The two faces of collaboration: Impacts of university-industry relations on public research

Industrial and Corporate Change

Volumn 18, Issue 6, 2009, Pages 1033-1065

  Perkmann, Markus ^a   Walsh, Kathryn ^b  

^a IMPERIAL COLLEGE LONDON   (United Kingdom)

^b LOUGHBOROUGH UNIVERSITY   (United Kingdom)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EDUCATION; INDUSTRIAL ENTERPRISE; KNOWLEDGE; RESEARCH; TECHNOLOGY POLICY;

EID: 76249095688     PISSN: 09606491     EISSN: 14643650     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1093/icc/dtp015     Document Type: Article

References (90)

1. Agrawal, A. and R.M. Henderson (2002), 'Putting patents in context: exploring knowledge transfer from MIT,' Management Science, 48(1), 44-60.
2. Agrawal, A. (2006), 'Engaging the inventor: exploring licensing strategies for university inventions and the role of latent knowledge,' Strategic Management Journal, 27(1), 63-79.
3. Arundel, A. and A. Geuna (2004), 'Proximity and the use of public science by innovative European firms,' Economics of Innovation and New Technology, 13(6), 559-580.
4. Azoulay, P., W. Ding and T. Stuart (2007), 'The determinants of faculty patenting behavior: demographics or opportunities?,' Journal of Economic Behavior and Organization, 63(4), 599-623.
5. Balconi, M., S. Breschi and F. Lissoni (2004), 'Networks of inventors and the role of academia: an exploration of Italian patent data,' Research Policy, 33(1), 127-145.
6. Balconi, M. and A. Laboranti (2006), 'University-industry interactions in applied research: the case of microelectronics,' Research Policy, 35(10), 1616-1630.
7. Behrens, T.R. and D.O. Gray (2001), 'Unintended consequences of cooperative research: impact of industry sponsorship on climate for academic freedom and other graduate student outcome,' Research Policy, 30(2), 179-199.
8. Bercovitz, J. and M. Feldman (2008), 'Academic entrepreneurs: organizational change at the individual level,' Organization Science, 19(1), 69-89.
9. Blumenthal, D., M. Gluck, K.S. Louis, M.A. Stoto and D. Wise (1986), 'University-industry research relationships in biotechnology - implications for the university,' Science, 232(4756), 1361-1366.
10. Blumenthal, D., E.G. Campbell, N. Causino and K.S. Louis (1996), 'Participation of life-science faculty in research relationships with industry,' New England Journal of Medicine, 335(23), 1734-1739.
11. Boyer, E.L. (1990). Scholarship reconsidered: Priorities of the professoriate. Princeton University Press, Princeton.
12. Breschi, S., F. Lissoni and F. Montobbio (2007), 'The scientific productivity of academic inventors: new evidence from Italian data,' Economics of Innovation and New Technology, 16(2), 101-118.
13. Brown, J.S. and P. Duguid (1991), 'Organizational learning and communities-of-practice: toward a unified view of working, learning, and innovation,' Organization Science, 2(1), 40-57.
14. Buenstorf, G. (2009), 'Is academic entrepreneurship good or bad for science? Individual-level evidence from the Max Planck Society,' Research Policy, 38(2), 281-292.
15. Calderini, M., C. Franzoni and A. Vezzulli (2007), 'If star scientists do not patent: the effect of productivity, basicness and impact on the decision to patent in the academic world,' Research Policy, 36(3), 303-319.
16. Carayol, N. (2007), 'Academic incentives, research organization and patenting at a large French university,' Economics of Innovation and New Technology, 16(2), 119-138.
17. Clark, B.R. (1998), Creating Entrepreneurial Universities: Organizational Pathways of Transformation. Pergamon: New York; Oxford.
18. Cockburn, I.M. and R.M. Henderson (1998), 'Absorptive capacity, coauthoring behavior, and the organization of research in drug discovery,' Journal of Industrial Economics, 46(2), 157-182.
19. Cohen, W.M., R.R. Nelson and J.P. Walsh (2002), 'Links and impacts: the influence of public research on industrial R&D,' Management Science, 48(1), 1-23.
