Scientists' collaboration strategies: Implications for scientific and technical human capital

Research Policy

Volumn 33, Issue 4, 2004, Pages 599-616

  Bozeman, Barry ^a   Corley, Elizabeth ^b  

^a GEORGIA INSTITUTE OF TECHNOLOGY   (United States)

^b ARIZONA STATE UNIVERSITY   (United States)

Author keywords

Co authorship; Collaboration; Mentoring; Scientific and technical human capital; Scientific publication

Indexed keywords

DATA ACQUISITION; ECONOMICS; ENGINEERS; PERSONNEL SELECTION; PROFESSIONAL ASPECTS; SOCIAL ASPECTS;

INFORMAL RESEARCH NETWORKS; MAILED QUESTIONNAIRE; MENTORING; SCIENTIFIC AND TECHNICAL HUMAN CAPITAL; SCIENTIFIC PUBLICATION; TECHNICAL SKILL;

INDUSTRIAL RESEARCH;

EID: 2442659377     PISSN: 00487333     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.respol.2004.01.008     Document Type: Article

References (62)

1. Allen, T., 1977. Managing the Flow of Technology. MIT Press, Cambridge, MA.
2. Balconi M. Tacitness, codification of technological knowledge and the organization of industry. Research Policy. 31:2002;357-379.
3. Beaver D. Reflections on scientific collaboration (and its study): past, present and future. Scientometrics. 52:2001;365-377.
4. Beaver D., Rosen R. Studies in scientific collaboration. Part I. Scientometrics. 1:1978;65-84.
5. Beaver D., Rosen R. Studies in scientific collaboration. Part II. Scientometrics. 1:1979a;133-149.
6. Beaver D., Rosen R. Studies in scientific collaboration. Part III. Scientometrics. 1:1979b;231-245.
7. Becker G. Investment in human capital: a theoretical analysis. Journal of Political Economics. 70(5):1962;9-49.
8. Behrens T.R., Gray D.O. Unintended consequences of cooperative research: impact of industry sponsorship on the climate for academic freedom and other graduate student outcomes. Research Policy. 30:2000;179-199.
9. Bourdieu, P., 1986. The forms of social capital. In: Richardson, J.G. (Ed.), Handbook of Theory and Research for the Sociology of Education. Greenwood, New York.
10. Bourdieu, P., Wacquant, L., 1992. An Invitation to Reflexive Sociology. University of Chicago Press, Chicago, IL.
11. Bozeman B., Dietz J., Gaughan M. Scientific and technical human capital: an alternative model for research evaluation. International Journal of Technology Management. 22(7/8):2001;636-655.
12. Bush G.P., Hattery L.H. Teamwork and creativity in research. Science Quarterly. 1:1956;361-362.
13. Cameron, S.W., 1978. Women faculty in academia: sponsorship, informal networks, and scholarly success. Ph.D. Dissertation. University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI.
14. Centra, J.A., 1974. Women, Men and the Doctorate. Educational Testing Service, Princeton, NJ.
15. Clarke B.L. Communication patterns of biomedical scientists. Federation Proceedings. 26:1967;1288-1292.
16. Cole, J., Zuckerman, H., 1984. The productivity puzzle: persistence and change in patterns of publication among men and women scientists. In: Steinkamp, M.W., Maehr, M.L. (Eds.), Advances in Motivation and Achievement, vol. 2. JAI Press, Greenwich, CT, pp. 217-258.
17. Coleman J. Social capital in the creation human capital. American Journal of Sociology. 94(Suppl.):1988;S95-S120.
18. Coleman, J., 1990. Foundations of Social Theory. The Belknap Press of Harvard University Press, Cambridge, MA.
19. Crane, D., 1972. The Invisible College. University of Chicago Press, Chicago, IL.
20. Edge D. Quantitative measures of communication in science: a critical review. History of Science. 17:1979;102-134.
21. Fox, M.F., 1985. Publication, performance, and reward in science and scholarship. In: Smart, J. (Ed.), Higher Education: Handbook of Theory and Research. Agathon Press, New York, pp. 188-204.
22. Fox, M.F., 1991. Gender, environmental milieu, and productivity. In: Zuckerman, H., Cole, J., Bruer, J. (Eds.), The Outer Circle. W.W. Norton and Company, New York, pp. 188-204.
23. Garg K.C., Padhi P. A study of collaboration in laser science and technology. Scientometrics. 51:2001;415-427.
24. Gaughan M., Bozeman B. Using curriculum vitae to compare some impacts of NSF research center grants with research center funding. Research Evaluation. 11(1):2002;17-26.
25. Glaser J. Macrostructures, careers, and knowledge production. International Journal of Technology Management. 22:2001;8.
26. Goffman, W., Warren, K.S., 1980. Scientific Information Systems and the Principle of Selectivity. Praeger Press, New York.
27. Gordon M.D. A critical reassessment of inferred relations between multiple authorship: scientific collaboration, the production of papers, and their acceptance for publication. Scientometrics. 2:1980;193-210.
