Research collaboration in universities and academic entrepreneurship: The-state-of-the-art

Journal of Technology Transfer

Volumn 38, Issue 1, 2013, Pages 1-67

  Bozeman, Barry ^a   Fay, Daniel ^a   Slade, Catherine P ^b  

^a UNIVERSITY OF GEORGIA   (United States)

^b AUGUSTA UNIVERSITY   (United States)

Author keywords

Academic entrepreneurship; Contributorship; Knowledge transfer; Research collaboration; Research effectiveness; Research productivity; Technology transfer

Indexed keywords

TECHNOLOGY TRANSFER;

ACADEMIC ENTREPRENEURSHIP; CONTRIBUTORSHIP; KNOWLEDGE TRANSFER; RESEARCH COLLABORATIONS; RESEARCH PRODUCTIVITY;

KNOWLEDGE MANAGEMENT;

EID: 84872359434     PISSN: 08929912     EISSN: 15737047     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1007/s10961-012-9281-8     Document Type: Review

References (159)

1. Abramo, G., D'Angelo, C. A., Di Costa, F., & Solazzi, M. (2011). The role of information asymmetry in the market for university-industry research collaboration. The Journal of Technology Transfer, 36(1), 84-100.
2. Aerts, K., & Schmidt, T. (2008). Two for the price of one? Additionality effects of R& D subsidies: A comparison between Flanders and Germany. Research Policy, 37(5), 806-822.
3. Allen, T. J. (1977). Managing the flow of technology: Technology transfer and the dissemination of technological information with the R& D organization. Boston: MIT Press.
4. Ambos, T. C., Mäkelä, K., Birkinshaw, J., & D'Este, P. (2008). When does university research get commercialized? Creating ambidexterity in research institutions. Journal of Management Studies, 45(8), 1424-1447.
5. Aschoff, B., & Grimpe, C. (2011). Localized norms and academics' industry involvement: The moderating role of age on professional imprinting. Unpublished paper downloaded February 3, 2012 from http://ftp. zew. de/pub/zew-docs/veranstaltungen/innovationpatenting2011/papers/Grimpe. pdf.
6. Audretsch, D. B., Bozeman, B., Combs, K. L., Feldman, M., Link, A. N., Siegel, D. S., et al. (2002). The economics of science and technology. The Journal of Technology Transfer, 27(2), 155-203.
7. Baldini, N. (2008). Negative effects of university patenting: Myths and grounded evidence. Scientometrics, 75(2), 289-311.
8. Beaver, D. B. (2001). Reflections on scientific collaboration (and its study): Past, present, and future. Scientometrics, 52(3), 365-377.
9. Beaver, D. B. (2004). Does collaborative research have greater epistemic authority? Scientometrics, 60(3), 399-408.
10. Behrens, T. R., & Gray, D. O. (2001). Unintended consequences of cooperative research: Impact of industry sponsorship on climate for academic freedom and other graduate student outcome. Research Policy, 30(2), 179-199.
11. Bercovitz, J., & Feldman, M. (2008). Academic entrepreneurs: Organizational change at the individual level. Organization Science, 19, 69-89.
12. Boardman, P. C., & Ponomariov, B. L. (2007). Reward systems and NSF university research centers: The impact of tenure on university scientists' valuation of applied and commercially relevant research. The Journal of Higher Education, 78(1), 51-70.
13. Bozeman, B. (2000). Technology transfer and public policy: A review of research and theory. Research Policy, 29, 627-655.
14. Bozeman, B., & Boardman, C. (in press). Academic faculty working in university research centers: Neither capitalism's slaves nor teaching fugitives. The Journal of Higher Education.
15. Bozeman, B., & Corley, E. (2004). Scientists' collaboration strategies: Implications for scientific and technical human capital. Research Policy, 33(4), 599-616.
16. Bozeman, B., Dietz, J. S., & Gaughan, M. (2001). Scientific and technical human capital: An alternative model for research evaluation. International Journal of Technology Management, 22(7), 716-740.
17. Bozeman, B., & Gaughan, M. (2007). Impacts of grants and contracts on academic researchers' interactions with industry. Research Policy, 36(5), 694-707.
18. Bozeman, B., & Gaughan, M. (2011). How do men and women differ in research collaborations? An analysis of the collaboration motives and strategies of academic researchers. Research Policy, 40(10), 1393-1402.
