Student feedback systems in higher education: A focused literature review and environmental scan

Quality in Higher Education

Volumn 18, Issue 3, 2012, Pages 261-280

  Alderman, Lyn ^a   Towers, Stephen ^a   Bannah, Sylvia ^a  

^a QUEENSLAND UNIVERSITY OF TECHNOLOGY   (Australia)

Author keywords

evaluation; higher education; pedagogy; quality; student feedback; surveys; teaching

Indexed keywords

EID: 84867548588     PISSN: 13538322     EISSN: 14701081     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1080/13538322.2012.730714     Document Type: Review

References (103)

1. Abrami, P.C. 1985. Dimensions of effective college instruction. Review of Higher Education, 8(3): 211-228.
2. Abrami, P.C., Rosenfeld, S. and Dedic, H. 2007. "The dimensionality of student ratings of instruction: an update on what we know, do not know, and need to do". In The Scholarship of Teaching and Learning in Higher Education: An evidence-based approach, Edited by: Perry, R.P. and Smart, J.C. Dordrecht: Springer.
3. Alderman, L. 2011. Feedback on the Learning Experience Survey (LEX), Brisbane: Queensland University of Technology.
4. Algozzine, B., Beattie, J., Bray, M., Flowers, C., Gretes, J., Howley, L., Mohanty, G. and Spooner, F. 2004. Student evaluation of college teaching: a practice in search of principles. College Teaching, 52(4): 134-141.
5. Ardalan, A., Ardalan, R., Coppage, S. and Crouch, W. 2007. A comparison of student feedback obtained through paper-based and web-based surveys of faculty teaching. British Journal of Educational Technology, 38(6): 1085-1101.
6. Arthur, L. 2009. From performativity to professionalism: lecturers' responses to student feedback. Teaching in Higher Education, 14(4): 441-454.
7. Australian Council for Educational Research (ACER). 2010. Doing More for Learning: Enhancing engagement and outcomes, Camberwell: ACER.
8. Australian Council for Educational Research (ACER), 2011, AUSSE. Available online at http://ausse.acer.edu.au (accessed 5 April 2011).
9. Australian Universities Quality Agency (AUQA). 2002. Report of an Audit of Australian Catholic University, Melbourne: AUQA.
10. Australian Universities Quality Agency (AUQA). 2004. Report of an Audit of The University of Western Australia, Melbourne: AUQA.
11. Ballantyne, C., 2004, 'Online or on paper: an examination of the differences in response and respondents to a survey administered in two modes', paper presented at the Australasian Evaluation Society Annual Conference, Adelaide, 13-15 October.
12. Barrie, S. and Ginns, P. 2007. The linking of national teaching performance indicators to improvements in teaching and learning in classrooms. Quality in Higher Education, 13(3): 275-286.
13. Barrie, S., Ginns, P. and Symons, R. 2008. Student Surveys on Teaching and Learning: Final report, Surry Hills: Australian Learning and Teaching Council.
14. Bennett, L. & Nair, C.S., 2008, 'Survey fatigue: myth or reality?', paper presented at the Australian Universities Quality Forum, Canberra, 9-11 July.
15. Bennett, L. and Nair, C.S. 2010. A recipe for effective participation rates for web-based surveys. Assessment and Evaluation in Higher Education, 35(4): 357-365.
16. Bennett, L. and Nair, C.S. 2011. "Web-based or paper-based surveys: a quandry?". In Student Feedback: The cornerstone to an effective quality assurance system in higher education, Edited by: Nair, C.S. and Mertova, P. Oxford: Chandos.
17. Berk, R.A. 2005. Survey of 12 strategies to measure teaching effectiveness. International Journal of Teaching & Learning in Higher Education, 17(1): 48-62.
18. Brew, A. and Ginns, P. 2008. The relationship between engagement in the scholarship of teaching and learning and students' course experiences. Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education, 33(5): 535-545.
19. Brookes, M., Boyle, R., Braithwaite, R., Mustard, J., Saundage, D. & Short, H., 2008, 'Investigating sample bias in student evaluations of teaching', paper presented at the Sixth Australian Conference on Teaching Statistics, Melbourne, 3-4 July.
