The organization of scientific collaborations

Research Policy

Volumn 31, Issue 5, 2002, Pages 749-767

  Chompalov, Ivan ^a   Genuth, Joel ^b   Shrum, Wesley ^c  

^a EDINBORO UNIVERSITY OF PENNSYLVANIA   (United States)

^b AMERICAN INSTITUTE OF PHYSICS   (United States)

^c LOUISIANA STATE UNIVERSITY   (United States)

Author keywords

Bureaucracy; Interdependence; Organizational typology; Science policy; Scientific collaboration

Indexed keywords

BUREAUCRACY; INTERDEPENDENCE; ORGANIZATIONAL TYPOLOGY; SCIENCE POLICY; SCIENTIFIC COLLABORATION;

CLUSTER ANALYSIS;

HIGH ENERGY PHYSICS;

EID: 31244437561     PISSN: 00487333     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/S0048-7333(01)00145-7     Document Type: Article

References (38)

1. Alter, C., Hage, J., 1993. Organizations Working Together: Coordination in Interorganizational Networks. Sage, Newbury Park, CA.
2. American Institute of Physics, 1992. AIP Study of Multiinstitutional. Collaborations. Phase I. High-energy Physics. American Institute of Physics, College Park, MD, USA.
3. American Institute of Physics, 1995. AIP Study of Multiinstitutional Collaborations. Phase II. Space Science and Geophysics. American Institute of Physics, College Park, MD, USA.
4. American Institute of Physics, 1999. AIP Study of Multiinstitutional. Collaborations. Phase III. Ground-based Astronomy, Materials Science, Heavy-ion and Nuclear Physics, Medical Physics, and Computer-Mediated Collaborations. American Institute of Physics, College Park, MD, USA.
5. Bozeman, B., 2000. Bureaucracy and Red Tape. Prentice Hall, Upper Saddle River, NJ.
6. Browning, L., Beyer, J., Shetler, J., 1995. Building co-operation in a competitive industry: Sematech and the semiconductor industry. Academy of Management Journal 38 (1), 113-151.
7. Burt, R., 1997. The contingent value of social capital. Administrative Science Quarterly 42, 339-366.
8. Clarke, L., 1989. Acceptable Risk? University of California Press, Berkeley.
9. DiMaggio, P., Powell, W., 1983. The iron cage revisited: institutional isomorphism and collective rationality in organizational fields. American Sociological. Review 48 (2), 147-160.
10. Etzkovitz, H., Leydesdorff, L., 2000. The dynamics of innovation: from national, systems and Mode 2 to a triple helix of university-industry- governinent relations. Research Policy 29, 109-123.
11. Galison, P., 1997. Image and Logic: A Material Culture of Microphysics. University of Chicago Press, Chicago.
12. Galison, P., Hevly, B. (Eds.), 1992. Big Science: The Growth of Large-scale Research. Stanford University Press, Stanford.
13. Gibbons, M., Limoges, C., Nowotny, H., Schwartzman, S., Scott, P., Trow, M., 1994. The New Production, of Knowledge: The Dynamics of Science and Research in Contemporary Societies. Sage, London.
14. Gulati, R., 1995. Does familiarity breed trust? The implications of repeated ties for contractual choice in alliances. Academy of Management Journal 38, 85-112.
15. Hagstrom, W., 1964. Traditional and modern forms of scientific teamwork. Administrative Science Quarterly 9 (3), 241-264.
16. Kang, C., Cnaan, R., 1995. New findings on large human service organization boards of trustees. Administration and Social Work 19 (3), 17-45.
17. Katz, S., Martin, B., 1997. What is research collaboration? Research Policy 26, 1-18.
18. Knorr Cetina, K., 1999. Epistemic Cultures: How the Sciences Make Knowledge. Harvard University Press, Cambridge, MA.
19. Koenig, R., 1981. The interorganizational network as a system: toward a conceptual framework. In: England, G., Negaudhi, A., Wilpert, B. (Eds.), The Functioning of Complex Organizations. Oelgeschlager, Gunn, and Hain, Cambridge, pp. 275-302.
20. Krige, J., 1993. Some socio-historical aspects of multinational collaborations in high-energy physics at CERN between. 1975 and 1985. In: Crawford, E. (Ed.), Denationalizing Science: The Contexts of International. Scientific Practice. Kluwer Academic Publishers, Dordrecht, pp. 233-262.
21. Kuhn, A., 1974. The Logic of Social. Systems. Jossey-Bass, San Francisco.
22. Laumann, E., Pappi, F., 1976. Networks of Collective Action. Academic Press, New York.
23. Levine, S., White, P., 1961. Exchange as a conceptual framework for the study of interorganizational relationships. Administrative Science Quarterly 5, 583-610.
24. Leydesdorff, L., Etzkovitz, H., 1996. Emergence of a triple helix of university-industry-govern.ment relations. Science and Public Policy 23, 279-286.
25. Leydesdorff, L., Etzkovitz, H., 1998. The triple helix as a model for innovation studies. Science and Public Policy 25, 195-203. (Pubitemid 128655751)
26. McMillan, G., Narin, F., Deeds, D., 2000. An analysis of the critical role of public science in innovation.: the case of biotechnology. Research Policy 29, 1-8.
27. Narin, F., Hamilton, K., Olivastro, D., 1997. The increasing linkage between US technology and public science. Research Policy 26, 317-330. (Pubitemid 127382138)
28. Pfeffer, J., Nowak, P., 1976. Joint ventures and interorganizational interdependence. Administrative Science Quarterly 21, 398-418.
29. Pfeffer, J., Salancik, G., 1978. The External Control of Organizations: A Resource Dependence Perspective. Harper & Row, New York.
30. Powell, W., 1990. Neither market nor hierarchy: network forms of organization. In: L. Cummings, L., Staw, B. (Eds.), Research in Organizational. Behavior 12. JAI Press, Greenwich, CT, pp. 295-336.
31. Powell, W, Koput, K., Smith-Doerr, L., 1996. Interorganizational collaboration and the locus of innovation: networks of learning in biotechnology. Administrative Science Quarterly 41, 116-145.
32. Schulz, M., 1998. Limits to bureaucratic growth: the density dependence of organizational rule births. Administrative Science Quarterly 43, 845-877.
33. Traweek, S., 1988. Beamtimes and Lifetimes: The World of Highenergy Physics. Harvard University Press, Cambridge, MA.
34. Van de Ven, A., Emmett, D., Koenig, R., 1974. Frameworks for interorganizational analysis. Organization and Administrative Sciences 5, 113-129.
35. Weber, M., 1978. Economy and Society. University of California Press, Berkeley.
36. Wiewel, W., Hunter, A., 1985. The interorganizational network as a resource: a comparative case study on organizational, genesis. Administrative Science Quarterly 30, 482-496.
37. Zabusky, S., 1995. Launching Europe: An Ethnography of European Co-operation in Space Science. Princeton University Press, Princeton, NJ.
38. Zeitz, G., 1985. Interorganizational dialectics. Administrative Science Quarterly 25, 72-88.