Behavioural additionality of R&D subsidies: A learning perspective

Research Policy

Volumn 38, Issue 10, 2009, Pages 1517-1533

  Clarysse, Bart ^a,b   Wright, Mike ^c,d   Mustar, Philippe ^e  

^a IMPERIAL COLLEGE LONDON   (United Kingdom)

^b GHENT UNIVERSITY   (Belgium)

^c UNIVERSITY OF NOTTINGHAM   (United Kingdom)

^d ERASMUS UNIVERSITY ROTTERDAM   (Netherlands)

^e CENTRE DE SOCIOLOGIE DE L INNOVATION   (France)

Author keywords

Behavioural additionality; Innovation; Learning; R D policy

Indexed keywords

BEHAVIOURAL ADDITIONALITY; FLANDERS; INNOVATION ACTIVITY; INPUT AND OUTPUTS; INTER-ORGANIZATIONAL LEARNING; LEARNING; LEARNING EFFECTS; MARKET FAILURES; ORGANIZATIONAL LEARNING; POLICY INSTRUMENTS; TELEPHONE SURVEY;

INFORMATION MANAGEMENT; KNOWLEDGE MANAGEMENT;

EDUCATION;

EID: 70449091791     PISSN: 00487333     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.respol.2009.09.003     Document Type: Article

References (56)