20. Buchanan, J. 2011. Quality teaching: means for its enhancement?. Australian Universities Review, 53(1): 66-72.
21. Chalmers, D. 2007. A Review of Australian and International Quality Systems and Indicators of Learning and Teaching, Chippendale: Carrick Institute for Learning and Teaching in Higher Education.
22. Chalmers, D. 2011. "Student feedback in the Australian national and university context". In Student Feedback: The cornerstone to an effective quality assurance system in higher education, Edited by: Nair, C.S. and Mertova, P. Oxford: Chandos.
23. Coates, H. 2005. The value of student engagement for higher education quality assurance. Quality in Higher Education, 11(1): 25-36.
24. Coates, H. 2010. Development of the Australasian Survey of Student Engagement (AUSSE). Higher Education, 60(1): 1-17.
25. Coates, H. 2011. "Tools for effective student feedback". In Student Feedback: The cornerstone to an effective quality assurance system in higher education, Edited by: Nair, C.S. and Mertova, P. Oxford: Chandos.
26. Collings, D. & Ballantyne, C., 2004, 'Online student survey comments: a qualitative improvement?', paper presented at the 2004 Evaluation Forum, Melbourne, 24-25 November.
27. Curtin University, eVALUate. Available online at http://evaluate.curtin.edu.au/ (accessed 5 September 2011).
28. Darwin, S., 2011, 'Moving beyond face value: re-envisioning higher education evaluation as a generator of professional knowledge', Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education, iFirst article, pp. 1-13. Available online at: http://www.tandfonline.com/doi/abs/10.1080/02602938.2011.565114 (accessed 24 January 2012).
29. Davies, M. 2010. Paper on Student Surveys, Melbourne: University of Melbourne.
30. Davies, M., Hirschberg, J., Lye, J. and Johnston, C. 2007. An Analysis of the Questions on University Teaching Surveys and the Universities That Use Them: The Australian experience, Melbourne: Department of Economics University of Melbourne.
31. Davies, M., Hirschberg, J., Lye, J. and Johnston, C. 2010. A systematic analysis of quality of teaching surveys. Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education, 35(1): 83-96.
32. Davies, M., Hirschberg, J., Lye, J., Johnston, C. and McDonald, I. 2007. Systematic influences on teaching evaluations: the case for caution. Australian Economic Papers, 46(1): 18-38.
33. Denson, N., Loveday, T. and Dalton, H. 2010. Student evaluation of courses: what predicts satisfaction?. Higher Education Research & Development, 29(4): 339-356.
34. Department of Education Employment and Workplace Relations (DEEWR), 2010, Compacts and Performance Funding Overview. Available online at: http://www.deewr.gov.au/HigherEducation/Policy/Documents/PerformanceFundingOverview.pdf (accessed 5 April 2011).
35. Department of Education Employment and Workplace Relations (DEEWR), 2011a, Education Investment Fund: Advancing quality in higher education. Available online at: http://www.deewr.gov.au/HigherEducation/Policy/Pages/AdvancingQuality.aspx (accessed 12 September 2011).
36. Department of Education Employment and Workplace Relations (DEEWR), 2011b, University Experience Survey: Design consultation paper. Available online at: http://www.deewr.gov.au/HigherEducation/Policy/Documents/University_Experience_Survey.pdf (accessed 7 July 2011).
37. Department of Education Science and Training (DEST). 2004. Learning and Teaching Performance Fund: Issues paper, Canberra: DEST.
38. Dommeyer, C.J., Baum, P., Hanna, R.W. and Chapman, K.S. 2004. Gathering faculty teaching evaluations by in-class and online surveys: their effects on response rates and evaluations. Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education, 29(5): 611-623.
39. Driscoll, J. and Cadden, D. 2010. Student evaluation instruments: the interactive impact of course requirement, student level, department and anticipated grade. American Journal of Business Education, 3(5): 21-30.