19. Bozeman, B., & Rogers, J. (2002). A churn model of knowledge value: Internet researchers as a knowledge value collective. Research Policy, 31(4), 769-794.
20. Bozeman, B., Youtie, J., Slade, C. P., & Gaughan, M. (2012). The "dark side" of academic research collaborations: Case studies in exploitation, bullying and unethical behavior. Paper prepared for the annual meeting of the Society for Social Studies of Science (4S) October 17-20, 2012, Copenhagen Business School, Frederiksberg, Denmark.
21. Brockner, J., & Wiesenfeld, B. M. (1996). An integrative framework for explaining reactions to decisions: Interactive effects of outcomes and procedures. Psychological Bulletin, 120(2), 189-208.
22. Bruneel, J., D'Este, P., & Salter, A. (2010). Investigating the factors that diminish the barriers to university-industry collaboration. Research Policy, 39(7), 858-868.
23. Buisseret, T. J., Cameron, H. M., & Georghiou, L. (1995). What difference does it make additionality in the public support of RD in large firms. International Journal of Technology Management, 10(4-5), 587-600.
24. Caloghirou, Y., Tsakanikas, A., & Vonortas, N. S. (2001). University-industry cooperation in the context of the European framework programmes. The Journal of Technology Transfer, 26(1), 153-161.
25. Carayannis, E. G., & Laget, P. (2004). Transatlantic innovation infrastructure networks: Public-private, EU-US R& D partnerships. R& D Management, 34(1), 17-31.
26. Carayol, N., & Matt, M. (2004). Does research organization influence academic production? Laboratory level evidence from a large European university. Research Policy, 33, 1081-1112.
27. Chang, D. B., & Dozier, K. (1995). Technology transfer and academic education with a focus on diversity. The Journal of Technology Transfer, 20(3), 88-95.
28. Chompalov, I., Genuth, J., & Shrum, W. (2002). The organization of scientific collaborations. Research Policy, 31(5), 749-767.
29. Chompalov, I., & Shrum, W. (1999). Institutional collaboration in science: A typology of technological practice. Science, Technology and Human Values, 24(3), 338-372.
30. Clark, B. Y. (2011). Influences and conflicts of federal policies in academic-industrial scientific collaboration. The Journal of Technology Transfer, 36(5), 514-545.
31. Clarysse, B., Wright, M., & Mustar, P. (2009). Behavioural additionality of R& D subsidies: A learning perspective. Research Policy, 38(10), 1517-1533.
32. Cohen, W. M., Nelson, R. R., & Walsh, J. P. (2002). Links and impacts: The influence of public research on industrial R& D. Management Science, 48(1), 1-23.
33. Cohen, M. B., Tarnow, E., & De Young, B. R. (2004). Coauthorship in pathology, a comparison with physics and a survey-generated and member-preferred authorship guideline. Medscape General Medicine, 63(1), 1-5.
34. Collins, S., & Wakoh, H. (2000). Universities and technology transfer in Japan: Recent reforms in historical perspective. The Journal of Technology Transfer, 25(2), 213-222.
35. Cooper, M. H. (2009). Commercialization of the university and problem choice by academic biological scientists. Science Technology Human Values, 34(5), 629-653.
36. Cronin, B. (2001). Hyperauthorship: A postmodern perversion or evidence of a structural shift in scholarly communication practices? Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology, 52(7), 558-569.
37. Crow, M. M., & Bozeman, B. (1998). Limited by design: R& D laboratories in the US national innovation system. New York: Columbia University Press.
38. Cummings, J. N., & Kiesler, S. (2005). Collaborative research across disciplinary and organizational boundaries. Social Studies of Science, 35(5), 703.
39. D'Este, P., & Perkmann, M. (2011). Why do academics engage with industry? The entrepreneurial university and individual motivations. The Journal of Technology Transfer, 36(3), 316-339.
40. Davis, L., Larsen, M. T., & Lotz, P. (2011). Scientists' perspectives concerning the effects of university patenting on the conduct of academic research in the life sciences. The Journal of Technology Transfer, 36(1), 14-37.
41. Devine, E. B., Beney, J., & Bero, L. A. (2005). Equity, accountability, transparency: Implementation of the contributorship concept in a multi-site study. American Journal of Pharmaceutical Education, 69(4), 455-459.
