Impacts of grants and contracts on academic researchers' interactions with industry

Research Policy

Volumn 36, Issue 5, 2007, Pages 694-707

  Bozeman, Barry ^a   Gaughan, Monica ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF GEORGIA   (United States)

Author keywords

Government grants; Industrial involvement; Industry grants; University research

Indexed keywords

EDUCATION; INDUSTRIAL APPLICATIONS; MATHEMATICAL MODELS; PRODUCT DEVELOPMENT; PROFESSIONAL ASPECTS; TECHNOLOGY TRANSFER;

GOVERNMENT GRANTS; INDUSTRIAL INVOLVEMENT; INDUSTRY GRANTS; UNIVERSITY RESEARCH;

CONTRACTS;

EID: 34249294343     PISSN: 00487333     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.respol.2007.01.007     Document Type: Article

References (50)

1. Audretsch D.B. Innovation and Industry Evolution (1995), MIT Press, Cambridge
2. Audretsch D.B., Link A., and Scott J. Public/private technology partnerships: evaluating SBIR-supported research. Research Policy 31 (2002) 145-158
3. Becher T. The significance of disciplinary differences. Studies in Higher Education 19 2 (1994) 151-161
4. Behrens T.R., and Gray D. Unintended consequences of cooperative research: impact of industry sponsorship on climate for academic freedom and other graduate student outcome. Research Policy 30 (2001) 179-199
5. Benner M., and Sandstrom U. Institutionalizing the triple helix: research funding and norms in the academic system. Research Policy 29 (2000) 291-301
6. Blumenthal D., Causino N., and Campbell E. Academic-industry research relationships in genetics: a field apart. Nature Genetics 16 (1997) 104-108
7. Blumenthal D.E., Causino C.N., and Louis K. Participation of life science faculty in research relationships with industry. New England Journal of Medicine 335 (1996) 1735-1739
8. Bollen K.A. Structural Equations with Latent Variables (1989), Wiley Interscience, New York
9. Bourke P., and Butler L. The efficacy of different modes of funding research: perspectives from Australian data on the biological sciences. Research Policy 28 5 (1999) 489-499
10. Bozeman B. Technology transfer research: a review and assessment. Research Policy 29 (2000) 627-655
11. Bozeman B., and Corley E. Scientists' collaboration strategies: implications for scientific and technical human capital. Research Policy 33 4 (2004) 599-616
12. Carayannis E., and Alexander J. Secrets of success and failure in commercializing US government R&D laboratory technologies: a structured case study approach. International Journal of Technology Management 18 3/4 (1999) 246-269
13. Carley E., and Gaughan M. Scientists' participation in university research centers: what are the gender differences?. Journal of Technology Transfer 30 (2005) 371-381
14. Carnegie Foundation, 2000. Classification of Higher Education. http://www.carnegiefoundation.org/Classification/index.htm.
15. Crow M., and Bozeman B. Limited by Design: R&D Laboratories in the U.S. National Innovation System (1998), Columbia University Press, New York
16. Etzkowitz H., Webster A., and Healey P. Capitalizing Knowledge: New intersections of industry and academia (1998), SUNY Press, Albany, NY
17. Etzkowitz H., and Brisolla S.N. Failure and success: the fate of industrial policy in Latin America and South East Asia. Research Policy 28 (1999) 337-350
18. Feller I., and Roessner D. What does industry expect from university partnerships?. Issues in Science and Technology Fall (1995) 80-84
19. Feller I., Ailes C.P., and David Roessner J. Impacts of research universities on technological innovation in industry: evidence from engineering research centers. Research Policy 31 3 (March 2002) 457-474
20. Gaughan M., and Bozeman B. Using curriculum vitae to compare some impacts of NSF research grants with research center funding. Research Evaluation 11 1 (2002) 17-26
21. Geisler E., Furino A., and Kiresuk T.J. Toward a conceptual model of cooperative research: patterns of development and success in university-industry alliances. IEEE Transactions on Engineering Management 38 2 (1991) 136-145
22. Geuna A. The changing rationale for European university research funding: are there negative unintended consequences?. Journal of Economic Issues 35 (2001) 607-632
23. Gluck M., Blumenthal D., and Stoto M. University-industry relationships in the life sciences: implications for students and post-doctoral fellows. Research Policy 16 (1987) 327-336
24. Gray D., and Steenhuis H.-J. Quantifying the benefits of participating in an industry university research center: an examination of research cost avoidance. Scientometrics 58 2 (2003) 281-300
