Managing competition between individual and organizational goals in cross-sector research and development centres

Journal of Technology Transfer

Volumn 35, Issue 5, 2010, Pages 527-546

  Garrett Jones, Sam ^a   Turpin, Tim ^b   Diment, Kieren ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF WOLLONGONG   (Australia)

^b UNIVERSITY OF WESTERN SYDNEY   (Australia)

Author keywords

Australia; Cooperative Research Centres; Cross sector R D; Inter organizational relations; Research organization; Research policy; University industry linkages

Indexed keywords

AUSTRALIA; COOPERATIVE RESEARCH CENTRES; CROSS SECTORS; INTER-ORGANIZATIONAL; RESEARCH ORGANIZATION; RESEARCH POLICIES; UNIVERSITY-INDUSTRY LINKAGES;

ECONOMICS; SURVEYS;

RESEARCH;

EID: 77956175071     PISSN: 08929912     EISSN: 15737047     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1007/s10961-009-9139-x     Document Type: Article

References (39)

1. Boardman, C., & Bozeman, B. (2007). Role strain in university research centers. The Journal of Higher Education, 78, 430-463.
2. Box, S., & Cotgrove, S. (1966). Scientific identity, occupational selection, and role strain. British Journal of Sociology, 17, 20-28.
3. Castells, M. (2001). The Internet galaxy: Reflections on the Internet, business, and society. Oxford; NY: Oxford University Press.
4. Chompalov, I., Genuth, J., & Shrum, W. (2002). The organization of scientific collaborations. Research Policy, 31, 749-767.
5. Cummings, J. N., & Kiesler, S. (2005). Collaborative research across disciplinary and organizational boundaries. Social Studies of Science, 35, 703-722.
6. Cummings, J. N., & Kiesler, S. (2007). Coordination costs and project outcomes in multi-university collaborations. Research Policy, 36, 1620-1634.
7. Diment, K., & Garrett-Jones, S. (2007). How demographic characteristics affect mode preference in a postal/web mixed-mode survey of Australian researchers. Social Science Computer Review, 25, 410-417.
8. Elzinga, A. (2004). The new production of reductionism in models relating to research policy. In Grandin, K., Wormbs, N., & Widmalm, S., (eds.), The science-industry Nexus: History, policy, implications: Nobel symposium 123: 277-304. USA: Science History Publications.
9. Etzkowitz, H., & Leydesdorff, L. (1997). Universities and the global knowledge economy: A triple helix of university-industry-government relations. London: Pinter.
10. Fulop, L., & Couchman, P. (2006). Facing up to the risks in commercially focused university-industry R& D partnerships. Higher Education Research & Development, 25, 163-177.
11. Garrett-Jones, S., & Turpin, T. (2007). The triple helix and institutional change: Reward, risk and response in Australian Cooperative Research Centres. Triple helix VI: 6th international conference on university, industry and government linkages-Emerging models for the entrepreneurial university: Regional diversities or global convergence. National University of Singapore (NUS), Singapore: Research Publishing Services.
12. Garrett-Jones, S., Turpin, T., Burns, P., & Diment, K. (2004). Common purpose and divided loyalties: The risks and rewards of cross-sector collaboration for academic and government researchers. The R& D management conference 2004: Managing people and managing R& D. Sesimbra, Portugal: Manchester, RADMA.
13. Gibbons, M., Limoges, C., Nowotny, H., Schwartzman, S., Scott, P., & Trow, M. (1994). The new production of knowledge: The dynamics of science and research in contemporary societies. London: Sage.
14. Gulbrandsen, M. (2000). Between Scylla and Charybdis-and enjoying it? Organizational tension and research work. Science Studies, 13, 53-76.
15. Handy, C. B. (1993). Understanding organizations. London: Penguin Books.
16. Handy, C. (1995). Trust and the virtual organization. Harvard Business Review, 73(3), 40-50.
17. Harvey, J., Pettigrew, A., & Ferlie, E. (2002). The determinants of research group performance: Towards Mode 2? Journal of Management Studies, 39, 747-774.
