Scientific collaboration

Annual Review of Information Science and Technology

Volumn 41, Issue , 2007, Pages 643-681

  Sonnenwald, Diane H ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF GOTHENBURG   (Sweden)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 33846046948     PISSN: 00664200     EISSN: None     Source Type: Book Series    
DOI: 10.1002/aris.2007.1440410121     Document Type: Article

References (149)

1. Adessa, C., & Sonnenwald, D. H. (2003, June). Exploring collaboration among historically black universities and doctoral/research universities in the USA UNESCO Conference on Teaching and Learning for Intercultural Understanding. Human Rights and a Culture of Peace. Jyväskylä, Finland.
2. Arunachalam, S., & Doss, J. J. (2000). Science in a small country at a time of globalization: Domestic and international collaboration in new biology research in Israel. Journal of Information Science, 26, 39-49.
3. Atkins, D. E., Droegemeier, K. K., Feldman, S. I., Garcia-Molina, H., Klein, M. L., Messerschmitt, D. G., et al. (2003). Revolutionizing science and engineering through cyberinfrastructure: Final report of the National Science Foundation Blue-Ribbon Advisory Panel on Cyberinfrastructure. Retrieved June 14, 2005, from www.cise.nsf.gov/evnt/reports/toc.htm
4. Atkinson, P., Batchelor, C., & Parsons, E. (1998). Trajectories of collaboration and competition in medical discovery. Science, Technology, & Human Values, 23, 259-284.
5. Autio, E., Hameri, A., & Nordberg, M. (1996). A framework of motivations for industry-big science collaboration: A case study. Journal of Engineering and Technology Management, 13, 301-314.
6. Banda, E. (2000). A Europe of science. Science, 288, 1963.
7. Beaver, D. D. (2001). Reflections on scientific collaboration (and its study): Past, present and future. Scientometrics, 52, 365-377.
8. Beaver, D. D. (2004). Does collaborative research have greater epistemic authority? Scientometrics, 60, 399-408.
9. Berman, F., & Brady, H. (2005). NSF SBE-CISE Workshop on Cyberinfrastructure and the Social Sciences: Final report. Retrieved May 19, 2005, from www.sdsc.edu/sbe/reports/SBE-CISE-FINAL.pdf
10. Bietz, M., Naidoo, M., & Olson, G. (in press). International AIDS research collaboratories: The HIV Pathogenesis Program. In G. M. Olson, A. Zimmerman, & N. Bos (Eds.), Science on the Internet. Boston: MIT Press.
11. Birnholtz, J. P., & Bietz, M. J. (2003). Data at work: Supporting sharing in science and engineering. Proceedings of the 2003 International ACM SIGGROUP Conference on Supporting Groupwork, 339-348.
12. Borgman, C. L., & Furner, J. (2002). Scholarly communication and bibliometrics. Annual Review of Information Science and Technology, 36, 3-72.
13. Bos, N., Zimmerman, A., Cooney, D., Olson, J. S., Dahl, E., & Yerkie, J. (in press). From shared databases to communities of practice: A taxonomy of collaboratories. In G. M. Olson, A. Zimmerman, & N. Bos (Eds.), Science on the Internet. Boston: MIT Press.
14. Bozeman, B., & Boardman, C. (2003). Research and technology collaboration and linkages: Implications from two U.S. case studies: Report prepared for the Council of Science and Technology Advisors (CSTA) Study on Federal S&T Linkages. Retrieved July 12, 2005, from www.csta-cest.ca/ files/usa.pdf
15. Bozeman, B., & Corley, E. (2004). Scientists' collaboration strategies: Implications for scientific and technical human capital. Research Policy, 33, 599-616.
16. Bozeman, D. P., Street, M. D., & Fiorito, J. (1999). Positive and negative behaviors in the process of research collaboration. Journal of Social Behavior and Personality, 14, 159-176.
17. Bruce, A., Lyall, C., Tait, J., & Williams, R. (2004). Interdisciplinary integration in Europe: The case of the Fifth Framework Program. Futures, 36, 457-470.
