Cnn1 inhibits the interactions between the KMN complexes of the yeast kinetochore

Nature Cell Biology

Volumn 14, Issue 6, 2012, Pages 614-624

  Bock, Lucy J ^a   Pagliuca, Cinzia ^a   Kobayashi, Norihiko ^b   Grove, Ryan A ^c   Oku, Yusuke ^b   Shrestha, Kriti ^c   Alfieri, Claudio ^a   Golfieri, Cristina ^a   Oldani, Amanda ^d   Dal Maschio, Marianna ^a   Bermejo, Rodrigo ^e   Hazbun, Tony R ^c   Tanaka, Tomoyuki U ^b   De Wulf, Peter ^a  

^a EUROPEAN INSTITUTE OF ONCOLOGY   (Italy)

^b UNIVERSITY OF DUNDEE   (United Kingdom)

^c PURDUE UNIVERSITY   (United States)

^d FIRC INSTITUTE OF MOLECULAR ONCOLOGY   (Italy)

^e UNIVERSITY OF SALAMANCA   (Spain)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

AURORA B KINASE; NDC80 COMPLEX; NUCLEAR PROTEIN; PROTEIN CNN1; PROTEIN KINASE; PROTEIN KNL1; PROTEIN MIS12; PROTEIN MPS1; UNCLASSIFIED DRUG;

ANAPHASE; ARTICLE; CELL CYCLE; CENTROMERE; CHROMOSOME REPLICATION; CHROMOSOME SEGREGATION; COMPLEX FORMATION; CONTROLLED STUDY; MITOSIS SPINDLE; NONHUMAN; PRIORITY JOURNAL; PROTEIN FUNCTION; PROTEIN INTERACTION; PROTEIN LOCALIZATION; REGULATORY MECHANISM; SACCHAROMYCES CEREVISIAE;

ANAPHASE; CELL CYCLE PROTEINS; CHROMOSOMES, FUNGAL; KINETOCHORES; MICROTUBULE-ASSOCIATED PROTEINS; MITOTIC SPINDLE APPARATUS; PHOSPHORYLATION; PROTEIN BINDING; PROTEIN-SERINE-THREONINE KINASES; SACCHAROMYCES CEREVISIAE; SACCHAROMYCES CEREVISIAE PROTEINS;

SACCHAROMYCETALES;

EID: 84861589937     PISSN: 14657392     EISSN: 14764679     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1038/ncb2495     Document Type: Article

References (48)