40. Edström, K. 2008. Doing course evaluation as if learning matters most. Higher Education Research & Development, 27(2): 95-106.
41. Ertl, H. and Wright, S. 2008. Teaching and learning in higher education: what does the literature tell us?. London Review of Education, 6(3): 193-194.
42. Feldman, K.A. 1978. Course characteristics and college students' ratings of their teachers: what we know and what we don't. Research in Higher Education, 9(3): 199-242.
43. Ginns, P. and Barrie, S. 2009. Developing and testing a student-focussed teaching evaluation survey for university instructors. Psychological Reports, 104(3): 1019-1032.
44. Ginns, P., Prosser, M. and Barrie, S. 2007. Students' perceptions of teaching quality in higher education: the perspective of currently enrolled students. Studies in Higher Education, 32(5): 603-615.
45. Graduate Careers Australia (GCA), 2011, Australian Graduate Survey. Available online at: http://www.graduatecareers.com.au/Research/Surveys/AustralianGraduateSurvey/index.htm (accessed 5 April 2011).
46. Griffin, P., Coates, H., McInnis, C. and James, R. 2003. The development of an extended Course Experience Questionnaire. Quality in Higher Education, 9(3): 259-266.
47. Hagel, P., Carr, R. & Devlin, M., 2011, 'Conceptualising and measuring student engagement through the Australasian Survey of Student Engagement (AUSSE): a critique', Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education, iFirst article, pp. 1-12. Available online at: http://www.informaworld.com/10.1080/02602938.2010.545870 (accessed 24 July 2011).
48. Harvey, L. 1997. Student Satisfaction Manual, Buckingham: Open University Press.
49. Harvey, L. 2001. Student Feedback: A report to the Higher Education Funding Council for England, Birmingham: University of Central England in Birmingham.
50. Harvey, L. 2003. Student feedback. Quality in Higher Education, 9(1): 1-20.
51. Harvey, L. 2011. "The nexus of feedback and improvement". In Student Feedback: The cornerstone to an effective quality assurance system in higher education, Edited by: Nair, C.S. and Mertova, P. Oxford: Chandos.
52. Kane, D., Williams, J. and Cappuccini-Ansfield, G. 2008. Student satisfaction surveys: the value in taking an historical perspective. Quality in Higher Education, 14(2): 135-155.
53. Kember, D. and Leung, D.Y.P. 2008. Establishing the validity and reliability of course evaluation questionnaires. Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education, 33(4): 341-353.
54. Laguilles, J., Williams, E. and Saunders, D. 2011. Can lottery incentives boost web survey response rates? Findings from four experiments. Research in Higher Education, 52(5): 537-553.
55. Leckey, J. and Neill, N. 2001. Quantifying quality: the importance of student feedback. Quality in Higher Education, 7(1): 19-32.
56. Lee, A. 2007, 'From teaching to learning: leading change at a large research-intensive university: a personal reflection'. Available online at: http://www.guidelinesonlearning.com/index (accessed 24 August 2011).
57. Linke, R.D. 1991. Performance Indicators in Higher Education: Report of a trial evaluation study commissioned by the Commonwealth Department of Employment, Education and Training, Canberra: Australian Government Publishing Service.
58. Marsh, H.W. 1982. Validity of students' evaluations of college teaching: a multitrait-multimethod analysis. Journal of Educational Psychology, 74(2): 264-279.
59. Marsh, H.W. 1987. Students' evaluations of university teaching: research findings, methodological issues, and directions for future research. International Journal of Educational Research, 11(3): 253-388.
60. Marsh, H.W. 2007. "Students' evaluations of university teaching: dimensionality, reliability, validity, potential biases and usefulness". In The Scholarship of Teaching and Learning in Higher Education: An evidence-based approach, Edited by: Perry, R.P. and Smart, J.C. Dordrecht: Springer.