20. Colyvas, J.A. (2007), 'From divergent meanings to common practices: the early institutionalization of technology transfer in the life sciences at Stanford University,' Research Policy, 36(4), 456-476.
21. Cowan, R., P.A. David and D. Foray (2000), 'The explicit economics of knowledge codification and tacitness,' Industrial & Corporate Change, 9(2), 211-253.
22. Czarnitzki, D., W. Glänzel and K. Hussinger (2009), 'Heterogeneity of patenting activity and its implications for scientific research,' Research Policy, 38(1), 26-34.
23. D'Este, P. and P. Patel (2007), 'University-industry linkages in the UK: what are the factors determining the variety of interactions with industry?,' Research Policy, 36(9), 1295-1313.
24. Dosi, G., P. Llerena and M.S. Labini (2006), 'The relationships between science, technologies and their industrial exploitation: an illustration through the myths and realities of the so-called 'European Paradox,' Research Policy, 35(10), 1450-1464.
25. Eisenhardt, K.M. (1989), 'Building theories from case study research,' The Academy of Management Review, 14(4), 532-550.
26. Elsbach, K.D. and R.M. Kramer (2003), 'Assessing creativity in Hollywood pitch meetings: evidence for a dual-process model of creativity judgments,' Academy of Management Journal, 46(3), 283-301.
27. Etzkowitz, H. (2003), 'Research groups as 'quasi-firms': the invention of the entrepreneurial university,' Research Policy, 32(1), 109-121.
28. Faulkner, W. and J. Senker (1994), 'Making sense of diversity: public-private sector research linkage in three technologies,' Research Policy, 23(6), 673-695.
29. Feller, I. (2005), 'A historical perspective on government-university partnerships to enhance entrepreneurship and economic development,' in S. Shane (ed.), Economic Development Through Entrepreneurship: Government, University and Business Linkages. Edward Elgar: Cheltenham, pp. 6-28.
30. Florida, R. (1999), 'The role of the university: leveraging talent, not technology,' Issues in Science and Technology, 15(4), 67-73.
31. Florida, R. and W.M. Cohen (1999), 'Engine or infrastructure? The university role in economic development,' in L.M. Branscomb, F. Kodama and R. Florida (eds), Industrializing Knowledge: University-industry Linkages in Japan and the United States. MIT Press: Massachusetts, pp. 589-610.
32. Geuna, A. (2001), 'The changing rationale for European university research funding: are there negative unintended consequences?,' Journal of Economic Issues, 35(3), 607-632.
33. Geuna, A. and L.J.J. Nesta (2006), 'University patenting and its effects on academic research: the emerging European evidence,' Research Policy, 35(6), 790-807.
34. Gibbons, M. and R. Johnston (1974), 'The roles of science in technological innovation,' Research Policy, 3(3), 220-242.
35. Goldfarb, B. (2008), 'The effect of government contracting on academic research: does the source of funding affect scientific output,' Research Policy, 37(1), 41-58.
36. Gulati, R. and H. Singh (1998), 'The architecture of cooperation: managing coordination costs and appropriation concerns in strategic alliances,' Administrative Science Quarterly, 43(4), 781-814.
37. Gulbrandsen, M. and J.C. Smeby (2005), 'Industry funding and university professors' research performance,' Research Policy, 34(6), 932-950.
38. Hall, B.H., A.N. Link and J.T. Scott (2001), 'Barriers inhibiting industry from partnering with universities: evidence from the Advanced Technology Program,' The Journal of Technology Transfer, 26(1), 87-98.
39. Hamel, G. (1991), 'Competition for competence and interpartner learning within international strategic alliances,' Strategic Management Journal, 12(Summer), 83-103.
40. Jong, S. (2006), 'How organizational structures in science shape spin-off firms: the biochemistry departments of Berkeley, Stanford, and UCSF and the birth of the biotech industry,' Industrial and Corporate Change, 15(2), 251-283.