1. Lampert, F. & Westermann, S. A blueprint for kinetochores-new insights into the molecular mechanics of cell division. Nat. Rev. Mol. Cell Biol. 12, 407-412 (2011).
2. Tanaka, K. et al. Molecular mechanisms of kinetochore capture by spindle microtubules. Nature 434, 987-994 (2005). (Pubitemid 40586041)
3. Tanaka, T. U. Kinetochore-microtubule interactions: steps toward bi-orientation. EMBO J. 29, 4070-4082 (2010).
4. Cheeseman, I. M., Chappie, J. S., Wilson-Kubalek, E. M. & Desai, A. The conserved KMN network constitutes the core microtubule-binding site of the kinetochore. Cell 127, 983-997 (2006). (Pubitemid 44792248)
5. Espeut, J. et al. Microtubule binding by KNL-1 contributes to spindle checkpoint silencing at the kinetochore. J. Cell Biol. 196, 469-482 (2012).
6. Tanaka, T. U. et al. Evidence that the Ipl1-Sli15 (Aurora kinase-INCENP) complex promotes chromosome bi-orientation by altering kinetochore-spindle pole connections. Cell 108, 317-329 (2002). (Pubitemid 34178397)
7. Lampson, M. A., Renduchitala, K., Khodjakov, A. & Kapoor, T. M. Correcting improper chromosome-spindle attachments during cell division. Nat. Cell Biol. 6, 232-237 (2004). (Pubitemid 38344361)
8. Maure, J-F., Kitamura, E. & Tanaka, T. U. Mps1 kinase promotes sisterkinetochore bi-orientation by a tension-dependent mechanism. Curr. Biol. 17, 2175-2182 (2007). (Pubitemid 350236864)
9. Santaguida, S. et al. Dissecting the role of MPS1 in chromosome biorientation and the spindle checkpoint through the small molecule inhibitor reversine. J. Cell Biol. 190, 73-87 (2010).
10. Maresca, T. J. & Salmon, E. D. Welcome to a new kind of tension: translating kinetochore mechanics into a wait-anaphase signal. J. Cell Sci. 123, 825-835 (2010).
11. Foley, E. A., Maldonado, M. & Kapoor, T. M. Formation of stable attachments between kinetochores and microtubules depends on the B56-PP2A phosphatase. Nat. Cell Biol. 13, 1265-1271 (2011).
12. Meadows, J. C. et al. Spindle checkpoint silencing requires association of PP1 to both Spc7 and kinesin-8 motors. Dev. Cell 20, 739-750 (2011).
13. Rosenberg, J. S., Cross, F. R. & Funabiki, H. KNL1/Spc105 recruits PP1 to silence the spindle assembly checkpoint. Curr. Biol. 21, 942-947 (2011).
14. De Wulf, P., McAinsh, A. D. & Sorger, P. K. Hierarchical assembly of the budding yeast kinetochore from multiple subcomplexes. Genes Dev. 17, 2902-2921 (2003). (Pubitemid 37523155)
15. Lechner, J. & Carbon, J. A 240 kd multisubunit protein complex, CBF3, is a major component of the budding yeast centromere. Cell 64, 717-725 (1991). (Pubitemid 121001159)
16. Coffman, V. C., Wu, P., Parthun, M. R. & Wu, J-Q. CENP-A exceeds microtubule attachment sites in centromere clusters of both budding and-ssion yeast. J. Cell Biol. 195, 563-572 (2011).
17. Lawrimore, J., Bloom, K. S. & Salmon, E. D. Point centromeres contain more than a single centromere-speci-c Cse4 (CENP-A) nucleosome. J. Cell Biol. 195, 573-582 (2011).
18. Ubersax, J. A. et al. Targets of the cyclin dependent kinase Cdk1. Nature 425, 859-864 (2003). (Pubitemid 37351471)
19. Loog, M. & Morgan, D. O. Cyclin speci-city in the phosphorylation of cyclindependent kinase substrates. Nature 434, 104-108 (2005). (Pubitemid 40349393)
20. Breitkreutz, A. et al. A global protein kinase and phosphatase interaction network in yeast. Science 328, 1043-1046 (2010).
21. Cheeseman, I. M. et al. Phospho-regulation of kinetochore-microtubule attachments by the aurora kinase Ipl1p. Cell 111, 163-172 (2002). (Pubitemid 35292437)
22. De Wulf, P., Montani, F. & Visintin, R. Protein phosphatases take the mitotic stage. Curr. Opin. Cell Biol. 21, 806-815 (2009).
23. Wei, R. R., Sorger, P. K. & Harrison, S. C. Molecular organization of the Ndc80 complex, an essential kinetochore component. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 102, 5363-5367 (2005). (Pubitemid 40530263)
24. Lingelbach, L. B. & Kaplan, K. B. The interaction between Sgt1p and Skp1p is regulated by HSP90 chaperones and is required for proper CBF3 assembly. Mol. Cell. Biol. 24, 8938-8950 (2004). (Pubitemid 39313899)
