Social-organizational characteristics of work and publication productivity among academic scientists in doctoral-granting departments

Journal of Higher Education

Volumn 78, Issue 5, 2007, Pages 542-571

  Fox, Mary Frank ^a   Mohapatra, Sushanta ^b  

^a GEORGIA INSTITUTE OF TECHNOLOGY   (United States)

^b SRI INTERNATIONAL   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 34548631559     PISSN: 00221546     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1353/jhe.2007.0032     Document Type: Article

References (83)

1. The Academic Technology Services of the University of California Los Angeles, (n.d.). STATA learning module on regression diagnostics: Multicollinearity. Retrieved December 5, 2004, from http://www.ats.ucla.edu/ stat/stata/modules/reg/multico.htm
2. Agresti, A. (1990). Categorical data analysis. New York: John Wiley & Sons.
3. Argote, L., & McGarth, J. E. (1993). Group process in organizations: Continuity and change. In C. L. Cooper & I. T. Robertson (Eds.), International review of industrial and organizational psychology (pp. 251-284). Greenwich, CT: JAI Press.
4. Baird, L. L. (1986). What characterizes a productive research department? Research in Higher Education, 25, 211-225.
5. Baird, L. L. (1990). Campus climate: Using surveys for policy-making and understanding. In W. Tierney (Ed.), Assessing academic climates and cultures (pp. 35-45). San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.
6. Baird, L. L. (1991). Research productivity in doctoral research departments: Interdisciplinary and intradisciplinary factors. Research in Higher Education, 32, 303-318.
7. Barker, K. (2002). At the helm: A laboratory navigator. Cold Spring Harbor, NY: Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory Press.
8. Beaver, D. d. B. (1986). Collaboration and teamwork in physics. Czechoslovak Journal of Physics, 1, 14-18.
9. Beaver, D. d. B. (2004). Does collaborative research have higher epistemic authority? Scientometrics, 60, 399-408.
10. Beaver, D. d. B., & Rosen, R. (1978). The professional origins of scientific co-authorship. Scientometrics, 1, 65-84.
11. Blau, P. (1970). A formal theory of differentiation in organizations. American Sociological Review, 35, 201-218.
12. Blau, P. (1973). The organization of academic work. New York: Wiley.
13. Boyer, E. L. (1990). Scholarship reconsidered: Priorities for the professoriate. Princeton, NJ: Carnegie Foundation for the Advancement of Teaching.
14. Bozeman, B., & Corley, E. (2004). Scientists' collaboration strategies: Implications for scientific and technical human capital. Research Policy, 33, 599-616.
15. Bradley, R. T. (1982). Ethical problems in team research: A structural analysis and an agenda for resolution. The American Sociologist, 17, 87-94.
16. Braxton, J. M., & Hargens, L. (1996). Variation among academic disciplines: Analytical frameworks and research. In J. S. Smart (Ed.), Higher education: Handbook of theory and research (Vol. 11, pp. 1-46). New York: Agathon.
17. Braxton, J. M., Luckey, W., & Holland, P. (2002). Institutionalizing a broader view of scholarship through Boyer's four domains (ASHE-ERIC Higher Education Report Vol. 29, No. 2). San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.
18. Buzaglo, G., & Wheelan, S. (1999). Facilitating work team effectiveness. Small Group Research, 30, 108-129.
19. Clark, M. J., & Centra, J. A. (1985). Influences on the career accomplishments of Ph.D.s. Research in Higher Education, 23, 256-269.
20. Cole, J. R., & Zuckerman, H. (1984). The productivity puzzle: Persistence and change in patterns of publication of men and women scientists. In P. Maehr & M. W. Steinkamp (Eds.), Advances in motivation and achievement (pp. 217-256). Greenwich, CT: JAI Press.
21. Commission on Professionals in Science and Technology. (2004). Professional women and minorities: A total human resource data compendium (15th ed.). Washington, DC: Author.
22. Creswell, J. W. (1985). Faculty research performance: Lessons from the sciences and social sciences. Washington, D.C.: ASHE-ERIC Higher Education Report, No. 4.
23. Devine, D., Clayton, L., Philips, J., Dunford, B., & Melner, S. (1999). Teams in organizations: Prevalence, characteristics, and effectiveness. Small Group Research, 30, 678-711.
24. Dietz, J. S., & Bozeman, B. (2005). Academic careers, patents, and productivity. Research Policy, 34, 349-367.
