriateness of Gastrointestinal Endoscopy European multicenter study. Gastrointest Endosc 2005;61:378-84. (Pubitemid 40349029)
14. Levin TR. Dealing with uncertainty: surveillance colonoscopy after polypectomy. Am J Gastroenterol 2007;102:1745-7. (Pubitemid 47206675)
15. Rex DK, Cutler CS, Lemmel GT et al. Colonoscopic miss rates of adenomas determined by back-to-back colonoscopies. Gastroenterology 1997;112:24-8. (Pubitemid 27008981)