61. Nair, C.S., Adams, P. and Mertova, P. 2008. Student engagement: the key to improving survey response rates. Quality in Higher Education, 14(3): 225-232.
62. Nair, C.S., Adams, P. and Mertova, P. 2009. Issues concerning the delivery of surveys: an institutional view. Evaluation Journal of Australasia, 9(2): 33-38.
63. Nulty, D.D. 2008. The adequacy of response rates to online and paper surveys: what can be done?. Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education, 33(3): 301-314.
64. Oliver, B., Tucker, B. & Pegden, J.A., 2007, 'An investigation into student comment behaviours: who comments, what do they say, and do anonymous students behave badly?', paper presented at the Australian Universities Quality Forum, Hobart, 11-13 July.
65. Oliver, B., Tucker, B., Gupta, R. and Yeo, S. 2008. eVALUate: an evaluation instrument for measuring students' perceptions of their engagement and learning outcomes. Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education, 33(6): 619-630.
66. Palermo, J., 2004a, Benchmarking Student Feedback Across the ATN: A Quality Improvement Group project. Available online at: http://dro.deakin.edu.au/view/DU:30028753 (accessed 24 September 2011).
67. Palermo, J., 2004b, 'Closing the loop on student evaluations', paper presented at the Australasian Association for Institutional Research Conference, Hobart, 26-29 September.
68. Porter, S.R. 2004a. Pros and cons of paper and electronic surveys. New Directions for Institutional Research, 121: 91-97.
69. Porter, S.R. 2004b. Raising response rates: what works?. New Directions for Institutional Research, 121: 5-21.
70. Porter, S.R. and Whitcomb, M.E. 2004. Understanding the effect of prizes on response rates. New Directions for Institutional Research, 121: 51-61.
71. Porter, S.R., Whitcomb, M.E. and Weitzer, W.H. 2004. Multiple surveys of students and survey fatigue. New Directions for Institutional Research, 121: 63-73.
72. Pounder, J.S. 2007. Is student evaluation of teaching worthwhile? An analytical framework for answering the question. Quality Assurance in Education, 15(2): 178-191.
73. Queensland University of Technology (QUT). 2010. Submission to Vice-Chancellor's Advisory Group, Brisbane: Queensland University of Technology.
74. Queensland University of Technology (QUT), 2011a, '2011 Performance Model'. Available online at: http://www.ltu.qut.edu.au/curriculum/coursequalit/cycle/icr/model.jsp (accessed 29 August 2011).
75. Queensland University of Technology (QUT), 2011b, 'Learning and teaching protocols and guidelines'. Available online at: http://www.ltu.qut.edu.au/curriculum/protocols.jsp (accessed 13 September 2011).
76. Queensland University of Technology (QUT), 2011c, Manual of Policies and Procedures. Available online at: http://www.mopp.qut.edu.au/ (accessed 24 January 2012).
77. Ramsden, P., 2003, 'Student surveys and quality assurance', paper presented at the Australian Universities Quality Forum, Melbourne, 11-13 June.
78. Richardson, J.T.E. 2005. Instruments for obtaining student feedback: a review of the literature. Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education, 30(4): 387-415.
79. Roszkowski, M.J. and Soven, M. 2010. Shifting gears: consequences of including two negatively worded items in the middle of a positively worded questionnaire. Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education, 35(1): 113-130.
80. Schuck, S., Gordon, S. and Buchanan, J. 2008. What are we missing here? Problematising wisdoms on teaching quality and professionalism in higher education. Teaching in Higher Education, 13(5): 537-547.
81. Smith, C. 2008a. Building effectiveness in teaching through targeted evaluation and response: connecting evaluation to teaching improvement in higher education. Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education, 33(5): 517-533.
82. Smith, C. 2008b. Design-focused evaluation. Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education, 33(6): 631-645.
