An analysis of science-industry collaborative patterns in a large European University

Journal of Technology Transfer

Volumn 34, Issue 1, 2009, Pages 1-23

  Levy, Rachel ^a   Roux, Pascale ^b   Wolff, Sandrine ^a  

^a CNRS   (France)

^b European Chair on Intellectual Capital and RITM University Paris Sud   (France)

Author keywords

Channels of technology transfers; Empirical analysis; Science industry collaborations; Typology of industrial collaborative behaviours

Indexed keywords

COLLABORATIVE PATTERNS; EMPIRICAL ANALYSIS; EUROPEAN UNIVERSITIES; MULTINOMIAL LOGIT; PAPER ANALYSIS; SCIENCE-INDUSTRY COLLABORATIONS; TYPOLOGY OF INDUSTRIAL COLLABORATIVE BEHAVIOURS;

TECHNOLOGY TRANSFER;

INDUSTRY;

EID: 58149199560     PISSN: 08929912     EISSN: 15737047     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1007/s10961-007-9044-0     Document Type: Article

References (41)

1. Adams, J. D., Chiang, E. P., & Jensen, J. L. (2003). The influence of federal laboratory R&D on industrial research. Review of Economics and Statistics, 84(4), 1003-1020.
2. Agrawal, A., & Henderson, R. M. (2002). Putting patents in context: Exploring knowledge transfer from MIT. Management Science, 48(1), 44-60.
3. Arundel, A., & Geuna, A. (2004). Proximity and the use of public science by innovative European firms. Economics of Innovation & New Technology, 13(6), 559-580.
4. Benzeécri, J.-P. (1992). Correspondence analysis handbook. New York: Marcel Dekker.
5. Blumenthal, D., Campbell, E., Anderson, M., Causino, N., & Seashore-Louis, K. (1997). Withholding research results in academic life science: Evidence from a national survey of faculty. Journal of the Academic Medical Association, 207, 1224-1228.
6. Bureth, A., Levy, R., Penin, J., & Wolff, S. (2006). Strategic reasons for patenting: Between exclusion and coordination and rationales. Rivista di Politica Economica, September-October 2005, IX-X, 19-46.
7. Caloghirou, Y., Aggelos, T., & Vonortas, N. S. (2001). University-industry cooperation in the context of the European framework programmes. Journal of Technology Transfer, 26(1-2), 153-161.
8. Cassier, M. (1997). Compromis institutionnels et hybridations entre recherche publique et recherche priveée. Revue d'Economie Industrielle, 79, 191-212.
9. Carayol, N. (2003). Objectives, agreements and matching in science-industry collaborations: Reassembling the pieces of the puzzle. Research Policy, 32, 887-908.
10. Carayol, N., & Matt, M. (2004a). The exploitation of complementarities in the scientific production process at the laboratory level. Technovation, 24(6), 455-465.
11. Carayol, N., & Matt, M. (2004b). Does research organization influence academic production? Laboratory level evidence from a large European University. Research Policy, 33, 1081-1102.
12. Cockburn, I. M., & Henderson, R. M. (1998). Absorptive capacity, coauthoring behavior, and the organization or research in drug discovery. Journal of Industrial Economics, 46(2), 157-182.
13. Cohen, W. M., Nelson, R. R., & Walsh, J. P. (2002). Links and impacts: The influence of public research on industrial R&D. Management Science, 48(1), 1-23.
14. Cohen, W. M., Florida, R., Randazzese, L., & Walsh, J. (1998). Industry and the academy: Uneasy partners in the cause of technological advance. In R. G. Noll (Ed.), Challenges to research universities, (chap. 7, pp. 171-200). Washington, DC: The Brookings Institution.
15. Dalpe, R. (2003). Interaction between public research organizations and industry in biotechnology. Managerial and Decision Economics, 24(2-3), 171-185.
16. Faulkner, W., & Senker, J. (1994). Making sense of diversity: Public-private sector research linkage in three technologies. Research Policy, 23(6), 673-695.
17. Fontana, R., Geuna, A., & Matt, M. (2006). Factors affecting university-industry R&D projects: The importance of searching, screening and signalling. Research Policy, 35(2), 309-332.