1. Aiken L.S., and West S.G. Multiple Regression: Testing and Interpreting Interaction (1991), Sage, Thousand Oaks
2. Argote L. Organizational Learning: Creating, Retaining, and Transferring Knowledge (1999), Kluwer Academic, Boston, MA
3. Arrow K. Economic welfare and the allocation of resources for invention. In: Nelson R. (Ed). The Rate and Direction of Inventive Activity (1962), Princeton University Press, Princeton
4. Autio E., Gustafsson R., and Kanninen S. First- and second-order additionality and learning outcomes in collaborative R&D programs. Research Policy 37 (2008) 59-76
5. Bach L., Cohendet P., Lambert G., and Ledoux M. Indirect effects of large-scale technological development programmes. In: Callon M., Larédo P., and Mustar P. (Eds). The Strategic Management of Research and Technology: Evaluation of Programmes (1997), Economica International, Paris 289-310
6. Becher G. The analysis of economic effects using before/after comparisons. In: Callon M., Larédo P., and Mustar P. (Eds). The Strategic Management of Research and Technology: Evaluation of Programmes (1997), Economica International, Paris 323-335
7. Bransetter L.G., and Sakakibara M. When do research consortia work well and why? Evidence from Japanese panel data. American Economic Review 92 (2002) 143-159
8. Bruneel, J., Yli-Renko, H., Clarysse, B., 2009. Learning from experience and learning from others: Interrelationships among learning mechanisms in young firm internationalisation. Babson College Paper.
9. Buisseret T., Cameron H., and Georghiou L. What difference does it make? Additionality in the public support of R&D in large firms. International Journal of Technology Management 10 (1995) 587-600
10. In: Callon M., Larédo P., and Mustar P. (Eds). The Strategic Management of Research and Technology: Evaluation of Programmes (1997), Economica International, Paris
11. Callon M., Larédo P., and Mustar P. Techno-economic networks and the analysis of structural effects. In: Callon M., Larédo P., and Mustar P. (Eds). The Strategic Management of Research and Technology: Evaluation of Programmes (1997), Economica International, Paris 385-429
12. Chandler G., and Hanks S.H. Measuring the performance of emerging businesses: a validation study. Journal of Business Venturing 8 (1993) 391-408
13. Cohen W.M., and Levinthal D. Innovation and learning: the two faces of R&D. The Economic Journal 99 (1989) 569-596
14. Cohen W.M., and Levinthal D. Absorptive capacity: a new perspective of learning and innovation. Administrative Science Quarterly 35 1 (1990) 128-152
15. Cooper A.C., and Artz K. Determinants of satisfaction for entrepreneurs. Journal of Business Venturing 10 (1995) 439-457
16. Criscuolo C., Martin R., Hoverman M., and Van Reenen J. The effect of industrial policy on corporate performance: evidence from panel data. Mimeo London School of Economics (2007)
17. Cyert R.M., and March J.G. A behavioral theory of the firm (1963), PrenticeHall, Englewood Cliffs, NJ
18. Czarnitzki D., Ebersberger B., and Fier A. The relationship between R&D collaboration, subsidies and R&D performance: empirical evidence from Finland and Germany. Journal of Applied Econometrics 22 (2007) 1347-1366
19. Czarnitzki D., and Licht G. Additionality of public R&D grants in a transition economy: the case of Eastern Germany. Economics of Transition 14 1 (2005) 101-131
20. David P., Hall B., and Toole A. Is public R&D a complement or a substitute for private R&D?. Research Policy 29 (2000) 497-529
21. Davidson R., and MacKinnon J.G. Estimation and Inference in Econometrics (1993), Oxford University Press, New York
22. Duguet E. Are R&D subsidies a substitute or a complement to privately funded R&D? Evidence from France using propensity scores methods for non-experimental data. Revue d'Economie Politique 114 2 (2004) 930-950
23. Falk R. Measuring the effects of public support schemes on firms' innovation activities-survey evidence from Austria. Research Policy 36 (2007) 665-679
24. Gimeno J., Folta T., Cooper A., and Woo C. Survival of the fittest? Entrepreneurial human capital and the persistence of underperforming firms. Administrative Science Quarterly 42 (1997) 750-783
25. González, X., Jaumandreu, J., Pazó, C., 2005. Barriers to Innovation and Subsidy Effectiveness, RAND Journal of Economics.
26. Gonzalez X., and Pazo C. Do public subsidies stimulate private R&D spending?. Research Policy 37 (2008) 271-389
27. Guy K., Georghiou L., and Cameron H. A combined questionnaire and interview approach to assess the impact of the Alvey programme. In: Callon M., Larédo P., and Mustar P. (Eds). The Strategic Management of Research and Technology: Evaluation of Programmes (1997), Economica International, Paris 345-356
28. Greve H.R. A behavioral theory of R&D expenditures and innovations: evidence from ship building. Academy of Management Journal 46 (2003) 685-702
29. Garcia-Quevedo J. Do public subsidies complement business R&D? A meta-analysis of the econometric evidence. Kyklos 57 (2004) 87-102
30. George G. Slack resources and the performance of privately held firms. Academy of Management Journal 48 4 (2005) 661-676
31. Georghiou L., and Roessner D. Evaluating technology programs: tools and methods. Research Policy 29 (2000) 657-678
32. Georghiou L. Additionality and impact of R&D subsidies. IWT Studies 40 (2002) 57-64
33. Georghiou L., Cameron H., and Malik K. Assessing Behavioural Additionality through Public Support of Industrial R&D in SMEs (2005), Mimeo
34. Globerman S. Market structure and R&D in Canadian manufacturing industries. Quarterly Review of Economics and Business 13 (1973) 59-68
35. Greene, H., 1980. Econometric Analysis. 6th Edition.
36. Hamberg D. R&D: Essays on the Economics of Research and Development (1966), Random House, New York
37. Huber G.P. Organizational learning: the cntributing process and the literatures. Organisation Science 2 (1991) 88-105
38. Jaffe A.B., and Tratjenberg M. Geographic localisation of knowledge spillovers as evidenced by patent citations. Quarterly Journal of Economics 108 3 (1993) 577
39. Jaffe, A.B., 1996. Economic analysis of research spillovers: implications for the Advance Technology Program, NIST, US Dept of Commerce Technology Administration NIST GCR 97-708.
40. Kale P., Singh H., and Perlmutter H. Learning and protection of proprietary assets in strategic alliances: building social capital. Strategic Management Journal 21 (2000) 217-237
41. Klette, T.J., Moen, J., 1998. R&D Investment responses to R&D subsidies: a theoretical analysis and econometric evidence presentation to the NBER Summer Institute, July.
42. Klette T., Moen J., and Griliches Z. Do subsidies to commercial R&D reduce market failure?. Research Policy 29 (2000) 471-496
43. Kumar N., Stern L.W., and Anderson J.W. Conducting interorganizational research using key informants. Academy of Management Journal 36 (1993) 1651-1663
44. Levitt B., and March J.G. Organizational learning. Annual Review of Sociology 14 (1988) 319-338
45. Levy, D.M., Terleckyj, N.E., 1983. Effects of Government R&D on Private R&D Investment and Productivity: A Macroeconomic Analysis, Bell Journal of Economics.
46. Luukkonen T. Additionality of EU framework programmes. Research Policy 27 (2000) 599-610
47. Metcalfe J.S., and Georghiou L. Equilibrium and evolutionary foundations of technology policy. Science Technology and Industry Review 22 (1998) 75-100
48. Meyer-Krahmer F. Methods for evaluating R&D and innovation policy-the control group approach. In: Callon M., Larédo P., and Mustar P. (Eds). The Strategic Management of Research and Technology: Evaluation of Programmes (1997), Economica International, Paris 311-335
49. Naman J.L., and Slevin D.P. Entrepreneurship and the concept of fit: a model and empirical tests. Strategic Management Journal 14 (1993) 137-153
50. Nelson R.R. The simple economics of basic scientific research. Journal of Political Economy 67 (1959) 148-163
51. Ozgen E., and Baron R. Social sources of information in opportunity recognition: effects of mentors, industry networks, and professional forums. Journal of Business Venturing 22 (2007) 174-192
52. Podsakoff P.M., and Organ D.W. Journal of Management (JofM) 12 (1986) 531-544
53. Rajagopalan N., and Spreitzer G.M. Toward a theory of strategic change: A multi-lens perspective and integrative framework. Academy of Management Review 22 1 (1997) 48-79
54. Wall T., Michie J., Patterson M., Wood S., Sheehan M., Clegg C., and West M. On the validity of subjective measures of company performance. Personnel Psychology 57 (2004) 95-118
55. Wallsten S.J. The effects of government-industry R&D programs on private R&D: the case of the Small Business Innovation Research Program. RAND Journal of Economics 31 1 (2000) 82-100
56. Zahra S., and George G. Absorptive capacity: a review, reconceptualization, and extension. Academy of Management Review 27 (2002) 185-203