Predictive effects of online peer feedback types on performance quality

Educational Technology and Society

Volumn 16, Issue 1, 2013, Pages 332-341

  Yu, Fu Yun ^a   Wu, Chun Ping ^b  

^a NATIONAL CHENG KUNG UNIVERSITY   (Taiwan)

^b TAMKANG UNIVERSITY   (Taiwan)

Author keywords

Online learning system; Peer assessment; Performance quality; Types of feedback

Indexed keywords

EID: 84873156446     PISSN: 11763647     EISSN: 14364522     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: None     Document Type: Article

References (48)

1. Ammer, J. J. (1998). Peer evaluation model for enhancing writing performance of students with learning disabilities. Reading & Writing Quarterly, 14 (3), 263-276
2. Brindley, C., & Scoffield, S. (1998). Peer assessment in undergraduate programmers. Teaching in Higher Education, 3(1), 79-90
3. Boud, D., Cohen, R., & Sampson, J. (1999). Peer learning and assessment. Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education, 24(4), 413-426
4. rd ed). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates
5. Cho, K., & MacArthur, C. (2010). Student revision with peer and expert reviewing. Learning and Instruction, 20(4), 328-338
6. Cho, K., & Schunn, C. D. (2007). Scaffolded writing and rewriting in the discipline: A web-based reciprocal peer review system. Computers & Education, 48(3), 409-426
7. Crane, L., & Winterbottom, M. (2008). Plants and photosynthesis: Peer assessment to help students learn. Journal of Biological Education, 42(4), 150-156
8. Davies, P. (2000). Computerized peer assessment. Innovations in Education and Training International, 37(4), 346-355
9. Falchikov, N., & Goldfinch, J. (2000). Student peer assessment in higher education: A meta-analysis comparing peer and teacher marks. Review of Educational Research, 70(3), 287-322
10. Fallows, S., & Chandramohan, B. (2001). Multiple approaches to assessment: reflections on use of tutor, peer and selfassessment. Teaching in Higher Education, 6(2), 229-246
11. Gatfield, T. (1999). Examining student satisfaction with group projects and peer assessment. Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education, 24(4), 365-377
12. Gielen, S., Peeters, E., Dochy, F., Onghena, P., & Struyven, K. (2010). Improving the effectiveness of peer feedback for learning. Learning and Instruction, 20(4), 304-315
13. Hanrahan, S. J., & Isaacs, G. (2001). Assessing self- and peer-assessment: The students' views. Higher Education Research & Development, 20(1), 53-70
14. Hughes, I. E., & Large, B. J. (1993). Staff and peer-group in graduate psychology courses. Studies in Higher Education, 18, 379-385
15. Humphreys, P., Greenan, K., & Mcllveen, H. (1997). Development work-based transferable skills in a university environment. Journal of European Industrial Training, 21(2), 63-69
16. King, A. (1992). Facilitating elaborative learning through guided student-generated questioning. Educational Psychologist, 27(1), 111-126
17. Lu, R., & Bol, L. (2007). A comparison of anonymous versus identifiable e-peer review on college student writing performance and the extent of critical feedback. Journal of Interactive Online Learning, 6(2), 100-115
18. Macpherson, K. (1999). The development of critial thinking skill in undergraduate supervisory management units: Efficacy of student peer assessment. Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education, 24(3), 273-284
19. Nelson, M. M., & Schunn, C. D. (2009). The nature of feedback: How different types of peer feedback affect writing performance. Instructional Science, 37(4), 375-401
20. Olson, V. L. B. (1990). The revising process of six-grade writers with and without peer feedback. Journal of Educational Research, 84(1), 22-29
21. Orsmond, P., Merry, S., & Reiling, K. (1996). The importance of marking criteria in the use of peer assessment. Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education, 21(3), 239-249
22. Purchase, H. C. (2000). Learning about interface design through peer assessment. Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education, 25(4), 341-352
23. Rosenshine, B., Meister, C., & Chapman, S. (1996). Teaching students to generate questions: A review of the intervention studies. Review of Educational Research, 66(2), 181-221
24. Smith, R. A. (1990). Are peer ratings of student debates valid? Teaching of Psychology, 17(3), 188-189
