Sos7, an essential component of the conserved schizosaccharomyces pombe Ndc80-MIND-Spc7 complex, identifies a new family of fungal kinetochore proteins

Molecular and Cellular Biology

Volumn 32, Issue 16, 2012, Pages 3308-3320

  Jakopec, Visnja ^a   Topolski, Boris ^a   Fleig, Ursula ^a  

^a HEINRICH HEINE UNIVERSITY   (Germany)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

FUNGAL PROTEIN; NDC80 COMPLEX; NDC80 MIND SPC7 COMPLEX; SOS7 PROTEIN; UNCLASSIFIED DRUG;

ARTICLE; CENTROMERE; CHROMOSOME; CHROMOSOME MISSEGREGATION; CONTROLLED STUDY; GENE INTERACTION; MICROTUBULE; MUTANT; NONHUMAN; PHENOTYPE; PRIORITY JOURNAL; SCHIZOSACCHAROMYCES POMBE;

ALLELES; AMINO ACID SEQUENCE; CENTROMERE; CHROMOSOMAL PROTEINS, NON-HISTONE; DNA; GENE EXPRESSION REGULATION, FUNGAL; KINETOCHORES; MICROTUBULE-ASSOCIATED PROTEINS; MODELS, GENETIC; MOLECULAR SEQUENCE DATA; MUTATION; PHENOTYPE; PHYLOGENY; SCHIZOSACCHAROMYCES; SCHIZOSACCHAROMYCES POMBE PROTEINS; SEQUENCE HOMOLOGY, AMINO ACID; SPECIES SPECIFICITY; TEMPERATURE;

EID: 84865121663     PISSN: 02707306     EISSN: 10985549     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1128/MCB.00212-12     Document Type: Article

References (75)

