A triple-jaw actuated and sensorized instrument for grasping large organs during minimally invasive robotic surgery

International Journal of Medical Robotics and Computer Assisted Surgery

Volumn 9, Issue 1, 2013, Pages 83-93

  Mirbagheri, Alireza ^a   Farahmand, Farzam ^a  

^a SHARIF UNIVERSITY OF TECHNOLOGY   (Iran)

Author keywords

Auto grasping; Force feedback; Hand held robotic instrument; Large organ grasper; Robotic surgery; Tissue characterization

Indexed keywords

FEEDBACK; REMOTE CONTROL; SURGICAL EQUIPMENT; TISSUE;

AUTO GRASPING; FEED BACK; FORCE TRACKING; FORCE-FEEDBACK; HAND-HOLD ROBOTIC INSTRUMENT; LARGE AMOUNTS; LARGE ORGAN GRASPER; MINIMALLY INVASIVE; ROBOTICS SURGERY; TISSUE CHARACTERIZATION;

ROBOTIC SURGERY;

ACCURACY; ARTICLE; CONTROLLED STUDY; DEVICE SAFETY; FORCE TRANSDUCER; GRIP STRENGTH; LARGE ORGAN GRASPER; MECHANICS; MICROCOMPUTER; MINIMALLY INVASIVE ROBOTIC SURGERY; MINIMALLY INVASIVE SURGERY; PHANTOM; ROBOTICS; SURGICAL EQUIPMENT; TRIPLE JAW GRASPER;

EID: 84874958593     PISSN: 14785951     EISSN: 1478596X     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1002/rcs.1438     Document Type: Article

References (48)