42. Dietz, J. S., & Bozeman, B. (2005). Academic careers, patents, and productivity: Industry experience as scientific and technical human capital. Research Policy, 34(3), 349-367.
43. Drenth, J. P. H. (1998). Multiple authorship: The contribution of senior authors. JAMA: Journal of the American Medical Association, 280(3), 219-221.
44. Duque, R. B., Ynalvez, M., Sooryamoorthy, R., Mbatia, P., Dzorgbo, D. B. S., & Shrum, W. (2005). Collaboration paradox. Social Studies of Science, 35(5), 755.
45. Faria, J. R., & Goel, R. K. (2010). Returns to networking in academia. Netnomics, 11(2), 103-117.
46. Feller, I., & Feldman, M. (2010). The commercialization of academic patents: Black boxes, pipelines, and Rubik's cubes. The Journal of Technology Transfer, 35(6), 597-616.
47. Feller, I., & Roessner, D. (1995). What does industry expect from university partnerships? Congress wants to see bottom-line results from industry/government programs, but that's not what the participating companies are seeking. Issues in Science and Technology, 12(1), 80-84.
48. Fox, M. F., & Mohapta, S. (2007). Social-organizational characteristics of work and publication productivity among academic scientists in doctoral-granting departments. Journal of Higher Education, 78(5), 542-571.
49. Franklin, S. J., Wright, M., & Lockett, A. (2001). Academic and surrogate entrepreneurs in university spin-out companies. The Journal of Technology Transfer, 26(1), 127-141.
50. Garg, K. C., & Padhi, P. (2001). A study of collaboration in laser science and technology. Scientometrics, 51(10), 415-427.
51. Garrett-Jones, S., Turpin, T., & Diment, K. (2010). Managing competition between individual and organizational goals in cross-sector research and development centres. The Journal of Technology Transfer, 35(5), 527-546.
52. Gaughan, M., & Corley, E. A. (2010). Science faculty at US research universities: The impacts of university research center-affiliation and gender on industrial activities. Technovation, 30(3), 215-222.
53. Gazni, A., & Didegah, F. (2011). Investigating different types of research collaboration and citation impact: A case study of Harvard University's publications. Scientometrics, 87(2), 251-265.
54. Geisler, E. (1986). The role of industrial advisory boards in technology transfer between universities and industry. The Journal of Technology Transfer, 10(2), 33-42.
55. Godin, B. (1998). Writing performative history: The new New Atlantis? Social Studies of Science, 28(3), 465-483.
56. Goel, R. K., & Grimpe, C. (2011) Active versus passive academic networking: Evidence from micro-level data. The Journal of Technology Transfer, 1-19. doi: 10. 1007/s10961-011-9236-5.
57. Gray, D. O., & Steenhuis, H. J. (2003). Quantifying the benefits of participating in an industry university research center: An examination of research cost avoidance. Scientometrics, 58(2), 281-300.
58. Grimpe, C., & Fier, H. (2010). Informal university technology transfer: A comparison between the United States and Germany. The Journal of Technology Transfer, 35(6), 637-650.
59. Grosse Kathoefer, D., & Leker, J. (2010). Knowledge transfer in academia: An exploratory study on the not-invented-here syndrome. The Journal of Technology Transfer, 35(1), 1-18.
60. Grossman, J. H., Reid, P. P., & Morgan, R. P. (2001). Contributions of academic research to industrial performance in five industry sectors. The Journal of Technology Transfer, 26(1), 143-152.
61. Guellec, D., & van Pottelsberghe de la Potterie, B. (2004). From R& D to productivity growth: Do the institutional settings and the source of funds of R& D matter? Oxford Bulletin of Economics and Statistics, 66(3), 353-378.
62. Gulbrandsen, M., & Etzkowitz, H. (1999). Convergence between Europe and America: The transition from industrial to innovation policy. The Journal of Technology Transfer, 24(2), 223-233.
63. Gulbrandsen, M., & Smedby, J. C. (2005). Industry funding and university professors' research performance. Research Policy, 34(6), 932-950.
64. Haeussler, C., & Colyvas, J. A. (2011). Breaking the ivory tower: Academic entrepreneurship in the life sciences in UK and Germany. Research Policy, 40(1), 41-54.