1. Baker DJ, et al. 2004. BubR1 insufficiency causes early onset of agingassociated phenotypes and infertility in mice. Nat. Genet. 36:744-749.
2. Cheeseman IM, Chappie JS, Wilson-Kubalek EM, Desai A. 2006. The conservedKMNnetwork constitutes the core microtubule-binding site of the kinetochore. Cell 127:983-997.
3. Cheeseman IM, et al. 2004. A conserved protein network controls assembly of the outer kinetochore and its ability to sustain tension. Genes Dev. 18:2255-2268.
4. Ciferri C, et al. 2008. Implications for kinetochore-microtubule attachment from the structure of an engineered Ndc80 complex. Cell 133:427-439.
5. DeLuca JG, et al. 2006. Kinetochore microtubule dynamics and attachment stability are regulated by Hec1. Cell 127:969-982.
6. Desai A, et al. 2003. KNL-1 directs assembly of the microtubule-binding interface of the kinetochore in C. elegans. Genes Dev. 17:2421-2435.
7. Dietrich FS, et al. 2004. The Ashbya gossypii genome as a tool for mapping the ancient Saccharomyces cerevisiae genome. Science 304: 304-307.
8. Ding R, West RR, Morphew DM, Oakley BR, McIntosh JR. 1997. The spindle pole body of Schizosaccharomyces pombe enters and leaves the nuclear envelope as the cell cycle proceeds. Mol. Biol. Cell 8:1461-1479.
9. Emanuele MJ, McCleland ML, Satinover DL, Stukenberg PT. 2005. Measuring the stoichiometry and physical interactions between components elucidates the architecture of the vertebrate kinetochore. Mol. Biol. Cell 16:4882-4892.
10. Famulski JK, Vos L, Sun X, Chan G. 2008. Stable hZW10 kinetochore residency, mediated by hZwint-1 interaction, is essential for the mitotic checkpoint. J. Cell Biol. 180:507-520.
11. Fishel B, Amstutz H, Baum M, Carbon J, Clarke L. 1988. Structural organization and functional analysis of centromeric DNA in the fission yeast Schizosaccharomyces pombe. Mol. Cell. Biol. 8:754-763.
12. Fleig U, Sen-Gupta M, Hegemann JH. 1996. Fission yeast mal2+ is required for chromosome segregation. Mol. Cell. Biol. 16:6169-6177.
13. Flory MR, Morphew M, Joseph JD, Means AR, Davis TN. 2002. Pcp1p, an Spc110p-related calmodulin target at the centrosome of the fission yeast Schizosaccharomyces pombe. Cell Growth Differ. 13:47-58.
14. Funabiki H, Hagan I, Uzawa S, Yanagida M. 1993. Cell cycle-dependent specific positioning and clustering of centromeres and telomeres in fission yeast. J. Cell Biol. 121:961-976.
15. Garnier J, Gibrat JF, Robson B. 1996. GOR method for predicting protein secondary structure from amino acid sequence. Methods Enzymol. 266:540-553.
16. Gordon JL, Byrne KP, Wolfe KH. 2011. Mechanisms of chromosome number evolution in yeast. PLoS Genet. 7:e1002190. doi:10.1371/journal.pgen.1002190.
17. Goshima G, Saitoh S, Yanagida M. 1999. Proper metaphase spindle length is determined by centromere proteins Mis12 and Mis6 required for faithful chromosome segregation. Genes Dev. 13:1664-1677.
18. Guindon S, et al. 2010. New algorithms and methods to estimate maximum-likelihood phylogenies: assessing the performance of PhyML 3.0. Syst. Biol. 59:307-321.
19. Hagan I, Yanagida M. 1995. The product of the spindle formation gene sad1+associates with the fission yeast spindle pole body and is essential for viability. J. Cell Biol. 129:1033-1047.
20. Hagan IM, Hyams JS. 1988. The use of cell division cycle mutants to investigate the control of microtubule distribution in the fission yeast Schizosaccharomyces pombe. J. Cell Sci. 89:343-357.
21. Hayashi T, et al. 2004. Mis16 and Mis18 are required for CENP-A loading and histone deacetylation at centromeres. Cell 118:715-729.
22. Hayette S, et al. 2000. AF15q14, a novel partner gene fused to the MLL gene in an acute myeloid leukaemia with a t(11;15)(q23;q14). Oncogene 19:4446-4450.
23. Heus JJ, Zonneveld BJ, de Steensma HY, van den Berg JA. 1993. The consensus sequence of Kluyveromyces lactis centromeres shows homology to functional centromeric DNA from Saccharomyces cerevisiae. Mol. Gen. Genet. 236:355-362.
24. Jakopec V, Walla E, Fleig U. 2011. Versatile use of Schizosaccharomyces pombe plasmids in Saccharomyces cerevisiae. FEMS Yeast Res. 11:653-655.
