Influencing scientists' collaboration and productivity patterns through new institutions: University research centers and scientific and technical human capital

Research Policy

Volumn 39, Issue 5, 2010, Pages 613-624

  Ponomariov, Branco L ^a   Boardman, P Craig ^b  

^a UNIVERSITY OF TEXAS AT SAN ANTONIO   (United States)

^b OHIO STATE UNIVERSITY   (United States)

Author keywords

Bibliometrics; Research collaboration; Science and technology policy; University research center

Indexed keywords

ACADEMIC DEPARTMENT; BIBLIOMETRICS; COLLABORATION PATTERNS; GOVERNMENT LABORATORIES; POLICY ANALYSIS; RESEARCH COLLABORATIONS; SCIENCE AND TECHNOLOGY POLICY; SCIENTISTS AND ENGINEERS; TECHNICAL CAPACITY; TECHNICAL DEMANDS; TECHNICAL HUMAN CAPITAL; UNIVERSITY RESEARCH; UNIVERSITY RESEARCHERS;

PRODUCTIVITY; SOCIETIES AND INSTITUTIONS;

RESEARCH;

EID: 77951207720     PISSN: 00487333     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.respol.2010.02.013     Document Type: Article

References (46)

1. Agranoff R., and McGuire M. Big questions in public network management research. Journal Of Public Administration Research And Theory 11 3 (2001) 295-326
2. Aldrich H., and Herker D. Boundary spanning roles and organization structure. The Academy of Management Review 2 2 (1977) 217-230
3. Arreola, R.A., Theall, M., Aleamoni, L.M., 2003. Beyond scholarship: recognizing the multiple roles of the professoriate. Paper presented at the Annual meeting of the American Educational Research Association.
4. Baldini N. Negative effects of university patenting: myths and grounded evidence. Scientometrics 75 2 (2008) 289-311
5. Barlow D., and Hensen M. Single Case Experimental Designs: Strategies for Studying Behavior Change (1984), Pergamon, New York
6. Boardman C. Government centrality to university-industry interactions: university research centers and the industry involvement of academic researchers. Research Policy 38 (2009) 1505-1516
7. Boardman C., and Bozeman B. Role strain in university research centers. The Journal of Higher Education 78 4 (2007) 430-463
8. Boardman P.C., and Corley E. University research centers and the composition of research collaboration. Research Policy 37 5 (2008) 900-913
9. Bozeman B., and Boardman P.C. Managing the New Multipurpose, Multidiscipline University Research Center: Institutional Innovation in the Academic Community (2003), IBM Endowment for the Business of Government, Washington, DC
10. Bozeman B., and Boardman P.C. The NSF engineering research centers and the uiversity-industry research revolution. The Journal of Technology Transfer 29 3-4 (2004) 365-375
11. Bozeman B., and Corley E. Scientists' collaboration strategies: implications for scientific and technical human capital. Research Policy 33 4 (2004) 599-616
12. Bozeman B., Dietz J., and Gaughan M. Scientific and technical human capital: an alternative model for research evaluation. International Journal of Technology Management 22 7/8 (2001) 636-655
13. Campbell D.T., and Stanley J.C. Experimental and Quasiexperimental Designs for Research (1963), Houghton Mifflin Company, Boston
14. Carnegie Foundation for the Advancement of Teaching, 2004. The Carnegie Classification of Institutions of Higher Education, 2000 Edition from http://www.carnegiefoundation.org/Classification/downloads/cc2000-public .xls.
15. Corley E., Boardman P.C., and Bozeman B. Design and the management of multi-institutional research collaborations: theoretical Implications from two case studies. Research Policy 35 7 (2006) 975-993
16. Dai Y., Popp D., and Bretschneider S. Institutions and intellectual property: the influence of institutional forces on university patenting. Journal of Policy Analysis and management 24 3 (2001) 579-598
17. Dietz J.S., and Bozeman B. Academic careers, patents, and productivity industry experience as scientific and technical human capital. Research Policy 34 3 (2005) 349-367
18. Feller I., Ailes C.P., and Roessner J.D. Impacts of research universities on technological innovation in industry: evidence from engineering research centers. Research Policy 31 3 (2002) 457-474
19. Ferron J., and Scott H. Multiple Baseline Design. In: Everitt B., and Howell D. (Eds). Encyclopedia of Statistics in Behavioral Science Vol.2 (2005), Wiley, Hoboken, NJ 941-945