28. Hagstrom, W.O., 1965. The Scientific Community. Basic Books, New York.
29. Heffner A.G. Funded research, multiple authorship, and subauthorship collaboration in four disciplines. Scientometrics. 3:1981;5-12.
30. Holmstrom E.I., Holmstrom R. The plight of the woman graduate student. American Educational Research Journal. 11(4):1974;1-17.
31. Jewkes, J., Sawers, D., Stillerman, R., 1959. The Sources of Invention. St. Martin's Press, New York.
32. Katz, J.S., 1993. Bibliometric Assessment of Intranational University-University Collaboration. Ph.D. Thesis. Science Policy Research Unit, University of Sussex, Brighton.
33. Katz J.S., Martin B.R. What is research collaboration? Research Policy. 26:1997;1-18.
34. Kelves, D., 1995. The Physicists: The History of a Scientific Community in Modern America, fourth ed. Harvard University Press, Cambridge, MA.
35. Kjerulff K., Blood M. A comparison of communication patterns in male and female graduate students. Journal of Higher Education. 44:1973;623-632.
36. Kraut, R., Egido, C., 1988. Patterns of Contact and Communication in Scientific Research Collaboration. In: Proceedings of the Conference on Computer-Supported Cooperative Work, Portland OR, September 1988, pp. 1-12.
37. La Follette, M.C., 1992. Stealing into Print. University of California Press, Berkeley, CA.
38. Landry R., Amara N. The impact of transaction costs on the institutional structuration of collaborative academic research. Research Policy. 27:1998;901-913.
39. Laudel G. Collaboration, creativity and rewards: why and how scientists collaborate. International Journal of Technology Management. 22:2001;8.
40. Liang L., Kretschmer H., Guo Y., Beaver D. Age structures of scientific collaboration in Chinese computer science. Scientometrics. 52:2001;471-486.
41. Long J.S., McGinnis R. Organizational context and scientific productivity. American Sociological Review. 46:1981;422-442.
42. Maanten, A.A., 1970. Statistical analysis of a scientific discipline: palynology. Earth Science Reviews 181-218.
43. Mangematin V. Individual careers and collective research: is there a paradox? International Journal of Technology Management. 22:2001;8.
44. Meadows, A.J., 1974. Communication in Science. Butterworths, London.
45. Meadows A.J., O'Connor J.G. Bibliographic statistics as a guide to growth points in science. Science Studies. 1:1971;95-99.
46. Melin G. Pragmatism and self-organization: research collaboration on the individual level. Research Policy. 29:2000;31-40.
47. Merton, R.K., 1973. The Sociology of Science. The University of Chicago Press, Chicago, IL.
48. National Research Council. 1983. Climbing the Ladder: As Update on the Status of Doctoral Women Scientists and Engineers. National Academy Press, Washington, DC.
49. Nelson K., Nelson R. On the nature and evolution of human know-how. Research Policy. 31:2002;719-733.
50. Pisano G. The governance of innovation: vertical integration and collaborative arrangements in the biotechnology industry. Research Policy. 20:1991;237-249.
51. Price, D.J. de Solla, 1963. Little Science, Big Science. Columbia University Press, New York.
52. Price D.J. de Solla, Beaver D. Collaboration in an invisible college. American Psychologist. 21:1966;1011-1018.
53. Schultz, T.W., 1963. The Economic Value of Education. Columbia University Press, New York.
54. Seglen P.O., Aksnes D.W. Scientific productivity and group size: a bibliometric analysis of norwegian microbiological research. Scientometrics. 49:2000;125-143.
55. Smith M. The trend toward multiple authorship in psychology. American Psychologist. 13:1958;596-599.
56. Sonnert, G., 1995. Who Succeeds in Science? The Gender Dimension. Rutgers University Press, New Brunswick, NJ.
57. Stephan P.E., Levin S.G. Career stage, benchmarking and collective research. International Journal of Technology Management. 22:2001;8.
58. Stokes T.D., Hartley J.A. Coauthorship, social structure, and influence with specialties. Social Studies of Science. 19:1989;101-125.
59. Thorsteinsdottir O. External research collaboration in two small science systems. Scientometrics. 49:2000;145-160.
60. Wagner-Dobler R. Continuity and discontinuity of collaboration behavior since 1800 - from a bibliometric point of view. Scientometrics. 52:2001;503-517.
61. Wen J., Kobayashi S. Exploring collaborative R&D network: some new evidence in Japan. Research Policy. 30:2001;1309-1319.
62. Zitt M., Bassecoulard E., Okubo Y. Shadows of the past in international cooperation: collaboration profiles of the top five producers of science. Scientometrics. 47:2000;627-657.