Scaffolding student-generated questions: Design and development of a customizable online learning system

Computers in Human Behavior

Volumn 25, Issue 5, 2009, Pages 1129-1138

  Yu, Fu Yun ^a  

^a NATIONAL CHENG KUNG UNIVERSITY   (Taiwan)

Author keywords

Applications in subject areas; Evaluation of online learning systems; Learning strategies; Supporting classroom teaching; Teaching strategies

Indexed keywords

APPLICATIONS IN SUBJECT AREAS; EVALUATION OF ONLINE LEARNING SYSTEMS; LEARNING STRATEGIES; SUPPORTING CLASSROOM TEACHING; TEACHING STRATEGIES;

E-LEARNING; INTERNET; MULTIMEDIA SYSTEMS; SCAFFOLDS; SCHOOL BUILDINGS; STUDENTS; TEACHING;

ONLINE SYSTEMS;

EID: 67650035043     PISSN: 07475632     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.chb.2009.05.002     Document Type: Article

References (51)

1. Abramovich S., and Cho E.K. Technology as a medium for elementary preteachers' problem-posing experience in Mathematics. Journal of Computers in Mathematics and Science Teaching 25 4 (2006) 309-323
2. Akira, N., Tsukasa, H., & Akira, T. (2004). A support environment for learning by describing problem map in arithmetical word problems. The international conference on computers in education proceedings (pp. 213-225). Melbourne, Australia.
3. Bangert-Drowns R.L., Hurley M.M., and Wilkinson B. The effects of school-based writing-to-learn interventions on academic achievement: A meta-analysis. Review of Educational Research 74 1 (2004) 29-58
4. Barak M., and Rafaeli S. On-line question-posing and peer-assessment as means for web-based knowledge sharing in learning. International Journal of Human-Computer Studies 61 1 (2004) 84-103
5. Barlow A., and Cates J.M. The impact of problem posing on elementary teachers' beliefs about mathematics and mathematics teaching. School Science and Mathematics 106 2 (2006) 64-73
6. Brown S.I., and Walter M.I. The art of problem posing. 3rd ed. (2005), Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, New Jersey
7. Chen C.-H., and Ge X. The design of a web-based cognitive modeling system to support ill-structured problem solving. British Journal of Educational Technology 37 2 (2007) 299-302
8. Cooper W.H., Gallupe R.B., Pollard S., and Cadsby J. Some liberating effects of anonymous electronic brainstorming. Small Group Research 29 2 (1998) 147-178
9. Davis F.D., Bagozzi R.P., and Warshaw P.R. User acceptance of computer technology: A comparison of two theoretical models. Management Science 35 (1989) 982-1003
10. Denny, P., Hamer, J., Luxton-Reilly, A., & Purchase, H. (2008). PeerWise: Students sharing their multiple choice questions. Proceeding of the fourth international workshop on computing education research (pp. 51-58). Sydney, Australia.
11. English L.D. Promoting a problem-posing classroom. Teaching Children Mathematics 4 3 (1997) 172-179
12. Fellenz M.R. Using assessment to support higher level learning: The multiple choice item development assignment. Assessment & Education in Higher Education 29 6 (2004) 703-719
13. Herrington J., and Oliver R. Designing for reflection in online courses. HERDSA (2002) 313-319
14. Hirai, Y., & Hazeyama, A. (2007). Concerto II: A learning support system based on question-posing. Proceedings of the seventh IEEE international conference on advanced learning technologies (pp. 338-339). Niigata, Japan.
15. Jonassen D.H., Howland J., Moore J., and Marra R. Learning to solve problems with technology: A constructivist perspective. 2nd ed. (2003), Pearson education Inc., Upper Saddle River, NJ
16. Keil, G. E. (1965). Writing and solving original problems as a means of improving verbal arithmetic problem solving ability. Unpublished doctoral dissertation. Indiana University, Indiana.
17. King A. Enhancing peer interaction and learning in the classroom through reciprocal questioning. American Educational Research Journal 27 4 (1990) 664-687
18. King W.R., and He J. A meta-analysis of the technology acceptance model. Information & Management 43 6 (2006) 740-755
19. Koch A., and Echstein S.G. Improvement of reading comprehension of physics texts by students' question formulation. International Journal of Science Education 13 4 (1991) 473-485
20. Land S.M., and Zembal-Saul C. Scaffolding reflection and articulation of scientific explanations in a data-rich, project-based learning environment: An investigation of progress portfolio. Educational Technology Research and Development 51 4 (2003) 65-84
21. Legris P., Ingham J., and Collerette P. Why do people use information technology? A critical review of the technology acceptance model. Information & Management 40 3 (2003) 191-204
22. Lin X., Hmelo C., Kinzer C.K., and Secules T.J. Designing technology to support reflection. Educational Technology Research and Development 47 3 (1999) 43-62
23. Maki R.H. Test prediction over text material. In: Hacker D.J., Dunlosky J., and Graesser A.C. (Eds). Metacognition in educational theory and practice (1998), Erlbaum, New Jersey 117-144
24. Marx G.T. What's in a name? Some reflections on the sociology of anonymity. The Information Society 15 2 (1999) 99-112
25. Moses B.M., Bjork E., and Goldenberg E.P. Beyond problem solving: Problem posing. In: Brown S.I., and Walter M.I. (Eds). Problem posing: Reflections and applications (1993), Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, NJ, Hillsdale 178-188