18. Brydon-Miller, M. (1997). Participatory action research: Psychology and social change. Journal of Social Issues. 53, 657-666.
19. Burroughs Wellcome Fund & Howard Hughes Medical Institute. (2004). Making the right moves: A practical guide to scientific management for postdocs and new faculty. Retrieved June 14, 2005, from www.hhmi.org/grants/ office/graduate/lab_book.html
20. CERN. (2005). The technical challenges of ATLAS. Retrieved July 23, 2005, from http://atlas.ch/atlas_brochures/atlas_brochures_pdf/ atlas_tech_full.pdf
21. Chin, G., Myers, J., & Hoyt, D. (2002). Social networks in the virtual science laboratory. Communications of the ACM, 45(8), 87-92.
22. Chompalov, I., Genuth, J., & Shrum, W. (2002). The organization of scientific collaborations. Research Policy, 31, 749-767.
23. Cohen, J. (2000). Balancing the collaboration equation. Science, 288, 2155-2159.
24. Cohen, J., & Linton, M. (2003). The next frontier for HIV/AIDS. Science, 301, 1650-1655.
25. Collaboration in extremis. (2002, May 16). Nature, 417, 207.
26. Crane, D. (1972). Invisible colleges: Diffusion of knowledge in scientific communities. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
27. Creamer, E. G. (2004). Collaborators' attitudes about differences of opinion. The Journal of Higher Education, 75, 556-571.
28. Cronin, B. (2001). Hyperauthorship: A postmodern perversion or evidence of a structural shift in scholarly communication practices? Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology, 52, 558-569.
29. Cronin, B. (2005). The hand of science: Academic writing and its rewards. Lanham, MD: Scarecrow Press.
30. Cronin, B., Shaw, D., & La Barre, K. (2003). A cast of thousands: Coauthorship and subauthorship collaboration in the 20th century as manifested in the scholarly journal literature of psychology and philosophy. Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology, 54, 855-871.
31. Cronin, B., Shaw, D., & La Barre, K. (2004). Visible, less visible, and invisible work: Patterns of collaboration in 20th century chemistry. Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology, 55, 160-168.
32. Cummings, J., & Kiesler, S. (2003). KDI Initiative: Multidisciplinary scientific collaborations (NSF Report). Arlington, VA: National Science Foundation. Retrieved November 14, 2004, from www.cise.nsf.gov/kdi/links.html
33. Cummings, J., & Kiesler, S. (2005). Collaborative research across disciplinary and organizational boundaries. Social Studies of Science, 35, 703-722.
34. Davenport, E. (2005, June). Understanding interdisciplinary research design. Case study: Compliance and compromise. Presentation at the Social Factors in Scientific Collaboration Workshop, First International Conference on e-Social Science, Manchester, UK.
35. Davenport, E., & Hall, H. (2002). Organizational knowledge and communities of practice. Annual Review of Information Science and Technology, 36, 171-227.
36. David, P. A. (2005, January). Towards a cyberinfrastructure for enhanced scientific collaboration: Providing its "soft" foundations may be the hardest part. Paper prepared for the international conference on Advancing Knowledge and the Knowledge-Economy, National Academy of Science, Washington, DC.
37. David, P. A., & Spence, M. (2003). Towards institutional infrastructures for e-science: The scope of the challenge (Oxford Internet Institute Research Reports). Oxford, UK: University of Oxford. Retrieved September 12, 2005, from www.oii.ox.ac.uk/resources/publications/RR2.pdf
38. De Cerreño, A. L. C., & Keynan, A. (Eds.). (1998). Scientific cooperation, state conflict: The roles of scientists in mitigating international discord. Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences, 866.
39. Drake, P., Ludden, D., Nzongola-Ntalaja, G., Patel, S., & Shevtsova, L. (2000). International scholarly collaboration: Lessons from the past. A report of the Social Science Research Council Inter-regional Working Group on International Scholarly Collaboration (SSRC Working Paper Series, 3). New York: Social Science Research Council. Retrieved March 9, 2006, from www.ssrc.org/programs/humancap/publications/workingpaper3.pdf
40. Duque, R. B., Ynalvez, M., Sooryamoorthy, R., Mbatia, P., Dzorgbo, D. S., & Shrum, W. (2005). Collaboration paradox: Scientific productivity, the Internet, and problems of research in developing areas. Social Studies of Science, 35, 755-785.