25. Blake-Hodek, K. A., Cassimeris, L. & Huffaker, T. C. Regulation of microtubule dynamics by Bim1 and Bik1, the budding yeast members of the EB1 and CLIP-170 families of plus-end tracking proteins. Mol. Biol. Cell 21, 2013-2023 (2010).
26. Wong, J. et al. A protein interaction map of the mitotic spindle. Mol. Biol. Cell 18, 3800-3809 (2007). (Pubitemid 47519474)
27. Schuyler, S. C. & Pellman, D. Analysis of the size and shape of protein complexes from yeast. Meth. Enzymol. 351, 150-168 (2002). (Pubitemid 34614986)
28. Gillett, E. S., Espelin, C. W. & Sorger, P. K. Spindle checkpoint proteins and chromosome-microtubule attachment in budding yeast. J. Cell Biol. 164, 535-546 (2004). (Pubitemid 38233315)
29. Pagliuca, C., Draviam, V. M., Marco, E., Sorger, P. K. & De Wulf, P. Roles for the conserved Spc105p-Kre28p complex in kinetochore-microtubule binding and the spindle assembly checkpoint. PLoS ONE 4, e7640 (2009).
30. Krenn, V. et al. Structural analysis reveals features of the spindle checkpoint kinase Bub1-kinetochore subunit Knl1 interaction. J. Cell Biol. 196, 451-467 (2012).
31. Kitamura, E., Tanaka, K., Kitamura, Y. & Tanaka, T. U. Kinetochore microtubule interaction during S phase in Saccharomyces cerevisiae. Genes Dev. 21, 3319-3330 (2007). (Pubitemid 350277758)
32. Koshland, D. & Hieter, P. Visual assay for chromosome ploidy. Meth. Enzymol. 155, 351-372 (1987).
33. Tong, A. H. & Boone, C. Synthetic genetic array analysis in Saccharomyces cerevisiae. Meth. Mol. Biol. 313, 171-192 (2006).
34. Tien, J. F. et al. Cooperation of the Dam1 and Ndc80 kinetochore complexes enhances microtubule coupling and is regulated by aurora B. J. Cell Biol. 189, 713-723 (2010).
35. Lampert, F., Hornung, P. & Westermann, S. The Dam1 complex confers microtubule plus end-tracking activity to the Ndc80 kinetochore complex. J. Cell Biol. 189, 641-649 (2010).
36. Maskell, D. P., Hu, X-W. & Singleton, M. R. Molecular architecture and assembly of the yeast kinetochore MIND complex. J. Cell Biol. 190, 823-834 (2010).
37. Schleiffer, A. et al. CENP-T proteins are conserved centromere receptors of the Ndc80 complex. Nat. Cell Biol. http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/ncb2493 (2012).
38. Perpelescu, M. & Fukagawa, T. The ABCs of CENPs. Chromosoma 120, 425-446 (2011).
39. Nishino, T. et al. CENP-T-W-S-X forms a unique centromeric chromatin structure with a histone-like fold. Cell 148, 487-501 (2012).
40. Gascoigne, K. E. et al. Induced ectopic kinetochore assembly bypasses the requirement for CENP-A nucleosomes. Cell 145, 410-422 (2011).
41. Przewloka, M. R. et al. CENP-C is a structural platform for kinetochore assembly. Curr. Biol 21, 399-405 (2011).
42. Screpanti, E. et al. Direct binding of Cenp-C to the Mis12 complex joins the inner and outer kinetochore. Curr. Biol. 21, 391-398 (2011).
43. Liu, S-T., Rattner, J. B., Jablonski, S. A. & Yen, T. J. Mapping the assembly pathways that specify formation of the trilaminar kinetochore plates in human cells. J. Cell Biol. 175, 41-53 (2006). (Pubitemid 44537197)
44. Ohkuni, K., Abdulle, R., Tong, A. H., Boone, C. & Kitagawa, K. Ybp2 associates with the central kinetochore of Saccharomyces cerevisiae and mediates proper mitotic progression. PLoS ONE 3, e1617 (2008).
45. Bermejo, R., Katou, Y. M., Shirahige, K. & Foiani, M. ChIP-on-chip analysis of DNA topoisomerases. Meth. Mol. Biol. 582, 103-118 (2009).
46. Akiyoshi, B. et al. Tension directly stabilizes reconstituted kinetochore-microtubule attachments. Nature 468, 576-579 (2010).
47. Cho, R. J. et al. Parallel analysis of genetic selections using whole genome oligonucleotide arrays. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 95, 3752-3757 (1998). (Pubitemid 28173201)
48. Cox, J. & Mann, M. MaxQuant enables high peptide identi-cation rates, individualized p.p.b.-range mass accuracies and proteome-wide protein quanti-cation. Nat. Biotechnol. 26, 1367-1372 (2008).