Development of actuated and sensor integrated forceps for minimally invasive robotic surger

International Journal of Medical Robotics and Computer Assisted Surgery

Volumn 1, Issue 3, 2005, Pages 96-107

  Kuebler, B ^a   Seibold, U ^a   Hirzinger, G ^a  

^a GERMAN AEROSPACE CENTER DLR   (Germany)

Author keywords

actuated and sensorized surgical instruments; force feedback; minimally invasive robotic surgery; telemanipulation; telepresence

Indexed keywords

DEGREES OF FREEDOM (MECHANICS); FEEDBACK; MOTION COMPENSATION; SURGICAL EQUIPMENT; VISUAL COMMUNICATION;

ACTUATED AND SENSORIZED SURGICAL INSTRUMENT; FORCE-FEEDBACK; MINIMALLY INVASIVE; MINIMALLY INVASIVE ROBOTIC SURGERY; MINIMALLY-INVASIVE SURGERY; ROBOTICS SURGERY; SURGICAL INSTRUMENT; TELEMANIPULATION; TELEPRESENCE; TISSUE MANIPULATION;

ROBOTIC SURGERY;

EQUIPMENT DESIGN; FEEDBACK SYSTEM; HUMAN; INSTRUMENTATION; MINIMALLY INVASIVE SURGERY; RESEARCH; REVIEW; ROBOTICS; SURGICAL EQUIPMENT; SURGICAL INSTRUMENT; TORQUE;

EQUIPMENT DESIGN; FEEDBACK; HUMANS; RESEARCH; ROBOTICS; SURGICAL EQUIPMENT; SURGICAL INSTRUMENTS; SURGICAL PROCEDURES, MINIMALLY INVASIVE; TORQUE;

EID: 33947278495     PISSN: 14785951     EISSN: 1478596X     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1002/rcs.33     Document Type: Article

References (33)