41. Eisenhart, M. A., & Finkel, E. (1998). Women's science: Learning and succeeding from the margins. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
42. Ellis, D., Oldridge, R., & Vasconcelos, A. (2004). Community and virtual community. Annual Review of Information Science and Technology, 38, 145-186.
43. Etzkowitz, H., & Leydesdorff, L. (2000). The dynamics of innovation: From national systems and 'mode 2' to a triple helix of university-industry- government relations. Research Policy, 29, 109-123.
44. Finholt, T. (2002). Collaboratories. Annual Review of Information Science and Technology, 36, 73-108.
45. Fisher, P. A., & Ball, T. J. (2003). Tribal participatory research: Mechanisms of a collaborative model. American Journal of Community Psychology, 32, 207-216.
46. Frenken, K., Hölzl, W., & de Vor, F. (2005). The citation impact of research collaborations: The case of European biotechnology and applied microbiology (1988-2002). Journal of Engineering and Technology Management, 22, 9-30.
47. Gast, A. P. (2003). The impact of restricting information access on science and technology. Retrieved June 14, 2005, from www.aau.edu/research/ gast.pdf
48. Gibbons, M., Limoges, C., Nowotny, H., Schwartzman, S., Scott, P., & Trow, M. (1994). The new production of knowledge: The dynamics of science and research in contemporary societies. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications.
49. Glänzel, W. (2002). Co-authorship patterns and trends in the sciences (1980-1998): A bibliometric study with implications for database indexing and search strategies. Library Trends, 50, 461-471.
50. Goldfinch, S., Dale, T., & DeRouen, K. (2003). Science from the periphery: Collaboration, networks and 'periphery effects' in the citation of New Zealand Crown Research Institute articles, 1995-2000. Scientometrics, 57, 321-337.
51. Grey, D., Lindblad, M., & Rudolph, J. (2001). Industry-university research centers: A multivariate analysis of member retention. Journal of Technology Transfer, 26, 247-254.
52. Grossman, J. W. (2002). The evolution of the mathematical research collaboration graph. Congressus Numeratium, 158, 202-212.
53. Hara, N., Solomon, P., Kim, S., & Sonnenwald, D. H. (2003). An emerging view of scientific collaboration: Scientists' perspectives on factors that impact collaboration. Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology, 54, 952-965.
54. Havemann, F. (2001). Collaboration behavior of Berlin life science researchers in the last two decades of the twentieth century as reflected in the Science Citation Index. Scientometrics, 52, 435-443.
55. Hey, T., & Trefethen, A. (2003). e-Science and its implications. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society London A: Mathematical, Physical and Engineering Sciences, 361, 1809-1825.
56. Hofer, E. C., Bos, N., & Olson, J. (in press). Collaborative technologies. In G. M. Olson, A. Zimmerman, & N. Bos (Eds.), Science on the Internet. Boston: MIT Press.
57. Hofer, E. C., McKee, S., Birnholz, J., & Avery, P. (in press). High energy physics: The large hadron collider collaborations. In G. M. Olson, A. Zimmerman, & N. Bos (Eds.), Science on the Internet. Boston: MIT Press
58. Iivonen, M., & Sonnenwald, D. H. (2000). The use of technology in international collaboration. Proceedings of the Annual Meeting of the American Society for Information Science, 78-92.
59. Jeffrey, P. (2003). Smoothing the waters: Observations on the process of cross-disciplinary research collaboration. Social Studies of Science, 33, 539-562.
60. th meeting of the Hirosaki International Forum of Medical Science held in Hirosaki, Japan between 28 and 29 October 2003 (International Congress Series, 1267; pp. 71-78). Amsterdam: Elsevier.