25. Kerres A, et al. 2006. Fta2, an essential fission yeast kinetochore component, interacts closely with the conserved mal2 protein. Mol. Biol. Cell 17:4167-4178.
26. Kerres A, Jakopec V, Fleig U. 2007. The conserved Spc7 protein is required for spindle integrity and links kinetochore complexes in fission yeast. Mol. Biol. Cell 18:2441-2454.
27. Kerres A, et al. 2004. The fission yeast kinetochore component Spc7 associates with the EB1 family member Mal3 and is required for kinetochore-spindle association. Mol. Biol. Cell 15:5255-5267.
28. Kitada K, Yamaguchi E, Hamada K, Arisawa M. 1997. Structural analysis of a Candida glabrata centromere and its functional homology to the Saccharomyces cerevisiae centromere. Curr. Genet. 31:122-127.
29. Kiyomitsu T, Murakami H, Yanagida M. 2011. Protein interaction domain mapping of human kinetochore protein Blinkin reveals a consensus motif for binding of spindle assembly checkpoint proteins Bub1 and BubR1. Mol. Cell. Biol. 31:998-1011.
30. Kiyomitsu T, Obuse C, Yanagida M. 2007. Human Blinkin/AF15q14 is required for chromosome alignment and the mitotic checkpoint through direct interaction with Bub1 and BubR1. Dev. Cell 13:663-676.
31. Kline SL, Cheeseman IM, Hori T, Fukagawa T, Desai A. 2006. The human Mis12 complex is required for kinetochore assembly and proper chromosome segregation. J. Cell Biol. 173:9-17.
32. Koch A, Krug K, Pengelley S, Macek B, Hauf S. 2011. Mitotic substrates of the kinase aurora with roles in chromatin regulation identified through quantitative phosphoproteomics of fission yeast. Sci. Signal. 4:rs6. doi: 10.1126/scisignal.2001588.
33. Kurtzman CP, Robnett CJ. 2003. Phylogenetic relationships among yeasts of the 'Saccharomyces complex' determined from multigene sequence analyses. FEMS Yeast Res. 3:417-432.
34. Lin YT, Chen Y, Wu G, Lee WH. 2006. Hec1 sequentially recruits Zwint-1 and ZW10 to kinetochores for faithful chromosome segregation and spindle checkpoint control. Oncogene 25:6901-6914.
35. Liu D, et al. 2010. Regulated targeting of protein phosphatase 1 to the outer kinetochore by KNL1 opposes Aurora B kinase. J. Cell Biol. 188: 809-820.
36. Liu ST, Rattner JB, Jablonski SA, Yen TJ. 2006. Mapping the assembly pathways that specify formation of the trilaminar kinetochore plates in human cells. J. Cell Biol. 175:41-53.
37. Liu X, McLeod I, Anderson S, Yates JR III, He X. 2005. Molecular analysis of kinetochore architecture in fission yeast. EMBO J. 24:2919-2930.
38. Lott IT, Head E. 2005. Alzheimer disease and Down syndrome: factors in pathogenesis. Neurobiol. Aging 26:383-389.
39. Maskell DP, Hu XW, Singleton MR. 2010. Molecular architecture and assembly of the yeast kinetochore MIND complex. J. Cell Biol. 190:823-834.
40. Meadows JC, et al. 2011. Spindle checkpoint silencing requires association of PP1 to both Spc7 and kinesin-8 motors. Dev. Cell 20:739-750.
41. Moreno MB, Duran A, Ribas JC. 2000. A family of multifunctional thiamine-repressible expression vectors for fission yeast. Yeast 16:861-872.
42. Moreno S, Klar A, Nurse P. 1991. Molecular genetic analysis of fission yeast Schizosaccharomyces pombe. Methods Enzymol. 194:795-823.
43. Moreno S, Nurse P. 1994. Regulation of progression through the G1 phase of the cell cycle by the rum1+gene. Nature 367:236-242.
44. Musacchio A, Salmon ED. 2007. The spindle-assembly checkpoint in space and time. Nat. Rev. Mol. Cell Biol. 8:379-393.
45. Nabeshima K, et al. 1998. Dynamics of centromeres during metaphaseanaphase transition in fission yeast: Dis1 is implicated in force balance in metaphase bipolar spindle. Mol. Biol. Cell 9:3211-3225.
46. Nekrasov VS, Smith MA, Peak-Chew S, Kilmartin JV. 2003. Interactions between centromere complexes in Saccharomyces cerevisiae. Mol. Biol. Cell 14:4931-4946.
47. Obuse C, et al. 2004. A conserved Mis12 centromere complex is linked to heterochromatic HP1 and outer kinetochore protein Zwint-1. Nat. Cell Biol. 6:1135-1141.
48. Pagliuca C, Draviam VM, Marco E, Sorger PK, De Wulf P. 2009. Roles for the conserved spc105p/kre28p complex in kinetochore-microtubule binding and the spindle assembly checkpoint. PLoS One 4:e7640.
