Institutional collaboration in science: A typology of technological practice

Science Technology and Human Values

Volumn 24, Issue 3, 1999, Pages 338-372

  Chompalov, Ivan ^a   Shrum, Wesley ^a  

^a NONE

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 0033137428     PISSN: 01622439     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1177/016224399902400302     Document Type: Article

References (35)

1. Aldenderfer, Mark, and Roger Blashfield. 1984. Cluster analysis. Beverly Hills, CA: Sage.
2. Alter, C. 1990. An exploratory study of conflict and coordination in interorganizational service delivery systems. Academy of Management Journal 33:478-501.
3. Alter, C., and J. Hage. 1993. Organizations working together: Coordination in interorganizational networks. Newbury Park, CA: Sage.
4. American Institute of Physics. 1992. AIP study of multi-institutional collaborations. Phase I: High-energy physics. New York: American Institute of Physics.
5. _. 1995. AIP study of 'multi-institutional collaborations. Phase II: Space science and geophysics. College Park, MD: American Institute of Physics.
6. Assael, G. 1969. Constructive role for interorganizational conflict. Administrative Science Quarterly 14:573-81.
7. Blau, Peter, and W. Richard Scott. 1962. Formal organizations. San Francisco: Chandler.
8. Browning, L., J. Beyer, and J. Shetler. 1995. Building cooperation in a competitive industry: Sematech and the semiconductor industry. Academy of Management Journal 38:113-51.
9. Crow, Michael, and Barry Bozeman. 1987. A new typology for R&D laboratories: Implications for policy analysis. Journal of Policy Analysis and Management 6:328-41.
10. de Solla Price, Derek J. 1963. Little science, big science. New York: Columbia University Press.
11. DiStefano, T. 1984. Interorganizational conflict: A review of an emerging field. Human Relations 37:351-66.
12. Etzioni, Amitai. 1961. A comparative analysis of complex organizations. New York: Free Press.
13. Galison, Peter, and Bruce Hevly, eds. 1992. Big science: The growth of large-scale research. Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press.
14. Gulati, R. 1995. Does familiarity breed trust? The implications of repeated ties for contractual choice in alliances. Academy of Management Journal 38:85-112.
15. Haas, J. Eugene, Richard Hall, and Norman Johnson. 1966. Toward an empirically derived taxonomy of organizations. In Studies on behavior in organizations, edited by R. Bowers, 157-80. Athens: University of Georgia Press.
16. Hall, Richard. 1977. Organizations: Structure and process. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice Hall.
17. Irvine, J., and B. Martin. 1985. Basic research in the East and West: A comparison of the scientific performance of high-energy physics accelerators. Social Studies of Science 15:293-343.
18. Knorr-Cetina, Karin. 1995. How superorganisms change: Consensus formation and the social ontology of high energy physics experiments. Social Studies of Science 25:119-47.
19. _. 1998. Epistemic cultures: The cultures of knowledge societies. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
20. Kramer, R., and T. Tyler, eds. 1995. Trust in organizations. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
21. Latour, Bruno. 1987. Science in action: How to follow scientists and engineers through society. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
22. Maienschein, Jane. 1993. Why collaborate? Journal of the History of Biology 26:167-83.
23. Orbuch, T. 1997. People's accounts count: The sociology of accounts. Annual Review of Sociology 23:455-78.
24. Parsons, Talcott. 1960. Structure and process in modern society. New York: Free Press.
25. Pelz, Donald, and Frank Andrews. 1966. Scientists in organizations: Productive climates of research and development. New York: John Wiley.
26. Pugh, Derek, D. Hickson, and C. Hinings. 1969. An empirical taxonomy of work organizations. Administrative Science Quarterly 14:115-26.
27. Ring, P., and A. Van de Ven. 1994. Developmental processes of cooperative interorganizational relationships. Academy of Management Review 19: 90-118.
28. Schild, I. 1997. International collaboration as work in polar research. Paper presented at the 1997 annual meeting of the Society for Social Studies of Science, Tucson, Arizona, October.
29. Shapin, Steven. 1995. Here and everywhere: Sociology of scientific knowledge. Annual Review of Sociology 21:289-321.
30. Shrum, Wesley, and Joan Morris. 1990. Organizational constructs for the assembly of technological knowledge. In Theories of science in society, edited by S. Cozzens and T. Gieryn, 235-59. Bloomington: Indiana University Press.
31. Sneath, P., and R. Sokal. 1973. Numerical taxonomy. San Francisco: W. H. Freeman.
32. Traweek, Sharon. 1988. Beamtimes and lifetimes: The world of high-energy physics. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
33. Warnow-Blewett, Joan. 1997. Multi-institutional collaborations in science: Documentation issues. Paper presented at the annual meeting of the Society for Social Studies of Science, Tucson, Arizona, October.
34. Whitley, Richard. 1984. The intellectual and social organization of the sciences. Oxford, UK: Clarendon Press.
35. Zabusky, Stacia. 1995. Launching Europe: An ethnography of European cooperation in space science. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.