18. Fritsch, M., & Lukas, R. (2001). Who cooperates on R&D. Research Policy, 30, 297-312.
19. Godin, B., & Gingras, Y. (2000). The place of universities in the system of knowledge production. Research Policy 29(2), 273.
20. Hall, B. H., Link, A. N., & Scott, J. T. (2001). Barriers inhibiting industry from partnering with universities: Evidence from the advanced technology program. Journal of Technology Transfer, 26, 87-98.
21. Hamdouch, A., & Depret, M. H. (2001). La nouvelle eéconomie industrielle de la pharmacie: Structures industrielles, dynamique d'innovation et strateégies commerciales. Paris: Elsevier.
22. Jankowski, J. E. (1999). Trends in academic research spending, alliances, and commercialization. Journal of Technology Transfer, 24(1), 55-68.
23. Joly, P. B., & Mangematin, V. (1996). Profile of public laboratories, industrial partnerships and organization of R&D. Research Policy, 25(6), 901-923.
24. Klevorick, A. K., Levin, R., Nelson, R., & Winter, S. (1995). On the source and significance of interindustry differences in technological opportunities. Research Policy, 24, 185-205.
25. Laursen, K., & Salter, A. (2004). Searching high and low: What types of firms use universities as a source of innovation? Research Policy, 33(8), 1201-1215.
26. Lee, Y. S. (1998). University-industry collaboration on technology transfer: Views from the ivory tower. Policy Studies Journal 26, 69-84.
27. Lee, Y. S. (2000). The sustainability of university-industry research collaboration: An empirical assessment. Journal of Technology Transfer, 25, 111-133.
28. Malerba, F. (2002). Sectoral systems of innovation and production. Research Policy, 31, 247-264.
29. Mansfield, E., & Lee, J.-Y. (1996). The modernn university: Contributor to industrial innovation and recipient of industrial R&D support. Research Policy, 25, 1047-1058.
30. Matt, M., & Wolff, S. (2004). Incentives, coordination and learning in government-sponsored vs. spontaneous inter-firm research cooperation. International Journal of Technology Management, 27(8), 694-711.
31. Merton, R. K. (1973). The sociology of science. In: Storer N. W. (Ed.), The sociology of science: Theoretical and empirical investigations. Chicago: University Press of Chicago.
32. Meyer-Krahmer, F., & Schmoch, U. (1998). Science-based technologies: University-industry interactions in four fields. Research Policy, 27, 835-851.
33. Miotti, L., & Sachwald, F. (2003). Co-operative R & D: Why and with whom? An integrated framework of analysis. Research Policy 32(8), 1481-1500.
34. Mohnen, P., & Hoareau, C. (2003). What type of enterprise forges close links with universities and governement labs? Evidence form CIS2. Managerial and Decision Economics, 24, 133-145.
35. Muller, E., & Zenker, A. (2001). Business services as actors of knowledge transformation and diffusion: Some empirical findings on the role of KIBS in regional and national innovation systems. Research Policy, 30, 1501-1516.
36. Pavitt, K. (1984). Sectoral patterns of technical change: Towards taxonomy and a theory. Research Policy, 13, 343-373.
37. Saez, C. B., Marco, T. G., & Arribas, E. H. (2002). Collaboration in R & D with universities and research centres: An empirical study of Spanish firms. R & D Management, 32 (4), 321-341.
38. Schartinger, D., Schibany, A., & Gassler, H. (2001). Interactive relations between universities and firms: Empirical evidence for Austria. Journal of Technology Transfer, 26, 255-268.
39. Schartinger, D., Rammer, C., Fischer, M. M., & Frohlich, J. (2002). Knowledge interactions between universities and industry in Austria: Sectoral patterns and determinants. Research Policy, 31, 303-328.
40. Tether, B. S. (2002). Who co-operates for innovation, and why. An empirical analysis. Research Policy, 31, 947-967.
41. Zucker, L. G., Darby, M. R., & Brewer, M. B. (1998). Intellectual human capital and the birth of US biotechnology enterprises. American Economic Review, 88(1), 209-306.