Design-focused evaluation

Assessment and Evaluation in Higher Education

Volumn 33, Issue 6, 2008, Pages 631-645

  Smith, Calvin ^a  

^a GRIFFITH UNIVERSITY   (Australia)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 79955563076     PISSN: 02602938     EISSN: 1469297X     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1080/02602930701772762     Document Type: Article

References (37)

1. Andrich, D. 1978. Relationships between the Thurstone and Rasch approaches to item scaling. Applied Psychological Measurement 2: 449-460.
2. Bath, D. 2006. Enhancing the first-year learning environment: report on Griffith Teaching Fellowship. Brisbane: Griffith University (Internal Report - contact author for access).
3. Bath, D., CD. Smith, S. Stein, and R. Swann. 2004. Beyond mapping and embedding graduate attributes: bringing together quality assurance and action learning to create a validated and living curriculum. Higher Education Research and Development 23, no. 3: 313-328.
4. Biggs, J. 1996. Enhancing teaching through constructive alignment. Higher Education 32, 347-364.
5. Bradburn, N., S. Sudman, and B. Wansink. 2004. Asking questions: the definitive guide to questionnaire design. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.
6. Campbell, D.T. 1969. Reforms as experiments. American Psychologist 24, no. 4: 409-429.
7. Cohen, S.A. 1987. Instructional alignment: searching for a magic bullet. Educational Researcher 16, no. 8: 16-20.
8. DeVellis, R.F. 2003. Scale development: theory and Applications, Vol. 26. Newbury Park, CA: Sage Publications.
9. Entwistle,N. 1981. Styles of learning and teaching. Chichester: Wiley.
10. Entwistle, N., and A. Entwistle. 1997. Revision and the experience of understanding. In The experience of learning: implications for teaching and studying in higher education, eds F. Marton, D. Hounsell, and N. Entwistle. 2nd ed. Edinburgh: Scottish Academic Press.
11. Entwistle, N., and P. Ramsden. 1983. Understanding student learning. London: Croom Helm.
12. Entwistle, N., and H. Tait. 1990. Approaches to learning, evaluations of teaching and preferences for contrasting academic environments. Higher Education 19, no. 2: 169-194.
13. Frisbie, D.A. 1979. Equivalence of questionnaire items with varying response formats. Journal of Educational Measurement 16, no. 1: 43-48.
14. Gatto, J.T. 2002. Dumbing us down: the hidden curriculum of compulsory education. 2nd ed. British Columbia: New Society Publishers.
15. Groves, R., J.F. Floyd, M. Couper, J. Lepkowski, E. Singer, and R. Tourangeau. 2004. Survey methodology. New York: Wiley.
16. Guttman, L. 1950. The basis for scalogram analysis. In Measurement and Prediction, ed. S.A. Stouffer. Studies in Social Psychology in World War II, Vol. 4. New York: Wiley.
17. Jackson, P.W. 1968. Life in classrooms. New York: Holt, Rinehart & Winston.
18. Kellaghan, T., and D.L. Stufflebeam, eds. 2003. International handbook of educational evaluation (Part 1), Vol. 9. Dordrecht: Kluwer.
19. Kirkpatrick, D.L. 1994. Evaluating training programs: the four levels. San Francisco: Berrett-Koehler.
20. Likert, R. 1932. A technique for the measurement of attitudes. Archives of Psychology 140: 5-53.
21. Lynch, K. 1989. The hidden curriculum: reproduction in education, a reappraisal. New York: Farmer Press.
22. Margolis, E., ed. 2001. The hidden curriculum in higher education. New York: Routledge.
23. Marsh, H., and L. Roche. 1994. The use of students' evaluations of university teaching to improve teaching effectiveness. Canberra: AGPS.
24. Patton, M.Q. 1997. Utlization-foeused evaluation. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications.
25. Porter, A.C., and J.L. Smithson. 2001. Are content standards being implemented in the classroom? A methodology and some tentative answers. In From the capitol to the classroom: standards-based reform in the states, ed. S.H. Fuhrman. Chicago, IL: National Society for the Study of Education and University of Chicago Press.
26. Ramsden, P. 1991. A performance indicator of teaching quality in higher education: the course experience questionnaire. Studies in Higher Education 16, no. 2: 129-150.
27. Reynolds, N., A. Diamantopoulos, and B. Schlegelmilch. 1993. Pretesting in questionnaire design: a review of the literature and suggestions for further research. Journal of the Market of Social Research Society 35, no. 2: 171-182.
28. Rockwood, T.H., R.L. Sangster, and D.A. Dillman. 1997. The effect of response categories on questionnaire answers: context and mode effects. Sociological Methods and Research 26, no. 1: 118-140.
29. Scriven, M. 2003. Evaluation theory and metatheory. In International handbook of educational evaluation, eds T. Kellaghan, and D.L. Stufflebeam, Vol. 9, 15-30. Dordrecht: Kluwer.
30. Smith, CD. 2003. Institutional course evaluation (iCEVAL). Report to DVC Academic (Friday, 27 June 2003). Brisbane: University of Queensland.
31. Smith, CD., and D.M. Bath. 2006. The role of the learning community in the development of discipline knowledge and generic graduate outcomes. Higher Educationno. 51: 259-286.
32. Smith, E.R., and RW. Tyler. 1942. Appraising and recording student progress, Vol. III. New York: Harper & Brothers.
33. Snyder, B.R. 1970. The hidden curriculum. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
34. Stake, R.E. 2004. Standards-based and responsive evaluation. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications.
35. Stufflebeam, D.L. 2003. The CIPP model for evaluation. In International handbook of educational evaluation, eds T. Kellaghan, and D.L. Stufflebeam, Vol. 9, 31-62. Dordrecht: Kluwer.
36. University of Queensland. 2007. Institutional course evaluation, http://www.tedi.uq.edu.au/downloads/evaluations/iCEVAL_TEVAL_SmplRpt.pdf.
37. Wholey, J.S. 1979. Evaluation: Promise and performance. Washington, DC: Urban Institute.