65. Hagedoorn, J., Link, A. N., & Vonortas, N. S. (2000). Research partnership. Research Policy, 29(4-5), 567-586.
66. Hall, B. H., Link, A. N., & Scott, J. T. (2001). Barriers inhibiting industry from partnering with universities: Evidence from the advanced technology program. The Journal of Technology Transfer, 26(1), 87-98.
67. Hanel, P., & St-Pierre, M. (2006). Industry-University collaboration by Canadian manufacturing firms. The Journal of Technology Transfer, 31(4), 485-499.
68. Heffner, A. G. (1981). Funded research, multiple authorship, and subauthorship collaboration in four disciplines. Scientometrics, 3(1), 5-12.
69. Heinze, T., & Bauer, G. (2007). Characterizing creative scientists in nano-S& T: Productivity, multidisciplinarity, and network brokerage in a longitudinal perspective. Scientometrics, 70(3), 811-830.
70. Hessels, L. K., & van Lente, H. (2008). Re-thinking new knowledge production: A literature review and a research agenda. Research Policy, 37(4), 740-760.
71. Hicks, D. M., & Katz, J. S. (1996). Where is science going? Science, Technology and Human Values, 21(4), 379.
72. Hisrich, R. D., & Smilor, R. W. (1988). The university and business incubation: Technology transfer through entrepreneurial development. The Journal of Technology Transfer, 13(1), 14-19.
73. Huang, M. H., & Lin, C. S. (2010). International collaboration and counting inflation in the assessment of national research productivity. Proceedings of the American Society for Information Science and Technology, 47(1), 1-4.
74. Huang, K. F., & Yu, C. M. J. (2011). The effect of competitive and non-competitive R& D collaboration on firm innovation. The Journal of Technology Transfer, 36(4), 383-403.
75. Jankowski, J. E. (1999). Trends in academic research spending, alliances, and commercialization. The Journal of Technology Transfer, 24(1), 55-68.
76. Jeong, S., Choi, J. Y., & Kim, J. (2011). The determinants of research collaboration modes: Exploring the effects of research and researcher characteristics on co-authorship. Scientometrics, 89(3), 967-983.
77. Johansson, M., Jacob, M., & Hellström, T. (2005). The strength of strong ties: University spin-offs and the significance of historical relations. The Journal of Technology Transfer, 30(3), 271-286.
78. Johnson, W. H. A. (2009). Intermediates in triple helix collaboration: The roles of 4th pillar organisations in public to private technology transfer. International Journal of Technology Transfer and Commercialisation, 8(2), 142-158.
79. Johnson, J., & Bozeman, B. (2012). Perspective: Adopting an asset bundles model to support and advance minority students' careers in academic medicine and the scientific pipeline. Academic Medicine, 87(11), 1488-1495.
80. Katz, J. S. (2000). Scale-independent indicators and research evaluation. Science and Public Policy, 27(1), 23-36.
81. Katz, J. S., & Hicks, D. (1997). How much is a collaboration worth? A calibrated bibliometric model. Scientometrics, 40(3), 541-554.
82. Katz, J. S., & Martin, B. R. (1997). What is research collaboration? Research Policy, 26(1), 1-18.
83. Klingensmith, M. E., & Anderson, K. A. (2006). Educational scholarship as a route to academic promotion: A depiction of surgical education scholars. The American Journal of Surgery, 191(4), 533-537.
84. Kuhn, T. S. (1996). The structure of scientific revolutions. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
85. Lagnado, M. (2003). Professional writing assistance: Effects on biomedical publishing. Learned Publishing, 16(1), 21-27.
86. Landry, R. J., Amara, N., & Ouimet, M. (2007). Determinants of knowledge transfer: Evidence from Canadian university researchers in natural sciences and engineering. The Journal of Technology Transfer, 32(6), 561-592.
87. Lee, Y. S. (2000). The sustainability of university-industry research collaboration: An empirical assessment. The Journal of Technology Transfer, 25(2), 111-133.
88. Lee, S., & Bozeman, B. (2005). The impact of research collaboration on scientific productivity. Social Studies of Science, 35(5), 673.