20. Gaughan M., and Robin S. National science training policy and early scientific careers in France and the United States. Research Policy 33 4 (2004) 569-581
21. Geisler E. Key output indicators in performance evaluation of research-and-development organizations. Technological Forecasting and Social Change 47 2 (1994) 189-203
22. Georghiou L., and Roessner D. Evaluating technology programs: tools and methods. Research Policy 29 4-5 (2000) 657-678
23. Gray D., Lindblad M., and Rudolph J. Industry-University Research Centers: A Multivariate Analysis of Member Retention. The Journal of Technology Transfer 26 3 (2001) 247-254
24. Ikenberry S., and Friedman R.C. Beyond Academic Departments (1972), Jossey-Bass, London
25. Katz J.S., and Martin B.R. What is research collaboration?. Research Policy 26 1 (1997) 1-18
26. Lal B., Boardman P.C., Deshmuck-Towery N., and Link J. Designing the Future Generation of NSF Engineering Research Centers: Insights from Worldwide Practice (2007), Science and Technology Policy Institute, Washington, DC
27. Landry R., and Amara N. The impact of transaction costs on the institutional structuration of collaborative academic research. Research Policy 27 9 (1998) 901-913
28. Lee S., and Bozeman B. The effects of scientific collaboration on productivity. Social Studies of Science 35 5 (2005) 673-702
29. Lin M.-W., and Bozeman B. Researchers' industry experience and productivity in university-industry research centers: a "scientific and technical human capital" explanation. Journal of Technology Transfer 31 2 (2006) 269-290
30. MAE. eight Year Annual Report: Volume 1. Plans, Programs, Infrastructure and Budget (2005), University of Illinois at Urbana Champaign, Urbana-Champaign, IL
31. Melin G. Pragmatism and self-organization-research collaboration on the individual level. Research Policy 29 1 (2000) 31-40
32. Melin G. Pragmatism and self-organization: research collaboration on the individual level. Research Policy 29 (2000) 31-40
33. Meyer J.W., and Rowan B. Institutionalized organizations: formal structure as myth and ceremony. American Journal of Sociology 83 2 (1977) 340-363
34. National Academy of Science. Rising Above the Gathering Storm: Energising and Employing America for a Brighter Economic Ruture (2007), National Academies Press, Washington, D.C
35. Ponomariov B.L., and Boardman P.C. The effect of informal industry contacts on the time university scientists allocate to collaborative research with industry. The Journal of Technology Transfer 33 3 (2008) 301-313
36. Porter A., and Cunningham S. Tech Mining: Exploiting Technologies for Competitive Advantage (2005), Wiley, New York
37. Porter A.L., Cohen A., Roessner D., and Perreault M. Measuring researcher interdisciplinarity. Scientometrics 72 1 (2007) 117-147
38. Slaughter S., and Rhoades G. The emergence of a competitiveness research and development policy coalition and the commercialization of academic science and technology. Science Technology and Human Values 21 3 (1996) 303-339
39. Stake R. The Art of Case Study Research (1995), SAGE, Thousand Oaks, CA
40. Stokols D., Hall J., Taylor B., and Moser R. The science of team science: overview of the field and introduction to the supplement. American Journal of Preventative Medicine 35 2S (2008) 77-89
41. Suh N.P. The Concept and Goals of the Engineering Research Centers The New Engineering Research Centers: Purposes, Goals, and Expectations (1986), National Academy Press, Washington, DC 37-43
42. Toker U., and Gray D. Innovation spaces: workspace planning and innovation in US university research centers. Research Policy 37 2 (2008) 309-329
43. van Raan A.F.J. Advanced bibliometric methods as quantitative core of peer review based evaluation and foresight exercises. Scientometrics 36 (1996) 397-420
44. Van Rijnsoever F., Hessels L., and Vandeberg R. A resource-based view on the interactions of university researchers. Research Policy 37 (2008) 1255-1266
45. Yin R.K. Case Study Research: Design and Methods: (2003), SAGE Publications
46. Zucker L.G., Darby M.R., Furner J., Liu R.C., and Ma H.Y. Minerva unbound: knowledge stocks, knowledge flows and new knowledge production. Research Policy 36 6 (2007) 850-863