41. Klevorick, A.K., R.C. Levin, R.R. Nelson and S.G. Winter (1995), 'On the sources and significance of interindustry differences in technological opportunities,' Research Policy, 24(2), 185-205.
42. Kreiner, K. and M. Schultz (1993), 'Informal collaboration in R&D. The formation of networks across organizations,' Organization Studies, 14(2), 189-209.
43. Krimsky, S. (2003), Science in the Private Interest: has the Lure of profits Corrupted the Virtue of Biomedical Research? Rowman & Littlefield: Lanham.
44. Larsson, R., L. Bengtsson, K. Henriksson and J. Sparks (1998), 'The interorganizational learning dilemma: collective knowledge development in strategic alliances,' Organization Science, 9(3), 285-305.
45. Lenoir, T. (1997), Instituting Science: the Cultural Production of Scientific Disciplines. Stanford University Press: Stanford, CA.
46. Liebeskind, J.P., A.L. Oliver, L. Zucker and M. Brewer (1996), 'Social networks, learning, and flexibility: sourcing scientific knowledge in new biotechnology firms,' Organization Science, 7(4), 428-443.
47. Link, A.N., D.S. Siegel and B. Bozeman (2007), 'An empirical analysis of the propensity of academics to engage in informal university technology transfer,' Industrial and Corporate Change, 16(4), 641-655.
48. Louis Seashore, K., D. Blumenthal M. Gluck and M.A. Stoto (1989), 'Entrepreneurs in academe: an exploration of behaviors among life scientists,' Administrative Science Quarterly, 34(1), 110-131.
49. Lowe, R. and C. Gonzalez-Brambila (2007), 'Faculty entrepreneurs and research productivity,' Journal of Technology Transfer, 32(3), 173-194.
50. Mansfield, E. (1991), 'Academic research and industrial innovation,' Research Policy, 20, 1-12.
51. Mansfield, E. (1995), 'Academic research underlying industrial innovations: sources, characteristics, and financing,' Review of Economics and Statistics, 77(1), 55-65.
52. March, J.G. (1991), 'Exploration and exploitation in organizational learning,' Organization Science, 2(1), 71-87.
53. Merton, R.K. (1973), The Sociology of Science. Theoretical and Empirical Investigations. University of Chicago Press: Chicago, London.
54. Meyer-Krahmer, F. and U. Schmoch (1998), 'Science-based technologies: university-industry interactions in four fields,' Research Policy, 27(8), 835-851.
55. Miles, M.B. and A.M. Huberman (1994), Qualitative Data Analysis: an Expanded Sourcebook. Sage: Thousand Oaks.
56. Milgrom, P. and J. Roberts (1990), 'Rationalizability, learning, and equilibrium in games with strategic complementarities,' Econometrica, 58(6), 1255-1277.
57. Miller, C.C., L.B. Cardinal and W.H. Glick (1997), 'Retrospective reports in organizational research: a reexamination of recent evidence,' Academy of Management Journal, 40(1), 189-204.
58. Mowery, D.C. and B.N. Sampat (2004), 'The Bayh-Dole Act of 1980 and university-industry technology transfer: a model for other OECD governments?,' The Journal of Technology Transfer, 30(1), 115-127.
59. Murray, F. (2002), 'Innovation as co-evolution of scientific and technological networks: exploring tissue engineering,' Research Policy, 31(8,9), 1389-1403.
60. Nelson, A.J. (2005), 'Cacophony or harmony? Multivocal logics and technology licensing by the Stanford University Department of Music,' Industrial and Corporate Change, 14(1), 93-118.
61. Nelson, R.R. (2004), 'The market economy, and the scientific commons,' Research Policy, 33(3), 455-471.
62. Nightingale, P. (1998), 'A cognitive model of innovation,' Research Policy, 27(7), 689-709.
63. Noble, D.F. (1977), America by Design: Science, Technology, and the Rise of Corporate Capitalism. 1st edn. Knopf: New York.
64. Nooteboom, B. (2004), Inter-firm Collaboration, Learning and Networks: an Integrated Approach. 1st edn. Routledge: London.
65. Owen-Smith, J. (2003), 'From separate systems to a hybrid order: accumulative advantage across public and private science at Research One universities,' Research Policy, 32(6), 1081-1104.