89. Levsky, M. E., Rosin, A., Coon, T. P., Enslow, W. L., & Miller, M. A. (2007). A descriptive analysis of authorship within medical journals, 1995-2005. Southern Medical Journal, 100(4), 371-375.
90. Levy, R., Roux, P., & Wolff, S. (2009). An analysis of science-industry collaborative patterns in a large European university. The Journal of Technology Transfer, 34(1), 1-23.
91. Liao, C. H. (2011). How to improve research quality? Examining the impacts of collaboration intensity and member diversity in collaboration networks. Scientometrics, 86(3), 747-761.
92. Liao, C. H., & Yen, H. R. (2012). Quantifying the degree of research collaboration: A comparative study of collaborative measures. Journal of Informetrics, 6(1), 27-33.
93. Lin, M. W., & Bozeman, B. (2006). Researchers' industry experience and productivity in university-industry research centers: A "scientific and technical human capital" explanation. The Journal of Technology Transfer, 31(2), 269-290.
94. Link, A. N., & Siegel, D. S. (2005). University-based technology initiatives: Quantitative and qualitative evidence. Research Policy, 34(3), 253-257.
95. Link, A. N., Siegel, D. S., & Bozeman, B. (2007). An empirical analysis of the propensity of academics to engage in informal university technology transfer, industrial & corporate change. Research Policy, 16(4), 641-655.
96. Liu, H., Chang, B., & Chen, K. (2012). Collaboration patterns of Taiwanese scientific publications in various research areas. Scientometrics, 29(1), 145-165.
97. Lööf, H., & Broström, A. (2008). Does knowledge diffusion between university and industry increase innovativeness? The Journal of Technology Transfer, 33(1), 73-90.
98. Luukkonen, T. (2000). Additionality of EU framework programmes. Research Policy, 29(6), 711-724.
99. Mansfield, E. (1995). Academic research underlying industrial innovations: Sources, characteristics, and financing. The Review of Economics and Statistics, 77(1), 55-65.
100. Martinelli, A., Meyer, M., & Tunzelmann, N. (2008). Becoming an entrepreneurial university? A case study of knowledge exchange relationships and faculty attitudes in a medium-sized, research-oriented university. The Journal of Technology Transfer, 33(3), 259-283.
101. Marusić, M., Bozikov, J., Katavić, V., Hren, D., Kljaković-Gaspić, M., & Marusić, A. (2004). Authorship in a small medical journal: A study of contributorship statements by corresponding authors. Science and Engineering Ethics, 10(3), 493-502.
102. Matt, M., Robin, S., & Wolff, S. (2011). The influence of public programs on inter-firm R& D collaboration strategies: Project-level evidence from EU FP5 and FP6. Journal of Technology Transfer, 1-32. doi: 10. 1007/s10961-011-9232-9.
103. Mattsson, P., Laget, P., Nilsson, A., & Sundberg, C. (2008). Intra-EU vs. extra-EU scientific co-publication patterns in EU. Scientometrics, 75(3), 555-574.
104. McCrary, S., Anderson, C., Jakovljevic, J., Khan, T., McCullough, L., Wray, N., et al. (2000). A national survey of policies on disclosure of conflicts of interest in biomedical research. The New England Journal of Medicine, 343(22), 1621-1626.
105. Melin, G. (2000). Pragmatism and self-organization: Research collaboration on the individual level. Research Policy, 29(1), 31-40.
106. Melin, G., & Persson, O. (1996). Studying research collaboration using co-authorships. Scientometrics, 36(3), 363-377.
107. Mendoza, P. (2007). Academic capitalism and doctoral student socialization: A case study. The Journal of Higher Education, 78(1), 71-96.
108. Merton, R. K. (1968). The Matthew effect in science. Science, 159(3810), 56-63.
109. Merton, R. K. (1995). The Thomas theorem and the Matthew effect. Social Forces, 74(2), 379-422.
110. Meyer, M. (2006). Academic inventiveness and entrepreneurship: On the importance of start-up companies in commercializing academic patents. The Journal of Technology Transfer, 31(4), 501-510.
111. Morgan, R. P., Kruytbosch, C., & Kannankutty, N. (2001). Patenting and invention activity of US scientists and engineers in the academic sector: Comparisons with industry. The Journal of Technology Transfer, 26(1), 173-183.
112. Morgan, R. P., & Strickland, D. E. (2001). U. S. university research contributions to industry. Science and Public Policy, 28(2), 113-122.
