A comparison of student feedback obtained through paper-based and web-based surveys of faculty teaching

British Journal of Educational Technology

Volumn 38, Issue 6, 2007, Pages 1085-1101

  Ardalan, Ali ^a,b   Ardalan, Roya ^a   Coppage, Samuel ^b   Crouch, William ^c  

^a Department of Information Technology and Decision Sciences ^*

^b OLD DOMINION UNIVERSITY   (United States)

^c Information Technology and Decision Sciences Department

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

FEEDBACK; STUDENTS; TEACHING; WEB SERVICES;

STUDENT FEEDBACK; WEB BASED SURVEY;

ENGINEERING EDUCATION;

EID: 34748906050     PISSN: 00071013     EISSN: 14678535     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1111/j.1467-8535.2007.00694.x     Document Type: Article

References (14)

1. Carini, R. N., Hayek, J. C., Kuh, G. D., Kennedy, J. M. Ouimet, J. A. (2003). College student responses to web and paper surveys: does mode matter? Research in Higher Education, 44, 1, 1 19.
2. Cummings, R. Ballatyne, C. (1999, October). Student feedback on teaching: Online! On target? Paper presented at the Australisian Society Annual Conference [www document]. Retrieved 3 August 2005, from http://cleo.murdoch. edu.au/evaluation/pubs/confs/aes99.htm
3. Handwerk, P. G., Carson, C. Blackwell, K. (2000, May). On-line vs. paper-and-pencil surveying of students: a case study. Proceedings of the 40th Annual Forum of the Association of Institutional Research (AIR 2000). Cincinnati, OH.
4. Hmieleski, K. (2000, June). Barriers to online evaluation. Troy, NY : Rensselaer Polytechnic Institute, Interactive and Distance Education Assessment (IDEA) Laboratory.
5. Hmieleski, K. Champagne, M. (2000, September/October). Plugging in to course evaluation. Technology Source. Retrieved 3 August 2005, from http://technologysource.org/article/plugging_in_to_course_evaluation
6. Kittleson, M. J. (1995). An assessment of the response rate via the postal service and email. Health Values, 19, 2, 27 37.
7. Kronholm, E. A., Wisher, R. A., Curnow, C. K. Poker, F. (1999). The transformation of a distance learning training enterprise to an Internet base: from advertising to evaluation. Paper presented at the Northern Arizona University NAU/Web99 Conference, Flagstaff, AZ.
8. Liegle, J. McDonald, D. (2005). Lessons learned from online vs. paper-based computer information students' evaluation system. Information Systems Education Journal, 3, 37, 3 14 http://isedj.org/3/37)
9. McGourty, J., Scoles, K. Thorpe, S. (2002, June). Web-based evaluation of instruction: promises and pitfalls. The proceedings of the 42nd Annual Forum of the Association of Institutional Research. Toronto, Canada : Association of Institutional Research.
10. Moss, J. Hendry, G. (2002). Use of electronic surveys in course evaluation. British Journal of Educational Technology, 33, 5, 583 592.
11. Ranchhod, A. Zhou, F. (2001). Comparing respondents of email and mail surveys: understanding the implications of technology. Marketing Intelligence and Planning, 19, 4, 245 262.
12. Recker, M. Greenwood, J. (1995). An interactive student evaluation system. The proceedings of Asia-Pacific World-Wide Web '95 Conference, Sydney, Australia WWW document]. Retrieved 3 August 2005, from http://www.csu.edu.au/ special/conference/apwww95/papers95/mrecker/mrecker.html
13. Theall, M. (2000, November/December). Electronic course evaluation is not necessarily the solution. Technology Source. Retrieved 19 June 2004, from http://technologysource.org/article/ electronic_course_evaluation_is_not_necessarily_the_solution/
14. Thorpe, S. (2002, June). Online student evaluation of instruction: an investigation of non-response bias.The proceedings of the 42nd Annual Forum of the Association of Institutional Research. Toronto, Canada : Association of Institutional Research.