49. Park CJ, et al. 2004. Requirement for Bbp1p in the proper mitotic functions of Cdc5p in Saccharomyces cerevisiae. Mol. Biol. Cell 15:1711-1723.
50. Partridge JF, Borgstrom B, Allshire RC. 2000. Distinct protein interaction domains and protein spreading in a complex centromere. Genes Dev. 14:783-791.
51. Petrovic A, et al. 2010. The MIS12 complex is a protein interaction hub for outer kinetochore assembly. J. Cell Biol. 190:835-852.
52. Pidoux AL, Richardson W, Allshire RC. 2003. Sim4: a novel fission yeast kinetochore protein required for centromeric silencing and chromosome segregation. J. Cell Biol. 161:295-307.
53. Pohlmann J, Fleig U. 2010. Asp1, a conserved 1/3 inositol polyphosphate kinase, regulates the dimorphic switch in Schizosaccharomyces pombe. Mol. Cell. Biol. 30:4535-4547.
54. Pribylova L, Straub ML, Sychrova H, de Montigny J. 2007. Characterisation of Zygosaccharomyces rouxii centromeres and construction of first Z. rouxii centromeric vectors. Chromosome Res. 15:439-445.
55. Przewloka MR, et al. 2007. Molecular analysis of core kinetochore composition and assembly in Drosophila melanogaster. PLoS One 2:e478. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0000478.
56. Rhind N, et al. 2011. Comparative functional genomics of the fission yeasts. Science 332:930-936.
57. Rosenberg JS, Cross FR, Funabiki H. 2011. KNL1/Spc105 recruits PP1 to silence the spindle assembly checkpoint. Curr. Biol. 21:942-947.
58. Saitoh S, Ishii K, Kobayashi Y, Takahashi K. 2005. Spindle checkpoint signaling requires the mis6 kinetochore subcomplex, which interacts with mad2 and mitotic spindles. Mol. Biol. Cell 16:3666-3677.
59. Santaguida S, Musacchio A. 2009. The life and miracles of kinetochores. EMBO J. 28:2511-2531.
60. Sanyal K, Baum M, Carbon J. 2004. Centromeric DNA sequences in the pathogenic yeast Candida albicans are all different and unique. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A. 101:11374-11379.
61. Sato M, Vardy L, Angel Garcia M, Koonrugsa N, Toda T. 2004. Interdependency of fission yeast Alp14/TOG and coiled coil protein Alp7 in microtubule localization and bipolar spindle formation. Mol. Biol. Cell 15:1609-1622.
62. Scannell DR, Butler G, Wolfe KH. 2007. Yeast genome evolution-the origin of the species. Yeast 24:929-942.
63. Schramm C, Elliott S, Shevchenko A, Schiebel E. 2000. The Bbp1p-Mps2p complex connects the SPB to the nuclear envelope and is essential for SPB duplication. EMBO J. 19:421-433.
64. Souciet JL, et al. 2009. Comparative genomics of protoploid Saccharomycetaceae. Genome Res. 19:1696-1709.
65. Starr DA, et al. 2000. HZwint-1, a novel human kinetochore component that interacts with HZW10. J. Cell Sci. 113(Pt 11):1939-1950.
66. Takahashi K, Yamada H, Yanagida M. 1994. Fission yeast minichromosome loss mutants mis cause lethal aneuploidy and replication abnormality. Mol. Biol. Cell 5:1145-1158.
67. Tanaka TU. 2010. Kinetochore-microtubule interactions: steps towards bi-orientation. EMBO J. 29:4070-4082.
68. Thompson SL, Compton DA. 2011. Chromosomes and cancer cells. Chromosome Res. 19:433-444.
69. Tran PT, Paoletti A, Chang F. 2004. Imaging green fluorescent protein fusions in living fission yeast cells. Methods 33:220-225.
70. Wang H, et al. 2004. Human Zwint-1 specifies localization of Zeste White 10 to kinetochores and is essential for mitotic checkpoint signaling. J. Biol. Chem. 279:54590-54598.
71. Wei RR, Al-Bassam J, Harrison SC. 2007. The Ndc80/HEC1 complex is a contact point for kinetochore-microtubule attachment. Nat. Struct. Mol. Biol. 14:54-59.
72. Welburn JP, et al. 2009. The human kinetochore Ska1 complex facilitates microtubule depolymerization-coupled motility. Dev. Cell 16: 374-385.
73. Welburn JP, et al. 2010. Aurora B phosphorylates spatially distinct targets to differentially regulate the kinetochore-microtubule interface. Mol. Cell 38:383-392.
74. Westermann S, Drubin DG, Barnes G. 2007. Structures and functions of yeast kinetochore complexes. Annu. Rev. Biochem. 76:563-591.
75. Wilson-Kubalek EM, Cheeseman IM, Yoshioka C, Desai A, Milligan RA. 2008. Orientation and structure of the Ndc80 complex on the microtubule lattice. J. Cell Biol. 182:1055-1061.