113. Mowery, D. C., & Sampat, B. N. (2001). Patenting and licensing university inventions: Lessons from the history of the research corporation. Industrial and Corporate Change, 10(2), 317-355.
114. Mullen, P. D., & Ramirez, G. (2006). The promise and pitfalls of systematic reviews. Annual Review of Public Health, 27, 81-102.
115. National Academy of Engineering. (2003). The impact of academic research on industrial performance. Washington, DC: National Academies Press.
116. Nedeva, M., Georghiou, L., & Halfpenny, P. (1999). Benefactors or beneficiary: The role of industry in the support of university research equipment. The Journal of Technology Transfer, 24(2), 139-147.
117. Nilsson, A. S., Rickne, A., & Bengtsson, L. (2010). Transfer of academic research: Uncovering the grey zone. The Journal of Technology Transfer, 35(6), 617-636.
118. Niosi, J. (2006). Introduction to the symposium: Universities as a source of commercial technology. The Journal of Technology Transfer, 31(4), 399-402.
119. Perkmann, M., & Walsh, K. (2009). The two faces of collaboration: Impacts of university-industry relations on public research. Industrial and Corporate Change, 18(6), 1033.
120. Pichini, S., Pulido, M., & García-Algar, O. (2005). Authorship in manuscripts submitted to biomedical journals: An author's position and its value. Science and Engineering Ethics, 11(2), 173-175.
121. Pollak, K. I., & Niemann, Y. F. (1998). Black and white tokens in academia: A difference of chronic versus acute Distinctiveness. Journal of Applied Social Psychology, 28(11), 954-972.
122. Ponds, R. (2009). The limits to internationalization of scientific research collaboration. The Journal of Technology Transfer, 34(1), 76-94.
123. Ponomariov, B. L. (2008). Effects of university characteristics on scientists' interactions with the private sector: An exploratory assessment. The Journal of Technology Transfer, 33, 485-503.
124. Ponomariov, B., & Boardman, P. C. (2008). The effect of informal industry contacts on the time university scientists allocate to collaborative research with industry. The Journal of Technology Transfer, 33(3), 301-313.
125. Ponomariov, B., & Boardman, P. C. (2010). Influencing scientists' collaboration and productivity patterns through new institutions: University research centers and scientific and technical human capital. Research Policy, 39, 613-624.
126. Poyago-Theotoky, J., Beath, J., & Siegel, D. S. (2002). Universities and fundamental research: Reflections on the growth of university-industry partnerships. Oxford Review of Economic Policy, 18(1), 10-21.
127. Pravdić, N., & Oluić-Vuković, V. (1986). Dual approach to multiple authorship in the study of collaboration/scientific output relationship. Scientometrics, 10(5), 259-280.
128. Renault, C. S. (2006). Academic capitalism and university incentives for faculty entrepreneurship. The Journal of Technology Transfer, 31(2), 227-239.
129. Rennie, D. (2001). Who did what? Authorship and contribution in 2001. Muscle and Nerve, 24(10), 1097-4598.
130. Rennie, D., & Flanagin, A. (1994). Authorship! Authorship! Guests, ghosts, grafters, and the two-sided coin. JAMA: Journal of the American Medical Association, 271(6), 469-471.
131. Rennie, D., Flannagin, A., & Yank, Y. (2000). The contribution of authors. JAMA: Journal of the American Medical Association, 284, 89-91.
132. Rhoades, G., & Slaughter, S. (1997). Academic capitalism, managed professionals, and supply-side higher education. Academic Labor, 51, 9-38.
133. Rijnsoever, F. J., & Hessels, L. K. (2011). Factors associated with disciplinary and interdisciplinary research collaboration. Research Policy, 40(3), 463-472.
134. Saragossi, S., & de la Potterie, B. (2003). What patent data reveal about universities: The case of Belgium. The Journal of Technology Transfer, 28(1), 47-51.
135. Schartinger, D., Schibany, A., & Gassler, H. (2001). Interactive relations between universities and firms: Empirical evidence for Austria. The Journal of Technology Transfer, 26(3), 255-268.
136. Shane, S. A. (2004). Academic entrepreneurship: University spinoffs and wealth creation. Northampton: Edward Elgar Publishing.
