Creating a psychologically safe online space for a student-generated questions learning activity via different identity revelation modes

British Journal of Educational Technology

Volumn 40, Issue 6, 2009, Pages 1109-1123

  Yu, Fu Yun ^b   Liu, Yu Hsin ^a  

^a NATIONAL CHI NAN UNIVERSITY   (Taiwan)

^b NATIONAL CHENG KUNG UNIVERSITY   (Taiwan)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

COMMUNICATION TECHNOLOGIES; CYCLIC PROCESS; KNOWLEDGE SYSTEM; LEARNING ACTIVITY; LEARNING PROCESS; NETWORKED TECHNOLOGIES; PEER ASSESSMENT; PHYSICS LABORATORIES; PROGRAM DEVELOPERS;

STUDENTS;

EID: 70350154536     PISSN: 00071013     EISSN: 14678535     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1111/j.1467-8535.2008.00905.x     Document Type: Article

References (33)

1. Abramovich, S. Cho, E. K. (2006). Technology as a medium for elementary preteachers' problem-posing experience in Mathematics. Journal of Computers in Mathematics and Science Teaching, 25, 309 323.
2. Bangert-Drowns, R. L., Hurley, M. M. Wilkinson, B. (2004). The effects of school-based writing-to-learn interventions on academic achievement: a meta-analysis. Review of Educational Research, 74, 29 58.
3. Barak, M. Rafaeli, S. (2004). On-line question-posing and peer-assessment as means for web-based knowledge sharing in learning. International Journal of Human-Computer Studies, 61, 84 103.
4. Barlow, A. Cates, J. M. (2006). The impact of problem posing on elementary teachers' beliefs about mathematics and mathematics teaching. School Science and Mathematics, 106, 64 73.
5. Brown, S. I. Walter, M. I. (2005). The art of problem posing (3rd ed.). Hillsdale, NJ : Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
6. Brown, J., Collins, A. Duguid, P. (1989). Situated cognition and the culture of learning. Educational Researcher, 18, 32 42.
7. Cooper, W. H., Gallupe, R. B., Pollard, S. Cadsby, J. (1998). Some liberating effects of anonymous electronic brainstorming. Small Group Research, 29, 147 178.
8. Dori, Y. J. Herscovitz, O. (1999). Question-posing capability as an alternative evaluation method: analysis of an environmental case study. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 36, 411 430.
9. English, L. D. (1997). Promoting a problem-posing classroom. Teaching Children Mathematics, 4, 172 179.
10. Fellenz, M. R. (2004). Using assessment to support higher level learning: the multiple choice item development assignment. Assessment and Education in Higher Education, 29, 703 719.
11. Festinger, L., Pepitone, A. Newcomb, T. (1952). Some consequences of deindividuation in a group. Journal of Abnormal and Social Psychology, 47, 382 389.
12. Franzoi, S. L. (2006). Social psychology (4th ed.). New York : McGraw Hill.
13. Gergen, K. J., Gergen, M. M. Barton, W. N. (1973). Deviance in the dark. Psychology Today, 7, 129 130.
14. King, A. (1990). Enhancing peer interaction and learning in the classroom through reciprocal questioning. American Educational Research Journal, 27, 664 687.
15. Lea, M. (1998). Effects of visual anonymity in computer-mediated group interactions. Retrieved January 25, 2008, from http://virtualsociety.sbs.ox.ac. uk/results/lea.pdf
16. Lea, M., Spears, R. de Groot, D. (2001). Knowing me, knowing you: anonymity effects on social identity processes within groups. Society for Personality and Social Psychology, 5, 526 537.
17. Moral-Toranzo, F., Canto-Ortiz, J. Gómez-Jacinto, L. (2007). Anonymity effects in computer-mediated communication in the case of minority influence. Computers in Human Behavior, 23, 1660 1674.
18. Moses, B. M., Bjork, E. Goldenberg, E. P. (1993). Beyond problem solving: problem posing. In S. I. Brown M. I. Walter (Eds Problem posing: reflections and applications (pp. 178 188). Hillsdale, NJ : Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
19. National Council of Teachers of Mathematics (NCTM) (1995). Assessment standards for school mathematics. Reston, VA : Author.
20. National Council of Teachers of Mathematics (NCTM) (2000). Principles and standards for school mathematics. Reston, VA : Author.
21. Palme, J. Berglund, M. (2002). Anonymity on the Internet. Retrieved January 10, 2008, from http://people.dsv.su.se/∼jpalme/society/anonymity. html
22. Pinsonneault, A. Heppel, N. (1997-98). Anonymity in group support systems research: a new conceptualization, measure, and contingency framework. Journal of Management Information Systems, 14, 89 108.
23. Postmes, T. Lea, M. (2000). Social processes and group decision making: anonymity in group decision support systems. Ergonomics, 43, 1252 1274.
24. Reigeluth, C. M. (1983). Instructional-design theories and models. Hillsdale, NJ : Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
25. Vreman-de Olde, C. de Jong, T. (2004). Student-generated assignments about electrical circuits in a computer simulation. International Journal of Science Education, 26, 859 873.
26. Whiten, D. J. (2004). Exploring the strategy of problem posing. In G. W. Bright R. N. Rubenstein (Eds Professional development guidebook for perspectives on the teaching of mathematics: companion to the sixty-sixth yearbook (pp. 1 4). Reston, VA : National Council of Teachers of Mathematics.
27. Whitin, P. (2004). Promoting problem-posing explorations. Teaching Children Mathematics, 11, 180 186.
28. Wilson, E. V. (2004). ExamNet asynchronous learning network: augmenting face-to-face courses with student-developed exam questions. Computer and Education, 42, 87 103.
29. Wittrock, M. C. (1978). The cognitive movement in instruction. Educational Psychology, 13, 15 29.
30. Wong, B. Y. L. (1985). Self-questioning instructional research: a review. Review of Educational Research, 55, 227 268.
31. Yu, F. Y. Liu, Y. H. (2005). Potential values of incorporating multiple-choice question-construction for physics experimentation instruction. International Journal of Science Education, 27, 1319 1335.
32. Yu, F. Y., Han, C. L. Chan, T. W. (2008). Experimental comparisons of face-to-face and anonymous real-time team competition in a networked gaming learning environment. CyberPsychology & Behavior, 11, 4.
33. Yu, F. Y., Liu, Y. H. Chan, T. W. (2005). A web-based learning system for question-posing and peer assessment. Innovations in Education and Teaching International, 42, 337 348.