25. Strijbos, J. W., Narciss, S., & Dünnebier, K. (2010). Peer feedback content and sender's competence level in academic writing revision tasks: Are they critical for feedback perceptions and efficiency? Learning and Instruction, 20(4), 291-303
26. Sung, Y. T., Chang, K. E., Chiou, S. K., & Hou, H. T. (2005). The design and application of a web-based self-and peerassessment system. Computers & Education, 45(2), 187-202
27. Torrance, E.P. (1974). Torrance tests of creative thinking. Bensenville, IL: Scholastic Testing Service, Inc
28. Topping, K. J. (1998). Peer assessment between students in colleges and universities. Review of Educational Research, 68(3), 249-276
29. Topping, K. J. (2010). Methodological quandaries in studying process and outcomes in peer assessment. Learning and Instruction, 20 (4), 339-343
30. Topping, K. J., & Ehly, S. W. (2001). Peer-assisted learning: A framework for consultation. Journal of Educational and Psychological Consultation, 12(2), 113-132
31. Trautmann, N. (2009). Interactive learning through web-mediated peer review of student science reports. Educational Technology Research & Development, 57(5), 685-704
32. Tsai, C. C., Lin, S. S. J., & Yuan, S. M. (2002). Developing science activities through a networked peer assessment system. Computers & Education, 38, 241-252
33. Tsai, C. C., Liu, E. Z. F., Lin, S., & Yuan, S. M. (2001). A networked peer assessment system based on a Vee Heuristic. Innovations in Education & Teaching International, 38(3), 220-230
34. Van den Berg, I., Admiraal, W., & Pilot, A. (2006). Design principles and outcomes of peer assessment in higher education. Studies in Higher Education, 31(3), 341-356
35. Van Gennip, N. A. E., Segers, M., & Tillema, H. H. (2010). Peer assessment as a collaborative learning activity: The role of interpersonal variables and conceptions. Learning and Instruction, 20(4), 280-290
36. Van Steendam, E., Riljlaarsdam, G., Sercu, L., & van den Bergh, H. (2010). The effect of instructional type and dyadic or individual emulation on the quality of high-order peer feedback in EFL. Learning and Instruction, 20(4), 316-327
37. Van Zundert, M., Sluijsmans, D., & Van Merriënboer, J. (2010). Effective peer assessment processes: Research findings and future directions. Learning and Instruction, 20(4), 270-279
38. Venables, A., & Summit, R. (2003). Enhancing scientific essay writing using peer assessment. Innovations in Education and Teaching International, 40(3), 281-290
39. Wen, M. L., & Tsai, C. C. (2006). University students' perceptions of and attitudes toward (online) peer assessment. Higher Education, 51, 27-44
40. Wen, M. L., Tsai, C. C., & Chang, C. Y. (2006). Attitudes toward peer assessment: A comparison of the perspectives of preservice and in-service teachers. Innovations in Education and Teaching International, 43(1), 83-92
41. Yang, M., Badger, R., & Yu, Z. (2006). A comparative study of peer and teacher feedback in a Chinese EFL writing class. Journal of Second Language Writing, 15(3), 179-200
42. Yelon, S. L. (1996). Powerful principles of instruction. White Plains, NY: Longman
43. Yu, F. Y. (2009). Scaffolding student-generated questions: Design and development of a customizable online learning system. Computers in Human Behavior, 25(5), 1129-1138
44. Yu, F. Y. (2011). Multiple peer-assessment modes to augment online student question-generation processes. Computers & Education, 56(2), 484-494
45. Yu, F. Y., & Liu, Y. H. (2005). Potential values of incorporating multiple-choice question-construction for physics experimentation instruction. International Journal of Science Education, 27(11), 1319-1335
46. Yu, F. Y. & Liu, Y. H. (2009). Creating a psychologically safe online space for a student-generated questions learning activity via different identity revelation modes. British Journal of Educational Technology, 40(6), 1109-1123
47. Yu, F. Y., Liu, Y. H., & Chan, T. W. (2005). A Web-based learning system for question-posing and peer assessment. Innovations in Education and Teaching International, 42(4), 337-348
48. Yu, F. Y., & Wu, C. P. (2011). Different identity revelation modes in an online peer-assessment learning environment: Effects on perceptions toward assessors, classroom climate and learning activities. Computers & Education, 57(3), 2167-2177