83. Spooren, P. and Mortelmans, D. 2006. Teacher professionalism and student evaluation of teaching: will better teachers receive higher ratings and will better students give higher ratings?. Educational Studies, 32(2): 201-214.
84. Spooren, P., Mortelmans, D. and Denekens, J. 2007. Student evaluation of teaching quality in higher education: development of an instrument based on 10 Likert-scales. Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education, 32(6): 667-679.
85. Sproule, R., 2000, 'Student evaluation of teaching: a methodological critique of conventional practices', Education Policy Analysis Archives, 8(50). Available online at: http://epaa.asu.edu/ojs/article/view/441 (accessed 24 January 2012).
86. Swinburne University of Technology, 2011, Student feedback survey (SFS). Available online at: http://www.swinburne.edu.au/corporate/spq/survey/SFSurvey.htm (accessed 10 January 2012).
87. The Good Universities Guide, 2010, (Melbourne, Hobsons).
88. Theall, M. and Feldman, K.A. 2007. "Commentary and update on Feldman's (1997) "Identifying exemplary teachers and teaching: evidence from student ratings In The Scholarship of Teaching and Learning in Higher Education: An evidence-based approach, Edited by: Perry, R.P. and Smart, J.C. Dordrecht: Springer.
89. Towers, S.J., Alderman, L., Nielsen, S. & McLean, V., 2010, 'A risk-based approach to course quality assurance', paper presented at the Australian Quality Forum 2010, Gold Coast, 30 June-2 July.
90. University of Adelaide, 2012, Student Experience of Learning and Teaching (SELT). Available online at: http://www.adelaide.edu.au/clpd/selt/ (accessed 30 January 2012).
91. University of Ballarat, 2011, Student Evaluation of Teaching/Course. Available online at: http://www.ballarat.edu.au/staff/learning-and-teaching@ub/set-and-sec (accessed 10 January 2012).
92. University of New South Wales, 2012, Course and Teaching Evaluation and Improvement (CATEI). Available online at: http://teaching.unsw.edu.au/catei (accessed 10 January 2012).
93. University of Queensland, 2011, Student Evaluations. Available online at: http://www.tedi.uq.edu.au/evaluations/student-evaluations (accessed 10 January 2012).
94. Venette, S., Sellnow, D. and McIntyre, K. 2010. Charting new territory: assessing the online frontier of student ratings of instruction. Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education, 35(1): 97-111.
95. Walker, D.J. and Palmer, E. 2009. The relationship between student understanding, satisfaction and performance in an Australian engineering programme. Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education, 36(2): 157-170.
96. Watson, S. 2003. Closing the feedback loop: ensuring effective action from student feedback. Tertiary Education & Management, 9(2): 145-157.
97. Wiers-Jenssen, J., Stensaker, B. and Grøgaard, J.B. 2002. Student satisfaction: towards an empirical deconstruction of the concept. Quality in Higher Education, 8(2): 183-195.
98. Williams, J. 2011. "Action and the feedback cycle". In Student Feedback: The cornerstone to an effective quality assurance system in higher education, Edited by: Nair, C.S. and Mertova, P. Oxford: Chandos.
99. Williams, J. and Cappuccini-Ansfield, G. 2007. Fitness for purpose? National and institutional approaches to publicising the student voice. Quality in Higher Education, 13(2): 159-172.
100. Williams, J. and Kane, D. 2010. The part-time student's experience 1996-2007: an issue of identity and marginalisation?. Tertiary Education & Management, 16(3): 183-209.
101. Yorke, M. 2009. "Student experience" surveys: some methodological considerations and an empirical investigation. Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education, 34(6): 721-739.
102. Young, A., McConkey, K. & Kirby, M., 2010, 'Student feedback surveys: an holistic approach to maximising their value to staff and students', paper presented at the Australasian Association for Institutional Research Conference, Geelong, 8-10 November.
103. Zabaleta, F. 2007. The use and misuse of student evaluations of teaching. Teaching in Higher Education, 12(1): 55-76.