61. Katz, J. S., & Martin, B. R. (1997). What is research collaboration? Research Policy, 26, 1-18.
62. Klein, J. T. (1994). Finding interdisciplinary knowledge and information. In J. Klein & W. Doty (Eds.), Interdisciplinary studies today (pp. 7-33). San Francisco: Jossey Bass.
63. Klein, J. T. (2004). Prospects for transdisciplinarity. Futures, 36, 515-526.
64. Kling, R. (2004). The Internet and unrefereed scholarly publishing. Annual Review of Information Science and Technology, 38, 591-637.
65. Kling, R., & Callahan, E. (2003). Electronic journals, the Internet, and scholarly communication. Annual Review of Information Science and Technology, 37, 127-177.
66. Kling, R., & McKim, G. (2000). Not just a matter of time: Field differences and the shaping of electronic media in supporting scientific communication. Journal of the American Society for Information Science, 51, 1306-1320.
67. Kling, R., McKim, G., & King, A. (2003). A bit more to IT: Scholarly communication forums as socio-technical interaction networks. Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology, 54, 47-67.
68. Kouzes, R. T., Myers, J. D., & Wulf, W. A. (1996). Collaboratories: Doing science on the Internet. IEEE Computer, 29, 40-46.
69. Kraut, R. E., Galegher, J., & Egido, C. (1988). Relationships and tasks in scientific research collaboration. Human-Computer Interaction, 3, 31-55.
70. Kuhn, T. S. (1970). The structure of scientific revolutions (2nd ed.). Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
71. Lambert, R. (2003). Lambert Review of Business-University Collaboration: Final Report. London, UK: HM Treasury. Retrieved June 12, 2005, from www.hm-treasury.gov.uk/media/DDE/65/lambert_review_final_450.pdf
72. Latour, B. (1987). Science in action. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
73. Lee, S., & Bozeman, B. (2005). The impact of research collaboration on scientific productivity. Social Studies of Science, 35, 673-702.
74. Leimu, R., & Koricheva, J. (2005). Does scientific collaboration increase the impact of ecological articles? BioScience, 55, 438-443.
75. Lessig, L. (2004). Free culture. New York: Penguin Press.
76. Let data speak to data. (2005). Nature, 438, 521. Retrieved December 16, 2005, from www.nature.com/nature/journal/v438/n7068/full/438531a. html
77. Leydesdorff, L., & Ward, J. (2005). Science shops: A kaleidoscope of science-society collaborations in Europe. Public Understanding of Science, 14, 353-372.
78. Liang, L., Guo, Y., & Davis, M. (2002). Collaborative patterns and age structures in Chinese publications. Scientometrics, 54, 473-489.
79. Maglaughlin, K. L. (2003). An exploration of interdisciplinary scientific collaboration factors. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, University of North Carolina, Chapel Hill.
80. Maglaughlin, K. L., & Sonnenwald, D. H. (2005). Factors that impact interdisciplinary natural science research collaboration in academia. Proceedings of the Conference of the International Society for Scientometrics and Informetrics, 499-508.
81. Marsh, S., & Dibben, M. R. (2003). The role of trust in information science and technology. Annual Review of Information Science and Technology, 37, 465-498.
82. Mathiasson, L. (2002). Collaborative practice research. Information Technology & People, 15, 321-345.
83. McGinley, S., & Charnie, J. (2003). Peace building through scientific collaboration. Arizona Land & People, 48(1). Retrieved July 25, 2005, from http://ag.arizona.edu/landand people/spring2003/article7_l&p.pdf
84. Mervis, J., & Normile, D. (1998). North-South relations: Lopsided partnerships give way to real collaboration. Science, 279, 1477.
85. Moody, J. (2004). The structure of a social science collaboration network: Disciplinary cohesion from 1963 to 1999. American Sociological Review, 69, 213-238.
86. Nan, N., Johnston, E. W., Olson, J. S., & Bos, N. (2005). Beyond being in the lab: Using multi-agent modeling to isolate competing hypotheses. Proceedings of the ACM Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems, 1693-1696.