25. Gray D., and Walters S.G. Managing Industry/University Cooperative Research Center: A Guide for Directors and Other Stakeholders (1998), Battelle Press, Columbus, OH
26. Guenther, G., 2000. The Research and Experimentation Tax Credit: Current Law and Selected Policy Issues for Congress, CRS Report, March 20.
27. Gulbrandsen M., and Smeby J.-C. Industry funding and university professors' research performance. Research Policy 34 6 (2005) 932-950
28. Hall, B.H., Link, A.L., Scott, J.T., 2000. Universities as Research Partners NBER Working Papers 7643, National Bureau of Economic Research, Inc.
29. Harman G. University-industry research partnerships in Australia: Extent, benefits and risks. Higher Education Research and Development 20 3 (2001) 245-264
30. Henderson, R., Jaffe, A.B., Trajtenberg, M., 1998. Universities as a source of commercial technology: a detailed analysis of university patenting, 1965-1988. Review of Economics and Statistics, 119-127. Joint Committee on Taxation, General Explanation of the Economic Recovery Tax Act of 1981 (JCS-71-81), December 31, 1981.
31. Hetzner W., Gidley T., and Gray D. Cooperative research and rising expectations: lessons from NSF's industry/university cooperative research centers. Technology in Society 11 (1989) 335-345
32. Joint Committee on Taxation, 1981. General Explanation of the Economic Recovery Tax Act of 1981 (JCS-71-81), December 31.
33. Jones C. R&D-based models of economic growth. Journal of Political Economy 103 (1995) 759-784
34. Lin Min.-Wei., and Bozeman B. Researchers' industry experience and productivity in university-industry research centers: a scientific and technical human capital explanation. Journal of Technology Transfer 31 2 (2006) 269-290
35. Link A., and Siegel D.S. University-based technology initiatives: quantitative and qualitative evidence. Research Policy 34 3 (2005) 253-257
36. Link A., and Scott J. Estimates of the social returns to small business innovation research projects. In: Charles W., and Wessner (Eds). The Small Business Innovation Research Program: An Assessment of the Department of Defense Fast Track Initiative. (2000), National Academy Press, Washington, DC 275-290
37. Mansfield E. Academic research underlying industrial innovations: sources, characteristics, and financing. The Review of Economics and Statistics 77 (1995) 55-65
38. Martin B.R. The changing social contract for science and the evolution of the university. In: Geuna A., Salter A.J., and Steinmueller W.E. (Eds). Science and Innovation. Rethinking the Rationales for Funding and Governance (2003), Edward Elgar, Cheltenham
39. Mowery D., Nelson R.R., Sampat B.N., and Ziedonis A.A. The growth of patenting and licensing by U.S. universities: an assessment of the effects of the Bayh-Dole act of 1980. Research Policy 30 1 (2001) 99-119
40. National Research Council. The Impact of Academic Research on Industrial Performance (2003), National Academy Press, Washington
41. National Research Council. From Scarcity to Visibility: Gender Differences in the Careers of Doctoral Scientists and Engineers (2001), National Academy Press, Washington
42. National Science Foundation, 2004. http://www.nsf.gov/statistics/seind04/c5/c5s1.htm#c5s1l2, downloaded July 5, 2005.
43. National Science Foundation, 2006. Science and Engineering Indicators. http://www.nsf.gov/statistics/seind06/c5/c5h.htm. Downloaded March 26, 2006.
44. Powell W., and Owen-Smith J. Universities and the market for intellectual property in the life sciences. Journal of Policy Analysis and Management 17 2 (1998) 253-277
45. Rosenberg N., and Nelson R. American universities and technical advance in industry. Research Policy 23 (1994) 323-348
46. Scott J. Historical and economic perspectives of the national cooperative research act. In: Link A.N., and Gregory T. (Eds). Cooperative Research and Development: The Industry-University-Government Relationship (1989), Kluwer Academic Publishers, Boston 65-84
47. Slaughter S., and Leslie L. Academic Capitalism: Politics, Policies, and the Entrepreneurial University (1997), Johns Hopkins University Press, Baltimore
48. Small H., and Griffith B. The structure of scientific literatures: identifying and graphing specialties. Science Studies 4 1 (1974) 17-40
49. Van Looy B., Ranga M., Callaert J., Debackere K., and Zimmermann E. Combining entrepreneurial and scientific performance in academia: towards a compounded and reciprocal Matthew-effect?. Research Policy 33 3 (2004) 425-441
50. Winship C., and Radbill L. Sampling weights and regression analysis. Sociological Methods and Research 23 2 (1994) 230-257