18. Hatch, M. J. (1997). Organization theory: Modern, symbolic, and postmodern perspectives. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
19. Henkel, M. (2004). Current science policies and their implications for the formation and maintenance of academic identity. Higher Education Policy, 17, 167-182.
20. Hofstede, G., & Hofstede, G. J. (2005). Cultures and organizations: Software of the mind. New York: McGraw-Hill.
21. Holland, C. P., & Lockett, A. G. (1998). Business trust and the formation of virtual organizations. 31st Annual Hawaii International Conference on System Sciences. IEEE 6: 602-610.
22. Jacob, M. (2000). 'Mode 2' in context: The Contract researcher, the university and the knowledge society. In M. Jacob & T. Hellstrom (Eds.), The future of knowledge production in the academy (pp. 11-27). Milton Keynes: Open University Press.
23. Jarvenpaa, S. L., & Leidner, D. E. (1999). Communication and trust in global virtual teams. Organization Science, 10, 791-815.
24. Lamb, R., & Davidson, E. (2004). Hybrid organization in high-tech enterprise., E-Global: 17th Bled e-Commerce Conference. Bled, Slovenia.
25. Leydesdorff, L., & Etzkowitz, H. (2001). The transformation of university-industry-government relations. Electronic Journal of Sociology. http://www. sociology. org/archive. html. Accessed 11 June 2008.
26. Liebeskind, J. P., & Oliver, A. L. (1998). From handshake to contract: Intellectual property, trust, and the social structure of academic research. In C. Lane & R. Bachmann (Eds.), Trust within and between organizations (pp. 118-145). New York: Oxford University Press.
27. Menard, C. (2004). The economics of hybrid organizations. Journal of Institutional and Theoretical Economics-JITE, 160, 345-376.
28. Merton, R. K., & Barber, E. (1976). Sociological ambivalence [originally published 1963]. In R. K. Merton (Ed.), Sociological ambivalence and other essays (pp. 3-31). New York: The Free Press.
29. Minkoff, D. C. (2002). The emergence of hybrid organizational forms: Combining identity-based service provision and political action. Nonprofit and Voluntary Sector Quarterly, 31, 377-401.
30. Nooteboom, B. (2000). Institutions and forms of co-ordination in innovation systems. Organization Studies, 21, 915-939.
31. Nowotny, H., Scott, P., & Gibbons, M. (2001). Re-thinking science: Knowledge and the public in an age of uncertainty. Cambridge, England: Polity.
32. Oster, S. M. (1994). Modern competitive analysis. New York: Oxford University Press.
33. Pelz, D. C., & Andrews, F. M. (1976). Scientists in organizations: productive climates for research and development (Revised Edition). Ann Arbor: Institute for Social Research, University of Michigan.
34. Rip, A. (2000). Fashions, lock-ins and the heterogeneity of knowledge production. In M. Jacob & T. Hellstrom (Eds.), The future of knowledge production in the academy (pp. 28-39). Milton Keynes: Open University Press.
35. Shove, E. (2000). Reciprocities and reputations: New currencies in research. In M. Jacob & T. Hellstrom (Eds.), The future of knowledge production in the academy (pp. 63-80). Milton Keynes: Open University Press.
36. Steenhuis, H.-J., & Gray, D. O. (2006). Cooperative research and technology dynamics: the role of research strategy development in NSF science and technology centres. International Journal of Technology Transfer and Commercialisation, 5, 56-78.
37. Turpin, T., & Garrett-Jones, S. (2000). Mapping the new cultures and organization of research in Australia. In P. Weingart & N. Stehr (Eds.), Practising interdisciplinarity (pp. 79-109). Toronto: Toronto University Press.
38. Turpin, T., Garrett-Jones, S., & Diment, K. (2005). Scientists, career choices and organizational change: Managing human resources in cross-sector R& D organizations. Journal of the Australian and New Zealand Academy of Management, 11, 13-26.
39. Ziman, J. (1991). Academic science as a system of markets. Higher Education Quarterly, 45, 41-61.