Quantifying quality: The importance of student feedback

Quality in Higher Education

Volumn 7, Issue 1, 2001, Pages 19-32

  Leckey, Janet ^a   Neill, Neville ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF ULSTER   (United Kingdom)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 15944401437     PISSN: 13538322     EISSN: 14701081     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1080/13538320120045058     Document Type: Article

References (13)

1. BOURNES, T., 1997. 'Teaching methods for learning outcomes'. Education and Training, 39(9): 344–48.
2. ELUS, R., 1993. Quality Assurance for University Teaching, Buckingham & Bristol: Open University Press.
3. HARVEY, L., 1999. "The sense in satisfaction'. Times Higher Education Supplement, 15: 29
4. HARVEY, L., 1997. Student Satisfaction Manual, Buckingham: Society for Research into Higher Education/Open University Press.
5. HIGHER EDUCATION QUALITY COUNCIL. 1994. Learning from Audit, London: HEQC.
6. HORSBURGH, M., 1998. 'Quality monitoring in two institutions; a comparison'. Quality in Higher Education, 4(2): 115–34.
7. JACOBS, D.J., 1998. 'External quality assurance in support of institutional autonomy'. Quality in Higher Education, 4(2): 187–97.
8. MARSH, H. W., and DUNKIN, M.J., 1997. “ 'Students' evaluations of university teaching: a multidimensional perspective' ”. In Effective Teaching in Higher Education, Edited by: PERRY, R.P., and SMART, J.C., New York: Agathon Press.
9. POWNEY, J., 1998. Closing the Loop: The impact of student feedback on students' subsequent learning, Edinburgh: Scottish Council for Research in Education.
10. RICHARDSON, K.E., 1998. 'Quantifiable feedback: can it really measure quality?'. Quality Assurance in Education, 6(4): 212–19.
11. ROWLEY, J., 1995. 'Student feedback: a shaky foundation for quality assurance'. Innovation and Learning in Education, 1(3): 14–20.
12. RUTHERFORD, D., 1987. 'Indicators of performance: reactions and issues'. Assessment and Evaluation in Higher Education, 12(2): 94–104.
13. WINTER-HEBRON, C., 1984. 'An aid for evaluating teaching in HE'. Assessment and Evaluation in Higher Education, 9(2): 145–63.