87. National Institutes of Health. (2000). NCRR Biomedical Collaborators Workshop report. Bethesda, MD: National Institutes of Health, National Center for Research Resources. Retrieved December 31, 2005, from www.ncrr.nih.gov/biotech/btcollabwrkshprpt10-2000.pdf
88. National Research Council. (1993). National collaborators: Applying information technology for scientific research. Washington, DC: National Academy Press.
89. National Science Board. (2004). Science and engineering indicators. Arlington, VA: National Science Foundation. Retrieved December 16, 2005, from www.nsf.gov/sbe/srs/seind04/start.htm
90. Newman, M. E. J. (2001). The structure of scientific collaboration networks. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 98, 404-409.
91. Newman, M. E. J. (2004). Coauthorship networks and patterns of scientific collaboration. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 191(Suppl. 1), 5200-5205.
92. Normile, D. (2003). Taiwan-China collaboration: A bridge over troubled waters. Science, 300, 1074-1075.
93. Oldham, G. (2005). International scientific collaboration: A quick guide. Retrieved June 30, 2005, from www.scidev.net/dossiers/index.cfm? fuseaction=policybrief&dossier=13& policy=60
94. Olson, G. M., & Olson, J. S. (2000). Distance matters. Human-Computer Interaction, 15, 139-178.
95. Olson, G. M., Teasley, S., Bietz, M., & Cogburn, D. L. (2002). Collaboratories to support distributed science: The example of international HIV/AIDS research. Proceedings of the Conference of the South African Institute of Computer Scientists and Information Technologists, 44-51.
96. Olson, G. M., & Zimmerman, A. (in press). Time matters: The evolution of collaboratories. In G. M. Olson, A. Zimmerman, & N. Bos (Eds.), Science on the Internet. Boston: MIT Press.
97. Olson, J. S., Olson, G. M., & Cooney, D. (in press). Success factors: Bridging distance in collaboration. In G. M. Olson, A. Zimmerman, & N. Bos (Eds.), Science on the Internet. Boston: MIT Press.
98. Owen-Smith, J., Riccaboni, M., Pammolli, F., & Powell, W. W. (2002). A comparison of U.S. and European university-industry relations in the life sciences. Management Science, 48, 24-42.
99. Palmer, C. L. (2001). Work at the boundaries of science: Information and the interdisciplinary research process. Dordrecht, NL: Kluwer.
100. Parent, A., Bertrand, F., Côté, G., & Archambault, E. (2003). Scientometric study on collaboration between India and Canada, 1990-2001. Montreal, Canada: Science-Metrix. Retrieved July 10, 2005, from www.science-metrix.com/pdf/SM_2003_009_DFAIT_Indo- Canadian_S&T_Collaboration.pdf
101. Pax Mediterranea. (2003). The future collaboration between university and civic associations in Sevilla (INTERACTS WP5 National Report). Retrieved June 14, 2005, from http://members.chello.at/wilawien/interacts/ interacts_easw_spain.pdf
102. Persson, O., Glänzel, W., & Danell, R. (2004). Inflationary bibliometric values: The role of scientific collaboration and the need for relative indicators in evaluative studies. Scientometrics, 60, 421-432.
103. Reichman, J. H., & Uhlir, P. F. (2003). A contractually reconstructed research commons for scientific data in a highly protectionist intellectual property environment. Law and Contemporary Problems, 66, 315-462. Retrieved September 12, 2005, from www.law.duke.edu/journals/lcp/articles/ lcp66dWinterSpring2003p315.htm
104. Rogers, E. (1995). Diffusion of innovations. New York: The Free Press.
105. Salter, L., & Hearn, A. (Eds.). (1996). Outside the lines: Issues in interdisciplinary research. Montreal, Canada: McGill-Queen's University.