25. Dundar, H., & Lewis, D. R. (1998). Determinants of research productivity in higher education. Research in Higher Education, 39, 607-631.
26. Fairweather, J. (1993). Academic values and faculty rewards. Review of Higher Education, 17, 43-68.
27. Fox, M. F. (1983). Publication productivity among scientists. Social Studies of Science, 13, 285-305.
28. Fox, M. F. (1985). Publication, performance, and reward in science and scholarship. In J. C. Smart (Ed.), Higher education: Handbook of theory and research (Vol. 1, pp. 255-282). New York: Agathon.
29. Fox, M. F. (1991). Gender, environmental milieu, and productivity in science. In H. Zuckerman, J. Cole, & J. Bruer (Eds.), The outer circle: Women in the scientific community (pp. 188-204). New York: W. W. Norton.
30. Fox, M. F. (1992a). Research productivity and the environmental context. In T. G. Whiston & R. L. Geiger (Eds.), Research and higher education: The United Kingdom and the United States (pp. 103-111). Buckingham, England: The Society for Research into Higher Education & Open University Press.
31. Fox, M. F. (1992b). Research, teaching, and publication productivity: Mutuality versus competition in academia. Sociology of Education, 65, 293-305.
32. Fox, M. F. (1999). Gender, knowledge, and scientific styles. Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences, 869, 89-93.
33. Fox, M. F. (2000). Organizational environments and doctoral degrees awarded to women in science and engineering departments. Women's Studies Quarterly, 28, 47-61.
34. Fox, M. F. (2001). Women, science, and academia: graduate education and careers. Gender & Society, 15, 654-666.
35. Fry, L., & Miller, J. P. (1974). The impact of interdisciplinary teams on organizational relationships. The Sociological Quarterly, 15, 417-431.
36. Garfield, E. (1979). Citation indexing. New York: John Wiley.
37. Garvey, W. (1979). Communication: The essence of science. Oxford: Pergamon Press.
38. Glick, W. H. (1985). Conceptualizing and measuring organizational and psychological climate. Academy of Management Review, 10, 601-616.
39. Gordon, M. D. (1980). A critical assessment of inferred relations between multiple authorship, scientific collaboration, the production of papers, and their acceptance for publication. Scientometrics, 2, 193-210.
40. Hagstrom, W. O. (1964). Traditional and modern forms of scientific teamwork. Administrative Science Quarterly, 3, 241-263.
41. Hargens, L. (1978). Relations between work habits, research technologies, and eminence in science. Sociology of Work and Occupations, 5(1), 97-112.
42. Heffner, A. (1979). Authorship recognition of subordinates in collaborative research. Social Studies of Science, 9, 377-384.
43. Hellriegel, D., & Slocum, J. W. (1974). Organizational climate: Measures, research, and contingencies. Academy of Management Journal, 17, 255-280.
44. Hopkins, W. (2000). A new view of statistics. Retrieved October 2, 2004, from http://www.sportsci.org/resource/stats/index.html
45. Ilgen, D. R. (1999). Teams embedded in organizations. American Psychologist, 54, 129-139.
46. Katz, J. S., & Martin, B. R. (1997). What is research collaboration? Research Policy, 26, 1-18.
47. Kim, J.-O., & Mueller, C. (1978). Factor analysis: Statistical methods and practical issues. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
48. Kopelman, R., Brief, A., & Guzzo, R. (1990). The role of climate and culture in productivity. In B. Schneider (Ed.), Organizational climate and culture (pp. 282-318). San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.
49. Kulis, S. (1998). Organizational variations in women's representation in academia. Journal of Women and Minorities in Science and Engineering, 4, 43-67.
50. Kulis, S., Sicotte, D., & Collins, S. (2002). More than a pipeline problem: Labor supply constraints and gender across academic science disciplines. Research in Higher Education, 43, 657-691.
51. Lambright, W. H., & Teich, A. H. (1981). The organizational context of scientific research. In P. C. Nystrom & W. H. Starbuck (Eds.), The handbook of organizational design (pp. 305-319). New York: Oxford University Press.
52. Long, J. S. (1997). Regression models for categorical and limited dependent variables. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
53. Long, J. S. (Ed.). (2001). From scarcity to visibility: Gender differences in the careers of doctoral scientists and engineers. Washington, DC: National Academy Press.