66. Pavitt, K. (2001), 'Public policies to support basic research: what can the rest of the world learn from US theory and practice? (And what they should not learn),' Industrial & Corporate Change, 10(3), 761.
67. Perkmann, M. and K. Walsh (2007), 'University-industry relationships and open innovation: towards a research agenda,' International Journal of Management Reviews, 9(4), 259-280.
68. Perkmann, M. and K. Walsh (2008), 'Engaging the scholar: three forms of academic consulting and their impact on universities and industry,' Research Policy, 37(10), 1884-1891.
69. Phan, P.H. and D.S. Siegel (2006), 'The effectiveness of university technology transfer: lessons learned from qualitative and quantitative research in the US and UK,' Foundations and Trends in Entrepreneurship, 2(2), 66-144.
70. Polanyi, M. (1958), Personal Knowledge: Towards a Post-critical Philosophy. Routledge: London.
71. Rebne, D. (1989), 'Faculty consulting and scientific knowledge - a traditional university-industry linkage,' Educational Administration Quarterly, 25(4), 338-357.
72. Rosenberg, N. (1982), Inside the Black Box: Technology and Economics. Cambridge University Press: Cambridge.
73. Rosenberg, N. and R.R. Nelson (1994), 'American universities and technical advance in industry,' Research Policy, 23(3), 323-348.
74. Rothaermel, F.T., S. Agung and L. Jiang (2007), 'University entrepreneurship: a taxonomy of the literature,' Industrial and Corporate Change, 16(4), 691-791.
75. Salter, A.J. and B.R. Martin (2001), 'The economic benefits of publicly funded basic research: a critical review,' Research Policy, 30(3), 509-532.
76. Schartinger, D., C. Rammer, M.M. Fischer and J. Fröhlich (2002), 'Knowledge interactions between universities and industry in Austria: sectoral patterns and determinants,' Research Policy, 31(3), 303-328.
77. Senker, J. (1995), 'Tacit knowledge and models of innovation,' Industrial and Corporate Change, 4(2), 425-447.
78. Shane, S.A. (2004), Academic Entrepreneurship: University Spinoffs and Wealth Creation. Edward Elgar: Cheltenham.
79. Shinn, T. and E. Lamy (2006), 'Paths of commercial knowledge: forms and consequences of university-enterprise synergy in scientist-sponsored firms,' Research Policy, 35(10), 1465-1476.
80. Siegel, D.S., M. Wright and A. Lockett (2007), 'The rise of entrepreneurial activity at universities: organizational and societal implications,' Industrial and Corporate Change, 16(4), 489-504.
81. Simon, H.A. (1969), The Sciences of the Artificial. MIT Press: Cambridge.
82. Slaughter, S. and L.L. Leslie (1997), Academic Capitalism: Politics, Policies and the Entrepreneurial University. Johns Hopkins University Press: Baltimore, MD.
83. Stephan, P.E. (2007), 'Who's patenting in the university? Evidence from the survey of doctorate recipients,' Economics of Innovation and New Technology, 16(2), 71-99.
84. Van De Ven, A.H. and P.E. Johnson (2006), 'Knowledge for theory and practice,' Academy of Management Review, 31(4), 802-821.
85. Van Looy, B., J. Callaert and K. Debackere (2006), 'Publication and patent behavior of academic researchers: conflicting, reinforcing or merely co-existing?,' Research Policy, 35(4), 596-608.
86. Vincenti, W.G. (1990), What Engineers Know and How they Know it: Analytical Studies from Aeronautical History. Johns Hopkins University Press: Baltimore.
87. Weingart, P. (1997), 'From "finalization' to 'mode 2" : old wine in new bottles?,' Social Science Information, 36(4), 591-613.
88. Zucker, L.G. and M.R. Darby (1996), 'Star scientists and institutional transformation: patterns of invention and innovation in the formation of the biotechnology industry,' Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 93(23), 12709-12716.
89. Zucker, L.G., M.R. Darby and J. Armstrong (1998), 'Geographically localized knowledge: spillovers or markets?,' Economic Inquiry, 36(1), 65-86.
90. Zucker, L.G., M.R. Darby and J.S. Armstrong (2002), 'Commercializing knowledge: university science, knowledge capture, and firm performance in biotechnology,' Management Science, 48(1), 138-153.