106. Schiff, L. (2002). Developing successful models for large-scale, collaborative biomedical research projects (Boston Cure Project Educational Paper). Retrieved July 14, 2005, from www.bostoncure.org/downloads/ collaborative-science.pdf
107. Science of Collaboratories. (2003). Workshops: The social underpinnings of collaboration: Final summary. Retrieved June 14, 2005, from www.scienceofcollaboratories.org/Work shops/WorkshopJune42001/index.php? FinalSummary
108. Secrest, L. A., Lassiter, B. S., Armistead, L. P., Wyckoff, S. C., Johnson, J., Williams, W. B., et al. (2004). The Parents Matter! program: Building a successful investigator-community partnership. Journal of Child and Family Studies, 13, 35-45.
109. Sell, S. K. (2003). Private power, public law: The globalization of intellectual property rights. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
110. Shortliffe, E. H., Patel, V. L., Cimino, J. J., Barnett, G. O., & Greenes, R. A. (1998). A study of collaboration among medical informatics research laboratories. Artificial Intelligence in Medicine, 12, 97-123.
111. Shrum, W., Chompalov, I., & Genuth, J. (2001). Trust, conflict and performance in scientific collaborations. Social Studies of Science, 31, 681-730.
112. Smith, D., & Katz, J. S. (2000). HEFCE fundamental review of research policy and funding: Collaborative approaches to research: Final report. Retrieved July 7, 2005, from www.sussex.ac.uk/Users/sylvank/pubs/ collc.pdf
113. Solomon, N., Boud, D., Leontios, M., & Staron, M. (2001). Researchers are learners too: Collaboration in research on workplace learning. Journal of Workplace Learning, 13, 274-281.
114. Sonnenwald, D. H. (2003a). Expectations for a scientific collaboratory: A case study. Proceedings of the 2003 International ACM SIGGROUP Conference on Supporting Group Work, 68-74.
115. Sonnenwald, D. H. (2003b). The conceptual organization: An emergent collaborative R&D organizational form. Science Public Policy, 30, 261-272.
116. Sonnenwald, D. H. (2003c). Managing cognitive and affective trust in the conceptual R&D organization. In M. Huotari & M. Iivonen (Eds.), Trust in knowledge management and systems in organizations (pp. 82-106). Hershey, PA: Idea Publishing.
117. Sonnenwald, D. H., Maglaughlin, K. L., & Whitton, M. C. (2004). Designing to support situational awareness across distances: An example from a scientific collaboratory. Information Processing & Management, 40, 989-1011.
118. Sonnenwald, D. H., & Pierce, L. (2000). Information behavior in dynamic group work contexts: Interwoven situational awareness, dense social networks, and contested collaboration in command and control. Information Processing & Management, 36, 461-479.
119. Sonnenwald, D. H., Solomon, P., Hara, N., Bolliger, R., & Cox, T. (2002). Collaboration in the large: Using video conferencing to facilitate large group interaction. In A. Gunasekaran & O. Khalil (Eds.), Knowledge and information technology in 21st century organizations: Human and social perspectives (pp. 136-155). Hershey, PA: Idea Publishing.
120. Sonnenwald, D. H., Whitton, M. C., & Maglaughlin, K. L. (2003). Evaluating a scientific collaboratory: Results of a controlled experiment. ACM Transactions on Computer-Human Interaction, 10(2), 150-176.
121. Sooryamoorthy, R., Duque, R. B., Ynalvez, M. A., & Shrum, W. (2005). Scientific collaboration and the Kerala Model: Does the Internet make a difference? Retrieved March 20, 2006, from http://worldsci.net/papers.htm
122. Star, S. L., & Ruhleder, K. (1996). Steps towards an ecology of infrastructure: Design and access for large information spaces. Information Systems Research, 7, 111-134.
123. Steiner, I. D. (1972). Group processes and productivity. New York: Academic Press.
124. Stokes, D. E. (1997). Pasteur's quadrant: Basic science and technological innovation. Washington, DC: Brookings Institution Press.
125. Stokols, D., Harvey, R., Gress, J., Fuqua, J., & Phillips, K. (2005). In vivo studies of transdisciplinary scientific collaboration. American Journal of Preventative Medicine, 28, 202-213.