54. Long, J. S., & Fox, M. F. (1995). Scientific careers: Universalism and particularism. Annual Review of Sociology, 21, 45-71.
55. Long, J. S., & Freese, J. (2001). Regression models for categorical outcomes using STATA. College Station, TX: Stata Press.
56. Long, J. S., & McGinnis, R. (1981). Organizational context and scientific productivity. American Sociological Review, 46, 422-442.
57. Lotka, A. J. (1926). The frequency distribution of scientific productivity. Journal of the Washington Academy of Sciences, 26, 317.
58. Meadows, A. J. (1974). Communication in science. London: Butterworth.
59. Milliken, F. J., & Martins, L. L. (1996). Searching for common threads: Understanding the multiple effects of diversity in organizational groups. Academy of Management Review, 21, 402-433.
60. Moran, E. T., & Volkwein, J. F. (1992). The cultural approach to the formation of organizational climate. Human Relations, 45, 19-47.
61. National Academy of Sciences. (1995). Reshaping the graduate education of scientists and engineers. Washington, DC: National Academy Press.
62. National Research Council. (1998). Trends in the early careers of life scientists. Washington, DC: National Academy Press.
63. National Research Council, Committee on Japan. (1997). Maximizing U.S. interests in science and technology relations with Japan. Washington, DC: National Academy Press.
64. National Science Foundation, Division of Science Resources Statistics. (2005). Engineers, scientists, and technicians in the United States. Arlington, VA: Author.
65. Neumann, Y., & Finaly-Neumann, E. (1990). The support-stress paradigm and faculty research publication. Journal of Higher Education, 61, 565-580.
66. Pearson, W., & Fechter, A. (Eds.). (1994). Who will do science? Educating the next generation. Baltimore: Johns Hopkins University Press.
67. Pelled, L. H., Ledford, G., & Mohrman, S. A. (1999). Demographic dissimilarity and workplace inclusion. Journal of Management Studies, 36, 1013-1031.
68. Pelz, D., & Andrews, F. M. (1976). Scientists in organizations: Productive climates for research and development. Ann Arbor, MI: The Institute for Social Research.
69. Peterson, M., & Spencer, M. (1990). Understanding academic culture and climate. In W. Tierney (Ed.), Assessing academic culture and climates (pp. 3-18). San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.
70. Presser, S. (1980). Collaboration and the quality of research. Social Studies of Science, 10, 95-101.
71. Reichers, A. E., & Schneider, B. (1990). Climate and culture: An evolution of the constructs. In B. Schneider (Ed.), Organizational climate and culture (pp. 5-39). San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.
72. Schneider, B. (1990). The climate for service: An application of the climate construct. In B. Schneider (Ed.), Organizational climate and culture (pp. 383-412). San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.
73. Slaughter, S., & Leslie, L. L. (1997). Academic capitalism: Politics, policies, and the entrepreneurial university. Baltimore: The Johns Hopkins University Press.
74. Slaughter, S., & Rhoades, G. (2004). Academic capitalism and the new economy: Markets, state, and higher education. Baltimore: The Johns Hopkins University Press.
75. Sonnert, G., & Holton, G. (1995). Gender differences in science careers. New Brunswick, NJ: Rutgers University Press.
76. Stinchcombe, A. (1966). On getting "hung up" and other assorted illnesses. Johns Hopkins Magazine, 25-30.
77. Swatez, G. M. (1970). The social organization of a university laboratory. Minerva, 8, 36-58.
78. Taylor, G., Dahnke, K., Snyder, L., & Kuether, G. (1996). The recipe for a successful R&D team. Chemtech, 7-9.
79. Toutkoushian, R. K., Porter, S., Danielson, C., & Hollis, P. (2003). Using publication counts to measure an institution's research productivity. Research in Higher Education, 44, 121-148.
80. Tsui, A. S., & O'Reilly, C. A. (1989). Beyond simple demographic effects. Academy of Management Journal, 32, 402-423.
81. Ward, K., & Grant, L. (1996). Gender and academic publishing. In J. Smart (Ed.), Higher education: Handbook of theory and research (Vol. 11, pp. 171-222). New York: Agathon.
82. Weinberg, A. (1970). Scientific teams and scientific laboratories. Daedalus, 99, 1056-1075.
83. Wray, K. B. (2002). The epistemic significance of collaborative research. Philosophy of Science, 69, 150-168.