Examining student satisfaction with group projects and peer assessment

Assessment and Evaluation in Higher Education

Volumn 24, Issue 4, 1999, Pages 365-377

  Gatfield, Terry ^a  

^a GRIFFITH UNIVERSITY   (Australia)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 0000681550     PISSN: 02602938     EISSN: 1469297X     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1080/0260293990240401     Document Type: Article

References (19)

1. Biggs, J. (1990) Teaching: design for learning, in: B.Ross (Ed.) Teaching for Effective Learning (Sydney, Higher Education Research and Development Society of Australasia).
2. CONWAY, R., KEMBER, D., SIVAN, A. & Wu, M. (1993) Peer assessment of an individual's contribution to a group project, Assessment and Evaluation in Higher Education, 18(1).
3. COVEY, S. J. (1989) The Seven Habits of Highly Effective People (Melbourne, The Business Library).
4. EARL, S. E. (1986) Staff and peer assessment-measuring an individual's contribution to group performance, Assessment and Evaluation in Higher Education, 11(1), pp. 60-69.
5. FALCWKOV, N. & MAGIN, D. (1997) Detecting gender bias in peer marking of students' group process work, Assessment and Evaluation in Higher Education, 22(4), pp. 385-396.
6. FRY, S. A. (1990) Implementation and evaluation of peer marking in higher education, Assessment and Evaluation in Higher Education, 15(3), pp. 177-189.
7. GOLDFINCH, J. & RAESIDE, R. (1990) Development of a peer assessment technique for obtaining individual marks on a group project, Assessment and Evaluation in Higher Education, 15(3), pp. 210-231.
8. HOFSTEDE, G. (1980) Motivation, leadership and organization: do American theories apply abroad?. Organizational Dynamics, pp. 42-63.
9. JACQUES, D. (1984) Learning in Groups (London, Croom Helm).
10. KWAN, K. & LEUNG, R. (1996) Tutor versus peer group assessment of student performance in a simulation training exercise, Assessment and Evaluation in Higher Education, 21(3), pp. 205-214.
11. LEJK, M., WYVILL, M. & FARROW S. (1997) Group learning and group assessment on undergraduate computing courses in higher education in the UK: results of a group survey, Assessment and Evaluation in Higher Education, 22(1), pp. 81-91.
12. MELLO, J. A. (1993) Improving individual member accountability in small group settings, Journal of Management Education, 17(2), pp. 253-259.
13. NALDER, D.; HACKMAN, J. R. & LAWLER, E. E. (1979) Managing Organisational Behavior (Boston, Little Brown).
14. OLDFIELD, K. A. & Macalpine, M. K. (1995) Peer and self assessment at tertiary level-an experiential report, Assessment and Evaluation in Higher Education, 20(1), pp. 125-132.
15. ORSMOND, P., MERRY, S. & REILING, K. (1996) The importance of marking criteria in the use of peer assessment, Assessment and Evaluation in Higher Education, 21(3), pp. 239-248.
16. RAFIQ, Y. & FULLERTON, H. (1996) Peer assessment of group projects in civil engineering, Assessment and Evaluation in Higher Education, 21(1), pp. 69-81.
17. REDDING, G. S. (1993) Spirit of Chinese Capitalism (Berlin, Walter de Gruyter).
18. SHULL, F. A. & DELBECQ, A. L. (1962) Selected Readings in Management (Illinois, Invin).
19. SORBRAL, D. T. (1997) Improving learning skills: a self-help approach, Higher Education, 33(1), pp. 39-50.