1. Treat MR. A Surgeon's Perspective on the Difficulties of Laparoscopic Surgery. Computer-Integrated Surgery. MIT Press (1995). p.559–60.
2. Rosen J, Hannaford B, MacFarlane M, Sinanan M. Force controlled and teleoperated endoscopic grasper for minimally invasive surgery - experimental performance evaluation. IEEE Transactions on Biomedical Engineering 46; 1999.
3. Helmy M. A comparative study between laparoscopic versus open appendicectomy in men. J Egypt Soc Parasitol. 2001.
4. Huang M, Wei P, Wu C, Lai I, Chen, R J, Lee W. Needlescopic, Laparoscopic, and Open Appendectomy: A Comparative Study. Surgical Laparoscopy, Endoscopy & Percutaneous Techniques. 2001;11(5):306–12. doi: 10.1097/00129689-200110000-00004
5. Sauerland S, Lefering R, Neugebauer E. Laparoscopic versus open surgery for suspected appendicitis. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2002.
6. Deml B, Ortmaier T, Weiss H. Minimally invasive surgery: Empirical comparison of manual and robot assisted force feedback surgery. Proceedings of the EuroHaptics2004, 4th International Conference, Munich, Germany; 2004.
7. Semere W, Kitagawa M, Okamura AM. Teleoperation with sensor/actor asymmetry: Task performance with partial force feedback. Proceedings of the 12th International Symposium on Haptic Interfaces for Virtual Environment and Teleoperator Systems, Chicago, IL; 2004.
8. Wei G, Arbter K, Hirzinger G. Real time visual servoing for laparoscopic surgery. IEEE Engineering in Medicine and Biology. 1997;16: 40–5. doi: 10.1109/51.566151
9. Konietschke R, Ortmaier T, Weiss H, Engelke R, Hirzinger G. Optimal design of a medical robot for minimally invasive surgery. 2nd Conference of the German Society of Computer and Robotic Assisted Surgery (CURAC), Nuremberg, Germany; 2003.
10. Müller JM. Charité - Chirurgenmanual.Website (2005) Available from http://www.charite.de/ch/chir/chir/ch_manu.htm
11. Falk V, Diegeler A, Walther T, Löscher N, Vogel B, Ulmann C, Rauch T. et al. Endoscopic coronary artery bypass grafting on the beating heart using a computer enhanced telemanipulation system. Heart Surg Forum. 2; 1999:199–205.
12. Ortmaier T, Weiss H, Hirzinger G. Minimally invasive robotic surgery: Foundations and perspectives. ICRA2003 Workshop: Recent Advances in Medical Robotics, 2003 IEEE International Conference on Robotics and Automation, Taipei, Taiwan; 2003.
13. Ortmaier T. Motion Compensation in Minimally Invasive Robotic Surgery. VDI Verlag, PhD Thesis; 2003.
14. Nakamura Y. Virtual stillness and small size robot system that occupies less space in OR. Proceedings of the International Conference on Robotics and Automation (ICRA) 2003, Workshop Recent Advances in Medical Robotics, Taipei, Taiwan; 2003.
15. Konietschke R, Weiss H, Ortmaier T, Hirzinger G. A preoperative planning procedure for robotically assisted minimally invasive interventions. Proceedings of the 3rd Conference of the German Society of Computer and Robotic Assisted Surgery (CURAC), Munich, Germany; 2004.
16. Guthart G, Salisbury J.The intuitive telesurgery system: Overview and application. Proceedings of the 2000 IEEE International Conference on Robotics and Automation (ICRA), San Francisco; 2000.
17. ®surgical system. [Homepage on the internet]. [Cited July 2005] Available from www.intuitivesurgical.com
18. Sackier J, Wang Y. Robotically Assisted Laparoscopic Surgery: From Concept to Development. Computer-Integrated Surgery. MIT Press. 1995;577–80.
19. Cavusoglu M, Williams W, Tendick F, Sastry S. Robotics for telesurgery: Second generation Berkeley/UCSF laparoscopic telesurgical workstation and looking towards the future applications. Proceedings of the 39th Allerton Conference on Communication, Control and Computing, Monticello, Italy; 2001.
20. Kwon D, Woo K, Song S, Kim W, Cho H. Microsurgical telerobot system. Proceedings of the IEEE/RSJ International Conference on Intelligent Robots and Systems, Victoria, BC, Canada; 1998.
21. MacFarlane M, Rosen J, Hannaford B, Pellegrini C, Sinanan M. Force-feedback grasper helps restore sense of touch in minimally invasive surgery. Journal of Gastrointestinal Surgery. 1999;3(3):278–85. doi:10.1016/S1091-255X(99)80069-9
22. Hu T, Castellanos A, Tholey G, Desai J. Real-time haptic feedback in laparoscopic tools for use in gastro-intestinal surgery. Proceedings of the 5th International Conference on Medical Image Computing and Computer-Assisted Intervention — MICCAI 2002, Tokyo, Japan; 2002:66–74.
23. Kennedy C, Hu T, Desai J. Combining haptic and visual servoing for cardio-thoracic surgery. Proceedings of the IEEE International Conference on Robotics and Automation (ICRA), Washington D.C., USA; 2002:2106–11.
24. Tavakoli M, Patel R, Moallem M. A force reflective masterslave system for minimally invasive surgery. Proceedings of the IEEE/RSJ International Conference on Intelligent Robots and Systems (IROS 2003), Las Vegas, USA; 2003.
25. Zemiti N, Ortmaier T, Vitrani MA, Morel G. A force controlled laparoscopic surgical robot without distal force sensing. Proceedings of the 9th International Symposium on Experimental Robotics (ISER 2004), Singapore; 2004.
26. Tholey G, Pillarisetti A, Green W, Desai J. Direct 3-D force measurement capability in an automated laparoscopic grasper. Proceedings of the 4th International Conference EuroHaptics 2004, Munich, Germany; 2004.
27. Peirs J, Clijne J, Reynaerts D, Brussel HV, Herijgers P, Corteville B, et al. A micro optical force sensor for force feedback during minimally invasive robotic surgery. Sensors and Actuators. 2004; A 115: 447–55.
28. Konietschke R, Ortmaier T, Weiss H, Hirzinger G, Engelke R. Manipulability and accuracy measures for a medical robot in minimally invasive surgery. Proceedings of the 9th International Symposium on Advances in Robot Kinematics of the International Federation for the Promotion of Mechanism and Machine Science, Sestri Levante, Italy; 2004.
29. Sorli M, Pastorelli S. Six-axis reticulated structure force/ torque sensor with adaptable performances. Mechatronics. 1995;5(6):585–601. doi: 10.1016/0957-4158(95)00039-8
30. Seibold U, Kuebler B, Hirzinger G. Prototype of instrument for minimally invasive surgery with 6-axis force sensing capability. Proceedings of the 2005 IEEE International Conference on Robotics and Automation (ICRA); 2005.
31. Seibold U, Hirzinger G. A 6-axis force/torque sensor design for haptic feedback in minimally invasive robotic surgery. Proceedings of the 2nd VDE World Microtechnologies Congress; 2003.
32. Kuebler B. Entwicklung einer integrierten Antriebseinheit für ein minimal invasives Zangeninstrument in der robotergestützten Chirurgie. Diplomarbeit, Universität Stuttgart; 2003.
33. Ortmaier T, Weiss H, Hirzinger G. A new robot for minimally invasive surgery. Proceedings of the 3rd Conference of the German Society of Computer and Robotic Assisted Surgery (CURAC), Munich, Germany; 2004.