126. Thagard, P. (1997). Collaborative knowledge. Nous, 31, 242-261.
127. Third World Academy of Sciences. (2004). Building scientific capacity. Trieste, Italy: The Academy. Retrieved June 14, 2005, from www.ictp.trieste.it/~twas/pdf/CapBuild Report.pdf
128. Traore, N., & Landry, R. (1997). On the determinants of scientists' collaboration. Science Communication, 19, 124-140.
129. Traweek, S. (1988). Beamtimes and lifetimes: The world of high energy physicists. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
130. U.K. Research Council. (2005). e-Science Core Program. Retrieved June 14, 2005, from www.research-councils.ac.uk/escience
131. U.S. Office of Science and Technology Policy. (2000). Examples of international scientific collaboration and the benefits to society. Retrieved June 14, 2005, from http://clinton4.nara.gov/WH/EOP/OSTP/html/00426_7. html
132. Van House, N. A. (2004). Science and technology studies and information studies. Annual Review of Information Science and Technology, 38, 3-86.
133. Velho, L., & Velho, P. (1996). Scientific collaboration of advanced/developing countries in biological sciences: The case of the Maraca Rain Forest project. Cadernos de Ciência & Tecnologia, Brasília, 13, 9-20.
134. Wagner, C., & Leydesdorff, L. (2005). Mapping the network of global science: Comparing international co-authorships from 1990 to 2000. International Journal of Technology and Globalization, 1, 185-208.
135. Wagner, C. S., Staheli, L., Silberglitt, R., Wong, A., & Kadtke, J. (2002). Linking effectively: Learning lessons from successful collaboration in science and technology (RAND Documented Briefing, DB-345-OSTP). Santa Monica, CA: RAND Corporation. Retrieved June 16, 2005, from www.rand.org/ publications/DB/DB345/
136. Walsh, J. P., & Bayma, T. (1996). Computer networks and scientific work. Social Studies of Science, 26, 661-703.
137. Walsh, J. P., & Hong, W. (2003). Secrecy is increasing in step with competition. Nature, 422, 801-802.
138. Walsh, J. P., Kucker, S., Maloney, N. G., & Gabbay, S. (2000). Connecting minds: Computer-mediated communication and scientific work. Journal of the American Society for Information Science, 51, 1295-1305.
139. Walsh, J. P., & Maloney, N. G. (2002). Computer network use, collaboration structures and productivity. In P. Hinds & S. Kiesler (Eds.), Distributed work (pp. 433-458). Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
140. Warnow-Blewett, J., Genuth, J., & Weart, S. R. (2001). AIP study of multi-institutional collaborations: Final report. College Park, MD: Center for the History of Physics, American Institute of Physics.
141. Welch, G., Fuchs, H., Cairns, B., Mayer-Patel, K., Sonnenwald, D. H., Yang, R., et al. (in press). Remote 3D medical consultation. Journal of Mobile Multimedia.
142. Whitley, R. (2000). The intellectual and social organization of the sciences. Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press.
143. Williams, N. (1998). Ireland: Peace process set to boost collaboration. Science, 280, 1519.
144. Wilson, D. (1999). Fisheries science collaboration: The critical role of the community (Institute for Fisheries Management and Coastal Community Development, Research Publication 45). Retrieved July 10, 2005, from www.ifm.dk/reports/45.pdf
145. World Health Organization. (2003). Severe acute respiratory syndrome (SARS) - Multicountry outbreak - Update 31. Retrieved June 14, 2005, from www.who.int/csr/don/2003_04_ 16/en/index.html
146. Wray, K. B. (2002). The epistemic significance of collaborative research. Philosophy of Science, 69, 150-168.
147. Wulf, W. A. (1993). The collaboratory opportunity. Science, 261, 854-855.
148. Ziman, J. (2000). Real science: What it is and what it means. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
149. Zucker, L. G., Darby, M. R., Brewer, M. B., & Peng, Y. (1995). Collaboration structure and information dilemmas in biotechnology: Organizational boundaries as trust production (NBER Working Paper No. W5199). Retrieved December 6, 2005, from http://ssrn.com/abstract=225262