137. Shrum, W., Chompalov, I., & Genuth, J. (2001). Trust, conflict and performance in scientific collaborations. Social Studies of Science, 31(5), 681-730.
138. Shrum, W., Genuth, J., & Chompalov, I. (2007). Structures of scientific collaboration. Cambridge: MIT Press.
139. Siegel, D. S., Waldman, D. A., Atwater, L. E., & Link, A. N. (2003a). Commercial knowledge transfers from universities to firms: Improving the effectiveness of university-industry collaboration. The Journal of High Technology Management Research, 14(1), 111-133.
140. Siegel, D. S., Waldman, D., Atwater, L. E., & Link, A. N. (2004). Toward a model of the effective transfer of scientific knowledge from academicians to practitioners: Qualitative evidence from the commercialization of university technologies. Journal of Engineering and Technology Management, 21, 115-142.
141. Siegel, D. S., Waldman, D., & Link, A. (2003b). Assessing the impact of organizational practices on the relative productivity of university technology transfer offices: An exploratory study. Research Policy, 32, 27-48.
142. Slaughter, S., Campbell, T., Folleman, M. H., & Morgan, E. (2002). The 'traffic' in graduate students: Graduate students as tokens of exchange between academe and industry. Science, Technology and Human Values, 27(2), 282-313.
143. Slaughter, S., & Leslie, L. L. (1997). Academic capitalism: Politics, policies, and the entrepreneurial university. Baltimore: Johns Hopkins University Press.
144. Sonnenwald, D. H. (2007). Scientific collaboration. Annual Review of Information Science and Technology, 41(1), 643-681.
145. Stokes, T. D., & Hartley, J. A. (1989). Coauthorship, social structure and influence within specialties. Social Studies of Science, 19(1), 101-125.
146. Stuart, T. E., & Ding, W. W. (2006). When do scientists become entrepreneurs? The social structural antecedents of commercial activity in the academic life sciences. American Journal of Sociology, 112(1), 97-144.
147. Subramanyam, K. (1983). Bibliometric studies of research collaboration: A review. Journal of Information Science, 6(1), 33-38.
148. Tartari, V., & Breschi, S. (2011). Set them free: Scientists' evaluations of benefits and costs of university-industry research collaboration. Industrial and Corporate Change, 21(5), 1117-1147.
149. Thursby, J. G., Jensen, R., & Thursby, M. C. (2001). Objectives, characteristics and outcomes of university licensing: A survey of major US universities. The Journal of Technology Transfer, 26(1), 59-72.
150. Toivanen, H., & Ponomariov, B. (2011). African regional innovation systems: Bibliometric analysis of research collaboration patterns. Scientometrics, 88(2), 471-493.
151. Turpin, T., Garrett-Jones, S., & Woolley, R. (2011). Cross-sector research collaboration in Australia: The Cooperative Research Centres Program at the crossroads. Science & Public Policy, 38(2), 87-97.
152. Ubfal, D., & Maffioli, A. (2011). The impact of funding on research collaboration: Evidence from a developing country. Research Policy, 40(9), 1269-1279.
153. Vasileiadou, E. (2012). Research teams as complex systems: Implications for knowledge management. Knowledge Management of Research Practice, 10(2), 118-127.
154. Vinkler, P. (1993). Research contribution, authorship and team cooperativeness. Scientometrics, 26(1), 213-230.
155. Wagner, C. S. (2005). Six case studies of international collaboration in science. Scientometrics, 62(1), 3-26.
156. Wainwright, S. P., Williams, C., Michael, M., Farsides, B., & Cribb, A. (2006). Ethical boundary-work in the embryonic stem cell laboratory. Sociology of Health & Illness, 28(6), 1467-9566.
157. Welsh, R., Glenn, L., Lacy, W., & Biscotti, D. (2008). Close enough but not too far: Assessing the effects of university-industry research relationships and the rise of academic capitalism. Research Policy, 37, 1255-1266.
158. Wuchty, S., Jones, B. F., & Uzzi, B. (2007). The increasing dominance of teams in production of knowledge. Science, 316(5827), 1036.
159. Ynalvez, M., & Shrum, W. (2011). Professional networks, scientific collaboration, and publication productivity in resource-constrained research institutions in a developing country. Research Policy, 40(2), 204-216.