Characterizing creative scientists in nano-S&T: Productivity, multidisciplinarity, and network brokerage in a longitudinal perspective

Scientometrics

Volumn 70, Issue 3, 2007, Pages 811-830

  Heinze, Thomas ^a   Bauer, Gerrit ^b  

^a FRAUNHOFER INSTITUTE FOR SYSTEMS AND INNOVATION RESEARCH ISI   (Germany)

^b UNIVERSITY OF MANNHEIM   (Germany)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 33847346974     PISSN: 01389130     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1007/s11192-007-0313-3     Document Type: Article

References (20)

1. ALLISON, P. D., WATERMAN, R. P. (2002), Fixed-effects negative binominal regression models, Sociological Methodology, 32: 247-265.
2. AMABILE, T. M. (1996), Creativity in Context, Westview Press, Boulder, Colorado.
3. BORGATTI, S., EVERETT, M., FREEMAN, L. (2002), Ucinet 6 for Windows. Software for Social Network Analysis, Analytic Technologies, Natick.
4. BURT, R. S. (1992), Structural Holes. The Social Structure of Competition, Harvard University Press, London.
5. BURT, R. S. (2004), Structural holes and good ideas, American Journal of Sociology, 110: 349-399.
6. CROSS, R., CUMMINGS, J. N. (2004), Tie and network correlates of individual performance in knowledge-intensive work, Academy of Management Journal, 47: 928-937.
7. HEINZE, T. (2006), Die Kopplung von Wissenschaft und Wirtschaft. Das Beispiel der Nanotechnologie, Campus, Frankfurt/New York.
8. HEINZE, T., SHAPIRA, P., SENKER, J., KUHLMANN, S. (2007), Identifying creative research accomplishments: methodology and results for nanotechnology and human genetics, Scientometrics, 70: 125-152.
9. HEMLIN, S., ALLWOOD, C. M., MARTIN, B. R. (Eds) (2004), Creative Knowledge Environments. The Influences on Creativity in Research and Innovation, Cheltenham: Edward Elgar.
10. HOLLINGSWORTH, R. (2002), Research Organizations and Major Discoveries in Twenthieth-Century Science: A Case of Excellence in Biomedical Research., WZB Discussion Paper P02-003, Berlin.
11. HOLLINGSWORTH, R. (2004), Institutionalizing excellence in biomedical research: The case of Rockefeller University. In: D. H. STAPLETON (Ed.), Creating a Tradition of Biomedical Research. Contributions to the History of the Rockefeller University. Rockefeller University Press, pp. 17-63.
12. HULLMANN, A., MEYER, M. (2003), Publications and patents in nanotechnology. An overview of previous studies and the state of the art, Scientometrics, 58: 507-527.
13. LEE, S., BOZEMAN, B. (2005), The impact of research collaboration on scientific productivity, Social Studies of Science, 35: 673-702.
14. RODAN, S., GALUNIC, C. (2004), More than network structure: How knowledge heterogeneity influences managerial performance and innovativeness, Strategic Management Journal, 25: 541-562.
15. SIMONTON, D. K. (1999), Origins of Genius: Darwinian Perspectives on Creativity, Oxford University Press, New York.
16. SIMONTON, D. K. (2004), Creativity in Science: Chance, Logic, Genius, and Zeitgeist, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge.
17. STERNBERG, R. J. (2003), Wisdom, Intelligence, and Creativity Synthesized, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge.
18. STERNBERG, R. J., OHARA, L. A., LUBART, T. I. (1997), Creativity as investment, California Management Review, 40: 8-32.
19. WEINERT, F. E. (2000), Individuelle Kreativität und kollektives Ergebnis, Der Architekt. Zeitschrift des Bundes deutscher Architekten, 48: 24-31.
20. nd edition, Oxford University Press, Oxford.