1. Heijnsdijk E, Dankelman J, Gouma D. Effectiveness of grasping and duration of clamping using laparoscopic graspers. Surg Endosc 2002; 16(9): 1329-1331.
2. Cartmill JA, Shakeshaft AJ, Walsht WR, Martin CJ. High pressures are generated at the tip of laparoscopic graspers. Australian N Z J Surg 1999; 69(2): 127-130.
3. Frank TG, Cuschieri A. Prehensile atraumatic grasper with intuitive ergonomics. Surg Endosc 1997; 11(10): 1036-1039.
4. Ortiz M. Manipulable hand for laparoscopy. United States patent US 5441494, 1995.
5. Viola FJ, Mastri DL, Sater GA, Young WP, Rende FM. Apparatus and method for performing surgical tasks during laparoscopic procedures. United States Patent US 5807376, 1998.
6. Takayama T, Omata T, Futami T, et al. Detachable-fingered hands for manipulation of large internal organs in laparoscopic surgery. Proceedings of IEEE International Conference on Robotics and Automation 2007, Roma, Italy, 244-299.
7. Ohshima R, Takayama T, Omata T, et al. Assemblable three fingered five-DOF hand for laparoscopic surgery. Proceedings of IEEE International Conference on Robotics and Automation, 2008, Pasadena, CA, USA, 3896-3901.
8. Osaki M, Takayama T, Omata T, et al. Single-trocar assemblable retractor-hand for laparoscopic surgery. Proceedings of IEEE International Conference on Robotics and Automation, 2009, Kobe, Japan, 3490-3495.
9. Oshima R, Takayama T, Omata T, et al. Assemblable three-fingered nine-degrees-of-freedom hand for laparoscopic surgery. Trans IEEE/ASME Mechatron 2010; 15(6): 862-870.
10. O'Hanley H, Rosario M, Chen Y, et al. Design and testing of a three fingered flexural laparoscopic grasper. J Med Devices 2011; 5(2): 027508.
11. Mirbagheri A, Farahmand F. Design, analysis and experimental evaluation of a general-purpose endoscopic large organ grasper. J Med Devices 2012, in press.
12. Van Hemert tot Dingshof V, Lazeroms M, van der Ham A, et al. Force reflection for a laparoscopic forceps. Proceedings of the 18th Annual International Conference of the IEEE Engineering in Medicine and Biology Society, 1996. Amsterdam, Netherlands, 1: 210-211.
13. Goertz RC, Thompson WM. Electronically controlled manipulator. Nucleonics 1954; 12(11): 46-47.
14. Hannaford B, Trujillo J, Sinanan M, et al. Computerized endoscopic surgical grasper. Stud Health Technol Inform 1998; 50: 265-271.
15. Tholey G, Chanthasopeephan T, Hu T, et al. Measuring grasping and cutting forces for reality-based haptic modeling. Int Congress Series 2003; 1256: 794-800.
16. Tholey G, Desai JP. A general-purpose 7 DOF haptic device: applications toward robot-assisted surgery. IEEE/ASME Trans Mechatron 2007; 12(6): 662-669.
17. Kuebler B, Seibold U, Hirzinger G. Development of actuated and sensor integrated forceps for minimally invasive robotic surgery. Int J Med Robot Comput Assist Surg 2005; 1(3): 96-107.
18. Tavakoli M, Patel RV, Moallem M. Haptic interaction in robot-assisted endoscopic surgery: a sensorized end-effector. Int J Med Robotics Comput Assist Surg 2005; 1(2): 53-63.
19. Afshari E, Najarian S, Simforoosh N, Hajizade Farkoush S. Design and fabrication of a novel tactile sensory system applicable in artificial palpation. Minim Invas Therapy Allied Technol 2011; 20(1): 22-29.
20. Mojra A, Najarian S, Towliat Kashani SM, Panahi F, Yaghmaei M. A novel haptic robotic viscogram for characterizing the viscoelastic behaviour of breast tissue in clinical examinations. Int J Med Robot Comput Assist Surg 2011; 7(3): 282-292.
21. Najarian S, Dargahi J, Zheng XZ. A novel method in measuring the stiffness of sensed objects with applications for biomedical robotic systems. Int J Medic Robot Comput Assist Surg 2006; 2(1): 84-90.
22. Najarian S, Dargahi J, Mehrizi AA. Artificial Tactile Sensing in Biomedical Engineering. : McGraw-Hill, 2009.
23. Najarian S, Dargahi J. Design, construction, and mathematical modeling of a tactile sensor for applications in robotic surgery. J Sci Technol 2005; 16(62 A): 37-45.
24. Dargahi J, Najarian S. Human tactile perception as a standard for artificial tactile sensing - a review. Int J Medic Robot Comput Assist Surg 2004; 1(1): 23-35.
25. Golpaygani AT, Najarian S, Movahedi MM, Emamieh GD. Fabrication of a capacitance-based tactile sensor with biomedical applications. Am J Appl Sci 2008; 5(2): 129-135.
26. Roham H, Najarian S, Hosseini SM, Dargahi J. Design and fabrication of a new tactile probe for measuring the modulus of elasticity of soft tissues. Sensor Rev 2007; 27(4): 317-323.
27. Hosseini SM, Towliat Kashani SM, Najarian S, Panahi F, Mousai Naeini SM, Mojra A. A medical tactile sensing instrument for detecting embedded objects, with specific application for breast examination. Int J Medic Robot Comput Assist Surg 2010; 6(1): 73-82.
28. Dargahi J, Najarian S, Ramezanifard R, Ghomshe FT. Fabrication and testing of a medical surgical instrument capable of detecting simulated embedded lumps. Am J Appl Sci 2007; 4(12): 957-964.
29. Mirbagheri A, Yahyazadehfar M, Farahmand F. Conceptual design of a novel laparoscopic instrument for manipulation of large internal organs. ASME 5th Frontiers in Biomedical Devices Conference, BioMed2010; September 20-21, 2010, Newport Beach, California, USA
30. Mirbagheri A, Farahmand F. Design and analysis of an actuated endoscopic grasper for manipulation of large body organs. Proceedings of the 32nd Annual International Conference of the IEEE Engineering in Medicine and Biology Society, 2010, Buenos Aires, Argentina, 1230-1233.
31. Rosen J, Macfarlane M, Richards C, Hannaford B, Sinanan M. Surgeon-tool force/torque signatures - evaluation of surgical skills in minimally invasive surgery. Studies Health Technol Informatics 1999; 62: 290-296.
32. Tavakoli M. Haptics for Teleoperated Surgical Robotic Systems. World Scientific, Singapore, 2008.
33. Hokayem PF, Spong MW. Bilateral teleoperation: an historical survey. Automatica 2006; 42(12): 2035-2057.
34. Okamura AM. Haptic feedback in robot-assisted minimally invasive surgery. Curr Opin Urol 2009; 19(1): 102-107.
35. Heijnsdijk EAM, DeVisser H, Dankelman J, Gouma DJ. Slip and damage properties of jaws of laparoscopic graspers. Surg Endosc Other Intervent Techniques 2004; 18(6): 974-979.
36. Whitney DE. Historical perspective and state of the art in robot force control. Int J Robotics Res 1987; 6(1): 3-14.
37. Tholey G. A teleoperative haptic feedback framework for computer-aided minimally invasive surgery. PhD Thesis, Drexel University; 2007.
38. Yip MC, Tavakoli M, Howe RD. Performance analysis of a haptic telemanipulation task under time delay. Adv Robotics 2011; 25(5): 651-673.
39. Zahraee AH, Szewczyk R, Paik JK, Morel G. Robotic hand-held surgical device: evaluation of end-effector's kinematics and development of proof-of-concept prototypes. Proceedings of the 13th International Conference on Medical Image Computing and Computer-assisted Intervention 2010, Beijing, China, 432-439.
40. Goepel T, Haertl F, Schneider A, et al. Automation of a suturing device for minimally invasive surgery. Surg Endosc Other Intervent Techniques 2011; 25(7): 2100-2104.
41. Sjoerdsma W, Herder JL, Horward MJ, et al. Force transmission of laparoscopic grasping instruments. Minim Invas Therapy Allied Technol 1997; 6(4): 274-278.
42. Lim JJB, Erdman AG. A review of mechanism used in laparoscopic surgical instruments. Mech Machine Theory 2003; 38(11): 1133-1147.
43. Rosen J, Brown JD, De S, Sinanan M, Hannaford B. Biomechanical properties of abdominal organs in vivo and postmortem under compression loads. J Biomech Eng 2008; 130(2): 021020.
44. MacFarlane M, Rosen J, Hannaford B, et al. Force-feedback grasper helps restore sense of touch in minimally invasive surgery. J Gastrointest Surg 1999; 3(3): 278-285.
45. Rosen J, Hannaford B, MacFarlane MP, Sinanan MN. Force controlled and teleoperated endoscopic grasper for minimally invasive surgery - experimental performance evaluation. IEEE Trans Biomed Eng 1999; 46(10): 1212-1221.
46. Tholey G, Pillarisetti A, Desai JP. On-site three dimensional force sensing capability in a laparoscopic grasper. Ind Robot 2004; 31(6): 509-518.
47. Kauer M, Vuskovic V, Dual J, Szekely G, Bajka M. Inverse finite element characterization of soft tissues. Med Image Anal 2002; 6(3): 275-287.
48. Karthikeyan B, Chawla A, Mukherjee S. Inverse finite element characterization of soft tissues using genetic algorithm. J Biomech 2006; 39(Supplement 1(0)): S491.