Evaluate: An evaluation instrument for measuring students' perceptions of their engagement and learning outcomes

Assessment and Evaluation in Higher Education

Volumn 33, Issue 6, 2008, Pages 619-630

  Oliver, Beverley ^a   Tucker, Beatrice ^a   Gupta, Ritu ^a   Yeo, Shelley ^a  

^a CURTIN UNIVERSITY   (Australia)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 77955480875     PISSN: 02602938     EISSN: 1469297X     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1080/02602930701773034     Document Type: Article

References (26)

1. Archer, J., R. Cantwell, and S. Bourke. 1999. Coping at university: an examination of achievement, motivation, self-regulation, confidence and method of entry. Higher Education Research and Development 18, no. 1:31-54.
2. Andrich, D., B. Sheridan, A. Lynne, and G. Luo. 2000. RUMM: a windows based item analysisprograme employing Rasch unidimensional measurement models. Perth: Murdoch University.
3. Bandura, A., and D.H. Schunk. 1981. Cultivating competence, self-efficacy and intrinsic interest through proximal self-motivation. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 41: 586-598.
4. Brennan, J., R. Brighton, N. Moon, J. Richardson, J. Rindl, and R. Williams. 2002. Collecting and using student feedback on quality and standards of learning and teaching in higher education: a report to the Higher Education Funding Council for England. London: HEFCE.
5. Candy, P., G. Crebert, and J. O'Leary. 1994. Developing lifelong learners through undergraduate education. Canberra: Higher Education Council, Australian Vice Chancellors' Committee, AGPS.
6. Coates, H. 2005. The value of student engagement for higher education quality assurance. Quality in Higher Education 11, no. 1: 25-36.
7. Curtin University of Technology. 2003. Excellence in teaching and learning at Curtin. http://lsn.curtin.edu.au/teach/teachexcel.html.
8. Curtin University of Technology. 2004, 2006. Curtin Annual Student Satisfaction Survey, http://planning.curtin.edu.au/surveys/cass.html.
9. Davies, M., J. Hirschberg, J. Lye, C. Johnston, and I. McDonald. 2005, November. Systematic influences on teaching evaluations: the case for caution. University of Melbourne Department of Economics Research Papers. http://www.economics.unimelb.edu.au/SITE/research/workingpapers/wp05/953.pdf
10. Department of Education Science and Training. 2004. Learning and Teaching Performance Fund Issues Paper, http://www.dest.gov.au/highered/learning_teaching/documents/ltp_issues_paper.pdf
11. Department of Education Science and Training. 2006. Learning Teaching Performance Fund: 2007 Administrative Information for Providers. http://www.dest.gov.au/sectors/higher_education/policy_issues_reviews/key_issues/learning_teaching/ltpf/20071tpf.htm.
12. Dixon, K., and S. Scott. 2003. The evaluation of an offshore professional-development programme as part of a university's strategic plan: a case study approach. Quality in Higher Education 9, no. 3: 287-294.
13. Fenwick, T.J. 2001. Using student outcomes to evaluate teaching: A cautious exploration. New Directions for Teaching and Learning 88, Winter: 63-74.
14. Jones, S., and B. Tucker. 2005. Course evaluation on the web (CEW) makes a difference to GCEQ results. Paper presented at the Making a Difference: 2005 Evaluations and Assessment Conference, Sydney, November.
15. Knapper, C. 2001. Broadening our approach to teaching evaluation. New Directions for Teaching and Learning 88: 3-8.
16. Marsh, H.W. 1982. SEEQ: A reliable, valid and useful instrument for collecting students' evaluations of university teaching. British Journal of Educational Psychology 52: 77-95.
17. Marsh, H.W., and LW. Roche. 1992. The use of student evaluations of university teaching in different settings: the applicability paradigm. Australian Journal of Education 36: 278-300.
18. Pintrich, P., RW. Roeser, and E.A.M. De Groot. 1994. Classroom and individual differences in early adolescents' motivation and self-regulated learning. Journal of Early Adolescence 14, no. 2: 139.
19. Presser, M., K. Trigwell, E. Hazel, and P. Gallagher. 1994. Students' experience of teaching and learning at the topic level. Research and Development in Higher Education 16: 305-310.
20. Ramsden, P. 2003. Student surveys and quality assurance. Paper presented at the Australian Universities Quality Forum 2003, Melbourne.
21. Ramsden, P., and N.J. Entwistle. 1981. Effects of academic departments on students' approaches to learning. British Journal of Educational Psychology 51: 368-383.
22. Richardson, J.T.E. 2005. Instruments for obtaining student feedback: a review of the literature. Assessment and Evaluation in Higher Education 30, no. 4: 387-415.
23. Scott, G. 2005. Accessing the student voice: using CEQuery to identify what retains students and promotes engagement in productive learning in Australian higher education. Canberra: Higher Education Innovation Program, Department of Education, Science and Training.
24. Sorensen, K.L., and C. Reiner. 2003. Charting the uncharted seas of online student ratings of instruction. New Directions for Teaching and Learning 96: 1-24.
25. Tucker, B., S. Jones, L. Straker, and J. Cole. 2003. Course evaluation on the web: facilitating student and teacher reflection to improve learning. New Directions for institutional Research 96, Winter: 81-93.
26. Zhao, C.-M., and G.D. Kuh. 2004. Adding value: learning communities and student engagement. Research in Higher Education 45, no. 2: 115-138.