26. Pea R.D. The social and technological dimensions of scaffolding and related theoretical concepts for learning, education, and human activity. The Journal of the Learning Sciences 13 3 (2004) 423-451
27. Perez, J. A. (1985). Effects of student-generated problems on problem solving performance. Unpublished doctoral dissertation. Teachers College, Columbia University, New York.
28. Pinsonneault, A., & Heppel, N. (1997-98). Anonymity in group support systems research: A new conceptualization, measure, and contingency framework. Journal of Management Information Systems, 14(3), 89-108.
29. Postmest T., and Lea M. Social processes and group decision making: Anonymity in group decision support systems. Ergonomics 43 8 (2000) 1252-1274
30. Pressley M., Ghatala E.S., Woloshyn V., and Pirie J. Sometimes adults miss the main ideas and do not realize it: Confidence in responses to short-answer and multiple choice comprehension questions. Reading Research Quarterly 25 3 (1990) 232-249
31. Quintana C., Reiser B.J., Davis E.A., Krajcik J., Fretz E., Duncan R.G., et al. A scaffolding design framework for software to support science inquiry. Journal of the Learning Sciences 13 3 (2004) 337-386
32. Quintana C., Zhang M., and Krajcik J. A framework for supporting metacognitive aspects of online inquiry through software-based scaffolding. Educational Psychologist 40 4 (2005) 235-244
33. Rosenshine B., Meister C., and Chapman S. Teaching students to generate questions: A review of the intervention studies. Review of Educational Research 66 2 (1996) 181-221
34. Saito H., and Miwa K. Construction of a learning environment supporting learners' reflection: A case of information seeking on the Web. Computers & Education 49 2 (2007) 214-229
35. Scott C.R. The impact of physical and discursive anonymity on group members' multiple identifications during computer-supported decision making. Western Journal of Communication 63 4 (1999) 456-487
36. Silver E.A. On mathematical problem posing. For the Learning of Mathematics 14 1 (1994) 19-28
37. Song H.-D., Grabowski G.L., Koszalka T.A., and Harkness W.L. Patterns of instructional-design factors prompting reflective thinking in middle-school and college level problem-based learning environments. Instructional Science 34 1 (2006) 63-87
38. Topping K.J., and Ehly S.E. Peer-assisted learning. Journal of Educational and Psychological Consultation 12 2 (2001) 113-132
39. Van Joolingen W.R., de Jong T., Lazonder A.W., Savelsbergh E.R., and Manlove S. Co-Lab: Research and development of an online learning environment for collaborative scientific discovery learning. Computers in Human Behavior 21 4 (2005) 671-688
40. Venkatesh V., and Bala H. Technology acceptance model 3 and a research agenda on interventions. Decision Sciences 39 2 (2008) 273-315
41. Vreman-de Olde C., and de Jong T. Student-generated assignments about electrical circuits in a computer simulation. International Journal of Science Education 26 7 (2004) 859-873
42. Whitin P. Promoting problem-posing explorations. Teaching Children Mathematics 11 4 (2004) 180-186
43. Wilson E.V. ExamNet asynchronous learning network: Augmenting face-to-face courses with student-developed exam questions. Computers & Education 42 1 (2004) 87-107
44. Wu H.-C., and Chang C.-Y. Development and validation of an animation-based test in the area of earth sciences. In: Mizoguchi R., Dillenbourg P., and Zhu Z. (Eds). Learning by effective utilization of technologies: Facilitating intercultural understanding (2006), IOS Press, Amsterdam 491-494
45. Yu, F. Y. (2005). Promoting metacognitive strategy development through online question-generation instructional approach. Proceeding of international conference on computers in education 2005 (pp. 564-571). Nanyang Technological University, Singapore.
46. Yu, F. Y., & Hung, C. C. (2006). An empirical analysis of online multiple-choice question-generation learning activity for the enhancement of students' cognitive strategy development while learning Science. Lecture series on computer and computational sciences: Recent progress in computational sciences and engineering (pp. 585-588). Chania, Crete, Greece.
47. Yu F.Y., and Liu Y.H. Creating a psychologically safe online space for a student-generated questions learning activity via different identity revelation modes. British Journal of Educational Technology (2008) 10.1111/j.1467-8535.2008.00905.x
48. Yu, F. Y., & Wu, C. P. (2008). Perceived task value and task difficulty of online student-generated questions: Its effects and implications for instruction. Proceedings of the world conference on educational multimedia, hypermedia & telecommunications (pp. 4516-4521). Vienna, Austria.
49. Yu F.Y., Han C.L., and Chan T.W. Experimental comparisons of face-to-face and anonymous real-time team competition in a networked gaming learning environment. CyberPsychology & Behavior 11 4 (2008) 511-514
50. Yu F.Y., and Liu Y.H. Potential values of incorporating multiple-choice question-construction for physics experimentation instruction. International Journal of Science Education 27 11 (2005) 1319-1335
51. Yu F.Y., Liu Y.H., and Chan T.W. A web-based learning system for question-posing and peer assessment. Innovations in Education and Teaching International 42 4 (2005) 337-348